These 3 Events Expose Gender Ideology
It’s Worse Than We Thought ...
They are coming after our kids and doctors are going along with it.
How did the medical community become a weapon of the woke mob? Simon Esler, the writer of Vague Rules and producer of Super Organism, reveals the disturbing connection between the medical industrial complex and the trans agenda.
Cut: Daughters of the West is an explosive documentary that reveals the ugly truth about the effect of Wokism on our daughters.
Here’s a trailer:
Film Release Date: April 15th, 2023
Go to Cut: Daughters of the West to pre-order the film. Use Promo Code: BADLANDS to save on a rental or purchase of the film.
In the following feature, Simon talks about the film.
by Simon Esler,
I have been researching and making content about warfare for almost half a decade, now.
Over the past few years, I have become especially fascinated with Fifth Generation Warfare, not just from the perspective of understanding it, and creating content about it, but from the perspective of living true to it.
What does it mean to imbue everything we give to our communities with intentional forms of fifth-generation warfare?
What does it mean to empower our fellow citizens with ammunition and situational awareness?
One of the most essential elements of fifth-generation warfare is that it is designed so that targets are unaware that they are being subjected to warfare at all.
The chaotic veneer of modern life is draped over every strategy, every operation and every tactic being waged, meaning two things:
That it is particularly difficult to cultivate situational awareness in terms of how we’re being targeted by the enemy on a daily basis.
That we need to learn to wage warfare that is similarly covert, and blends into the socio-cultural landscape in the same way as our enemy’s operations.
One of my biggest passions has been digging into the occulted war on the family, which unavoidably lead me to research gender ideology, as it seemed to be one of the primary operations targeting children.
If we look at it as a warfare operation, it has ideologically infiltrated the family, divided child from parent, stripped away parental rights, dissolved the idea that children cannot consent, and empowered the state to take custody of children with greater ease than ever before.
If fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is the battle of perceptions and information, the implementation of gender ideology into the West is a massive success story for our enemies and a huge blow to our side.
More pointedly, in a war that focuses so heavily on occupying people’s minds and driving them towards particular behaviors, the insertion of gender ideology very successfully attacked one target: adolescent girls.
Between 2010 and 2018, the number of girls seeking gender treatment in the UK rose by 4,000%.
According to data Komodo compiled for Reuters:
“In 2021, about 42,000 children and teens across the United States received a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, nearly triple the number in 2017.”
Gender clinics in Canada and around the world began to report that clients went from being predominantly preschool boys with clinical gender dysphoria to teenage girls with no history of gender dysphoria whatsoever.
A MASSIVE change in the psychological landscape of girls in the Western World took place. Not only did it manage to change their entire outlook on the world, and themselves, but it generated an entirely new set of behaviors.
All of a sudden, girls were begging their parents to call them by new names, to help them get access to Lupron (typically used to castrate sex offenders), to anxiously halt puberty and avoid the alleged trauma of becoming a woman.
Girls started pleading with their parents to have their breasts surgically removed and to be put on testosterone to deepen their voices, change their body shape, and grow facial hair.
And the necessary population of ideologically-captured adults, from parents to therapists and surgeons, were there to receive them, damage their bodies, and usher in this new and sudden change without question.
But while the vehicle for this ideology was left-wing politics, is this the entire picture of how the Daughters of the West were reprogrammed and turned against themselves?
I recently dropped the web site and trailer for my latest documentary CUT - Daughters of the West, and it occurred to me that my intention to develop CUT as a weapon of 5G warfare has been present all along, and yet it’s not something I have shared very much about.
In part, I haven’t shared these intentions because the elements of the film that are imbued with these intentions are meant to remain covert in their design.
They are meant to remain camouflaged, not to be surreptitious, but merely according to the principles of 5GW.
Gender Ideology & 5GW
To get a sense of how effectively this campaign has been waged—most successfully against the people of Canada & America—here are three sources to consider:
The shutting down of the Tavistock Institute’s Gender Clinic in the UK
A major study on gender dysphoria in youth out of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
These three sources alone should have decimated the narrative driving people to medically transition children in Canada and the US, and yet its momentum continues.
The legacy media here in North America has had to work very hard to sanitize the information landscape to keep the rapid implementation of gender ideology’s prime operation, the gender affirmative model, on track.
It has been absolutely necessary to keep left wing citizens emotionally inflamed under the guise that right wing transphobia is on the rise, while also keeping the right wing inflamed and hating the left for transitioning kids. This creates conditions in which the left and the right are less likely to network effectively to fight back against an enemy who uses politics but is not inherently political.
These kinds of divisive tactics are common in the theatre of 5G War.
One of the best examples targeting left wing cognition is a May 2022 Scientific American Article entitled “What the Science on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Kids Really Shows”.
In terms of information warfare, one of the most notable things about this article is that it sticks almost entirely to American citations. As we’ll see, the curation of only American sources is deeply intentional, and is omitting international sources that would very quickly undo almost everything Scientific American is claiming.
