The Hybridization of Asymmetric & Political Warfare

Engineered Political Tension in the U.S. and Canada

Jan 31, 2024

Update:

, who helped do a lot of the ground work on this piece, provided me the media examples that really drive the points home on all this. It is recommended that you take a look.

I want to ask you to explore two distinct, but related forms of warfare—asymmetrical and narrative—in order to advance our collective understanding of the global, fifth-generation war we are facing.

Asymmetrical warfare is a type of conflict where two opposing sides have unequal military power, with one using unconventional tactics like guerrilla warfare or terrorism to compensate for its weaknesses against a stronger opponent. It's like a small, nimble fighter taking on a much larger opponent by using creative and unconventional strategies.

Narrative warfare involves using storytelling and information to shape perceptions, influence opinions, and gain an advantage in conflicts. It's like a battle of narratives, where different sides try to tell their version of the story to sway public opinion or achieve strategic goals.

In an interview on the Mel K show, General Michael Flynn spoke about the fact that there are ongoing attempts to assassinate Donald Trump not by means of actually killing him, like JFK, but by means of narrative warfare. According to Flynn, it is now too difficult to carry out a real assassination by killing someone in the context of the present war. Using the conditions and tools of fifth-generation warfare to kill someone's character is significantly more straightforward and efficient.

I found this to be a very clear example of narrative warfare, and it is simple to observe that a continuous list of narratives has been constructed since 2016 in an effort to undermine Donald Trump's reputation. From the botched Russia probe to the accusations that Trump labeled all Mexicans as rapists and killers, to the current narratives claiming that Trump would destroy America and democracy itself, what we are seeing now represents a culmination of ongoing assassination via narrative.

Setting aside one's own feelings toward Trump, it is a useful exercise in reflection to take into account the concerted effort that has gone into creating and promoting these myths. There's an endless supply of new narratives to bolster the idea that Trump is a prejudiced, racist, sexist, and law-breaking pig, even while support for him has increased among all the minority groups he is purportedly racist against. He's a beloved supervillain!

These attempts have failed even if you are not a fan of Trump.

Consider that the largest news media organization in the world, in conjunction with big tech, has intentionally worked to assassinate Trump's character, and alienate his followers since 2016. After seven or eight years of relentless narrative warfare, support for Trump has increased, and the number of people watching the media outlets that criticize him has decreased.

In the meantime, the Twitter files have demonstrated that there was, as with Hunter Biden's laptop, a real plot to utilize big tech to rig the election between Biden and Trump—not to mention the Project Veritas leaks from years prior, which featured Facebook whistleblowers who revealed that staff members had been instructed that it was acceptable to target straight white men, particularly those who supported Trump. Facebook staff were informed that individuals who support the Make America Great Again campaign ought to be dealt with in the same manner as White supremacists and Nazis. These leakers even went so far as to say that it was acceptable for left-wing users to threaten Trump supporters with death.

Take a step back and assess the extent of this well-organized initiative. Try to grasp the scope of this narrative warfare and how astonishing it is, both in terms of the amount of work that went into the attempt at assassination and how unbelievable it is that it has failed so spectacularly.

Which brings us to the concept of asymmetrical warfare. This is the modern-day version of David versus Goliath. Powers of equal kind are no longer the only ones with capability in war.

One of the most significant instances of asymmetrical warfare in use today is the idea of mind-controlling tiny, highly radicalized groups of people to alter the very fabric of a nation.

The concept of asymmetric warfare teaches us that even large forces can be defeated by small decentralized, or concentrated organizations using highly skilled tactics. Manpower and size have been replaced by intelligence, inventiveness, and sophistication.

This means that, by the principles of asymmetrical warfare, it matters less that the narrative warfare directed towards Donald Trump has helped the growth of his following. The truth is that asymmetrical warfare can go on as long as narrative warfare is able to keep only a small percentage of people radicalized. As long as big tech, compromised media, and other inputs like the post-secondary education system control the thoughts and actions of radicalized citizens their voices can be amplified and the asymmetrical warfare can continue.

