65 Comments
May 16, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

From the Declaration of Independence we derived our "unalienable" rights from our Creator. these include, but are not limited to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

Under the Organic (Original) Constitution of 1787 we were a "Republic" which is a nation with clearly defined rights for the people, strict limits on what government could do, and minority rights were protected just as carefully as majority rights.

After the Civil War, the USA was bankrupt. This bankruptcy was expected ahead of time by the global bankers headquartered in the City of London. So immediately after the Civil War their agents gained access to Congress and removed the original 13th amendment, replaced it with a new 13th amendment and engineered the 14th amendment which "removed" those Rights given by our Creator and replaced them, with the help of Congress changing one letter of one word in the Declaration of Independence, and placed us under a system where it is argued and enforced today as if our rights are granted by Government, not God.

The one letter of one word in the Declaration of Independence that was changed was the removal of a "u" and replaced by an "i" changing the word "unalienable" to "inalienable." A little change that made a tremendous difference. When our rights were "unalienable", root word "lien" and were given by our Creator, see the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, no entity or person could place a lien on our rights. No one entity or person was higher than the Creator who gave us those Rights.

When the "u" was replaced by an "i" it changed the meaning of everything related to our rights. Now the word was "inalienable", root word "alien". What is an "alien?" An alien in a foreigner, someone not a "natural citizen" by birth. To become a "citizen" the "alien" has to go through a process to obtain citizenship and as a result is granted "privileges and immunities" by the government and does not have a claim to "Rights granted by the Creator." (See the 14th amendment for verification).

Then came the Act of Feb. 21, 1871 where Congress created a Corporation, the UNITED STATES. A corporation has to own something so the corporation was given, by Congress, ownership of what we know as Washington D.C.

This owned area of land, being also the site of government that was no longer a Republic, but now a Corporation had the legal effect of changing the President, Vice President and Congress into what today we call the CEO, COO, and Shareholders of a Corporation.

Now the International Bankers of the City of London would loan money to the newly formed corporation the UNITED STATES.

As many of you well know and understand, a Corporation exists for one main purpose, to enrich the CEO, COO and shareholders of the corporation at the expense of those who "rely" upon the corporation for the "goods" the corporation sells-think "protection," policing of professions such as Medicine, Law, Drug companies, etc.

How is the funds borrowed from the International Bankers paid back? It is not all in monthly or yearly payments like we would have to make on a house or car loan. It is by a combination of "control," think passing laws pushed by the international Bankers who, if the laws are not passed will "call" the loans and by a system that is gradually phased in to vacuum all the money possible from the common people, think IRS.

Those of you were adults in the 1980s, do you remember getting the letter from your bank saying you needed to be sure the bank had your correct SSN by a certain date or the bank would have to close your accounts?

Then in the late 1990s the banks switched from returning your canceled checks each month to a system where you had a very small copy of your canceled checks included with your bank statement instead of the actual canceled checks. (Just a copy of the face of the check.)

Now you get a "line item" such as "Check 1224 (of) $345.95 (cleared by the bank on) 5/13/2022.

Did you notice the progression? First be sure the banks have the correct SSN (also needed on your income tax forms). Then you no longer get the canceled checks back, just a small copy of them-front page only. Now you just get a "line item," why?

If you were fortunate, some would say "enough of a pack rat" to save those checks that were canceled and returned to you some 40 years ago AND if you had to write a check to the IRS for taxes owed, you would be able to discover something very interesting.

Instead of the checks to the IRS being stamped on the back "Deposit into the US Treasury" so the tax funds collected could go for the operating expenses of the "US Government" you would find that every one of those checks were stamped on the back "Pay any Federal Reserve Bank."

I can just hear some saying "So what's the big deal? Isn't the Federal Reserve part of our government?" No it is not, it is a "central bank" that is in league with the International Bankers the UNITED STATES keeps borrowing money from.

The IRS is the collection agency for the Federal Reserve which is in league with the International Bankers! You've not been told the truth!

That is just scratching the surface of the deception the Corporate UNITED STATES is engaged in each and every day. You can thank the Politicians who many are Law School Graduates.

