Ashe -- thank you for your commentary on the mail in ballot decision. We, the people, need to stand up now and act with the power of the people.
The founding fathers set up our government to have a series of checks and balances to keep government "honest" so to speak. As I read of the SCOTUS rulings, it seems that this is a restoration of some checks and balances. Maybe I'm wrong, but that is how I see it.
Eastern Europe -- this looks like a bunch of toddlers trying to learn how to protect their toys. Proves that NATO really is a paper tiger. Had each country actually participated in NATO over all these years, then this nonsense wouldn't be happening.
Gotta love reading about the crazy world we live in. Let the exposure continue at all levels.
Bleighv05, you're right about the Euro mess. US "oversight" and support has infantilized the leadership in many countries around the world. The eagle kept the chicks in the nest for too long.
Isn’t this what the Act of 1871 set into motion? Gold was still backing our currency then, but over the years the new system evolved. In 1913 the FED was invented but still had no real power. That changed in 1933 when FDR outlawed Gold ownership and in 1935 he introduced our entitlement business into the government’s bag of tricks.
All we need to do is to graph the national debt since 1913. Look at what is happening to the curve! It is accelerating in its rate of growth. It starts at a growth rate of just 1% per year and by 2020 it was over 8% per year. GDP isn’t keeping up with our debt growth. This is a formula destined to end in bankruptcy. And, I would argue it is by design to recapture America for the Crown. Since 1776 war is the key! The UK lost the fighting war but they have never stopped fighting the economic war. Socialism versus Capitalism is the war and it isn’t won yet.
E.M. Burlingame asserts in an interview with Rich does Politics that the City is coming for the monarchy. He gives a history of the monarchy starting with the beheading of Charles I 400 years ago. Would love any feedback if you are interested in watching it. Talks about the English Constitution, how the monarchy is supposed to protect the rights of the common man, common law.
Ashe, I agree completely that, while the mail-in ballot decision was disappointing at first blush, the Court argued reasonably on the Constitution's requirements. Congress can fix this, and must. The politicization of the SCOTUS has been a direct result of Congress' expectation the Court would do what our elected legislators were afraid to tackle.
That makes what Trump is doing in Iran make total sense. The UK got what they wanted by blockading the Strait and Trump has used the exact same tactic to get them out of Persia!
The world needs Persia back without the influence of the City of London. I think we are seeing this happen today.
In many ways this is what happened with America starting in 1609 in Jamestown. At that time Spain, France and England had carved up America for their benefit. The Eastern U.S. was put into the hands of The Virginia Company and The Hudson Bay Company for development of our resources. The land was given away in exchange for the future assets that would be exported to England. Oil wasn’t a prized commodity back then except for whale oil which we were soon exporting.
America screwed up the game in 1776 and the City of London has never given up on getting us back under their control. I just pray we keep them at bay. In 2017 we were fast falling back under their power, but Trump is not going to have that conclusion to our story.
Yes! This is the article I was referencing in my reply to Feather. That was the story I have known about for decades. She put it all together in a way no one else has before now.
1. I hope U.S. Treasury boss Bessent cleans Neville Roy Singham's clock. But a "Federal Grand Jury in MANHATTAN!?!?!???" Puleeeze. New York City is CommieTown now. They are all for anything that harms the United States.
2. According to the grandmotherly ladies at Promethean Action, the modern-day construct of middle-eastern conflict began with the Balfour Declaration (1917) and other manipulations of politics, boundaries and resources in that part of the world–all managed by British Intelligence and The City of London. The English have been playing global hardball ever since they defeated the Spanish Armada and Napoleon. It’s the great game, and the English have been running the table for a long time. President DJT has taken strong exception to English bossiness. He’s been standing them off pretty much singlehandedly. If Trump can get Thune out of the way and get the Save America Act passed, DJT’s crusade against the globalist\imperialist regime will be strengthened immeasurably.
Significant historical side-note: Christopher Steele, the British MI6 agent who brought the Russia Hoax to America? Mr. Steele knew exactly who to schmooze to get that ball rolling: Redneck Rhodes Scholar Willie Jeff Clinton along with his Chicago Communist wife.
The long game is a lot longer than we've been led to believe for the past hundred years or so. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the Balfour Declaration in Palestine both kicked off, a week apart, in November, 1917, one year before the Armistice of November 1918 which ended WW-One.
The Promethean Action Grandmothers are about as fed up as a body can be with the City of London, Chatham House and our own British-run Council on Foreign Relations. Search for youtubes from Promethean Action. You will be glad you did. No kidding.
I have voted by absentee ballot since the mid 90's. With the job I had, which was 25 miles, and 45 minutes away, it was always hard to get out to vote. In order to get an absentee ballot, I had to provide proof of who I was. That meant, 3 forms of ID to include a gas and electric bill with my name on it. So if they are talking about absentee ballots and the conditions for getting one are the same, counting during election plus 5 days is not overwhelming. In Ca that would be a stand up and cheer victory. I believe they are still counting primary ballots.
The US and Iran…and the whole MiddleEast…is certainly interesting theater!! Taking down a very old system that perpetuates unending managed conflict vs the American System
“The American system is like a great piece of art still in progress” ~ Mike Steger
Did you read Vivify's recent article on Persia? It gave a very good timeline of events on the history of Iran/Persia and the machinations in play since the discovery of oil.
I believe I also replied in the comments on her post. The only issue I had was her mention of the killing of Osama bin Laden. Other rabbit holes have reported he died years before, from kidney failure?, and the claim he was buried according to Islamic tradition by burial at sea was a total lie. They might have dumped a body into the sea, but that is not Islamic tradition. And I don't believe it was bin Laden's body.
I like her writing and her determination to tackle deep dives on current understanding with historical context…but she relies heavily on AI and I myself have found contradictions in different AI!!
Which is why I wondered if her view added up to your take 😉
I believe she uses AI for grammar and to see how far she can push the machine. I think her opinions were formed from personal experiences and gut instincts. She writes what she believes to be true, and if you have tried to follow her on a live interview, her speaking skills are really difficult to follow, so I am glad she uses AI to clean up her writing. That said, the bots push back on her bold writing and display of truth, softening her words and intended meanings so that she brings the receipts and makes them collapse against her arguments. I watched her with Rich just last night defending her take on slavery.