Take into consideration that if there are still ways to magnify the opinions and responses of this radicalized group in the mainstream media and the echo chambers created by big tech censorship, then there are still ways to undermine the overwhelming support for Donald Trump. There is still a threat. That's how warfare in the fifth generation works.

Remember that there was more to the 2020 election manipulation than simply tampering with the results. To create the narratives that refute electoral fraud, the media had to continue its psyops to keep extremist voices in the forefront.

Asymmetrical warfare operations like this rely on narrative warfare to hide the asymmetry.

But let's put Donald Trump aside for a second, and examine the ongoing battle with gender ideology in order to have a fuller understanding of our adversary's dependence on asymmetrical and narrative warfare.

On July 2, Elijah Schaffer put out a Twitter poll, which was engaged by over 65 thousand users, which asked, ‘Would you rather have your son be in the KKK or be in the LGBTQ?’

74.8% chose the KKK while 25.2% chose the LGBTQ+.

Christina Buttons, a self-described politically homeless and former leftist, who frequently writes critically against gender ideology, responded to this poll with a post on Instagram, emphasizing how disheartening these results were. She claimed that this re-enforced her sense of political homelessness.

She believed that this was "an extreme position" taken by conservatives, but is this really the case in the context of fifth-generation warfare, with such limited options?

Perhaps, a typical socio-political lens is not the best way to understand the poll findings; rather, a fifth-generation warfare lens would be more appropriate.

As I mentioned before, asymmetrical warfare is being used to radicalize tiny groups of people in order to change the structure of a whole country. This calls for narrative warfare, which uses people's cognitive entrenchment into political camps as a tool of control.

Furthermore, the story that the LGBTQ+ community is specifically targeting children is being utilized to radicalize conservatives against progressives. This narrative ignores the existence of large, vocal organizations like Gays Against Groomers and LGB United who have all spoken out aggressively against gender affirmative care, and the basic assumption that gay and lesbian people cannot be politically conservative.

In the meantime, the right wing as a whole is attacked by narratives that claim that conservatives are committing ‘trans genocide.’ Is this what the vast majority of leftists truly believe? Doubtful. But this is warfare that is asymmetrical. If the voices of the extremists echoing these narratives can be elevated and transformed into the illusion of a majority on the left, then the actual majority of the left believing this simply isn't necessary.

Why do you think “politically homeless” pundits like Christina Buttons have such a substantial following?

And yet, many on the right are oblivious to the reality that large numbers on the left are also against this, and more significantly, that an increasing proportion of gay and lesbian voters are as well. Organizational examples include Lesbians United, the LGB Alliance, and Gays Against Groomers, who have all released statements opposing the indoctrination of children with gender ideology and the resulting homophobia that these organizations allege it fosters.

The hybridization of narrative and asymmetrical warfare by the deep state takes advantage of people's emotional states on the left and the right, and takes advantage of the cognitive abilities both sides lose while reacting to the intense emotional stimuli of weaponized stories.

Coming back to the Twitter poll, it’s worth asking: does the poll’s framing take advantage of the real time emotionality caused by today’s children being attacked by propaganda and pit this against the threat of the KKK, an organization that is more closely linked to historical tragedies? I don't think this answer is at all surprising in light of the current LGBTQ narrative weaponizing our culture to attack children, and the absolute impotence of the KKK on the modern battlefield.

This poll’s results do not represent the racism that breathless leftists and even politically homeless writers like Christina Buttons believe it is about—not the CRT sort of racism, which claims a conspiracy theory that white people are intentionally and unconsciously trying to rule the globe out of their never-ending feeling of selfishness and narcissism, I mean actual racism: the real conviction that a particular race is superior to another. It also doesn't reflect mounting homophobia or a growing conservative opposition to same-sex rights.

These aren't the issues that need to worry us at this time. The use of narrative warfare to maintain a small, radicalized, mind-controlled group of people in a toxic relationship with a media and technology complex intent on imposing a New World Order is what should worry both the politically homeless left and the burgeoning conservative movement. This is the asymmetrical warfare employed by the Deep State through narrative warfare, and it targets both groups in different ways.

