An excellent post! The Trust System is something I have been recently learning more about. It appears you are spot on, Trust is a primary bed rock for civilization itself. In my study of Double Headed Phoenix Heraldry, as often seen on the coats of arms in European history, it seems that one Head represents the public facing side of Trustee and the other represents the hidden side of power held by Trustor. The Beneficiary party is actually the Trustor.
One of the most alarming things I have reconciled in the Trust System, is the Birth Certificate Straw Man "Beneficiary" and how this is used to hypotheticate the backing of the fiat currency. Essentially, people are "pledged" to the Federal Government for ipso facto guarantor status to the Federal Reserve Inc. We are some how counted to pay back the National debt.
I have broken this Trust; I have claimed Sovereign Status.
Trust is mutually earned and mutually treasured, but it is always coveted by those who never deserved it.
Thanks for this article. I think it points out, again, how much of how the world works is obscured intentionally so that us plebes don't catch on to the game. It ties to an article by Will Zoll I read recently about why New Zealand is so popular with the cabal/elite/pedophile satanic death cult people due to its trust laws. Here is the link https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/havens-horse-heads-and-hermann-part
Actually, the precursor to the trust is the legal theory of bailments, otherwise know as warehousing. This gave rise to warehouse receipts, which gave rise to doing the same with gold (money), which gave rise to fiat currency, which is the grease on the road to hell, evil and corruption.
You discuss the Trustor, Trustee and Beneficiary as being separate persons. Which of course they can be; but it is quite common for one person to fulfill the responsibilities of two or even all three roles.
For instance, many 'family trusts' are often created/funded (Trustor), managed (Trustee), and benefits paid to (Beneficiary) the same person or persons. Also the Trustor is sometimes called the Settlor, in some circumstances/jurisdictions.
Note also that the term 'person' here is used in the legal sense; i.e. a 'person' can be one or more natural person(s) (human being(s)) or it can be a 'legal person' as in a corporation or other entity that is treated as a person under the law. Banks have large trust departments, which serve as trustees for their clients in managing certain assets.
Banks have large trust departments like Pictet Morning Star Bank; they manage a lot of the Trusts of Private Equity Owners who operate out of the City of London. There are Trillions of dollars in assets held in trusts; commanding the actions of various corporations around the world. Corporations like Pfiser, contracting with the DOD and DARPA using pseudo legal frameworks like "Other Transaction Authority." The entire depopulation agenda was run through Trusts.
Who ya gonna Trust? Not the US Government or any other.
You are right. A trust, like many things, is a tool. It can be used for evil, or good. Increasingly, things associated with governments (at least in the G20) are being used for evil.
There are 2 very separate classifications of Trusts; Common Law Trusts, (like the Trust in the article that had Patrick Henry's name with it), described in the set of Legal Encyclopedias titled "First Restatement of Trusts" which is very difficult to find in a Legal Library and what are called "Statutory Trusts" which make up the vast bulk of Trusts talked about in the "Second Restatement of Trust" and possibly a Third Edition of the Restatement of Trusts."
A "Family Trust" is a Statutory Trust made under the current Laws of a State.
There are MAJOR differences between those 2 types of trusts.
Common Law Trusts must have separate parties as the Trustor and Trustee. The same person cannot be named to both those positions! Beneficiaries in this type of trust are rarely the same as a Trustor and never the same as a TRustee.
Statutory Trusts can have the same person as Trustor aka Grantor or Settlor, Trustee and Beneficary. in this type of trust there is no "separation of ownership" between the parties to the trust and a Court can "undo" this type of trust if the trust is the subject of a law suit because all positions in the trust are held by the same person. So a Statutory Trust where those above positions are all held by the same person gives NO ASSET PROTECTION.
You are correct in saying that the term "person" when referencing a Statutory Trust (a trust set up under the law of a State) is used in a "legal sense" and can include a corporation or other legal entity. Different States have enacted some provisions which increase the protections given by a Statutory Trust.
Trust Law has not been a required course in US Law Schools since shortly after WWII. Trusts as a separate section of the BAR Exam has not been tested for about the same time frame.
A "Common Law Trust" aka Massachusetts Business Trust or Massachusetts Trust or simply as a Business Trust is a much different creature. I will talk about it in a comment above.
Good article to open people's eyes as to a type of trust that is rarely used and has not been taught in Law Schools for some 75 or more years. The last Lawyer I talked with who was taught these trusts set up under the Common Law, was retirement age when I met him way back in the late 1990's.
I appreciate the link to the "handbook" given in the article, it has both good and questionable information in it.
Good information is that information that is supported by Court Cases prior to the end of the U.S. Civil War in 1865 and a few court cases from the period up to around 1900. Sadly, most court cases cited in that handbook do not have a date listed for them and would require a person to spent a lot of time in a Law Library looking up the cases and determining if they were valid for the type of trust the handbook is talking about. This would require a knowledge of more than the date of the court case but also the court cases cited in each court case to know for sure the case was relevant to a trust under the Common Law.
There is a term mentioned in the handbook which is "sui juris." This term does not seem to be defined in the handbook. Sui Juris is a Latin definition which means "of one's own right", it means that someone is "capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights." It is crucial to note there is no mention of "legal age" or "legal capacity" in the definition. That is because in the U.S. we have a post Civil War 14th Amendment. More on that in a moment.
Prior to the 14th Amendment a U.S.A. Citizen obtained their "Rights" from their Creator, i.e. God. This is set out in the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence which says in pertinent part. "...all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights..." Note the word "unalienable." It's root word is "lien" which is when someone else or some entity has a higher claim to what you say is yours, than you do. Example: If you have a mortgage on "your" house, the bank or mortgage company has a "higher claim" to that house than your claim. Just quit paying the payment and see what happens to your house! Point to remember is that when your rights are "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) they come from God and God is above all earthly governments.