Note: the ai transcription which was provided was terrible so I am glad I had previously read and understood her position before watching the interview.
So I don't think she uses AI to do her writing. Or help her form opinions. She's a David with a slingshot taking down the programming of the machine, aka Goliath. That's how I understand it. Maybe I'm wrong.
I like her posts very much. I don’t listen though, as I do find her difficult to understand.
That said, if I compare her to Promethean, she falls a little short…Vivify offered no bibliography and sources for her post on Iran/Persia.
Promethean gives extensive source references and the Ladies have been deeply immersed in politics since way before the internet. They cite books and news media for their newsletters, as well as active participation for decades.
I like it that Vivify starts (in her own mind) asking questions and then follows the threads for answers and the overall picture. Because she has integrity, her “gut instincts” are valuable but I don’t automatically believe everything she writes…in her favor, I don’t myself look up everything either! ⏳⌛️ ❤️🌟
BB is always a wonderful source of food for thought.
Congress and the Uniparty.
Of course we need term limits, otherwise it becomes a career profession replete with perks (that cost taxpayers around 1Billion a year), alongside a great salary, a retirement pension that increases with years “in service”…top healthcare insurance that average Americans don’t get…on and on.
Who is the invisible enemy? Congress, so different from what service to one’s country meant when our country was younger.
It’s our responsibility to impose term limits via our votes, although our track record has not been good, even before the massive election fraud. Once that is fixed, actual term limits set in law would be a good deterrent, however. (Understanding human nature.)
I would agree that we can't put the cart before the horse. CA implemented term limits some time ago and it made things worse. We have been gaslit for years that "well, it's what you voted for!" No. It's a cheat.
Are you sure? I was looking it up and it seems it has to be an amendment passed by Congress.
“Article V of the Constitution requires either a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress or a convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states), followed by ratification by three-fourths of states (38 states)
Term limits is favored high across party lines…and gets onto ballot amendments in different states numerous times…
AI: “Votes alone cannot impose congressional term limits because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995) that states cannot enforce term limits on federal representatives; only a constitutional amendment can establish them”
I don’t understand how it can actually be that way! How do we get term limits??
Honest election system…then ‘we the people’ impose term limits through our votes, but I concur we additionally need Congress to legally establish them. Once we clean out the traitors there.😏🇺🇸🇺🇸
The SCOTUS decision yesterday was a straightforward win for federalism and the Constitution: elections are primarily administered by the States under the Elections Clause. SCOTUS refused to let federal law invent new restrictions Congress never wrote, returning power where it belongs instead of imposing one-size-fits-all micromanagement from Washington. Common sense and the text of the law prevailed. this was another ploy by the democrats to get the SCOTUS to do the job of congress.
It correctly recognizes that federal election-day statutes set the day for voting, not a rigid National receipt deadline that overrides State rules.
And the post office has the right to refuse to deliver them, or do they? The SC punted in this, and Congress has shown disinterest in legislating ever since FDR's progressive agenda (they invented the administrative state): it now boils down to whether rogue states like Colorado can force the Post Office to do something the Executive Branch prohibits it from doing. In other words, do states have the authority to run elections in a way that changes election results that impact OTHER states?
The SC did do something that rogue states do not like: the President has absolute authority over the administrative state. IMO, it made the right decision regarding the Federal Reserve, because it was created through an act of Congress with no oversight. Question for all those who have dug rabbit holes: is the Post Office also one of these agencies? We have all read about various Postmaster Generals planting flags to assert sovereignty over the corporation. If so, does President Trump have the authority to tell the Post Office not to deliver mail-in ballots? We heard some time ago about the Post Office's patent on the quantum voting system. Why the Post Office? Is it also independent like the Federal Reserve?
What would happen if the a district judge said that the Post Office had to deliver mail in ballots as long as someone kept putting in mail in ballots into a post box? This is turning out to be a showdown between rogue judges who report to the bankrupt corporation, run by the City of London, with its resurrected three time figurehead of King Charles III and the President who now runs the Republic (notice the flags now have no gold fringes-no longer under Admiralty Law): a government at war with itself parts optically controlled by the City of London, and parts under the Republic.
If you see this and realize that the City of London created Israel under the Balfour Agreement, you begin to see more clearly why this comedy show is playing out the way it is: Congress reporting to Israel, who was created by the City of London, various states with loyalty to the corporation and others (mostly red states) loyal to the Republic represented by President Trump, who declared independence in 2020 and guess who is stuck in the middle? The Supreme Court. If you ever wondered why judges continue to defy the SC, this is why. The District judges were created by Congress and only Congress can dissolve them. Using this argument, the President can say FU to the injunctions and do it anyway and he has on many occasions. This also explains lawfare, because attorneys report to the Crown. BAR stands for BRITISH Accredited Registry. Even though you pay them, they don't represent you because the court system is under Admiralty Law.
ICONS2020 telegram channel has numerous documents on how he successfully challenged the local authorities (I believe he lives in New York) when they tried to do things to his property that were done or attempting to do without his consent. It matters what you say because merely saying "I do not consent" is insufficient. But getting back to the issue: knowing that this is the issue and we are ALL brainwashed to believe that the corporation is the legitimate government, how can the President play this out knowing that Congress won't do anything and that the Administrative state is under the absolute authority of the President? Is Trump still the CEO of the corporation and if not who is? Is Trump engineering a hostile takeover? Or has he taken over and now dealing with managers who can't be fired but won't comply? What does a corporation do with them (or asked a better way-how does the CEO fire them)?
For those who worked in large corporations that have experienced hostile takeovers, much of what you see is more like window office machinations rather than actual warfare. We live on sovereign territory (never under the corporation) but every time we get a driver's license, get our dogs jabbed, pay property taxes, or even file a tax return, we are telling the corporation that we think governs us that we comply with their ridiculous rules, when we live on land that does NOT fall under their jurisdiction, just like a job with a corporation. They have rules regarding social media posts because they own the brand, but are in shakier grounds when regulating our off hours behavior.
Isn’t this why Trump is attacking the problem from a totally different direction? He pokes at the internal government problems to point them out and bring attention to them. But the main battle is with the behind the scenes driving forces.
