101 Comments
User's avatar
Sovereign Yogi's avatar

A/o else scratching their head searching for "Vagina Mom Just Can't Get Paid" story?

Jim Schout's avatar

I’m scratching my head trying to understand how her ridiculous story got into a court of law. Then, I start scratching again trying to figure how a ridiculous story can get an $83 Million award.

This actually requires a huge amount of stupidity on the part of everyone involved including the jury of her peers. They are all seriously affected by TDS. This is a severe mental illness case, not a legal one.

MAB4Liberty's avatar

My disdain for the legal profession grows every time these violations of justice ocur.

I looked into the derivation of the term bar for attorneys. Wiki info: In law, the bar is the legal profession as an institution. The term is a metonym for the line (or "bar") that separates the parts of a courtroom reserved for spectators and those reserved for participants in a trial such as lawyers.

Websters 1828 def of barrister: BAR'RISTER, noun [from bar.] A counselor, learned in the laws, qualified and admitted to please at the bar, and to take upon him the defense of clients; answering to the advocate or licentiate of other countries. Anciently, barristers were called, in England, apprentices of the law. Outer barristers are pleaders without the bar, to distinguish them from inner barristers, benchers or readers, who have been sometime admitted to please within the bar, as the king's counsel are.

Bar definition in Websters includes this gem: 2. Any obstacle which obstructs, hinders or defends; an obstruction; a fortification.

This fortifies my disdain for these actors putting on a spectacle to obstruct justice for us spectators and defend the king's (elites) interests.

The true obstructers of juistice and rule of law.

Alan Lightner's avatar

Question: What is brown and black and looks good on a lawyer??🤔

Answer: a Doberman Pincer!😁

Jim Schout's avatar

Your disdain is well deserved, but please don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Our problem is with the misuse of the law by unscrupulous crooks who know enough about their profession to use it in reverse.

As an engineer I have seen this in action in my field. A smart engineer can design a product to fail after a definable period of use. A fantastic engineer can make that failure happen just days after the warranty goes out. This is an abortion of the goal of a true engineer.

All professionals are in a position to use their skill for good and not evil. Honorable humans understand the difference. Others just don’t care. They figure it is only about making money.

MAB4Liberty's avatar

The key part is those in the bar who are allegiant to the king's interests. Generally speaking bar attorneys are allegiant to the system.

ALtab's avatar

Yes, why I decided not to become an attorney. Congress is full of ‘em….go figure.

Bleighv05 (believe05)'s avatar

E Jean Carroll story. Her cat is named Vagina

Featherjourney's avatar

Only a sex-crazed woman would name her cat Vagina and come up with a fantasy of being raped by a public figure to gain notoriety with a lawsuit…funded by Reid Hoffman, billionaire donor to the Democrat Party, who happens to hate Trump…but was friends with Epstein.

Her book (2019). What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal.

“A central feature of the book is her running list titled "The Most Hideous Men of My Life," which includes figures such as mafia bosses, media titans, abusive boyfriends, husbands, a serial killer, and prominent public figures.”

Fantasy delusions of a sex-crazed woman?

Bleighv05 (believe05)'s avatar

Her interview with Anderson Cooper was.....insane.

She said that people find rape sexy. I remember viewing part of the interview. He is as gay as they come. She talked about wanting to have sex with him. She gave the impression she'd jump him over the the desk if he allowed it. Gross.....just gross. AT least that is what I remember. It is funny how you can't find that full interview anymore.

Featherjourney's avatar

Side note

Yesterday you asked about Eisenhower and I left a reply, in part about his great granddaughter, Laura Eisenhower and her lifelong involvement in the UFO / Alien community. She believed her gr grandfather, President Eisenhower, did actually meet with ET Intelligence.

I just saw that Nino has her on for an interview. Haven’t listened yet but I’m about to.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BMOjAFvQZHA&ra=m

Jim Schout's avatar

OK, I listened to it. Now what? She may be Ike’s grandchild, but she is a nut case in my mind. I mean, did Harry Truman actually accept unconditional surrender to a mysterious space power? I just don’t buy it. But, she gets air time telling her story. You go girl!

Featherjourney's avatar

I respectfully disagree, Jim.

She has been around for decades. Did Eisenhower meet with extraterrestrial entities?