The 14th Amendment, 1868, turned things upside down. It says in pertinent part, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,..." there is a lot to "unpack" in this 14th Amendment. Please follow closely:
1. We will start with the words "...the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States..." In Law where do "privileges and immunities" come from? They are what government can give "citizens". They are not the same as "rights" from God. Note the phrase at the beginning of that Amendment, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States..." Notice the coupling together of the concepts of "born" and "naturalized." this was the beginning of doing away with the idea of some people being "freeborn Citizens" with God given rights and classifying all as "citizens" in the category of "naturalized", why? A naturalized citizen is someone born in a country that does not recognize "God given rights" but who wants to become an American. They go through the process of "naturalization" and once that is completed they receive "privileges and immunities" granted by government, not rights from God! What government has given, government can take away!
2. Notice the word "citizens" in the 14th Amendment. It is spelled with a lower case "c". Yet, for example in the Constitution; Article II, Section 5 the same word is spelled "Citizen" with an upper case "C" and that word is not the first word in a sentence! "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution..." In Law, even the capitalization of a word has meaning! Prior to the 14th Amendment, the capitalization of "Citizen" meant a human being who's rights came from God not from government. Notice that there were 2 classes of "Citizens" before the Adoption of the Constitution! Those born here and those who had become Citizens prior to the Adoption of the Constitution! That is prior to there being a government that could "naturalize" those not born here!
3. Post Civil War there was "The Act of February 21, 1871" which, among other things changed one letter of one word in the Declaration of Independence. It changed an "u" to an "i" changing the word "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" pronounced "in-alien-able" root word "alien" (which interestingly enough the first 4 letters of that word tell you this word is "a lie"!) So when this Act changed the word in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence from "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" (in-alien-able) it supported the change in status of all Americans from God given Rights to government given rights!
Why is this important in light of the article and handbook on Trusts from yesterday's article? To have a Common Law Type Trust the parties to it must be "sui juris"! Remember the definition of "sui juris" is "of one's own right" and "Capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights". If you are a 14th Amendment "citizen", (little "c" meaning you are a subject of government and a subject of God, aka "a Sovereign") you have no "private law rights" you have "government granted privileges and immunities" such as the "privilege" of being "taxed", travel freely granted by private car only if you are "licensed", the privilege of being used in commerce via your "Birth Certificate" which is an "Admirality Law Instrument" (Law of the Sea, therefore you have a "birth certificate" showing the "berth" where you came into existence) used in International Commerce and much more.
The type of "Trust", a trust under the Common Law, as talked about in yesterday's post are concerned, that type of trust came from English Common Law adopted by the "colonies" in America long before there was any US government "taxing authority" under the 16th Amendment. (The story of it's failed ratification is told by another below this post). These type of Common LawTrusts are not subject to the April 15th Tax, but the April 15th Agency does not agree with that and will and have prosecuted those using these trusts to operate a business out of-unless they obtain an EIN and pay taxes on the trust income. Strictly speaking, when a Common Law Based Trust becomes "bastardized" by adopting ANY Statutory provisions such as an EIN, that trust looses the ability to protect assets and as a tusrt that contains any Statutory Provision it now falls under the purview of the Court system of this land, (America), and can be pierced, legally, by those courts, the assets taken by the court, and the parties to the trust, including Trustors, Trustees and Beneficiaries, convicted of fraud or crimes, under the Laws of the UNITED STATES Corporation, not the united States Constitution (lower case "u" intentional).
The courts will readily agree that this type of trust are "legal" which means they are subject to the courts jurisdiction and have been used "illegally" either via bastardization via mixing Statutory Trust language and concepts with Common Law language and concepts or by a person lacking in the "sui juris" status using the trusts.
In the last 20 or so years, a Common law Trust, such as the ones talked about in yesterdays post, have been pierced by a Federal District Court and the Federal Appeals Courts have up heald the lower court's rulings and SCOTUS, to my knowledge has not taken any cases involving these trusts.
In some 50 years of fighting the "good fight" I have only seen 2 individuals who were able to beat a trial in court because they had successfully removed themselves from being a 14th Amendment citizen and after nearly a year of attempts at tripping them up in a court room and after local newspaper articles of a "Couple Dumps Citizenship In Anti-government Rant" they were successful.
Now for a "silver lining." If you understand the "Restored Republic Idea", we should all be "restored" to Citizen status and the US Corporation ceasing to exist. Then, the use of this type of trust will, again, be taught, used and understood by all-even the Lawyers and Courts/judges.
In the meantime, unless you know you are not a 14th Amendment citizen and the Common Law Trust you are using is not bastardized by Statutory Trust language or concepts and those who are named in the trust as Trustor(s), Trustee(s) and Beneficiaries are not 14th Amendment citizens, be extremely careful as you move forward.
Thanks to Nefahotep for sending me here. Fascinating stuff and I'll need to send one of my readers who's been deciphering words. She'll love una-lien-able to inalienable and berth certificate.
Thanks for your response, Bitterroot, and I agree with your assessment of Nef. We've been alternating posts on esoteric mystical texts and, before that, world war histories. When I posted on my economic system (that's the conclusion to my book, How to Dismantle an Empire) I thought for a moment I'd hit a topic where he had done no research. But then he sent me to two of his posts, this article and particularly your astute comments.
My focus is on taking back the right to issue mortgages and the credit to repay them at a local level I call a commonwealth. I'm wondering if there's a way to use the Trust system to protect the commonwealth bank. Just brainstorming, but the same tools seem like they could be used to dismantle the master's house ;-) If you had the time, I'd love to have your thoughts on the two I just posted on the subject: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/caretology and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/dreaming-and-scheming. Thanks again!