FYI, nationally one out of every three Law School Graduated can never pass a Bar Exam and practice Law. What do they do? A large number of them become Politicians, nationally, state, or local Politicians who in a large part pass the laws those of us Law School Graduates who passed a Bar Exam have to deal with to protect each one of you.

By now, many of you should be beginning to see why Politicians have one set o rules (laws) for them and another set of rules for the rest of us. Sometimes stated as "Rules for me and not for thee!"

Become educated, educate others and we will be able to change our country for the better!

and a BIG THANK YOU to Badlands media for the commitment to educate us!

Expand full comment
author

^^This right here is why I always make a shout out to the audience. Absolutely outstanding clarification of the facts at hand. I greatly appreciate your post here. Thank you very much for taking the time to write this!

Expand full comment

Your Welcome, it is great to be able to help!

Expand full comment

Wonderful explanation. I have tried to explain this to other Patriots (forget the Normies) and I just get a look like they want to ask me where my tin foil hat is

Your explanation is concise clear and helpful. Thank you

Expand full comment

Another very interesting part of this is the use of the birth certificate as a "securities trust" I'm still trying to get actual documentation on this. I have a copy of an SEC Form 10; this lists 4 types of securities to be "registered"

Birth Certificate Bond; Individual Surety Bond; International Bills of Exchange; and International Promissory Notes.

'Cestui Que Vie' birth certificate trust, seems to be a form of collateral for the Federal Reserve Inc, and is "held" by Cede & Co. (DTC) Owners of Cede somehow own your record of birth as this "security" through an Allodial instrument. I'm still trying to really figure this thing out, my goal is to find a way to nullify it or gain access to the same level of control over it that the "Multinational Billionaires" do.

Once I really have it figured out, I want to blast that info out to everyone.

Expand full comment

When you get into securities and things like that, I'm lost - my mind does not do well at math at all. However, I did find this from 2013, which was when I began MY journey to knowledge - took me almost to retirement age! I have not vetted this and it is a new source for me but I was aware there is a difference between state and federal citizenship; I also read - can't find that reference at the moment - that there is a process to revert from federal citizen to state citizen only. It has been claimed this is a way to avoid the federal income tax. Again, when it comes to anything with financial connections, I'm a goner!

EXCERPT : "State Citizenship vs Federal Citizenship: This leaves one born in any of the fifty states with options of citizenship. Because each State of the Union has a separate sovereignty from that of the United States government, there are at least two types of citizenship in America. State citizenship and United States citizenship. While most Americans readily and unwittingly claim to be U.S. citizens, the provisions of these two types of American citizenship are distinct from each other. I personally prefer to not use the term citizen at all and use state national instead. Today the term is presumed to mean the US Citizen, to avoid any confusion, one has nationality with their respective nation-state that they were born in and can utilize the title of state national if/as they see fit.

The California Supreme Court makes the clear distinction between the two types of citizenship in Tashiro v. Jordan, 1927, California Supreme Court: “That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country”. (Country=California)"

****https://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/state-citizenship-federal-citizenship/****

Expand full comment

Thanks I'll check it out. I think the term I found somewhere was "American National."

When asked if "I am" a US Citizen, I just say that I "hold a citizenship." It's what I'm doing.... not what I am.

Expand full comment

Amazing that I went thru basic training and served at the Pentagon for 2+ years, yet never truly understood any of this!

Expand full comment

Sometimes the important things hide in plain sight. I only began seeing all this recently, studying all the pseudo legal structures that Kathrine Watt and Sasha Latypova are exposing, in regards to the covid kill box and so called "mandates." I realized that if the Criminal / Government -- Public / Private relationship existed this way for the Medical Industrial Complex; it must surly exist everywhere else too.

"No law is sacred except that of my nature." --- Ralph Waldo Emerson

Expand full comment

I experienced the COVID genocide first-hand - my 50 year old son was murdered at a hospital in SC when they followed the protocol and put him on a ventilator 2 years ago last September - it followed the usual progression: ventilator, Remdesivir, kidney failure, sporadic dialysis, continuous dialysis, coma, brain death - all in less than 5 days; my 35 year old daughter also died partially at the hands of the medical community - a so-called "pain doctor" got her hooked on Fentanyl patches instead of arranging for the spinal stimulus implant she needed. The pain and all the drugs they had her on simply overwhelmed her, along with her other mental/emotional/alcohol issues. He never ONCE tested her alcohol level!