Congress with its deficit spending is bankrupting America by using the FED’s credit card. Trump cannot change that mess, but he can totally redesign it. I just hope I am seeing this correctly.
To me, the bottom line is in creating a solid currency. The Constitution calls for a currency backed by Gold and Silver, but since 1933 our government has chosen to ignore the Constitution. By 1968 they took out the Silver. And in 2026 they took away Copper which was never considered a precious metal. But they had to take it away because taking away Gold and Silver created crazy inflation that has caused a penny to be worth three cents!
My friends, this is not complex. It is being played out in front of us but no one is explaining the true problem! And, the solution isn’t complex either. Watch Gold, Silver, and Oil. As they come down in price, the dollar is getting more valuable because one dollar buys more. This is the opposite of inflation and everyone is better off. Well, everyone except the manipulators of our currency.
This battle is 250 years old. Trump didn’t start it, but he is dedicated to finishing it in 2026. To me that is our real story.
There is much more to this than meets the eye. We know the traitors are in all areas, including Congress and the SC. BTW: I personally listed to NPR for about 15 minutes while in our travels ( a week ago) and after the program, the narrator announced the donations to the program and key was the USPS. What is that about??
These is much more to this! Keep on asking the questions, Eileen!!👏👏
Oh excellent take. There are things to follow up on here. One of the things I'd (figuratively) kill for is a solid book(-like thing) on how admiralty law bears on and has developed into the political and legal environment we swim in. It shows up in bit and places and semi-coherent arguments that don't really map back to practical reality, that I've seen so far.
Broadly speaking, however, it is entirely correct to view the real war Trump is focused on as between the Executive office and the legion of middle-managers and extra-Constitutional offices that do... whatever they are told by other middle-managers, etc.
The Constitutionally-appointed SC is the correct lever to use to pry such ticks off the body politic, to re-establish guardrails and authority delimits, and otherwise force the system to do what the Constitution says it should do and no further. Due to how the SC works, however, they will lay down a guardrail when the right parties ask--but not before. Sometimes that means hauling an issue in front of them that you (the Feds) intend to lose, but lose well, so the precedent doesn't harm the country later.
It's also worth noting an overall flaw: it is not laws or practice that violate the Constitution, it is *people* who do so, via their laws or practice. We do not have a good measure, clearly articulated and with teeth, for censuring such violators. Aside from treason, which often might be challenging to prove versus idiocy.
Regarding the post office, here are two links to an essay written last century.
"The Myth of the Post Office" refers to a famous 1948 libertarian pamphlet written by Frank Chodorov. It posits that the U.S. Postal Service operates as a myth because, absent true free-market competition, its claim to exist solely for the public good is a pretext for political control and government inefficiency.
I like Ashe’s take and insight on the SC ruling with the mail-in ballots.
“The court saying it won’t legislate from the Bench is a good thing in the big picture. “
I can see that and it rightly puts the burden back on the shoulders of Congress.
In my state of MA my husband and I have each received a mail in ballot every election since 2020 - not requested by us! Curious to see if we’ll get one for the midterms…we desperately need a new Governor!
I get mail in ballots, too. The most recent one cited my age as a factor for being eligible to vote with a mail in ballot. I'm not so sure about previous ballots received. I lived in a blue county in 2020, whereas now, I am in a red county.
After reading this opinion on WLTreport, I do wonder if the case hadn't been deliberately doomed since it has been filed 🤔🤔:
“The syllabus made the majority’s reasoning plain. It noted that the Executive Order leaned on words like mother, father, lawful, and temporary, and pointed out that none of those words appear anywhere in the Citizenship Clause itself.”
Maybe either to reveal the true colors of certain conservative justices OR to provide SCOTUS some narrative shielding and an understandable off ramp …
It recalls me some usual tactics used by some well-known Artist of the Deal !
Elections are fake.....Congress is fake.......Courts are fake.....seems like we're nearing the same point of causation the patriots faced in 1776.
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
Go read it for yourself.....especially starting at "The history of the present" substituting "King of Great Britain" with "U.S. Corporation"....happy 250th!
"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."
I agree. If we think about the Revolutionary War it was actually a Civil War between rebels and loyalists. Many loyalists fled to Canada after losing. And, of course the Civil War was American against American. Today our country is divided once again by our politics.
I believe we are being divided by the same enemy in London. They have never stopped fighting to enslave us. They manipulated us into the Civil War and used it to create the Corporation you cite as our new enemy, but it is the same old enemy from 1776. Isn’t it about time to win the Revolutionary War and achieve unconditional surrender? The Treaty of Paris merely ended the physical fighting but the fiscal fighting has never stopped. One thing about the British, they know how to keep fighting. Divide and conquer is their game.
Yes.....I've said for years we never won the revolutionary war, they simply withdrew to regroup and change tactic. It was never the Crown.....but the bankers to the crown...a.k.a. City of London.
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
That is super interesting but he missed an important river that I believe is very important. The sixth river is the economic flow created to bankrupt America that Trump is attacking and Q never explains. It involves the Corporation we discuss all of the time.
A corporation exists because it generates more revenue than it expends. Otherwise it goes out of business. But the U.S. Corporation is still here and losing $2 Trillion annually. How can that be? In fact, we have lost money every year since 1935. This sixth river is the big one that no one is addressing. The real question is, “Is this corporation really losing money or are the owners making a fortune?”
I agree with your take, Jim but I ask 3 questions:
Does DS17 Team have the economical skills needed to apprehend “your” river which you're the only one among us who is able to explain it and make it understandable for most of us ?
Maybe you should offer him to add your river, or explain it on their comments …
Could you use its own method and the same time frame on your own river ? Could this river be considered as a subterranean one, w
hich could resurface at any moment (or even on command!)? I haven't forgotten Q's famous line, "Watch the water"!
Does anyone remember this election year usual gimmick “It's the economy, stupid !”?
Does anyone remember the 2020 “Unleash the Kraken !”?
From Brave Leo AI:
“The legend of the Kraken dates back to at least the 12th century, with the first written account attributed to King Sverre of Norway in 1180. In Norse sagas, such as the Örvar-Oddr, the creature (sometimes referred to as Hafgufa or "sea mist") was described as an island-sized beast that lurked beneath the surface”… 😉🤗
Judge Thomas has it 100% correct. This is not complex because the words in the 14th Amendment are not confusing in any way. What has confused this is corrupt politicians misreading the words intentionally and not being confronted legally at the time. Most of America never knew the Amendment was being abused and the perpetrators just got away with it.