I read the 2 above posts on your substack. You have put a lot of work into your ideas for changing the economic system in the U.S. Your system seems to borrow several ideas from the current system of Central Bank Fiat Currency (Federal Reserve System) which is no more "Federal" than Federal Express and the FED has no "reserves" so it's name is a complete sham.
Your system seems to lean heavily on the present economic system but with increased emphasis on caring for all those in each "fiefdom." That deserves a compliment; "That would indeed be an improvement over the current system."
You mention such things as "interest", "taxes" and "Social Security" which we are all familiar with. I suppose this is to have a way of easing people into your system with a minimum of a "learning curve."?
I could not determine if your system using dollars and carets is a system that is "fiat" or "asset backed"? In the first article you referenced 3 Platinum $trillion dollar Coins" and in the second article it appears those same 3 $trillion dollar coins are "fiat."
You also mentioned the "Social Security Trust Fund" which does not exist, except in the minds of politicians and the main stream media. For instance, a deep dive into the Social Security Act will not turn up a "Social Security Trust Fund."
There is mention in your first article (above) about "incentives" for people to use "carets in ways you want to promote."
As a retired businessman with 3 Professional Degrees, including Doctorate Level and a life long pursuit of American History, my initial impression is there are gaps between what is talked about and what the reality may be.
For Example: The Constitution; Article I; Section X; Clause 2 speaks to only gold and silver coin being a "tender in payment of debt." That would mean the current "fiat" currency is unconstitutional and any replacement currency would need to be gold/silver backed.
I'm sure yo have heard of the BRICS nations which a deep dive will show now has well over 65% of the world's population on board, is a hard asset backed (mostly silver and gold) currency and has their own inter bank and inter country transfer system that is separate from the SWIFT system. Many of those BRICS nations have "thrown" out their central banks and if you saw Tucker Carlson's recent Videos on his trip to Russia you know he purchased some $400.00 of food from a Russian Supermarket but it only cost the equivalent of $104.00 U.S. in Rubles. That is because Russian currency is "hard asset backed" and not "fiat."
I'm sure you also know that the Saudi's are now selling oil to BRICS nations in exchange for their currency instead of the U.S. "Petro dollar." This means that the U.S. fiat currency is in a death struggle.
As former U.S. Military, I have information from sources I am not allowed to reveal that tell me that it is just a mater of time before the Federal Reserve Note" aka "greenback" and U.S. Dollar" will be replaced with "U.S. Notes" which will be the transition currency to a new gold and sliver backed U.S. currency that very likely will not be termed the "dollar." When this happens the FED as we know it will be dead and gone. It is suspected that this may happen this year.
Simultaneously, it is very likely that taxes will change completely to a system where only things bought that are brand new will be taxed and government's size will be reduced by over 50%. That reduces the need for unconstitutional income taxes tremendously.
You asked about "could a Common Law Trust protect the Commonwealth Bank" in your idea of a replacement financial system?
Under the system my sources tell me is likely to happen this year, our basis for Law would return to a "Constitutional Republic" and under that system is is likely that Common Law Trusts, or a variation of them would, again, become lawful. (They are currently "legal" if they obtain an EIN and file/pay taxes on income. Lawful = Constitutional whereas Legal=statutory.
If they were to become lawful and a system such as yours was adopted, the Commonwealth Bank Manager could be the Trustor/Settlor who set up the trust but no one with any employment type attachment to the Commonwealth Bank could be a Trustee or Beneficiary of the trust. Those who have an account at the Commonwealth Bank could be Beneficiaries.
You see, a Common Law Trust is an "irrevocable" trust where those or the "entity" who sets up the trust can not "control the trust," (i.e. can't be a trustee) and can not receive what was placed into the trust upon the Trust's being dissolved so they can't be a beneficiary.
Thank you so much, Bitter Root, for reading my articles and giving such a detailed response. I mentioned your reflection on him to Nefahotep and he replied, "I just love Bitter Root. I admire his precision in what he says." So the admiration is mutual, for exactly the right things.
Yes, I often use the Fed Ex joke, which I got from Ellen Brown, to explain that. Currently with 94% of dollars being created through mortgages, real estate backs the dollar--or would if they hadn't been sold in tranches. Mine is based on Ben Franklin's scrip that he called a 'land-backed currency.' In my system, it can't be exported as it is now.
That's very interesting about the new US Note. I'll be curious to see that. I didn't think the US even had the gold reserves to back the currency. It will be interesting to see how that plays out and whether it replaces existing dollars or only for some.
Thanks for the details on the trust system. I didn't realize that the entity who sets up an irrevocable trust couldn't be a trustee, although I knew they couldn't be a beneficiary. Useful information. Thanks again for your detailed reading and response.
Your Welcome. I spent some time In Appalachia back in the 1990's. East of the home of the first Kentucky Fried Chicken Resturant and in a small town that had a College that allowed me to do some research in their Library "Stacks" where I found 3 old U.S. History Books and a lot of real U.S. History.
As far as the question; "Does the US have the gold?" I believe that time will show that the U.S. has it's fair share of 165 Military Transport Airplanes, like C-130's, full of gold that was removed from the "end all bank" in the World's Central Bank's System under the cover of Covid-19. My sources say the dollar will completely die and be replaced by full hard asset (gold/silver) backrd currency. I trust those sources, but can not, at this time state if all I have been told will pan out. Time will tell. If everything I have been told plays out, you, and others will be surprised to learn which Military's co-operated in removing the gold and returning the gold to the original nations where it was removed from by corrupt Central Banks policies.