My 89 year old Mom, having long had COPD and high blood pressure, as well as clotting problems, got COVID in November 2019 and I went and stayed with her in her tiny 1 BR apartment to take care of her - getting up at midnight to set up her nebulizer, putting ointment on her shingles (which she never had until she got the vaccine), etc.. She ended up in the hospital 5 days later when she simply couldn't breath any more and was in and out of hospitals; the hospital here, where she was supposed to have 9 days of physical therapy to get her strength back, was horrendous! She arrived on a Thursday afternoon, had therapy on Friday - nothing Saturday or Sunday - Monday morning they "evaluated" her and sent her home. Turns out she had a blood clot in her leg and pneumonia by then. But we pulled her thru it and were able to celebrate her 90th that next July. And she's still kicking, believe it or not! We're some tough old broads!!! I only wore a mask when I was required to at medical facilities and/or pharmacies for her. I haven't had a vaccine in years, since my tetanus booster around 5 years ago, and will never have another one. I am fine, never had COVID - I had surgery for skin cancer removal and they tested me - no antibodies.

Expand full comment

Under the organic Constitution there were no "privileges and immunities" but instead "unalienable right given by the Creator" that government could not touch or change.

Note please, the wording of the California Supreme Court in your last paragraph above: "..., and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other..."

What you are seeing in that phrase is "legal double talk" meant to satisfy the masses.

In 1927 the United States was really a corporation known as the UNITED STATES (all caps to show it's corporation status) yet courts, politicians and many legal professionals hid that fact of corporation from the "masses" by subterfuge such as not spelling United States in all caps. since the US was a corporation at that time, it also meant that each Stae was a (sub) corporation of the Iparent) corporation the UNITED STATES.

in 1927 it had been some 46 years since 1871 and the forming of the Corporate UNITED STATES and it was relatively easy to pull the wool over the eyes of people.

You are correct that Country+California. Country also, legally, equals any State, not just California.

Expand full comment
May 17, 2023·edited May 17, 2023

Thanks for the confirmation. The capital letters in our legal name on DL, SS card, BC, etc., etc., is also an indication that we are the "property" of the UNITED STATES Corporation, according to my understanding. I have links to one or two - maybe more - cute videos explaining some of this in fun, humorous, uncomplicated ways. Also about the Natural Born Citizen requirement in our Constitution - it is claimed that the 14th Amendment "eliminated" that requirement. Au contraire, my friend! Not at all, at all! "The Three-Legged Stool"

Expand full comment

Congrats on knowing about the all caps on the DL, SS card, BC etc. You are way ahead of many!

The so called 14th Amendment was a necessary and facially UnConstitutional Amendment that is void from its inception according to an 1802 SCOTUS case Marbary v. Madison where anything thing that is unconstitutional is void "ab inito" or from its beginning or inception.

Expand full comment

It is my understanding that "soon" the Birth Certificate scam will be made plain and there is a good chance that funds generated from your Birth Certificate will be returned to you. I can not guarantee this 100%.

It is, to my understanding, a part of NESARA which will replace the Fiat US Dollar which is backed by nothing except a "promise" that it is has value above the roughly 3.5 cents it takes to print one.

Expand full comment

That's interesting. I wasn't aware that there was any money there; I had a sense that it was more about a method to "back" the fiat. So I suppose that it is true that the treasure of a nation is quite literally the people.

Expand full comment

I can see the light bulb going off inside your head. You have done an excellent job of putting that fact together. As they say in math, 2+2 still equals 4!

Expand full comment
May 17, 2023·edited May 17, 2023

I've also been following NESARA and, again, have a number of links saved. Between you and me? I no longer have any confidence in that actually happening or, at this point, that it is even factual. But, then, I've become seriously skeptical in the last months - about everything. I'm simply fed up and sooo tired of this battle that too many people are STILL ignoring!

Expand full comment

I hear what you are saying about NESARA. However, remember history, specifically WWII history.