“A easy search: William Cooper and Navy Commander Charles L. Suggs, have cited classified briefings or secondhand accounts supporting the encounter.”

Do you dismiss the possibility because it’s too far fetched, in the realm of science fiction? Or do you dismiss the idea because, if it did happen, surely our government would have disclosed it by now?

I get that Ascension, interdimensional beings, and maybe even the UFO disclosures coming are not your area of interest. You are a genius at the politics of economics.

The first release of ufo/uap documents have actually been around for years. I saw all the “pictures” so far released years ago. I can’t imagine there are very many people who aren’t already familiar with them. So…waiting for the documents releases ahead.

Q’s last word ever posted was Ascension. What really IS the Great Awakening?

Q’s very last post:

“What is coded in your DNA?

Who put it there?

Why?

Mankind is repressed.

We will be repressed no more. Information is knowledge.

Knowledge is power.

Information is power.

How do you protect your DNA?

There is a war for your DNA.

Protect your DNA.

Ascension.

Q

Genetic manipulation didn’t start with covid and the bioweapon jabs.

Why were a group of pastors called to a government meeting where they were given advice on how to speak to people in light of upcoming ufo/alien disclosures?

https://www.christianpost.com/news/perry-stone-claims-us-officials-briefed-pastors-on-ufos.html

Hope you stay open minded.

Bleighv05 (believe05)'s avatar

I would be interested in your take on it. Thanks!

Featherjourney's avatar

I didn’t see that interview but I remember reading excerpts about it.

What a dark place, the landscape of her mind!

ALtab's avatar

Mentally ill!!

Eric Sowers's avatar

More like fantasy delusions of a nitwit well past her shelf life desperately grasping at the spotlight.

Anna's avatar

Tongue in cheek. Carroll's cat 🐈 is named Vagina. Makes for a funnier headline.

This has to be a movie, right? White Hat Productions.

cgg's avatar

Can you imagine her talking to the cat? "Vagina! Here kittykittykitty!"

(So many things wrong there.)

Anna's avatar

🤣🤣🤣

Anna's avatar

Ah, doesn't take me to the note in question. 🥴

Just the main article. Whose comment am I looking for?

PS I share links to comments, too, but can't receive them and go straight to the comment.

Featherjourney's avatar

Nino has an interview just posted with Laura Eisenhower, great granddaughter of the former President.

Bleighv had asked a question about Eisenhower yesterday and part of my reply was a reference to Laura Eisenhower, who has long been prominent in the UFO / Alien community.

The link was to my comment with a link to Nino on yt (which you know how to find 😉)

😉🥕🐇

Anna's avatar

Thanks, Feather! I missed that part of yesterday's comments. I will check it out!❤️🕊🌟

Featherjourney's avatar

Bleighv isn’t into it …and Jim is definitely not it into it 😊 I caught interviews with her years ago…back in the days of David Wilcock (R.I.P.)

(Jim and I had a discussion here today. He thinks she’s flakey and just using her name to make money…which I totally disagree with!). But I get it. He’s a numbers math guy and lives in a reality where only known science prevails. WildBill, same engineering background, has always been much more open minded…into Steven Greer and stuff like SkinWalker Ranch)

😊❤️🥕🐇🌟

Burning Bright's avatar

Only in the Brief!

Sovereign Yogi's avatar

22 yrs ago I had girlfriend w/ cat named Yoni. This cat was so sweet & pure (in yoga we'd say: Sattvic) that she wouldn't kill a mouse or a bird. She just wanted to play w/ 'em. Such a lovely sentient.

Gary's avatar

It made me think of Virginia's misspelling of its own name in the state's ridiculous attempt to wipe some of the egg off its face by crying to SCOTUS (filed, I believe, by a state senator who can't even spell his own job title) but it probably refers to the E. Jean Carroll story. Cryptic ...

CT Loyd's avatar

"The question on everyone’s mind is: What is going to be done about it?"

"splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds".

JFK

Burning Bright's avatar

Strange that once oft-repeated stance has become a trigger for some in this community.

Joe Kronner's avatar

ASHE it's good to see continued forward movement on the 2020 stolen election (& elections in general), and as GBPH stated yesterday "Congress is a crime scene. It should be dismissed, indefinitely..."

We the People need to be ready to lead the effort to fix this mess.