Thank you for recognizing the importance of this information. Trust law is the very soul of the state national movement. What one creates one controls. It’s not about ownership. Trust law is the superior law above all others. Whether you know it or not a trust was opened in your name by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. It is the legal fiction known as your ALL CAPS name. Since a corporation cannot contract with a living soul they create a legal fiction to contract with. It very important you understand the legal ramifications of that and that there is a difference between your legal entity and you the living soul. Learning to take control of the trust made in your ALL CAPS name in which you can be the trustee and beneficiary is they key to escaping the system and reclaiming your inalienable rights under the original 1787 Constitution. I said rights, not privileges, which is what you actually have now. Privileges that can be taken from you.
The more I learn about the state national movement the more I’m convinced this is “The Plan” for us to take our country back. Only when people are willing to learn about, accept, and wield the power of trust law will they be the kings they were intended to be and bring the government to heel. Thank you for linking Weiss’ book as it will be invaluable and many are pay-gating trust law knowledge.
A good start to understanding the state national movement is the book “Fruit from the Poisonous Tree” by Melvin Stamper.
For a more step by step mechanical how to become a state national check out this guy’s free video classes https://onestupidfuck.com/ Resist the urge to judge this book by its cover! This guy comes off a bit immature and crass but delivers the goods by citing USC and UCC throughout this teachings. Feel free to skip the first video as it is only jabbering about overcoming cognitive dissonance and a plea for you to not flip out and get violent when you learn the truth of the control of yourself that you have given to others. The meat starts in video two.
One last thing, before any of you are tempted to think of “Sovereign Citizen” videos on YouTube and then equate them to this knowledge, just STOP. This is not that. As you will learn the term Sovereign Citizen itself is an oxymoron. It contradicts itself. SCs have no clue about being a free man and do a disservice to the state national movement. They are not at all associated with each other. Good luck.
Lol. Love that website. Onestupidfuck is truly onto something. I've been researching a lot on the sovereign citizen movement since 1986. Went to a couple of meetings in Cali area but did not take the plunge. Also, took some steps to remove myself from the IRS rolls. Nothing came of that eexcept me paying them 3 years worth of back taxes and penalties when I decided I'd be going to chiropractic school.
One Stupid F*ck is losing his video library and says his video course is moving over to YouTube. The sign up instructions are confusing so I’m watching his channels for further information.
Excellent! My grandparents were likely the last generation in the US who’s word was their bond, as was the handshake. Now, and for many decades, many of us have lost all trust in the ‘trustees’ who govern us. Your article also revealed clearly how our country has been infiltrated. I remember a dig I did a few years ago; I believe the family who owned the US properties was the Payseur family and Rockefeller was the trustee....(Maybe there was more than one trustee? Rockefeller was oil...how many more big name wealth-holders were just trustees for the Payseur family?) Now, his statement makes more sense. “John D. Rockefeller supposedly once said that the key to power is to “own nothing, but control everything” What about Vanderbilt, Carnegie or Morgen?
Excellent assessment of the influence of trusts in a civilization. It makes perfect sense! God bless.🙏
This is also what Richard Kiyosaki stated in Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Control of property is more powerful than owning property. Not at all the way Herr Shwab states, you will own nothing and be happy. Whatever
Haven’t heard of him, but don’t believe a syllable that Schwab says. We can’t take anything when we die, but I certainly want responsibility while here. Bugs suck as food! I’m not obliging to orders!
Your FIRST MIDDLE LAST trust was created on the registration date (not birthdate) located on your birth certificate and you need to re-organize and record your status as grantor of said trust. https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/928-documents/
Beginning in my childhood, I remember my late father saying often, "you cannot deal with anyone who does not tell the truth." I am grateful for that principle he ingrained in me.
Some years ago, I was weeding poison ivy from under trees while listening to a West Virginia statewide radio program. It originated in Morgantown and the host was also local. The WVU basketball coach, John Beilein, had just been offered the coaching job at Michigan. His contract with WVU specified a buy-out should either side break the contract. Coach Beilein did not way to pay his buy-out for breaking the contract and was trying to skirt it. The program host said, "That is why there
are lawyers".
At that point, I pulled off my gloves, marched into the house and called the show. When I got to speak to host, "Hoppy" Kercheval, I told him the following. "Hoppy, I come from a family where your word is as good as any contract." "What Beilein is trying to do is not only wrong, it is dishonest."
Eventually, Beilein did have to pay his buy-out. It was considerable. He HAD been known as an upright man.
The federal government rests its authority to collect income tax on the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—the federal income tax amendment—which was allegedly ratified in 1913.
After an extensive year-long nationwide research project, William J. Benson discovered that the 16th Amendment was not ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states and that nevertheless, Secretary of State Philander Knox had fraudulently declared ratification.
It was a shocking revelation; it reached deep to the core of our American system of governance.
That’s a very interesting topic Hypnotist! Thank you for that education my friend!
Perhaps we should all - or those that chose to, leave this system and start a trust. Starve the fed gov of funds and control.
I'm speaking to a friendly US land trust lawyer about it this week 👀
If anyone has a recommendation in the UK I'm all ears
An excellent post! The Trust System is something I have been recently learning more about. It appears you are spot on, Trust is a primary bed rock for civilization itself. In my study of Double Headed Phoenix Heraldry, as often seen on the coats of arms in European history, it seems that one Head represents the public facing side of Trustee and the other represents the hidden side of power held by Trustor. The Beneficiary party is actually the Trustor.
One of the most alarming things I have reconciled in the Trust System, is the Birth Certificate Straw Man "Beneficiary" and how this is used to hypotheticate the backing of the fiat currency. Essentially, people are "pledged" to the Federal Government for ipso facto guarantor status to the Federal Reserve Inc. We are some how counted to pay back the National debt.
I have broken this Trust; I have claimed Sovereign Status.