After the allies gained a foothold on the Normandy beaches on June 6, 1944 it was apparent that Germany would not prevail in Europe. No one knew the time frame between June 6, 1944 and VE Day in Europe. Also, no one could have predicted that during the winter of 1944/45 the allies would encounter problems in the Ardennes Forest, i.e, The Battle of the Bulge which was the last German attempt to save the Fatherland.

Now apply that lesson from WWII to today's battle we've been talking about. With over 70% of the world's countries already on a gold/silver standard, (think BRICs nations and those who have joined them) plus even Texas talking about moving to a gold/silver backed currency which is the only Constitutional currency, the battle to remain "fiat" such as the Federal Reserve fiat US PETRO dollar will not be able to compete globally with a gold/silver backed currency. NESARA will win out and the fiat dollar will lose-we just don't know the exact date that will happen, but it will! Don't let discouragement drag you down.

Expand full comment

Outstanding! Much, much better than I did with my brief explanation! Soooo nice to "see" someone who knows about this!! So very few do these days! I've been telling people for years but I'm not as good on the details as you.

Expand full comment

You’ve succinctly explained how we got to where are. Jekyll island. Now I clearly understand why lawyers were 1of 2 classes prevented from living there (history teacher tour guide). Taken the same tour several times since the late 90s and that fact has not been included again.

Expand full comment

What a brilliant article. Pointing out the obfuscations of our global patronizing leadership. It is no wonder that justice is in a state of quandary. (And just to be clear, I would appreciate the dropping of all the legalese in legal documents of every kind)

Expand full comment

I have felt for some time now that those tasked to write our laws must do so with a quill pen as it would go a long way to eliminating the verbal diarrhea of our current system.

Expand full comment

Great essay. In essence they have eviscerated the US Constitution and the Deep State has weaponized Lawfare against us Anti-Globalists.

The mass invasion (e.g., migration) has nothing to do with Climate Change and everything to do with imposing slavery on every country on planet Earth. The point is destabilization of the US, Canada, and the EU. This is being engineered by filling the boat (e.g., nation) with so many immigrants that it results in a societal collapse. Same the Electric Vehicles which make no damn sense either. The point is to make them disposable (new battery 15 to 35 thousand dollars) and unaffordable which then make the public dependent on mass transit and autonomous vehicles which they will not own.

If you actually printed out my latest essay it is about 46 pages long. So don't do that. Instead take a few hours, or days, to fully assimillate the essay, the videos and the links to related articles. If you do I am confident you will reach the following conclusions I have.

* There is no Anthropogenic Climate Change (man made) and spending 50 Trillion to reduce CO2, Nitrogen etc. will do absolutely nothing.

* Electric Cars, Trucks, Ovens, etc. will also do nothing for the environments since they rely on fossil fuels to provide the electricity. Neither will Windmills and Solar Panels. What all of this will do is advantage China, who will eventually invade our country. After all all of these technologies, minerals, patents are controlled by China.

* The "Green Agenda" is not really about controlling the Climate. It is about controlling you. You are actually the Carbon they want to reduce.

Climate Change, the Mass Invasion of our Southern Border, the Plandemic etc. have all been perpetrated by Globalist Oligarchs in order to enslave every human on planet Earth. I am not smart enough to solve all these problems but that is not going to stop me from trying. Because if we don't rise up now we will all be nothing but slaves on a Global Plantation. Perhaps the most insidious part of the Globalist's plan is a Digital Currency, which is in fact the Mark of the Beast made real: a mark you must have to buy or sell.

The Globalist Oligarchs are powerful but small in numbers. The good people of planet Earth are many. We must unite where we can and end their rule before they turn all of us into slaves. All of us is all we need. Rise up.

To Globalist Traitors -- Biden, Dingell, Whitmer and Granholm: Stop EV Production in the US Now!

Village Idiot Biden and his Merry Band of Climate Change Retards

https://brucecain.substack.com/p/to-globalist-traitors-biden-dingell

Expand full comment
author

Fun fact: CO2 not only helps plants grow, but it's also been shown that nose-breathing helps the body retain slightly more CO2 within itself, which enhances and sharpens the morphology of the body (for example, nose-breathing while working out will lead to a more "toned" look). The fact that CO2 helps plants and humans alike attain peak form is extremely telling... what would happen if we sequestered all the CO2 from the atmosphere? Assuming we don't die from it, we'd probably just turn into blobs.