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

Bleighv05 (believe05)'s avatar

"The evidence of widespread public corruption, ostensibly in service of treasonous conspiracies to undermine the will of the people, is overwhelming. We must demand accountability, and we must act. We must withhold belief and withdraw consent and starve the machine.

“What truly matters is not which party controls our government but whether our government is controlled by the people.”

"The first step to restoring public trust is accountability. Start with Kaplan. "

Ashe - you are on fire today. This -- accountability -- at ALL levels. Let's start somewhere - so why not Kaplan. All areas and levels need to be held accountable.

Thank you for your commentary.

Gary's avatar

"𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙜𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙞𝙩?"

That's a frighteningly cogent question. What exactly will happen in this country if, say, a third of Congress is ejected (shades of Revelation 12:4!) or thousands of public employees - maybe even entire departments or bureaus - are locked up? If we truly embrace Jefferson's Declaration, we must also acknowledge his warning about how the tree of liberty is refreshed. A lot of people - a WHOLE lot of people - won't think it's worth the inconvenience.

Jim Schout's avatar

Could the answer be connected to something we discussed yesterday? Article V of our Constitution talks about a Constitutional Convention to bypass Congress if the States need to take control. Is this what is being organized under the title of a balanced budget amendment? Congress using the Federal Reserve as its credit card is certainly indicative of our real problem. Constantly voting to raise the credit limit on its own credit card fits also. Then, toss in the fact that these clowns weren’t even legally elected and the states have a super good reason. Plus, the 17th Amendment took away the state’s legislatures right to appoint its Senators in 1913 and was illegally declared to be ratified.

So, constitutionally the states should immediately appoint two Senators since the 16th Amendment was negated by the bankruptcy and was never legal to begin with. The Constitutional Convention will need to fix 155 years of illegal messes. But, meanwhile our business community can merely keep doing business as normal. The government can sort out its screw ups and let us know what makes sense in 2026. We can still control our States legislatures and we can pay our taxes to them and cut out the middleman in Washington. This might look a lot like what our founders designed in 1787.

JC's avatar

I'll like, and... there's reason no Article V convention has been called, and it comes down to not trusting the process that sends delegates. Imagine: a convention is called and the state legislatures miraculously manage to select individuals "helpfully" suggested by Soros or the raft of treasonous creatures the current polity is infected with. Now you have handed ultimate power to write anything they want in the Constitution to such; yes, ratification is necessary, but again that is state legislatures (or, conventions if the state desires).

The brake on such a scenario is the OTHER reason Article V has never been triggered: it requires three-quarters of the state legislatures to ratify, which is either a lot of bribery work, a lot of fellow travelers, or a lot of guns screwed to people's foreheads. You may, if you wish, look at the efforts of foreign infiltration groups (Globalists, socialists via Cuba, Neoconservatives, and etc.) to lay enough groundwork to have their way with an Article V convention, but in practice such foundations are indistinguishable from just corrupting the national congress, administrations and judiciary until they can pick and choose what gets enforced and ignore the Law.

To get back to the "what's going to be done about it" question?

Realtalk: if, tomorrow, all the receipts for generational treason were dropped on the table, substantiating or motivating hundreds of thousands of indictments, imprisonments for flight risk, and etc. affecting one or both major political parties. The day after would you expect the administration of the US at any level above dogcatcher to function? Probably not, and while personally I'm tired and mean enough not to care, in practice the implication is martial law and intense disruption with a period of deep distrust lasting a generation. This could only possibly be mitigated through generous application of some truly spectacular justice (as in, spectacles) of such terrifying character that even baby-eating satanist liars to the core of their black hearts piss themselves for a hundred years.

And, then the administration who exacts such justice has to step down like Washington and Cincinnatus to go tend their farm or whatnot. Any other path than the above gets us a Caesar and the end of the Republic (which, arguably, ended in 1913 at the latest).

Jim Schout's avatar

I disagree. The dog catchers will still catch dogs and everyone can still get up and go to work. The Congress can be totally gone and it will not change my life in any way.

I think you are placing way too much disaster into a legal problem. The whole idea was we are a country of laws. So, we do not need any wars, we work it out legally. In fact, the states can work just fine without Washington. That was also a part of our design. The Constitution calls for border control, national defense, and a sound currency. Period.