Trust is mutually earned and mutually treasured, but it is always coveted by those who never deserved it.
Thanks for this article. I think it points out, again, how much of how the world works is obscured intentionally so that us plebes don't catch on to the game. It ties to an article by Will Zoll I read recently about why New Zealand is so popular with the cabal/elite/pedophile satanic death cult people due to its trust laws. Here is the link https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/havens-horse-heads-and-hermann-part
Check out Zola’s 1871. It’s related to the financial corruption that brought on USA Inc.
Yes, a great series.
Will Zoll’s work is fascinating as it connects so many dots!!
Actually, the precursor to the trust is the legal theory of bailments, otherwise know as warehousing. This gave rise to warehouse receipts, which gave rise to doing the same with gold (money), which gave rise to fiat currency, which is the grease on the road to hell, evil and corruption.
I haven't trusted the government since 1970. Yes TRUST was the root cause of my almost leaving, instead I tried to destroy it from within.
DUAL CONCEPTS.
*
Thoughtfully Said AH !
(In-Manner-of-Writing, that is).
Thank You.
**
"Divide & Conquer."
~ Is [their] meany measure to rule.
*
WE SHANT FALL FOR [IT].
You discuss the Trustor, Trustee and Beneficiary as being separate persons. Which of course they can be; but it is quite common for one person to fulfill the responsibilities of two or even all three roles.
For instance, many 'family trusts' are often created/funded (Trustor), managed (Trustee), and benefits paid to (Beneficiary) the same person or persons. Also the Trustor is sometimes called the Settlor, in some circumstances/jurisdictions.
Note also that the term 'person' here is used in the legal sense; i.e. a 'person' can be one or more natural person(s) (human being(s)) or it can be a 'legal person' as in a corporation or other entity that is treated as a person under the law. Banks have large trust departments, which serve as trustees for their clients in managing certain assets.
Banks have large trust departments like Pictet Morning Star Bank; they manage a lot of the Trusts of Private Equity Owners who operate out of the City of London. There are Trillions of dollars in assets held in trusts; commanding the actions of various corporations around the world. Corporations like Pfiser, contracting with the DOD and DARPA using pseudo legal frameworks like "Other Transaction Authority." The entire depopulation agenda was run through Trusts.
Who ya gonna Trust? Not the US Government or any other.
You are right. A trust, like many things, is a tool. It can be used for evil, or good. Increasingly, things associated with governments (at least in the G20) are being used for evil.
Exact! How to infiltrate and create a Fascist government, Nefahotep.
Wild Bill,
There are 2 very separate classifications of Trusts; Common Law Trusts, (like the Trust in the article that had Patrick Henry's name with it), described in the set of Legal Encyclopedias titled "First Restatement of Trusts" which is very difficult to find in a Legal Library and what are called "Statutory Trusts" which make up the vast bulk of Trusts talked about in the "Second Restatement of Trust" and possibly a Third Edition of the Restatement of Trusts."
A "Family Trust" is a Statutory Trust made under the current Laws of a State.
There are MAJOR differences between those 2 types of trusts.
Common Law Trusts must have separate parties as the Trustor and Trustee. The same person cannot be named to both those positions! Beneficiaries in this type of trust are rarely the same as a Trustor and never the same as a TRustee.
Statutory Trusts can have the same person as Trustor aka Grantor or Settlor, Trustee and Beneficary. in this type of trust there is no "separation of ownership" between the parties to the trust and a Court can "undo" this type of trust if the trust is the subject of a law suit because all positions in the trust are held by the same person. So a Statutory Trust where those above positions are all held by the same person gives NO ASSET PROTECTION.
You are correct in saying that the term "person" when referencing a Statutory Trust (a trust set up under the law of a State) is used in a "legal sense" and can include a corporation or other legal entity. Different States have enacted some provisions which increase the protections given by a Statutory Trust.
Trust Law has not been a required course in US Law Schools since shortly after WWII. Trusts as a separate section of the BAR Exam has not been tested for about the same time frame.
A "Common Law Trust" aka Massachusetts Business Trust or Massachusetts Trust or simply as a Business Trust is a much different creature. I will talk about it in a comment above.
Thanks Bitterroot! 💖🍻
Very astute observation, Wild Bill!! I think I will renew my look into the very private Payseur family.
Hypnotist,
Good article to open people's eyes as to a type of trust that is rarely used and has not been taught in Law Schools for some 75 or more years. The last Lawyer I talked with who was taught these trusts set up under the Common Law, was retirement age when I met him way back in the late 1990's.
I appreciate the link to the "handbook" given in the article, it has both good and questionable information in it.
Good information is that information that is supported by Court Cases prior to the end of the U.S. Civil War in 1865 and a few court cases from the period up to around 1900. Sadly, most court cases cited in that handbook do not have a date listed for them and would require a person to spent a lot of time in a Law Library looking up the cases and determining if they were valid for the type of trust the handbook is talking about. This would require a knowledge of more than the date of the court case but also the court cases cited in each court case to know for sure the case was relevant to a trust under the Common Law.
There is a term mentioned in the handbook which is "sui juris." This term does not seem to be defined in the handbook. Sui Juris is a Latin definition which means "of one's own right", it means that someone is "capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights." It is crucial to note there is no mention of "legal age" or "legal capacity" in the definition. That is because in the U.S. we have a post Civil War 14th Amendment. More on that in a moment.
Prior to the 14th Amendment a U.S.A. Citizen obtained their "Rights" from their Creator, i.e. God. This is set out in the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence which says in pertinent part. "...all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights..." Note the word "unalienable." It's root word is "lien" which is when someone else or some entity has a higher claim to what you say is yours, than you do. Example: If you have a mortgage on "your" house, the bank or mortgage company has a "higher claim" to that house than your claim. Just quit paying the payment and see what happens to your house! Point to remember is that when your rights are "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) they come from God and God is above all earthly governments.