In the battlefield of fifth-generation warfare, we must not become complacent in the notion that being the majority is sufficient. Having said that, we do need to get over the notion that we do not represent the majority. Those of us standing up to the Globalist NWO are a majority, and that's a significant source of inspiration. This war is going to last a long time. It won't be finished very soon.

So while we should be grateful for our rising numbers, we must also acknowledge our challenges. This could entail softening one’s attachment to a political identity while also maintaining an awareness of what it means to be involved in local politics.

On Instagram, Louis Uridel, the owner of Metroflex Gym with 134,000 followers posted a widely-circulated video depicting a clearly frightened young child in front of an aggressively sexual performance. In the post, he says, "Kids need to be exposed to new and educational experiences."

He is citing this video as evidence of what liberals are purportedly advocating as a unified political movement.

I disagree that a political wing is indeed the source of this manipulation. I reject the illusion that the majority of the liberal left-wing population is bringing about these cultural shifts. I also reject the illusion that this change is occurring naturally and from the grassroots up.

We are up against a small number of powerful elites who are trying to create a NWO through a political Uniparty. These manipulations originate from a small set of people who have a far deeper understanding of human behavior than the average individual. Therefore, even though I think instances like these should be pointed out, I question whether sometimes terminology like "lib" or "libtard" are further cementing our pre-engineered, carefully polarized political identities. The opponent we face is significantly more complex than a simple binary political conflict.

This is the extremely fine line we have to tread. Political identities are helpful when they are defined by us in terms of the ideals and values we have learned to live by through our understanding of who we are as people and the kind of world we desire for our future generations; however, when they are installed into us by centralized systems of cultural creation, they become a very dangerous phenomenon.

We should ask: how often are we confronted with people who have actually developed a political identity in terms of their lived values and principles? How often are modern political identities a result of living every day through knowledge of self and the world people want for their children, as opposed to savage streams of curated media consumption?

And beyond the struggle to develop an authentic political identity, we also have to acknowledge that the left wing of politics has been infiltrated and turned into a factory for narrative warfare, using asymmetrical operations to socially engineer us towards a New World Order.

We are vulnerable to influence, and Influence operations are all around us, while a centralized system of cultural production daily defines the political identities of the left and right.

Contrastingly, building a political identity from life experience requires effort, as well as the discipline of sticking to a particular set of beliefs and ideals. Allowing someone else to create that identity on your behalf is far simpler.

It actually begs the question of what it would be like to have a resurgence of real debates and discussions between the two dominant political identities, one that accurately embodied the organic idea of left and right wing ideals.

Rejecting narrative warfare, which aims to appeal to our emotions and sacrifice critical thinking in the name of asymmetrical operations, is the only way we can return to that. These continuous operations take the small, radicalized left and place them in front of agitated right-wing citizens, merely to watch as their divisions grow.

I'll accordingly close this section with an inquiry and an invitation. Is it possible for you to meet someone who has developed a political stance that differs from your own, one they have formed authentically rather than through mimicry, and gain insight from them?

On the other side, are there any instances of political identity commitments that you, or anyone else in your political community, believe were bestowed upon you rather than developed from personal experience or a valued family legacy?

Can you begin to distinguish between the use of politics to create the society we want—one devoid of the NWO—and the rote recitation of socially constructed political identities?

If you can, you might begin to realize that in order to create that society, we'll need the creative friction that comes from having people on opposing political sides.

Part of our truest progress as a species has come from this tension. We will forfeit our freedom of thought and our capacity to employ political tension effectively if we fall into the trap that claims that the world's political conservatism is the cornerstone of the novel system we are trying to create.

What would happen to the left without the influence of narrative warfare plugged into asymmetrical operations, and what role might they play in a free world?

Furthermore, what can an analysis of our neighbors up north tell us about the consequences of losing such an asymmetric war?

Trudeau's 5G War

In Canada’s most recent election, only 33% of voters put Justin Trudeau in power, making him the smallest minority government in Canadian history.