So, here we are watching the SCOTUS abusing the Constitution legally. That doesn’t make it right.
I'm each day more convinced President Trump deliberately let SCOTUS publish controversial opinions and rulings in order to give the conservative justices some narrative shielding and put the Congress just in front (and center!) of its own DUTIES owed to We The People!
Remember the well-known quote “Sometimes you can't tell people the truth... you must show them...”
In this 5G warfare this is a popular sentiment found in motivation and mindset communities, suggesting that direct verbal explanations are often ineffective or resisted, and that experiential demonstration or leading by example is a more powerful way to convey reality. [Brave Leo AI]
[EDIT]
It seems Jim is saying the same thing from a different point of view and I concur 💯 with him !👍🏻🙏🏻
I feel vindicated after I read the official statement President Trump made on Truth Social 🙏🏻🤗
He's obviously demanding the Congress to DO their work AND DUTIES they OWE to We The People!
“Trump called on Congress to immediately get to work on ending “expensive and unfair” birthright citizenship.
Trump’s full statement:
The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
'Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who ruled with the majority but authored a partial dissent, wrote that he did not believe the executive order violated the 14th Amendment but instead federal law.
“Congress could … enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so,” he wrote."
—-‘And in the states, the people should have the power to force the state legislatures to run real elections.’ Thank you, Ashe! Our state requires that absentee ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted. I agree, after initial surprise, that this is encouraging in the long run.
—-Oh, Ghost! You are very likely right about the continuing Iran/US saga…..you’re especially gifted and have seen the Middle East machinations so clearly. It helps all of us. Thank you!!
—-Wait a minute. The FED was put under the US Treasury in Trump’s first term.🤔. BB. You nailed this, ‘…but have revealed themselves as being diametrically opposed to its implementation.’ ‘Are they hiding in plain sight?’ Indeed they have and you’ve shown all here clearly who (en masse) the enemy is!
—-Ukraine, the closest proxy state to 2 of the 3 arms of the cabal’s triad of governance (until it’s not)! We knew the cabal’s minions would fight to the bitter end. It’s human nature (while still in a fallen state).
—-Ashe, you have the gift (among others) of clear sight! ‘A portfolio of half measures and an overt disdain for the People and their desired outcomes.’ Exactly the position of elites everywhere!
—-Billions, foreign involvement, NGOs, Socialism and Marxism = attacks on our constitutional republic via all tested means. What an opportunity to gather evidence and awaken even more!
—-What a time to be living in, without fear and with hope and assurance, thanks in part to all here whom God has gifted for this time. Thank each of you!🇺🇸
I just heavily updated my comment/ note and I'm deeply convinced this birthright citizenship case has deliberately been allowed to be rebuked by SCOTUS.
So where I live they have those dedicated ballot mailboxes - do those get a postmark? All I know is the envelope doesn't require postage. Also, depending on the election, sometimes mail in is the only option. (And I really don't like the fact that my name on a mail in ballot.)
I think the take on the last minute lawsuit in CO is good, even though the issue itself is infuriating. Who comes up with these ideas?? I live in a city that has a strange little neighborhood that is unincorporated and ergo considered county. So while the line is literally one house over, when it comes to city elections, I cannot vote for mayor, council, measures, etc. Only school issues. And I LIVE here.
Ashe -- thank you for your commentary on the mail in ballot decision. We, the people, need to stand up now and act with the power of the people.
The founding fathers set up our government to have a series of checks and balances to keep government "honest" so to speak. As I read of the SCOTUS rulings, it seems that this is a restoration of some checks and balances. Maybe I'm wrong, but that is how I see it.
Eastern Europe -- this looks like a bunch of toddlers trying to learn how to protect their toys. Proves that NATO really is a paper tiger. Had each country actually participated in NATO over all these years, then this nonsense wouldn't be happening.
Gotta love reading about the crazy world we live in. Let the exposure continue at all levels.
Bleighv05, you're right about the Euro mess. US "oversight" and support has infantilized the leadership in many countries around the world. The eagle kept the chicks in the nest for too long.
Isn’t this what the Act of 1871 set into motion? Gold was still backing our currency then, but over the years the new system evolved. In 1913 the FED was invented but still had no real power. That changed in 1933 when FDR outlawed Gold ownership and in 1935 he introduced our entitlement business into the government’s bag of tricks.
All we need to do is to graph the national debt since 1913. Look at what is happening to the curve! It is accelerating in its rate of growth. It starts at a growth rate of just 1% per year and by 2020 it was over 8% per year. GDP isn’t keeping up with our debt growth. This is a formula destined to end in bankruptcy. And, I would argue it is by design to recapture America for the Crown. Since 1776 war is the key! The UK lost the fighting war but they have never stopped fighting the economic war. Socialism versus Capitalism is the war and it isn’t won yet.
E.M. Burlingame asserts in an interview with Rich does Politics that the City is coming for the monarchy. He gives a history of the monarchy starting with the beheading of Charles I 400 years ago. Would love any feedback if you are interested in watching it. Talks about the English Constitution, how the monarchy is supposed to protect the rights of the common man, common law.
https://youtu.be/-uIVASmlj_0?is=aB_iZAlCs3PiWVdi
Ashe, I agree completely that, while the mail-in ballot decision was disappointing at first blush, the Court argued reasonably on the Constitution's requirements. Congress can fix this, and must. The politicization of the SCOTUS has been a direct result of Congress' expectation the Court would do what our elected legislators were afraid to tackle.
Or, the enemies within will reveal their actual intentions against our constitutional republic via…
They just did.
The true enemy in Iran and it ain't Iran... Agree, Ghost, Trump/Iran will end well if Britain stays out of it which they can't.
https://nofilterjustfacts.substack.com/p/the-square-mile-erased-dynasties-persia-iran-city-london
That makes what Trump is doing in Iran make total sense. The UK got what they wanted by blockading the Strait and Trump has used the exact same tactic to get them out of Persia!
The world needs Persia back without the influence of the City of London. I think we are seeing this happen today.