The 14th Amendment, 1868, turned things upside down. It says in pertinent part, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State in which they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,..." there is a lot to "unpack" in this 14th Amendment. Please follow closely:
1. We will start with the words "...the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States..." In Law where do "privileges and immunities" come from? They are what government can give "citizens". They are not the same as "rights" from God. Note the phrase at the beginning of that Amendment, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States..." Notice the coupling together of the concepts of "born" and "naturalized." this was the beginning of doing away with the idea of some people being "freeborn Citizens" with God given rights and classifying all as "citizens" in the category of "naturalized", why? A naturalized citizen is someone born in a country that does not recognize "God given rights" but who wants to become an American. They go through the process of "naturalization" and once that is completed they receive "privileges and immunities" granted by government, not rights from God! What government has given, government can take away!
2. Notice the word "citizens" in the 14th Amendment. It is spelled with a lower case "c". Yet, for example in the Constitution; Article II, Section 5 the same word is spelled "Citizen" with an upper case "C" and that word is not the first word in a sentence! "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution..." In Law, even the capitalization of a word has meaning! Prior to the 14th Amendment, the capitalization of "Citizen" meant a human being who's rights came from God not from government. Notice that there were 2 classes of "Citizens" before the Adoption of the Constitution! Those born here and those who had become Citizens prior to the Adoption of the Constitution! That is prior to there being a government that could "naturalize" those not born here!
3. Post Civil War there was "The Act of February 21, 1871" which, among other things changed one letter of one word in the Declaration of Independence. It changed an "u" to an "i" changing the word "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" pronounced "in-alien-able" root word "alien" (which interestingly enough the first 4 letters of that word tell you this word is "a lie"!) So when this Act changed the word in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence from "unalienable" (un-a-lien-able) to "inalienable" (in-alien-able) it supported the change in status of all Americans from God given Rights to government given rights!
Why is this important in light of the article and handbook on Trusts from yesterday's article? To have a Common Law Type Trust the parties to it must be "sui juris"! Remember the definition of "sui juris" is "of one's own right" and "Capable of owning property and enjoying private law rights". If you are a 14th Amendment "citizen", (little "c" meaning you are a subject of government and a subject of God, aka "a Sovereign") you have no "private law rights" you have "government granted privileges and immunities" such as the "privilege" of being "taxed", travel freely granted by private car only if you are "licensed", the privilege of being used in commerce via your "Birth Certificate" which is an "Admirality Law Instrument" (Law of the Sea, therefore you have a "birth certificate" showing the "berth" where you came into existence) used in International Commerce and much more.
The type of "Trust", a trust under the Common Law, as talked about in yesterday's post are concerned, that type of trust came from English Common Law adopted by the "colonies" in America long before there was any US government "taxing authority" under the 16th Amendment. (The story of it's failed ratification is told by another below this post). These type of Common LawTrusts are not subject to the April 15th Tax, but the April 15th Agency does not agree with that and will and have prosecuted those using these trusts to operate a business out of-unless they obtain an EIN and pay taxes on the trust income. Strictly speaking, when a Common Law Based Trust becomes "bastardized" by adopting ANY Statutory provisions such as an EIN, that trust looses the ability to protect assets and as a tusrt that contains any Statutory Provision it now falls under the purview of the Court system of this land, (America), and can be pierced, legally, by those courts, the assets taken by the court, and the parties to the trust, including Trustors, Trustees and Beneficiaries, convicted of fraud or crimes, under the Laws of the UNITED STATES Corporation, not the united States Constitution (lower case "u" intentional).
The courts will readily agree that this type of trust are "legal" which means they are subject to the courts jurisdiction and have been used "illegally" either via bastardization via mixing Statutory Trust language and concepts with Common Law language and concepts or by a person lacking in the "sui juris" status using the trusts.
In the last 20 or so years, a Common law Trust, such as the ones talked about in yesterdays post, have been pierced by a Federal District Court and the Federal Appeals Courts have up heald the lower court's rulings and SCOTUS, to my knowledge has not taken any cases involving these trusts.
In some 50 years of fighting the "good fight" I have only seen 2 individuals who were able to beat a trial in court because they had successfully removed themselves from being a 14th Amendment citizen and after nearly a year of attempts at tripping them up in a court room and after local newspaper articles of a "Couple Dumps Citizenship In Anti-government Rant" they were successful.
Now for a "silver lining." If you understand the "Restored Republic Idea", we should all be "restored" to Citizen status and the US Corporation ceasing to exist. Then, the use of this type of trust will, again, be taught, used and understood by all-even the Lawyers and Courts/judges.
In the meantime, unless you know you are not a 14th Amendment citizen and the Common Law Trust you are using is not bastardized by Statutory Trust language or concepts and those who are named in the trust as Trustor(s), Trustee(s) and Beneficiaries are not 14th Amendment citizens, be extremely careful as you move forward.
Thanks to Nefahotep for sending me here. Fascinating stuff and I'll need to send one of my readers who's been deciphering words. She'll love una-lien-able to inalienable and berth certificate.
Tereza,
Nefahotep is someone I have never met but someone who has traded comments with me.
In my opinion, Nefahotep is someone who has an understanding and a recognition of what is right and proper and what is wrong and a scam!
Thanks for your response, Bitterroot, and I agree with your assessment of Nef. We've been alternating posts on esoteric mystical texts and, before that, world war histories. When I posted on my economic system (that's the conclusion to my book, How to Dismantle an Empire) I thought for a moment I'd hit a topic where he had done no research. But then he sent me to two of his posts, this article and particularly your astute comments.