This comparison will also give us a sense of how captured American science and academia have to be for them to be operating in stark contrast to the rest of the world with so much hubris.
One of the first definitive, yet misleading, statements about gender affirming care in the Scientific American article reads:
“A decade of research shows [gender affirmative] treatment reduces depression, suicidality and other devastating consequences of trans preteens and teens being forced to undergo puberty in the sex they were assigned at birth.”
Let’s see what happens to their claims when we leave their web of compromised American citations and look at the information arising from other nations.
The End of Gender Affirmative Care in the UK
In December of 2019, The Telegraph reported that the UK's largest children’s transgender clinic had been hit by 35 resignations over a three-year period, all of them warning of a massive over diagnosis of gender dysphoria in children.
When a review of the Gender Clinic’s practices was carried out by Dr. Hilary Cass, the result was the clinic being shut down. And while the clinic attempted to deflect criticism of the shut down, claiming that their “Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) was only being closed because the Cass review recommended a regional model instead of a single national service, and not because of safety concerns,” the changes that resulted tell a different story.
In the fall of 2022, the NHS released an entirely new set of protocols for treating gender dysphoric youth.
On Oct. 24, 2022, the Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine reported that,
“The previous presumption that gender dysphoric youth <18 need specialty “transgender healthcare” has been supplanted by the developmentally-informed position that most need psychoeducation and psychotherapy. Eligibility determination for medical interventions will be made by a centralized Service and puberty blockers will be delivered only in research protocol settings. The abandonment of the "gender-affirming" model by England had been foreshadowed by The Cass Review's interim report, which defined "affirmative model" as a "model of gender healthcare that originated in the USA.” (Emphasis added)
It is especially notable that Cass’s review overtly points out that it was the UK’s copying of the American model that was the problem, and the exact approach to gender dysphoria in youth being scientifically rejected.
The concerns cited include:
(1) a significant and sharp rise in referrals;
(2) poorly-understood marked changes in the types of patients referred;
(3) scarce and inconclusive evidence to support clinical decision-making, and
(4) operational failures of the single gender clinic model, as evidenced by long wait times for initial assessment, and overall concern with the clinical approach.
The changes highlight the misleading statements in the Scientific American article claiming that gender affirming care is protecting kids from “being forced to undergo puberty,” or that the science “overwhelmingly proves” the efficacy of the gender affirmative model.
The NHS changes also address the harsh reality of socially transitioning children:
“The new NHS guidance recognizes social transition as a form of psychosocial intervention and not a neutral act, as it may have significant effects on psychological functioning. The NHS strongly discourages social transition in children, and clarifies that social transition in adolescents should only be pursued in order to alleviate or prevent clinically-significant distress or significant impairment in social functioning, and following an explicit informed consent process.”
Meanwhile, back at Scientific American, social transitioning is “harmless” and simply gives kids “time to figure things out.”
Here’s another quote from Scientific American designed to frighten readers into backing “gender affirmative care”:
“Currently more than a dozen state legislatures or administrations are considering—or have already passed—laws banning health care for transgender young people. On April 20, the Florida Department of Health issued guidance to withhold such gender-affirming care. This includes social gender transitioning,”
The “American Model” itself has been outright banned in the UK, but is mysteriously framed by Scientific American as “health care.”
Is it becoming clear why propaganda outlets like Scientific American have to strictly rely on a corrupt network of pseudoscientific institutions as “evidence?”
Information warfare.
The End of Gender Affirmative Care in Sweden
In may of 2021, Sweden became the first country to stop the practice of prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children under 16 who are experiencing gender dysphoria.
The news broke in a letter from the Karolinska Hospital which stated that,
“In December 2019, the SBU (Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services) published an overview of the knowledge base which showed a lack of evidence for both the long-term consequences of the treatments, and the reasons for the large influx of patients in recent years. These treatments are potentially fraught with extensive and irreversible adverse consequences such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, infertility, increased cancer risk, and thrombosis. This makes it challenging to assess the risk / benefit for the individual patient, and even more challenging for the minors and their guardians to be in a position of an informed stance regarding these treatments.” (Emphasis added)
The letter goes on to cite the recent changes at the NHS, along with a highly publicized court case in which the ruling stated,
“it is highly unlikely, if at all possible, for an individual under the age of 16 to give informed consent to this treatment. For individuals between the age of 16 and 18, the court considers it advisable to request court approval before starting hormonal treatment, since the treatment should be considered experimental.” (Emphasis added)
Another entire nation ditches the gender affirmative model, and it’s still practiced and defended in Canada and America?
How?
Information warfare.
The Toronto Study Vs Gender Affirmative Care for Youth
In 1975 in Toronto, Ontario, a study began that, once completed decades later, should have had a devastating impact on the push to normalize gender affirming care in North America.
Three researchers—Devita Singh, Susan J. Bradley and Kenneth J. Zucker—working out of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, also known as CAMH, focused their work on 139 birth assigned males:
“This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation.” (Emphasis added)
The boys in the study ranged from 3 to 12 years old.