In many ways this is what happened with America starting in 1609 in Jamestown. At that time Spain, France and England had carved up America for their benefit. The Eastern U.S. was put into the hands of The Virginia Company and The Hudson Bay Company for development of our resources. The land was given away in exchange for the future assets that would be exported to England. Oil wasn’t a prized commodity back then except for whale oil which we were soon exporting.
America screwed up the game in 1776 and the City of London has never given up on getting us back under their control. I just pray we keep them at bay. In 2017 we were fast falling back under their power, but Trump is not going to have that conclusion to our story.
Yes! This is the article I was referencing in my reply to Feather. That was the story I have known about for decades. She put it all together in a way no one else has before now.
1. I hope U.S. Treasury boss Bessent cleans Neville Roy Singham's clock. But a "Federal Grand Jury in MANHATTAN!?!?!???" Puleeeze. New York City is CommieTown now. They are all for anything that harms the United States.
2. According to the grandmotherly ladies at Promethean Action, the modern-day construct of middle-eastern conflict began with the Balfour Declaration (1917) and other manipulations of politics, boundaries and resources in that part of the world–all managed by British Intelligence and The City of London. The English have been playing global hardball ever since they defeated the Spanish Armada and Napoleon. It’s the great game, and the English have been running the table for a long time. President DJT has taken strong exception to English bossiness. He’s been standing them off pretty much singlehandedly. If Trump can get Thune out of the way and get the Save America Act passed, DJT’s crusade against the globalist\imperialist regime will be strengthened immeasurably.
Significant historical side-note: Christopher Steele, the British MI6 agent who brought the Russia Hoax to America? Mr. Steele knew exactly who to schmooze to get that ball rolling: Redneck Rhodes Scholar Willie Jeff Clinton along with his Chicago Communist wife.
The long game is a lot longer than we've been led to believe for the past hundred years or so. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the Balfour Declaration in Palestine both kicked off, a week apart, in November, 1917, one year before the Armistice of November 1918 which ended WW-One.
The Promethean Action Grandmothers are about as fed up as a body can be with the City of London, Chatham House and our own British-run Council on Foreign Relations. Search for youtubes from Promethean Action. You will be glad you did. No kidding.
They aren’t the only grandmothers to know this history! That’s a good thing!
"Grandmotherly"?!? I dare say, those are fearsome grandmother types that I consider wise old dragon slayers. Made me laugh. Good points, though.
I have voted by absentee ballot since the mid 90's. With the job I had, which was 25 miles, and 45 minutes away, it was always hard to get out to vote. In order to get an absentee ballot, I had to provide proof of who I was. That meant, 3 forms of ID to include a gas and electric bill with my name on it. So if they are talking about absentee ballots and the conditions for getting one are the same, counting during election plus 5 days is not overwhelming. In Ca that would be a stand up and cheer victory. I believe they are still counting primary ballots.
Exactly, of course, CA has to deep cheating until they get the margin they need.😡
Fantastic job Badlanders!
The US and Iran…and the whole MiddleEast…is certainly interesting theater!! Taking down a very old system that perpetuates unending managed conflict vs the American System
“The American system is like a great piece of art still in progress” ~ Mike Steger
Trump is a master artist ❤️🇺🇸🌟🕊🌎
Did you read Vivify's recent article on Persia? It gave a very good timeline of events on the history of Iran/Persia and the machinations in play since the discovery of oil.
I did read it! I wondered while reading if the history jived with your understanding so I’m happy you just just commented! 👍❤️🕊🌟
🙏❤️👏🔥🇺🇲
I believe I also replied in the comments on her post. The only issue I had was her mention of the killing of Osama bin Laden. Other rabbit holes have reported he died years before, from kidney failure?, and the claim he was buried according to Islamic tradition by burial at sea was a total lie. They might have dumped a body into the sea, but that is not Islamic tradition. And I don't believe it was bin Laden's body.
I like her writing and her determination to tackle deep dives on current understanding with historical context…but she relies heavily on AI and I myself have found contradictions in different AI!!
Which is why I wondered if her view added up to your take 😉
I believe she uses AI for grammar and to see how far she can push the machine. I think her opinions were formed from personal experiences and gut instincts. She writes what she believes to be true, and if you have tried to follow her on a live interview, her speaking skills are really difficult to follow, so I am glad she uses AI to clean up her writing. That said, the bots push back on her bold writing and display of truth, softening her words and intended meanings so that she brings the receipts and makes them collapse against her arguments. I watched her with Rich just last night defending her take on slavery.
Note: the ai transcription which was provided was terrible so I am glad I had previously read and understood her position before watching the interview.
So I don't think she uses AI to do her writing. Or help her form opinions. She's a David with a slingshot taking down the programming of the machine, aka Goliath. That's how I understand it. Maybe I'm wrong.
I like her posts very much. I don’t listen though, as I do find her difficult to understand.
That said, if I compare her to Promethean, she falls a little short…Vivify offered no bibliography and sources for her post on Iran/Persia.
Promethean gives extensive source references and the Ladies have been deeply immersed in politics since way before the internet. They cite books and news media for their newsletters, as well as active participation for decades.
I like it that Vivify starts (in her own mind) asking questions and then follows the threads for answers and the overall picture. Because she has integrity, her “gut instincts” are valuable but I don’t automatically believe everything she writes…in her favor, I don’t myself look up everything either! ⏳⌛️ ❤️🌟
I’m thankful for the Comments today to help me understand today’s brief Brief.
BB is always a wonderful source of food for thought.
Congress and the Uniparty.
Of course we need term limits, otherwise it becomes a career profession replete with perks (that cost taxpayers around 1Billion a year), alongside a great salary, a retirement pension that increases with years “in service”…top healthcare insurance that average Americans don’t get…on and on.
Who is the invisible enemy? Congress, so different from what service to one’s country meant when our country was younger.
It’s our responsibility to impose term limits via our votes, although our track record has not been good, even before the massive election fraud. Once that is fixed, actual term limits set in law would be a good deterrent, however. (Understanding human nature.)
I would agree that we can't put the cart before the horse. CA implemented term limits some time ago and it made things worse. We have been gaslit for years that "well, it's what you voted for!" No. It's a cheat.