Yes, we are being invaded. "Refugees" should at least mean families—ie. women and children and what-have-you. But what we're seeing are almost nothing but fighting aged men, sexual slaves (I forget where I heard this so I don't have the link at hand, but they found a 6 year old girl who had the DNA of 57 men inside of her), and paid actors of various sort. What's happening is vile beyond description, and every single subhuman golem enabling it ought to be loaded into a rocket and shot directly into the sun.

My 2 cents, at least.

I look forward to reading your substack. Cheers!

Expand full comment

I live up in Michigan and have been growing my own Cannabis for about 15 years now. It is well known that supplementing indoor grows with CO2 can increase yields by up to 20% and CO2 only constitutes .04% of what we know as air. When I ran for Congress (1996) I had 3 planks: Stop offshoring jobs/factories to China, a 20 year moratorium on both Legal/Illegal Immigration and legalizing adult Cannabis cultivation. Surely most Americans wish someone listened to me 27 years ago. Gee might have averted a direct war with China which may well be in the cards. And thanks for bringing up the 8 year old. I found a link to that one.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-kari-lake-us-border-girl-raped-67-men-1795669

Expand full comment
May 16, 2023·edited May 17, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

“The Deep State requires our collective ignorance to operate unopposed.”

Perhaps the overwhelming size of our government had the slight of hand trick of hypnotizing it’s citizens into a level of apathy. In our more prosperous decades, we happily left the complexities to one Party or another, trusting our elections…every 4 years things would balance. Begs the question (in light of the present day): How long have our elections been manipulated to serve the emerging DeepState?

So very much was snuck in under the radar of intelligent Americans who trusted the Rule of Law.

We are waking up now to the fact that a Criminal Syndicate is running the country.

Criminals do not care about The Law.

The Criminal Syndicate, like the Mafia, does not care about our Laws.

I enjoyed reading your article. I think most of us have recognized that unethical lawyers have, over time, added multiple layers of complexities to our laws…until here we are, the Criminal Syndicate, in the corruption of our DOJ, FBI, CIA, DHS, the current illegitimate man playing President, care absolutely nothing about our Laws. They are not going to investigate, arrest, and take themselves to trial.

The Military is the only way.

After that and going forward, you are right!

“To restore America—and all nations—a renaissance in civic awareness is required.” ❤️🇺🇸

Expand full comment

Interesting how the percentage of lawyer to other career has exponentially increased over the last 30-60 years. Hmmm... that’s likely what makes up the 3-letter bureaucratic state in DC. This will be changing, however.

Expand full comment

Your comment got me wondering why there are so many lawyers in Congress and government. I wandered through a few articles and liked this one:

https://tylersuarez.medium.com/why-are-there-so-many-lawyers-in-congress-db0e5dd19848

“The higher the share of lawyers in a national legislature, the more unequal the society.”

“I shouldn’t have to go to law school to understand my country and the laws that are contained within it. Laws should not be meant to only be communicated and understood by lawyers.”

“Lawyers are not typical Americans. Lawyers contribute to inequalities and shape the inner-workings of Congress, producing a legalistic, procedural-oriented government”

It is a good essay that compliments this substack. One factor is that candidates with a law background win more often than other career backgrounds because lawyers are better at networking for fundraising!

“In America, money in politics feeds a vicious cycle — funding campaign costs, decreasing competition, increasing political reliance on a small portion of society — that eats away at the representation of the average voter. The winners of this sad cycle are clear. They get to hold on to their seats; wealthy donors get to keep influencing public policy to their own benefit. The rest of us, however, find ourselves increasingly alienated from the political sphere.”