With just 37% of the vote, Olivia Chow, the newest mayor of Toronto, became mayor in a microcosm of the same scenario. Is the election system in Canada giving a minority of radicalized left-wing voters the ability to overrule the majority?

Is it feasible that the current state of the Canadian political system is being maintained as an ongoing asymmetrical political warfare operation? Is it intended to offer the democratic power of a majority to radicalize a minority within the population?

The asymmetry of this broken system has undoubtedly served Justin Trudeau's current tyrannical operation well, since he initially ran on a platform of changing the broken Canadian electoral system and won on it before revealing that he was lying and never intended to do so.

An Overview of Trudeau’s Operations

The Trudeau government funds an organization called the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) to provide "Anti-Hate kits." This helps to validate the Network as authorities. Trudeau also owns the Canadian MSM, which is regularly paid enormous sums of money by his liberal government

With this set up, the CAHN are authorized by the government to use narrative assassination to attack Trudeau's opponents. While doing this, they are positioned by Trudeau’s media as the authorities that justify Trudeau’s harsh, authoritative policies.

Is there a more perfect set up for controlling a society through asymmetrical and narrative warfare?

Doesn't Trudeau appear to have this down to a science, if asymmetrical warfare is the capacity of smaller entities to influence larger groups and narrative warfare is the capacity to create stories that change a target audience's perception?

It would seem that Trudeau is managing warfare operations that aim to create narratives that serve a single objective two distinct ways. These oprations are performed in tandem with organizations like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), which gets most of its financing from his government, and the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, which is in collaboration with groups like ANTIFA.

These narrative operations develop into two separate tactics, if the goal is to make Canada the model of Klaus Schwab's Great Reset and to fully subjugate Canada to the United Nations Agenda 2030:

First of all, Trudeua bases his campaign on outright lies that are supported by the government-run media, which helps him pinpoint the radicalized base of Canadians who are gullible enough to believe his propaganda and lack knowledge of his true nature and goals. When it comes to the field of psychological operations, this is his target audience. Then, in carrying out his New World Order plan, he keeps his supporters fanatical and ignorant by manipulating the media.

This is a crucial matter. Since the misinformation is largely made up of expertly constructed lies and half-truths, it is fairly straightforward. A type of narrative warfare that can quickly and efficiently target particular dissidents when they emerge is needed to fuel the radicalization of his base. Those who disagree with Trudeau's ideas not only have their reputations damaged in the public eye, but their criticism also serves as gasoline for his small, radical following.

The Canadian Anti-Hate Network will assist in this operation. They are allegedly "fully independent," as stated on their Twitter account; however, you can view a news release dated June 2022 on the Government of Canada website, which clearly indicates that they received $268,400 in support from the federal government for developing their “Anti-Hate Kits.” The press release from the Canadian government even mentions the group's independence while mentioning the money.

It's amazing the amount of doublespeak. Nevertheless, Trudeau’s media empire can point to the Canadian Anti-Hate Network as an authority. "Far-right attacks on LGBTQ2S+ community rising in Canada: Canadian Anti-Hate Network" is but one example.

Subsequently, he can assert that the parents are ignorant victims of hateful propaganda when discussing issues such as the Muslim community's opposition to gender ideology in schools. The far-right radicals who are lying about what is being taught in Canadian classrooms are misleading and misinforming them.

They are obviously too naive to be concerned about a problem they independently investigated, and they are being used by the American Right! They are merely pawns in the far-right's attacks against LGBTQ2S+ people. Do you want the proof? That's what the Canadian Anti-Hate Network claims.

Planned Parenthood and other organizations distribute flyers and propaganda at Canadian and American schools. This kind of content is a natural outcome of the culture that the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) curriculum creates, which instills in kids an obsession with queer theory along with an obsession with gender expression and sexual identity. It trains kids to view the world through this narrow, gender-based, hyper-sexualized lens.

This should infuriate any typical parent, but according to Trudeau, it's all lies. It's critical to comprehend this aspect of his operation.

Since he is not speaking to the majority, Trudeau is able to say things that are blatantly false. He's just keeping his base radicalized and feeding their opinions into his well-crafted echo chamber in the media, which serves to reinforce his asymmetrical warfare tactics.