Are you sure? I was looking it up and it seems it has to be an amendment passed by Congress.
“Article V of the Constitution requires either a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress or a convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states), followed by ratification by three-fourths of states (38 states)
Term limits is favored high across party lines…and gets onto ballot amendments in different states numerous times…
AI: “Votes alone cannot impose congressional term limits because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995) that states cannot enforce term limits on federal representatives; only a constitutional amendment can establish them”
I don’t understand how it can actually be that way! How do we get term limits??
Honest election system…then ‘we the people’ impose term limits through our votes, but I concur we additionally need Congress to legally establish them. Once we clean out the traitors there.😏🇺🇸🇺🇸
So we should just vote harder in a completely rigged election system controlled by those committing fraud to retain office.
The SCOTUS decision yesterday was a straightforward win for federalism and the Constitution: elections are primarily administered by the States under the Elections Clause. SCOTUS refused to let federal law invent new restrictions Congress never wrote, returning power where it belongs instead of imposing one-size-fits-all micromanagement from Washington. Common sense and the text of the law prevailed. this was another ploy by the democrats to get the SCOTUS to do the job of congress.
It correctly recognizes that federal election-day statutes set the day for voting, not a rigid National receipt deadline that overrides State rules.
The SCOTUS ruling is ALL about JURISDICTION. States have the right to have rules with the mail in ballots.
And the post office has the right to refuse to deliver them, or do they? The SC punted in this, and Congress has shown disinterest in legislating ever since FDR's progressive agenda (they invented the administrative state): it now boils down to whether rogue states like Colorado can force the Post Office to do something the Executive Branch prohibits it from doing. In other words, do states have the authority to run elections in a way that changes election results that impact OTHER states?
The SC did do something that rogue states do not like: the President has absolute authority over the administrative state. IMO, it made the right decision regarding the Federal Reserve, because it was created through an act of Congress with no oversight. Question for all those who have dug rabbit holes: is the Post Office also one of these agencies? We have all read about various Postmaster Generals planting flags to assert sovereignty over the corporation. If so, does President Trump have the authority to tell the Post Office not to deliver mail-in ballots? We heard some time ago about the Post Office's patent on the quantum voting system. Why the Post Office? Is it also independent like the Federal Reserve?
What would happen if the a district judge said that the Post Office had to deliver mail in ballots as long as someone kept putting in mail in ballots into a post box? This is turning out to be a showdown between rogue judges who report to the bankrupt corporation, run by the City of London, with its resurrected three time figurehead of King Charles III and the President who now runs the Republic (notice the flags now have no gold fringes-no longer under Admiralty Law): a government at war with itself parts optically controlled by the City of London, and parts under the Republic.
If you see this and realize that the City of London created Israel under the Balfour Agreement, you begin to see more clearly why this comedy show is playing out the way it is: Congress reporting to Israel, who was created by the City of London, various states with loyalty to the corporation and others (mostly red states) loyal to the Republic represented by President Trump, who declared independence in 2020 and guess who is stuck in the middle? The Supreme Court. If you ever wondered why judges continue to defy the SC, this is why. The District judges were created by Congress and only Congress can dissolve them. Using this argument, the President can say FU to the injunctions and do it anyway and he has on many occasions. This also explains lawfare, because attorneys report to the Crown. BAR stands for BRITISH Accredited Registry. Even though you pay them, they don't represent you because the court system is under Admiralty Law.
ICONS2020 telegram channel has numerous documents on how he successfully challenged the local authorities (I believe he lives in New York) when they tried to do things to his property that were done or attempting to do without his consent. It matters what you say because merely saying "I do not consent" is insufficient. But getting back to the issue: knowing that this is the issue and we are ALL brainwashed to believe that the corporation is the legitimate government, how can the President play this out knowing that Congress won't do anything and that the Administrative state is under the absolute authority of the President? Is Trump still the CEO of the corporation and if not who is? Is Trump engineering a hostile takeover? Or has he taken over and now dealing with managers who can't be fired but won't comply? What does a corporation do with them (or asked a better way-how does the CEO fire them)?
For those who worked in large corporations that have experienced hostile takeovers, much of what you see is more like window office machinations rather than actual warfare. We live on sovereign territory (never under the corporation) but every time we get a driver's license, get our dogs jabbed, pay property taxes, or even file a tax return, we are telling the corporation that we think governs us that we comply with their ridiculous rules, when we live on land that does NOT fall under their jurisdiction, just like a job with a corporation. They have rules regarding social media posts because they own the brand, but are in shakier grounds when regulating our off hours behavior.
Excellent comment and questions, eileen…along with great replies.
The recent US District Judge ruling states: “ no law enacted by Congress delegates authority to control mail-in voting to USPS”
It’s the same problem with getting term limits - it’s an Amendment that has to be created by Congress…to limit Congressional term limits!
The UnityParty of Congress is the invisible enemy.
Why is there so much trouble passing The Save America Act?
Isn’t this why Trump is attacking the problem from a totally different direction? He pokes at the internal government problems to point them out and bring attention to them. But the main battle is with the behind the scenes driving forces.
Congress with its deficit spending is bankrupting America by using the FED’s credit card. Trump cannot change that mess, but he can totally redesign it. I just hope I am seeing this correctly.
To me, the bottom line is in creating a solid currency. The Constitution calls for a currency backed by Gold and Silver, but since 1933 our government has chosen to ignore the Constitution. By 1968 they took out the Silver. And in 2026 they took away Copper which was never considered a precious metal. But they had to take it away because taking away Gold and Silver created crazy inflation that has caused a penny to be worth three cents!
My friends, this is not complex. It is being played out in front of us but no one is explaining the true problem! And, the solution isn’t complex either. Watch Gold, Silver, and Oil. As they come down in price, the dollar is getting more valuable because one dollar buys more. This is the opposite of inflation and everyone is better off. Well, everyone except the manipulators of our currency.
This battle is 250 years old. Trump didn’t start it, but he is dedicated to finishing it in 2026. To me that is our real story.
Do we actually need the Save America act?
Only 9 state have strict Voter ID laws, both to register to vote and to vote.
My belief is that the 2020 election was stolen. So an Act that significantly prevents voter fraud is needed.