Most if our present mess has been manipulated since 1913. The states let it happen and they need to fix their mistakes. That is what I see.

JC's avatar

Correct that the subdivision is intended to free subsidiary entities to function normally. My point, however, was that to thoroughly, legally address the scale of the corruption (and treason!) it has to cut down through every level of political administration right to local and their bureaucratic appointees.

The dogcatcher will catch dogs because no one wants such a position for political and corrupt ends.

I'd like to say that sheriffs could provide local stability in the exercise of state-sanctioned force and order, but I know for a fact that due to the power that position normally holds (answerable only to state governors), the office is often targeted for election of compromised, corrupt individuals.

Jim Schout's avatar

Politics was not supposed to be a full time job. Politicians have made it that way and we have allowed it. But, we can fix it too.

Look at America from the 40,000 foot level. It is humming along and booming with economic power. The only thing broke (and I mean really broke) is our government. Despite a dollar that will only buy 3 cents of 1913 value, our economy is still strong and can deal with our past stupidity. The key is to admit our mistakes, learn from them, and make things even better. Doing away with a corrupted Congress is a great new start.

ALtab's avatar

This is a very reasonable point, Jim.

🇫🇷 TRUMPist de La Fayette 🇺🇸's avatar

Hi JC!

I don't know where the truth actually stands about this matter, but I enjoy and agree 💯 with your clear and comprehensive analysis!

LilJoey's avatar

The baby eating satanist liars need to be tied to the post and made an example of. Not just pissing for 100 years. Evil needs to pay in pain.

JC's avatar

Public stocking had a purpose, but I'm fond of piling their possessions and burning.

ALtab's avatar

Good points!

Jim Schout's avatar

Let’s go back to 1913 and think about the logic of the 16th and 17th Amendments. I think the Democrat’s logic was quite simple and logical. It is, “Politicians are lazy and hate being embarrassed”. That’s it.

So, think about the idea of a federal income tax collected by the government and remitted back to the state governments for their use? What lazy state legislator wouldn’t love that idea? The federal government is the bad guy so there is no embarrassment and the state gets all that free money to spend. Wow! What a deal.

But, there was one problem with the Amendment that was sent to them from Washington. It said, “Without apportionment” which said the feds might not give back your state’s fair share. Oops! Can’t have that.

So, many lazy state politicians agreed to merely cross out the word “out” and their problem went away. The Fed’s would tax and send all of the money back to them.

The Secretary of State declared the Amendment to be ratified because enough state legislations signed it. The strike out of that one word was just ignored. So, it stayed in! And, because the whole plan was corrupt from the git go, no one bitched in public. The means of communication in 1913 was the newspaper and it took time for the word to be spread about the ratification and the lazy politicians were trapped by the Democrats who devised this scheme.

The other part of this evil scheme was the 17th Amendment. The state’s Senators would no longer be appointed by the legislatures per the Constitution. We the people would be given that power. That was what democracy demanded! It made sense from a Democrat’s perspective. But, it took away a major strength of our Constitution in that there would be no one looking out for the specific interests of the state legislatures. The states lost their power! But, the people thought it made sense and it was declared ratified. I do not know the details of how the individual legislatures tried to fight this, but I have to believe they had to do so. They had to know this was not a good thing. But, again, if they were lazy and their people were in favor, why fight a popular idea?

Here we are 113 years down this crazy road and the laziness and stupidity is still killing our country. You tell me, would we have $39 Trillion of national debt if what happened in 1913 had been rejected as un-Constitutional? And, who is responsible? I say we know precisely who to blame. It is the party that knows how to exploit laziness and stupidity.

Offering free stuff sells. Taxing the rich sells. That is what sold America on the income tax in 1913 and got this whole ball rolling.

JC's avatar

It's worth observing the context of the 17th amendment: there had been, going back decades, political turmoil in multiple states that prevented them from filling vacant Senate seats. It was ginned-up in the newspapers as a crisis and failure of democracy, along with allegations (probably true, but I speak without returning to the research) of vote-buying in the legislatures and the stage was set.

Thing is, following the Parliamentary model all these drawbacks were well-known. The appointment and replacement cycles were intended to counter the effects of lifetime seats in the House of Lords, which itself filled appointments by the will of the monarch. So state legislatures approving candidates their governor put forward was both a considerable democratic step forward AND a nod to the states themselves as sovereign within the Republic.