Thirty-four years later, the researchers followed up to compile the data and the results were startling.
In the end, only 12% of the gender confused youth had continued to struggle with gender dysphoria.
Almost 90 percent of the participants in this study had completely desisted.
“Of the 139 participants, only 17 (12.2%) were classified as persisters and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters.”
Not only that, but the majority of the desisters turned out to be gay, meaning the mass transitioning of gender nonconforming youth underway in Canada and America right now is a deeply homophobic movement.
If one of the only studies with this many participants, over this long a period of time, shows that the majority of gender confused children desist, why are outlets like Scientific American promoting the excessive use of life-altering, permanent treatments for minors?
How did this study not send shockwaves throughout the gender affirmative medical and academic community in Canada and America?
Information warfare.
The Gender Affirmative Model Rages on In North America
Given the perspective that we are navigating information warfare, it then becomes unsurprising that, despite these bold sources of information and dramatic reversals in policy, Canada has remained steadfast in ramping up the large-scale implementation of the gender affirmative model.
And, although a recent shift in the Overton Window has lead to particularly-successful policy changes in a growing number of US states, it’s worth asking:
How has it been possible to keep the gender affirmative model alive and well for so long in the US, considering that the changes unfolding in the UK began all the way back in 2020?
How has Canada maintained momentum in the implementation of the gender affirmative model despite being the source of one of the most definitive studies on gender dysphoric youth in the world?
How have both countries been able to keep left-wing citizens vigilantly engaged in defending the gender affirmative model despite so much evidence of harm from around the world?
Logically, how would this be possible without information warfare?
We live in a society where information is global. A localized phenomenon like this has to be curated.
This model is in motion only as a result of omitting the internationally-recognized evidence against it, ensuring that concerned parents cannot access good information, regardless of their political affiliation.
The gender affirmative model is part of a 5G warfare operation camouflaged by a veneer of scientific and academic authority that, when put into the context of information from around the world, comes across as extreme and absurd.
The Tactical Benefits of Displacing Political Ideologies
In 1984, a KGB defector named Yuri Bezmenov gave an interview in which he defined ideological subversion in America:
“What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality … to such an extent that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”
He went on to describe individuals who had become “demoralized” by this process, and completely contaminated by Marxist-Leninist values:
“They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.”
While I’m sure the readers of this article have all encountered people who have become examples of this form of contamination, there is currently an exception to this phenomenon arising within our theatre of war, and we need to take advantage of it.
Detransitioners emerging from the absolute nightmare of becoming so ideologically-captured that they have maimed and potentially sterilized themselves represent an exception to what Bezmenov described.
While they were contaminated to this extent during their years as a “trans youth,” the sheer trauma of their mistakes has in fact changed their “basic perception” and awakened them to “authentic information.”
They are essentially sharing the experience of waking up out of mind control from an extremely poignant and authentic perspective.
This brings me back to my point about the left and the right being intentionally inflamed to avoid unity and networking on this issue.
These detransitioners didn’t emerge into political conservatism; they emerged into free thought.
In the same way, many conservatives who used to be ruled by MSM propaganda that lead us into wars based on false narratives have emerged not into leftism but into the ability to think freely.
This is why my new film CUT, explores the fact that there were exponentially rising rates of teenage girls getting breast augmentation and labiaplasties (cosmetic genital surgery) before and during the trans-craze.
These trends were not initiated by a politically-charged ideology like gender theory, and yet, they encouraged girls to permanently alter their bodies based on trends being handed to them by the MSM, and the normalization of self diagnosis.
Exposing these cosmetic surgery trends alongside the testimony of detransitioners is an invitation to both left and right-wing parents to take a deep and thoughtful look at the daughters of the West.
We are up against an apolitical enemy, which means we have to be able to tactically displace political narratives and identities when they do not serve us.
Groups like Gays Against Groomers are operating outside of the false narrative that claims this is a Gay Vs. Straight issue.
Billboard Chris, a well known activists standing against medically transitioning children has openly received support from droves of left wing citizens.
Tulsi Gabbard leaving the DNC, and interviewing detransitioner Chloe Cole represents yet another apolitical event in this saga.
The point is that our enemy needs this issue to seem political to maintain situational control.
The more we can uncover apolitical elements of this battle, the more we can create networks across the political divide that undermine enemy operations that rely on political division.
Check out www.daughtersofthewestfilm.com, and help me wage 5G warfare by getting this film into the world and breaking the collective into greater awareness outside of the information warfare we have been entrenched within.
For more on this theater of the information war, check out Simon’s work on Substack.
 | A guest post by
|
good article- total khazarian nonsense assaulting kids= we need millstones
This article is so incredibly important because it exemplifies the insidious nature of the woke ideology covertly infiltrating every fibre of our society- it’s not just gender ideology that’s at issue, but our very belief systems that are under attack. My daughter has fallen under the spell of the woke ideology and it’s information like this that might just shatter the illusion of ‘social justice warriors’ the leftists like to pretend they are.