There is much more to this than meets the eye. We know the traitors are in all areas, including Congress and the SC. BTW: I personally listed to NPR for about 15 minutes while in our travels ( a week ago) and after the program, the narrator announced the donations to the program and key was the USPS. What is that about??
These is much more to this! Keep on asking the questions, Eileen!!👏👏
Oh excellent take. There are things to follow up on here. One of the things I'd (figuratively) kill for is a solid book(-like thing) on how admiralty law bears on and has developed into the political and legal environment we swim in. It shows up in bit and places and semi-coherent arguments that don't really map back to practical reality, that I've seen so far.
Broadly speaking, however, it is entirely correct to view the real war Trump is focused on as between the Executive office and the legion of middle-managers and extra-Constitutional offices that do... whatever they are told by other middle-managers, etc.
The Constitutionally-appointed SC is the correct lever to use to pry such ticks off the body politic, to re-establish guardrails and authority delimits, and otherwise force the system to do what the Constitution says it should do and no further. Due to how the SC works, however, they will lay down a guardrail when the right parties ask--but not before. Sometimes that means hauling an issue in front of them that you (the Feds) intend to lose, but lose well, so the precedent doesn't harm the country later.
It's also worth noting an overall flaw: it is not laws or practice that violate the Constitution, it is *people* who do so, via their laws or practice. We do not have a good measure, clearly articulated and with teeth, for censuring such violators. Aside from treason, which often might be challenging to prove versus idiocy.
Regarding the post office, here are two links to an essay written last century.
"The Myth of the Post Office" refers to a famous 1948 libertarian pamphlet written by Frank Chodorov. It posits that the U.S. Postal Service operates as a myth because, absent true free-market competition, its claim to exist solely for the public good is a pretext for political control and government inefficiency.
If interested, follow the links below.
https://share.google/aimode/gBNuTrBn9PfWRLf6V
And a pdf of the original essay.
https://cooperative-individualism.org/chodorov-frank_one-is-a-crowd-1952-16.pdf
I like Ashe’s take and insight on the SC ruling with the mail-in ballots.
“The court saying it won’t legislate from the Bench is a good thing in the big picture. “
I can see that and it rightly puts the burden back on the shoulders of Congress.
In my state of MA my husband and I have each received a mail in ballot every election since 2020 - not requested by us! Curious to see if we’ll get one for the midterms…we desperately need a new Governor!
I don't get mail-in ballots. So -- can you return them to the county and ask to view them shred yours? Then no one else can use it.
I would not trust my very Liberal Blue state to shred them. I hang onto them until after I vote in person and then shred them a month or so after 😉
I can’t wait to see if they send them out to everyone in MA again!
I get mail in ballots, too. The most recent one cited my age as a factor for being eligible to vote with a mail in ballot. I'm not so sure about previous ballots received. I lived in a blue county in 2020, whereas now, I am in a red county.
🤔⚖️🇺🇲⚖️🤔
HAPPENING NOW: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, says kids born in US are citizens at birth
[Fox News Live thread]
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-supreme-court-strikes-down-president-trumps-executive
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-strikes-down-trumps-birthright-citizenship-curbs
[EDIT]
After reading this opinion on WLTreport, I do wonder if the case hadn't been deliberately doomed since it has been filed 🤔🤔:
“The syllabus made the majority’s reasoning plain. It noted that the Executive Order leaned on words like mother, father, lawful, and temporary, and pointed out that none of those words appear anywhere in the Citizenship Clause itself.”
Maybe either to reveal the true colors of certain conservative justices OR to provide SCOTUS some narrative shielding and an understandable off ramp …
It recalls me some usual tactics used by some well-known Artist of the Deal !
https://wltreport.com/2026/06/30/breaking-roberts-and-barrett-join-liberal-justices-to-hand-america-huge-loss-on-birthright-citizenship
[Meaningful EDIT]
"Justice Clarence Thomas UNLEASHES on majority in Birthright Citizenship ruling — ⚖️🇺🇲 “The 14th Amendment was CLEARLY made for FREED SLAVES!” ⚖️🇺🇲
https://wltreport.com/2026/06/30/just-in-justice-clarence-thomas-unleashes-on-majority-in-birthright-citizenship-ruling-the-14th-amendment-was-clearly-made-for-freed-slaves
"Trump’s efforts to reverse birthright citizenship may succeed with or without SCOTUS"
https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trumps-efforts-reverse-birthright-citizenship-can-succeed-or-without-scotus
Elections are fake.....Congress is fake.......Courts are fake.....seems like we're nearing the same point of causation the patriots faced in 1776.
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
Go read it for yourself.....especially starting at "The history of the present" substituting "King of Great Britain" with "U.S. Corporation"....happy 250th!
"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
I agree. If we think about the Revolutionary War it was actually a Civil War between rebels and loyalists. Many loyalists fled to Canada after losing. And, of course the Civil War was American against American. Today our country is divided once again by our politics.
I believe we are being divided by the same enemy in London. They have never stopped fighting to enslave us. They manipulated us into the Civil War and used it to create the Corporation you cite as our new enemy, but it is the same old enemy from 1776. Isn’t it about time to win the Revolutionary War and achieve unconditional surrender? The Treaty of Paris merely ended the physical fighting but the fiscal fighting has never stopped. One thing about the British, they know how to keep fighting. Divide and conquer is their game.
Yes.....I've said for years we never won the revolutionary war, they simply withdrew to regroup and change tactic. It was never the Crown.....but the bankers to the crown...a.k.a. City of London.
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
Hello CT !
Glad to read you on the same page as several (most ?) of us!
I don't believe in any coincidences when President Trump's acting about anything!
I invite you:
Maybe you should read this latest DS17'S article:
"THE CONVERGENCE
When Time Begins To Tell The Story"
Digital SwQlljer 17 🐸 https://digitalswqlljer17.substack.com/p/the-convergence
That is super interesting but he missed an important river that I believe is very important. The sixth river is the economic flow created to bankrupt America that Trump is attacking and Q never explains. It involves the Corporation we discuss all of the time.
A corporation exists because it generates more revenue than it expends. Otherwise it goes out of business. But the U.S. Corporation is still here and losing $2 Trillion annually. How can that be? In fact, we have lost money every year since 1935. This sixth river is the big one that no one is addressing. The real question is, “Is this corporation really losing money or are the owners making a fortune?”