The campaign for these amendments used the same propaganda hooks that proved effective in shaping public opinion, e.g. for the Spanish-American war 15 years prior, which was inflamed at the decision of William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal, among others, conspiring to push the US into an imperialist role. Note that Edward Bernays laid out the techniques in 1928 in his book Propaganda, which were eagerly adopted by others as the 20th century progressed.

Jim Schout's avatar

You make a very solid point. The big city newspapers were manipulating the public with “Democratic” propaganda and ignoring our Constitution in the process. Small town papers were solidly conservative but did not get the circulation of the big guys.

The bias we see today is very much the same but the internet has weakened the influence of the influencers. Yeah!!!

🇫🇷 TRUMPist de La Fayette 🇺🇸's avatar

Hi Jim !

Here's the answer I got from Brave Leo AI about the matter:

"Utah was the only state that formally rejected the Seventeenth Amendment, doing so on February 26, 1913. Several other states—Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia—took no action on the amendment and thus did not ratify it.

At the time of the amendment’s proposal, Alaska and Hawaii were not yet states and therefore did not participate in the original ratification process; they later adopted the amendment upon statehood in 1959."

I think you should make a better use than myself of this whole search 😉🤗

https://urls.fr/71cUiz

Same question to Freespoke:

https://urls.fr/UEjD1J

Jim Schout's avatar

Ah! Southern States! Democrat states! See how that worked? The lazy southern, Democrat politicians knew how to avoid being embarrassed, they just did nothing! That is what the lazy, corrupt, Democrat politicians still do!

ALtab's avatar

Yes, but now joined fully by the lazy, corrupt, Republicans…

Jim Schout's avatar

I must cut them some slack. After over 90 years of being out of any real level of political control, many republicans chose to go with the winners.

If you think about it, in 2016 Trump was the very first president since Hoover to be elected with a Republican house and senate. The Mueller silliness took the house away and the Democrats pulled their old tricks to stymie the next two years. Guess what they plan for November?

ALtab's avatar

—-Not completely, obviously, but I am optimistic, too, Ashe. ‘Is it?’ Not when the justice system is still in flux, ‘The process will be weaponized again in this way if there aren’t consequences for everyone…’

—-Ghost nailed this as it has applied to the entire information war. ‘Sometimes it’s hard to tell.’

—-Bottom line? It appears you have all (BB, Ashe, Ghost) been correct in your varied analyses. That’s a good thing!

Kathy's avatar

People who practice the occult often don’t “look like” they do, so seems like a strange and superficial framework through which to evaluate participation.

JC's avatar

Exactly. The "kindly looking" witch is still a witch and Grimm's tales recorded the common wisdom for such.

Yermak has been accused of being a sorcerer, himself. That is, actual blood sacrifices and things that scared people shitless on encountering him. He is credibly the occult center of the administration and probably knows more than anything about the human trafficking, organ harvesting and missing children from the country--let alone the ordinary financial and sexual corruption now so common it's boring.

If a fraction of Yermak's spiritualism is true, then with this woman he's just "checking professional references". And yes, they could have been having an affair; such people do magic that way, after all.

ZetaCrown13's avatar

I got the title reference and I laughed out loud!!! Very clever, thanks for unexpected amusement.

Burning Bright's avatar

We live to serve.

And to be weird.

🇫🇷 TRUMPist de La Fayette 🇺🇸's avatar

😡🤬🇺🇲🤬😡

When members of Congress themselves show just how useless they are and openly mock their constituents when they try to explain why they oppose this expenditure of just ONE billion dollars after having blown past the debt:

💸💸 Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy, said he has "a lot" of questions of his own, adding that "One of the biggest concerns on our side is adding to the deficit." 💸💸

😡🤬

"GOP lawmakers leery of Trump's billion-dollar ballroom-security package"

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/gop-lawmakers-leery-trumps-billion-dollar-ballroom-security-package

ALtab's avatar

It’s not being funded by our taxes. That was announced in the beginning (unless I missed something, which is possible).

🇫🇷 TRUMPist de La Fayette 🇺🇸's avatar

Hi Altab!

The only part that's NOT paid for by taxpayers money is the ballroom and adjacent parts all above the ground.

Taxpayers money is rightfully needed for the bunker and all the “doom day” security improvements created underground, under the ballroom.