Have a great day, ALtab ❤️🇺🇸🦅

Expand full comment

Featherjourney, that’s an excellent article. Likely the people of Savannah clearly understand that back in the 1700s, hence the decision to ban them. Interesting that the vast majority of lawyers are always Dems. Explains a lot about the progressive corruption in the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party’s (finally 🤔) achieved the same level of corruption. It’s primarily the corruption of morals and ethics (foundation of the rule of law, right?). I considered law, so worked as a paralegal for 2 years for a district attorney. Abandoned the plan when I saw the corruption at the local level. This does clearly help us understand why we need to clean government and start over. We need to put God back in place and look to Him, then all the rest will follow, including the rule of law! A whole lot of attorneys are going to be out of work. Have a great day and God bless you.🙏

Expand full comment

“ It’s primarily the corruption of morals and ethics (foundation of the rule of law, right?) YES!!

Books could, and likely have been and will be, written on how we, as a Nation, strayed so far from the values established at our founding and strayed so far from the virtues that keep us on the path of living lives that honor our Creator and each other.

I think you would like this site, ALtab…

https://www.virtuesproject.com/

God Bless you, ALtab ❤️

Expand full comment

The Next Stage in the University Battles: Break Up the Universities!

https://tomklingenstein.com/the-next-stage-in-the-university-battles-break-up-the-universities/

Expand full comment

That is an interesting read. Thanks

Expand full comment

I agree.

Expand full comment
May 17, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

I'm sitting here with my attorney husband and he listened to this with me over dinner and doesn't believe that the US is or was ever a Corporation....can you please send me information and links to back up that America is/was incorporated? I need to win this battle :-)

Expand full comment
author

There are many different types of "United States"—a corporation being one version of it. It's a bit like if you had 2 friends named Billy Bob. It's the same name but two different entities (as of yet I'm not sure how many "United States" there are... but I can point to at least two of them).

Anyways, to prove that a corporate United States exists, check out item 15(a) at this link: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

It says it right there in plain english that "United States" refers to a federal corporation.

As an aside, one thing I've noticed through studying hypnosis is that "hypnotic deletion" of sensory material can indeed take place when one is confronted with something that runs completely contrary to ones belief system. It may be the case that, due to his training, your husband is literally unable to see citation—as in, not even trying to be difficult, but literally can't see it. "Hypnotic blindness" is far more common than most realize.

In any event, a persuasive maneuver might be to say something like "I know the United States usually thought of as a country [this is known in the hypno-world as a "pacing" statement, which basically means your affirming a person's present experience], but what if that's not the whole picture? [non-committal language helps people ease into new ideas] All I'm saying is that it says right here that it's a corporation [now you've presented the fact to him, without any need for him to make anything in particular out of it, which also helps people begin to expand their belief systems to be able to cognize new information]"

You know your husband better than I do, but thought I'd throw in my 2 cents.

Cheers and best of luck to ya!

Expand full comment

Thank you thank you! This is wonderful information. I'm going to print this off from Cornell. And just the information you provide on human psychology can be used in lots of ways. So thank you again!

Expand full comment

I had to use the way-back machine to find this - I first learned about this in 2013:

***https://web.archive.org/web/20150711203107/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k***

Expand full comment
May 17, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

It is my understanding that the US became a "corporation" with the signing of the Act of 1871, making DC the center of the federal government. I had to use the wayback machine to find it - the original can't be found any more (by FederalJack, IIRC). Hope links like this are ok - feel free to delete if not!

Video: District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto formed 1

****https://web.archive.org/web/20150711203107/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k****

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for the link—will look into asap.

Expand full comment
founding
May 16, 2023·edited May 16, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

A simple set of suggestions, if we can first manage to get rid of the '250 years of constitutional jurisprudence' starting with Marbury v Madison, and all subsequent laws:

1. No bill in Congress may be more than ten pages long, nor may it address more than one issue. (California has this sort of requirement for ballot referenda, presumably because the Populace cannot be expected to understand anything more complex. I posit to you, fair reader, that a similar observation may be made of legislators, since they are on average no more or less intelligent than the general population.)

2. No bill may give any non-elected person or persons the authority to write regulations with the power of law. All laws which may be enforced against any US Person (n.b. this includes corporations) must have been duly passed into law by Congress and the President per Article 1, Section 7 of the US Constitution. (Most of the regulatory morass we face these days is in fact written by agencies like the EPA and IRS.)

3. No budget shall be passed which does not balance. Any unintended deficit must be made up prior to any appropriation being made in the next fiscal period. Neither the United States, nor any State, shall have the power to borrow or encumber the Population with any sort of future obligations.