My focus is on taking back the right to issue mortgages and the credit to repay them at a local level I call a commonwealth. I'm wondering if there's a way to use the Trust system to protect the commonwealth bank. Just brainstorming, but the same tools seem like they could be used to dismantle the master's house ;-) If you had the time, I'd love to have your thoughts on the two I just posted on the subject: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/caretology and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/dreaming-and-scheming. Thanks again!
Tereza,
I read the 2 above posts on your substack. You have put a lot of work into your ideas for changing the economic system in the U.S. Your system seems to borrow several ideas from the current system of Central Bank Fiat Currency (Federal Reserve System) which is no more "Federal" than Federal Express and the FED has no "reserves" so it's name is a complete sham.
Your system seems to lean heavily on the present economic system but with increased emphasis on caring for all those in each "fiefdom." That deserves a compliment; "That would indeed be an improvement over the current system."
You mention such things as "interest", "taxes" and "Social Security" which we are all familiar with. I suppose this is to have a way of easing people into your system with a minimum of a "learning curve."?
I could not determine if your system using dollars and carets is a system that is "fiat" or "asset backed"? In the first article you referenced 3 Platinum $trillion dollar Coins" and in the second article it appears those same 3 $trillion dollar coins are "fiat."
You also mentioned the "Social Security Trust Fund" which does not exist, except in the minds of politicians and the main stream media. For instance, a deep dive into the Social Security Act will not turn up a "Social Security Trust Fund."
There is mention in your first article (above) about "incentives" for people to use "carets in ways you want to promote."
As a retired businessman with 3 Professional Degrees, including Doctorate Level and a life long pursuit of American History, my initial impression is there are gaps between what is talked about and what the reality may be.
For Example: The Constitution; Article I; Section X; Clause 2 speaks to only gold and silver coin being a "tender in payment of debt." That would mean the current "fiat" currency is unconstitutional and any replacement currency would need to be gold/silver backed.
I'm sure yo have heard of the BRICS nations which a deep dive will show now has well over 65% of the world's population on board, is a hard asset backed (mostly silver and gold) currency and has their own inter bank and inter country transfer system that is separate from the SWIFT system. Many of those BRICS nations have "thrown" out their central banks and if you saw Tucker Carlson's recent Videos on his trip to Russia you know he purchased some $400.00 of food from a Russian Supermarket but it only cost the equivalent of $104.00 U.S. in Rubles. That is because Russian currency is "hard asset backed" and not "fiat."
I'm sure you also know that the Saudi's are now selling oil to BRICS nations in exchange for their currency instead of the U.S. "Petro dollar." This means that the U.S. fiat currency is in a death struggle.
As former U.S. Military, I have information from sources I am not allowed to reveal that tell me that it is just a mater of time before the Federal Reserve Note" aka "greenback" and U.S. Dollar" will be replaced with "U.S. Notes" which will be the transition currency to a new gold and sliver backed U.S. currency that very likely will not be termed the "dollar." When this happens the FED as we know it will be dead and gone. It is suspected that this may happen this year.
Simultaneously, it is very likely that taxes will change completely to a system where only things bought that are brand new will be taxed and government's size will be reduced by over 50%. That reduces the need for unconstitutional income taxes tremendously.
You asked about "could a Common Law Trust protect the Commonwealth Bank" in your idea of a replacement financial system?
Under the system my sources tell me is likely to happen this year, our basis for Law would return to a "Constitutional Republic" and under that system is is likely that Common Law Trusts, or a variation of them would, again, become lawful. (They are currently "legal" if they obtain an EIN and file/pay taxes on income. Lawful = Constitutional whereas Legal=statutory.
If they were to become lawful and a system such as yours was adopted, the Commonwealth Bank Manager could be the Trustor/Settlor who set up the trust but no one with any employment type attachment to the Commonwealth Bank could be a Trustee or Beneficiary of the trust. Those who have an account at the Commonwealth Bank could be Beneficiaries.
You see, a Common Law Trust is an "irrevocable" trust where those or the "entity" who sets up the trust can not "control the trust," (i.e. can't be a trustee) and can not receive what was placed into the trust upon the Trust's being dissolved so they can't be a beneficiary.
Hope this answers some of your questions.
Thank you so much, Bitter Root, for reading my articles and giving such a detailed response. I mentioned your reflection on him to Nefahotep and he replied, "I just love Bitter Root. I admire his precision in what he says." So the admiration is mutual, for exactly the right things.
Yes, I often use the Fed Ex joke, which I got from Ellen Brown, to explain that. Currently with 94% of dollars being created through mortgages, real estate backs the dollar--or would if they hadn't been sold in tranches. Mine is based on Ben Franklin's scrip that he called a 'land-backed currency.' In my system, it can't be exported as it is now.
That's very interesting about the new US Note. I'll be curious to see that. I didn't think the US even had the gold reserves to back the currency. It will be interesting to see how that plays out and whether it replaces existing dollars or only for some.
Thanks for the details on the trust system. I didn't realize that the entity who sets up an irrevocable trust couldn't be a trustee, although I knew they couldn't be a beneficiary. Useful information. Thanks again for your detailed reading and response.
Your Welcome. I spent some time In Appalachia back in the 1990's. East of the home of the first Kentucky Fried Chicken Resturant and in a small town that had a College that allowed me to do some research in their Library "Stacks" where I found 3 old U.S. History Books and a lot of real U.S. History.
As far as the question; "Does the US have the gold?" I believe that time will show that the U.S. has it's fair share of 165 Military Transport Airplanes, like C-130's, full of gold that was removed from the "end all bank" in the World's Central Bank's System under the cover of Covid-19. My sources say the dollar will completely die and be replaced by full hard asset (gold/silver) backrd currency. I trust those sources, but can not, at this time state if all I have been told will pan out. Time will tell. If everything I have been told plays out, you, and others will be surprised to learn which Military's co-operated in removing the gold and returning the gold to the original nations where it was removed from by corrupt Central Banks policies.