This is why he doesn't care about the majority's opinion, which is why he can say such heinous, foolish things that the vast majority of people find offensive. It doesn't phase him at all. Observe how he never confronts the terrible treatment he has received in the international press. He does not need to.

His radicalized following will feel increasingly in danger as long as he continues to persuade CBC, Global, and CTV news to produce a narrative kind of assassination against his dissenters that makes them seem like a force of mounting hate. He can then direct his media conglomerate to amplify their outrage once this base becomes triggered, despite the fact that they are a minority. This allows him to maintain the delusion that the majority opinion opposing him is actually the minority opinion of far-right extremists spreading hate—a so-called "fringe minority."

It is strategically critical for us to understand this combination of asymmetrical warfare and weaponized storytelling. The enemy has factored our large numbers into their ongoing operations, thus, we must not allow our awareness that the majority of us opposing the New World Order to weaken our defensive and offensive positions.

Election Fraud: Canada Vs. America

It is noteworthy that the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) attempted to sue Jonathan and Barbara Kay for defamation after they exposed how the CAHN supported the far-left extremist organization ANTIFA.

Trudeau's little psyop met a disastrous end when an Ontario judge upheld this characterization. Their claim to be “an independent, nonprofit organization made up of Canada’s leading experts and researchers on hate groups and hate crimes” has thus been brilliantly disproven. Nevertheless, this may not matter to those who have been ideologically subverted into Trudeau’s cult, as asymmetric warfare operations are keeping Trudeau in power through our flawed electoral system.

In fact, Justin Trudeau and controlled opposition Jagmeet Singh have been quietly preparing electoral reform that will sound disturbingly familiar to American’s critical of the 2020 election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

What kinds of reform?

Allowing an "expanded" three-day voting period during general elections;
Allowing voters to cast their ballots at any polling place within their riding; and
Improving the mail-in ballot process with both accessibility and maintaining integrity in mind.

When comparing election fraud between Canada and America, this is arguably one of the most significant differences.

It was declared in America that Joe Biden had received more votes than Barack Obama had ever received! A wonderful joke, but funny in that American elections do not divide voters' power into tiny blocs, allowing despots like Trudeau to seize power with only the 33% of Canadian votes required to control the nation and freeze bank accounts at will.

In the event that Trudeau cheats in the 2025 election, he won't have to fabricate a story claiming to have received the greatest number of votes in Canadian history. His only task will be to preserve the imbalance that has benefited him so greatly thus far, and to make our broken system worse with the electoral reform currently in the works. With mail-in ballots and a 3 day voting period, another minority victory will be easy to frame as long as he has control over the local media, which provides him with endless narrative ammunition.

For this reason, it is crucial to discuss this in terms of fifth-generation warfare. It's not so much about the right or left wings.

When they signed the so-called conversion treatment bill into law, both the Liberal party and the Conservative party voted against parental rights. While the middle class perishes, both parties are complicit in permitting mass migration to physically flood our streets. The goal is to identify the plans, operations, and tactics being used against us, not to criticize the left or the right, but to bring our level of sophistication up to par with that of our apolitical adversary.

In reaction, we in America and Canada must wage asymmetrical warfare. The bulk of the populace may oppose Trudeau and Biden, but the alternative media networks we have formed lack the concentrated power and resources of the conglomerates we face. We must embrace and shift toward being a more localized and dispersed media force.

This does not imply disempowerment in fifth-generation warfare; rather, it just indicates that we must use the appropriate asymmetrical strategies, operations, and tactics in order to respond accordingly.

Badlands Media articles and features represent the opinions of the contributing authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Badlands Media itself.

If you enjoyed this contribution to Badlands Media, please consider checking out more of Justin’s work for free on Substack.

Badlands Media

The Hybridization of Asymmetric & Political Warfare

Engineered Political Tension in the U.S. and Canada

Trudeau's 5G War

An Overview of Trudeau’s Operations

Election Fraud: Canada Vs. America

Discussion about this post