4. No tax may be laid on income of any sort, nor on wealth. The Federal Government may lay a sales tax on the final retail sale of all new goods and services, not to exceed 5% (see fairtax.org for how to do this -- no exemptions, which would require an 'exemption agency' with the resulting rent-seeking (i.e. corrupt) potential such power would inevitably entail).

5. Get rid of all executive departments, agencies etc. except for those existing initially: War (Defense), State, Treasury and Justice. (This is who George Washington had, just four members, in his Cabinet: Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of War Henry Knox, and Attorney General Edmund Randolph.)

6. Feel free to add to this list, it is just a starting point.

Expand full comment
author

I like your thinking, Bill.

Expand full comment

Hi Wild Bill ! 🙋🏼‍♂️

This would be an appealing and powerful conservative political/electoral program I'd enjoy to be offered here in France (and in the whole European Union as well)!

Could you send a copy to our Macron for helping him ? 😁😉

https://insolentiae.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Macron-casserole.jpg

🙏🏻✝️🇺🇲🕊️🇫🇷

Expand full comment

Excellent!

Expand full comment
May 17, 2023Liked by American Hypnotist

You wrote: "The fact of the matter is that there are multiple entities that call themselves “the United States”; the system is playing linguistic shell games—aka, games wherein the meanings of words are surreptitiously redefined in such a way as to attach “hidden” meanings in familiar words. This, in essence, creates a “dual” language where one may think that the words they speak mean one thing, and yet the system will presume (often without telling you!) that they mean something else."

This dual Language is the a very telling feature of the Dragon Bloodline Families or Bavarian Illuminati. Some of the research I have done, points to the presence of very exclusive bloodline defined families that have been a the center of this "Corporatization," from before the colonies broke away from the British Empire. As with most of this stuff, it is very multilayered and by design, meant to be "Hidden."

Something does stand out to me when "Dual Language" is mentioned. The ruling structure of the Khazarian Khagnate was a dual structure; also, much of the "heraldry" found on various coats of arms through out Europe where the Order of the Garter have influence, always feature either a double eagle, or double dragon. With a dual control system there is a public "face" or Facade (what we normally think of as our 'Republic'), then there is the real controllers behind the curtain. [Double Eagle] Biden is DEFINITELY a puppet, but all the politicians are.

Here are some links to two of my articles on the Dragon Bloodlines there will be more coming.

https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/dragon-court-a-history-of-symbolism

https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/dragon-court-and-the-order-of-the

The way I see the issue of the "legal system," is that it should be a structural set of "social agreements." These agreements should never be too arbitrary from what I call "Natural Law." Common Law could be considered one step down from natural law; the actual application of our "Constitution for these states united," (lower case intended) can be considered an enshrinement of natural law where all Individually Sovereign Beings are able to agree to interact, without the interference of Arbitrarily Superior Legal Structures. So, Laws are only "Social Agreements."

There is one other aspect to view the of role Individual Sovereignty and this nullifies Arbitrary Hierarchy; each Individual is their own master. To expand on this concept I used an important linguistic connection to the Eternal Being within each of us:

Let's start with some linguistics used for declaration of being. The same expression can be found in every language in and from every age: This is the porthole of, "I am.” When viewed from other languages; especially some of the ancient ones, this is extremely profound.

Note: that “porthole” refers to a connection between physical and non-physical reality of being. A very significant portion of what we are is NOT physical, it is Energy.

In the Bible, God said through the burning bush: "I am that I am.”

Government attempts to restrict Sovereignty to gain control over Individuals by coercion of use of “I am.” Linguistic Manipulation becomes Psychological Entanglement and Obedience.

When we use language that addresses "I am" to (a subject) in this case, "citizenship" we are addressing ourselves within a linguistic constraint; tethering the infinite condition of a sovereign being directly to a conditional, legally defined fictional entity. Which is then controlled by the issuing entity; Depository Trust Corporation under the legal umbrella of the United States Incorporated. Through issuance and control of birth certificates, the citizen becomes legal collateral to the Bank of International Settlements, this creates ipso facto guarantorship for every living human being who holds a “citizenship.”