ALtab's avatar

Yes, that makes perfect sense. Thank you for the clarification! I’ve filed it away in my mind.

Sovereign Yogi's avatar

Here are my notes from Q the Storm Rider's (aka Bear) Patreon last night:

Trumo is giving testimony in China Mil Tribunals 2B inserted into military records. China is undergoing massive division infighting btwn powerful families. btw: Of course, it's not really Trump (security reasons). Xi is permanently removing CCP from China.

US Supersoldiers have been running mil ops inside China.

Recent Mega Earthquakes in Edmonton, Canada were result of US taking out longstanding Chinese DUMBs (China version of Area 51 inside Canada).

Before US assault on Venezuela, Trump ordered military escorts to insure safe passage for Chinese & Russian tankers to transport oil & minerals out. But all DARK Ops in S America have been removed.

China wants to cut all underwater cables to bring down US financial but DJT is stopping it. (DARN!!!)

ALL DRAGON Families are in attendance of China Mil Tribunals to insert truth on the record for mil archives regarding Wuhan role in COVID 19 bioweapon.

Kharazian Globalists have and are still attempting coop inside China which Xi & DJT are stopping.

Elon & US Mega-Corps are negotiating to repurposed China's Ghost Ctities + enact planetary 6000 patent High Tech infrastructure to benefit all humanity + end all wars.

Charlie Ward is reporting HUGE enthusiastic crowds welcomed DJT.

Xi & DJT teams have already worked $1T deal for China to build factories inside USA.

CW is hinting DJT will pay off ALL US Debt using BitCoin. Wouldn't it perfect if BitCoin value went to shit immediately thereafter?

Burning Bright's avatar

I mean, it all sounds cool, and some of it might be true, but it's also just literally stuff a guy is saying with precisely nothing to back it up.

Either way, good things happening.

Anna's avatar

Is there a link? Thanks.

Sovereign Yogi's avatar

It's behind Patreon paywall. NEWS17CHANNEL. Q the Storm Rider (Bear) is worth it

NBK's avatar
14hEdited

OHHHH MY, SHOOO IS GETTIN MIGHTY HOT IN THE KITCHEN!

Elections old & new, Fauci GOF, CDC, NIAID & CiA, Ukraine the biggest crime scene, Clowns clawing back MKultra & JFK files, untouchables now become the hunted, and Chinese network exposed, adjudicated, & sentencing. Those still complaining about no justice, no perp walks, and no jail, really do have their head up their cake hole. OAN, and other new conservative media outlets need to step up their game, and start trampling the old mocking birds. There is no doubt we have entered the justice phase, Chinese police network in NYC found guilty looking at 15 years in federal prison, foreign invaders posing as mayors getting sentenced, military age foreign students departed & banded from reentry. A lot going on in the justice bull pen that was awfully quiet for years, and now sounds like a barroom brawl every night.

ELECTION NOISE

I have voiced that the Uniparty are the majority, democrats & republicans are the minority in the DC Swamps. There are no RINOs in DC, but there are crap tons of them in the state legislatures, and with the recent SCOTUS ruling on gerrymandering, you are going to see all those Uniparty members reveal themselves. Here's an easy one, the uniparty senate leader revealed himself to you, he scuttled the SAVE Act, and President Trump's former 45 COS Mark Meadows gave Americans a list of Uniparty members who screwed them over on the SAVE Act, and they need to be given the boot. All this feels good, democrats registering as republicans, just remember what Pelosi, Waters, Schiff, Schumer, and the former chief of clowns said, they will encourage democrats to register as republicans to infiltrate the GOP. They are no different from the RINOs turned Uniparty, each of the legislative candidates deserve all the extra scrutiny they get, and it is on us to get it right. NBK

LilJoey's avatar

Every note makes the trialiance seem more possible. Could this really happen? It would take so many powerful enemies to see a mutual betterment……… a master statesman/salesman with a plan that solves so many parts- If so this would be a momentous moment- humanity gets a big day- we want this! Praying for success.

🇫🇷 TRUMPist de La Fayette 🇺🇸's avatar

🕊️🇺🇲🫂🇷🇺🫂🇨🇳🕊️

Just while President Trump's talking and dealing with Xi in China ...

"When global order begins to fracture"

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/when-global-order-begins-fracture