Who actually owns it?
I agree with your take, Jim but I ask 3 questions:
Does DS17 Team have the economical skills needed to apprehend “your” river which you're the only one among us who is able to explain it and make it understandable for most of us ?
Maybe you should offer him to add your river, or explain it on their comments …
Could you use its own method and the same time frame on your own river ? Could this river be considered as a subterranean one, w
hich could resurface at any moment (or even on command!)? I haven't forgotten Q's famous line, "Watch the water"!
Does anyone remember this election year usual gimmick “It's the economy, stupid !”?
Does anyone remember the 2020 “Unleash the Kraken !”?
From Brave Leo AI:
“The legend of the Kraken dates back to at least the 12th century, with the first written account attributed to King Sverre of Norway in 1180. In Norse sagas, such as the Örvar-Oddr, the creature (sometimes referred to as Hafgufa or "sea mist") was described as an island-sized beast that lurked beneath the surface”… 😉🤗
Will do, mon ami!
I could have written the same argument but it's not my history !
😉🤗👍🏻
🤔😡⚖️🇺🇲⚖️😡🤔
Clarence Thomas dissenting the SCOTUS ruling: '14th Amendment has been ‘Repurposed for political projects’
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/06/30/clarence-thomas-dissenting-birthright-citizenship
Judge Thomas has it 100% correct. This is not complex because the words in the 14th Amendment are not confusing in any way. What has confused this is corrupt politicians misreading the words intentionally and not being confronted legally at the time. Most of America never knew the Amendment was being abused and the perpetrators just got away with it.
So, here we are watching the SCOTUS abusing the Constitution legally. That doesn’t make it right.
Hi Jim !
We agree but from different points of view 😉🤗
https://substack.com/@trumpistdelafayette/note/c-285577734
https://badlands.substack.com/p/badlands-brief-169/comment/285608600
👍❤️🌟
Everything in the realm of common sense seems to come down to Congress passing Bills and Amendments!
Congress could pass a Bill ending Birth Tourism!
But will it??
I'm each day more convinced President Trump deliberately let SCOTUS publish controversial opinions and rulings in order to give the conservative justices some narrative shielding and put the Congress just in front (and center!) of its own DUTIES owed to We The People!
Remember the well-known quote “Sometimes you can't tell people the truth... you must show them...”
In this 5G warfare this is a popular sentiment found in motivation and mindset communities, suggesting that direct verbal explanations are often ineffective or resisted, and that experiential demonstration or leading by example is a more powerful way to convey reality. [Brave Leo AI]
[EDIT]
It seems Jim is saying the same thing from a different point of view and I concur 💯 with him !👍🏻🙏🏻
I feel vindicated after I read the official statement President Trump made on Truth Social 🙏🏻🤗
He's obviously demanding the Congress to DO their work AND DUTIES they OWE to We The People!
“Trump called on Congress to immediately get to work on ending “expensive and unfair” birthright citizenship.
Trump’s full statement:
The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/president-trump-responds-scotus-birthright-citizenship-ruling-calls
'Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who ruled with the majority but authored a partial dissent, wrote that he did not believe the executive order violated the 14th Amendment but instead federal law.
“Congress could … enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so,” he wrote."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/4630634/congressional-republicans-split-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-ruling
Yep! It comes down to Congress AGAIN
👍🙏❤️🕊🌎
Just updated with a justice opinion 🤗
Hello Feather 🕊️ 🪶 🕊️
https://wltreport.com/2026/06/30/president-trump-meets-with-freed-election-integrity-hero-tina-peters-at-white-house
—-‘And in the states, the people should have the power to force the state legislatures to run real elections.’ Thank you, Ashe! Our state requires that absentee ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted. I agree, after initial surprise, that this is encouraging in the long run.
—-Oh, Ghost! You are very likely right about the continuing Iran/US saga…..you’re especially gifted and have seen the Middle East machinations so clearly. It helps all of us. Thank you!!
—-Wait a minute. The FED was put under the US Treasury in Trump’s first term.🤔. BB. You nailed this, ‘…but have revealed themselves as being diametrically opposed to its implementation.’ ‘Are they hiding in plain sight?’ Indeed they have and you’ve shown all here clearly who (en masse) the enemy is!
—-Ukraine, the closest proxy state to 2 of the 3 arms of the cabal’s triad of governance (until it’s not)! We knew the cabal’s minions would fight to the bitter end. It’s human nature (while still in a fallen state).
—-Ashe, you have the gift (among others) of clear sight! ‘A portfolio of half measures and an overt disdain for the People and their desired outcomes.’ Exactly the position of elites everywhere!
—-Billions, foreign involvement, NGOs, Socialism and Marxism = attacks on our constitutional republic via all tested means. What an opportunity to gather evidence and awaken even more!
—-What a time to be living in, without fear and with hope and assurance, thanks in part to all here whom God has gifted for this time. Thank each of you!🇺🇸
…”without fear” ❤️🌟
🙏🏻⚖️🇺🇲⚖️🙏🏻
JUST IN / GOOD News:
"Supreme Court makes ruling on trans athletes in women's sports.
The Alliance Defending Freedom backed both states in cases involving a Boise State runner and a West Virginia youth athlete."
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/supreme-court-makes-ruling-trans-athletes-womens-sports
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-supreme-court-upholds-schools-right-ban-biological
Amy Coney-Barrett continues to disappoint! (Re birthright citizenship)
And banning biological males from female sports, left up to the states!!
I agree and concur 💯, Feather 🪶 🕊️ 🪶!
I just heavily updated my comment/ note and I'm deeply convinced this birthright citizenship case has deliberately been allowed to be rebuked by SCOTUS.
So where I live they have those dedicated ballot mailboxes - do those get a postmark? All I know is the envelope doesn't require postage. Also, depending on the election, sometimes mail in is the only option. (And I really don't like the fact that my name on a mail in ballot.)
I think the take on the last minute lawsuit in CO is good, even though the issue itself is infuriating. Who comes up with these ideas?? I live in a city that has a strange little neighborhood that is unincorporated and ergo considered county. So while the line is literally one house over, when it comes to city elections, I cannot vote for mayor, council, measures, etc. Only school issues. And I LIVE here.