Here is a link to my article on Individualized Sovereignty:

https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/individualized-sovereignty-and-political

Expand full comment
author

Wow! This is outstanding research. Thanks very much for posting this.

I've been looking through some old Westminster statutes and see that the grammar used to refer to the "United States" or "united states of America" and so on seems to change quite drastically from statute to statute to treaty, etc... These can't be the same entity. Indeed, I'm starting to think there are as many as 4 or 5 different versions of the "US", and each one operates in it's own unique jurisdiction, all of which pretend to be the same jurisdiction (more or less).

My current working hypothesis is that we made an attempt to free ourselves that never truly came to fruition—likely due to a combination of legal illiteracy (which is by design) combined with the presence of snakes and traitors amongst the founding fathers. I hesitate to give names only because I'm still piecing together the picture, however Jefferson noted many times in his private journals that the federalists entire goal was to "reunite our fate with that of Great Britain", which appears exactly to have been what occurred (assuming the countries ever split apart to begin with).

At most, we might have had a year or so of genuine independence—but probably not even that. The "freedom" we're told we have is nothing more than a propaganda set piece designed to thwart accurate perception of our true circumstances. The way I see it, the American Dream has yet to come to fruition at all.

Expand full comment

I'm just happy to see that I'm not alone in this perspective. My research is dedicated to exposure of the International Criminal Cabal, you are showing part of what I refer to as the hard infiltration. The pseudo legal structures that most law is based on, is a self feeding and self maintaining system.

What really made me see it, is Kathrine Watt's research on the plandemic covid scam. Almost all law is linguistic sensitive.

Even the word "government" is: govern = control and ment at the end of a word refers to mind; so it means mind control.

I look forward to more of your articles, mapping out the Parasitic Globalist Syndicate takes the effort of everyone.

Expand full comment

WOW !! 🤔😲

I would never have gone so far ...

Expand full comment

We have a system that is of, by and for lawyers. Word cleverness rules.

Expand full comment

Laws created for a personal or particular whim or fashioned to create power or wealth, rather than build on Natural, God given Rights, and authority given by the governed.

Expand full comment

IOM. {UN}.

International Organization for Migration.

Amy Pope, Director General

(Listen freakin' up).

([Their] bringin' an army in).

*

"This is how [THEY OPERATE]."

"It's An Invasion."

"The Plan..."

(among others, & US).

~ Tore Maras

15 May 2023

https://rumble.com/ToreSays

Expand full comment

I have noticed, and Redacted pointed out, that it is mostly young, fit men who are crossing the border and being bussed under cover of darkness to God knows where all over the nation. I like Tore Says and will listen to her talk that you linked. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Sounds very much like whats happened in oztrailya.. They brought in the Australia Act in 1973 which shifted our consititution without a referendum of the people .. NOW they're starting race wars just like old soros and his lot told them too..

Expand full comment

Nice ice breaker, A.H. Hopefully this ‘soft sell’ will help some otherwise timid citizens to realize that there are ‘games afoot’ and fully activate their radar from now on.

Expand full comment

"why do we need lawyers?" To strut around like bantam roosters. The truth is we don't really need them, but we are too busy to learn every nuance of law. We're okay with most. Lawyers especially those who feel entitled are hiding from the as they call it "Missing 13th amendment." You can probably still find it on the internet.

Expand full comment

What do YOU think? Should we use this or the one we have now which is common sense?

Expand full comment

Hi Rob ! 🙋🏼‍♂️🇫🇷

There's no such choice in France ... But I'm a fierce defender of our common sense (in French, we rather use "good sense")!

For illustration, this expression was used by "Crédit Agricole" one of our major banks decades ago:

https://images.moneyvox.fr/i/media/03i/003501i7d6.jpg

Translation: "Common sense near to you"

🙏🏻✝️🇫🇷🕊️🇺🇲

Expand full comment

My thought is this, you have common sense or the thirteenth amendment we have presently, who doesn't know slavery? I'm not living in the past. So why not bring up the Missing 13th Amendment? In short it says "No entitled BARister shall hold office," And what are Dems"

Expand full comment

-- AAAA M E N ... !!!!!!!!

Expand full comment