Have a nice day.
Thank you for recognizing the importance of this information. Trust law is the very soul of the state national movement. What one creates one controls. It’s not about ownership. Trust law is the superior law above all others. Whether you know it or not a trust was opened in your name by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. It is the legal fiction known as your ALL CAPS name. Since a corporation cannot contract with a living soul they create a legal fiction to contract with. It very important you understand the legal ramifications of that and that there is a difference between your legal entity and you the living soul. Learning to take control of the trust made in your ALL CAPS name in which you can be the trustee and beneficiary is they key to escaping the system and reclaiming your inalienable rights under the original 1787 Constitution. I said rights, not privileges, which is what you actually have now. Privileges that can be taken from you.
The more I learn about the state national movement the more I’m convinced this is “The Plan” for us to take our country back. Only when people are willing to learn about, accept, and wield the power of trust law will they be the kings they were intended to be and bring the government to heel. Thank you for linking Weiss’ book as it will be invaluable and many are pay-gating trust law knowledge.
A good start to understanding the state national movement is the book “Fruit from the Poisonous Tree” by Melvin Stamper.
For a more theoretical introduction explaining how a state national deals with the government check out this 8 part series by David Lester Straight https://rumble.com/vzm5ip-out-of-babylon-with-david-straight-part-1.html
For a more step by step mechanical how to become a state national check out this guy’s free video classes https://onestupidfuck.com/ Resist the urge to judge this book by its cover! This guy comes off a bit immature and crass but delivers the goods by citing USC and UCC throughout this teachings. Feel free to skip the first video as it is only jabbering about overcoming cognitive dissonance and a plea for you to not flip out and get violent when you learn the truth of the control of yourself that you have given to others. The meat starts in video two.
One last thing, before any of you are tempted to think of “Sovereign Citizen” videos on YouTube and then equate them to this knowledge, just STOP. This is not that. As you will learn the term Sovereign Citizen itself is an oxymoron. It contradicts itself. SCs have no clue about being a free man and do a disservice to the state national movement. They are not at all associated with each other. Good luck.
Lol. Love that website. Onestupidfuck is truly onto something. I've been researching a lot on the sovereign citizen movement since 1986. Went to a couple of meetings in Cali area but did not take the plunge. Also, took some steps to remove myself from the IRS rolls. Nothing came of that eexcept me paying them 3 years worth of back taxes and penalties when I decided I'd be going to chiropractic school.
One Stupid F*ck is losing his video library and says his video course is moving over to YouTube. The sign up instructions are confusing so I’m watching his channels for further information.
So, when the USA DOD attacked us with biological weapons, they violated our trust.
Excellent! My grandparents were likely the last generation in the US who’s word was their bond, as was the handshake. Now, and for many decades, many of us have lost all trust in the ‘trustees’ who govern us. Your article also revealed clearly how our country has been infiltrated. I remember a dig I did a few years ago; I believe the family who owned the US properties was the Payseur family and Rockefeller was the trustee....(Maybe there was more than one trustee? Rockefeller was oil...how many more big name wealth-holders were just trustees for the Payseur family?) Now, his statement makes more sense. “John D. Rockefeller supposedly once said that the key to power is to “own nothing, but control everything” What about Vanderbilt, Carnegie or Morgen?
Excellent assessment of the influence of trusts in a civilization. It makes perfect sense! God bless.🙏
This is also what Richard Kiyosaki stated in Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Control of property is more powerful than owning property. Not at all the way Herr Shwab states, you will own nothing and be happy. Whatever
Haven’t heard of him, but don’t believe a syllable that Schwab says. We can’t take anything when we die, but I certainly want responsibility while here. Bugs suck as food! I’m not obliging to orders!
We will not comply!
👍👍
Your FIRST MIDDLE LAST trust was created on the registration date (not birthdate) located on your birth certificate and you need to re-organize and record your status as grantor of said trust. https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/928-documents/
https://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/
Beginning in my childhood, I remember my late father saying often, "you cannot deal with anyone who does not tell the truth." I am grateful for that principle he ingrained in me.
Some years ago, I was weeding poison ivy from under trees while listening to a West Virginia statewide radio program. It originated in Morgantown and the host was also local. The WVU basketball coach, John Beilein, had just been offered the coaching job at Michigan. His contract with WVU specified a buy-out should either side break the contract. Coach Beilein did not way to pay his buy-out for breaking the contract and was trying to skirt it. The program host said, "That is why there
are lawyers".
At that point, I pulled off my gloves, marched into the house and called the show. When I got to speak to host, "Hoppy" Kercheval, I told him the following. "Hoppy, I come from a family where your word is as good as any contract." "What Beilein is trying to do is not only wrong, it is dishonest."
Eventually, Beilein did have to pay his buy-out. It was considerable. He HAD been known as an upright man.
...until he wasn’t (by exposure). This is how the cabal will fall.
Love this topic, the explanation of the subject matter & the “why” & “how come” of it all. Very well done!👏
The battle IS about good vs evil, isn’t it?
The Law that NEVER WAS, https://thelawthatneverwas.com/
The federal government rests its authority to collect income tax on the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—the federal income tax amendment—which was allegedly ratified in 1913.
After an extensive year-long nationwide research project, William J. Benson discovered that the 16th Amendment was not ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states and that nevertheless, Secretary of State Philander Knox had fraudulently declared ratification.
It was a shocking revelation; it reached deep to the core of our American system of governance.
IT is in a multi-book set.