63 Comments

As a Virginian, I can tell you that most of the people in the state are very much supportive of governor, Glenn Youngkin, and his efforts to clean up the lists. When this idiot judge shut down these efforts, we were all pissed off. It is completely illogical to leave on the voter list. people who are not eligible to vote, and dead people. Because you know all dead people immediately turn into Democrats. You can be an ultra Maga Trump supporting Republican when you’re alive, but when you die , stay on the voter list you become a Democrat. We know how there works. This is absolute insanity. Make it makes sense. Hopefully the Supreme Court does the right thing.

Expand full comment

Only the Dead Vote blue. If you were dead you’d be Blue too. Lol not taking them off the voter roll is

Just lazy and ignorant and ignorant and judge needs a new job. Vote all dead wood out!!!

Expand full comment

How can judges agree to hear ridiculous cases in the first place? Shouldn’t silly cases be rejected immediately?

But, if they agree to hear a bogus case, isn’t it their job to rule against the obviously erroneous idea behind the lawsuit?

You would think a judge showing such poor judgement would be fired immediately. But, they just get a slap on the wrist and continue to embarrass themselves. They are not concerned because they are being paid by us taxpayers and so are the lawyers who must work to overturn the bad decisions. Both sides win and we lose.

Our system is broken, but not beyond repair.

Expand full comment
founding

Many judges (federal at least) serve 'lifetime appointments under good behavior.'

The judges behaving badly need to be fired.

AFAIK that has never happened, except perhaps in extreme cases, but it seems to me that the misbehavior has risen to the level requiring the termination of these judges' employment. Clearly, ruling according to one's personal preferences rather than the plainly stated law qualifies as misbehavior.

Expand full comment

Trump's "purely a vessel" comment was almost immediately twisted by the left into a "Handmaid's Tale" issue, such as Michelle Obama's outburst that "[Women] are more than just baby-making vessels!". Of course it was - lies are all the left has to offer.

Expand full comment

"Michelle" Obama has a valid point. In her case a woman is a man.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣

Expand full comment

The Axios story makes a lot of good points. But the Call her Daddy episode with Kamala has received 740K views. The Trump Rogan podcast is at about 37 Million views. Not the same thing.

Expand full comment
Oct 29·edited Oct 29

Megyn Kelly would have gotten her more views but Megyn would have cleaned her clock because she's a better lawyer than Kamala.

And Trump is right about her being an empty vessel. On one hand, I kind of feel sorry for her because she is obviously being used. But then I come back down to reality because she could have said no, but she didn't. So be it - reap what you sow....

Expand full comment

What does Kamala have to lose by being an empty vessel? She may become our president for goodness sake! The real question is, “What does America have to lose?”

Kamala is making huge money running for office and holding the second highest office in America. We are paying for that empty vessel. What have we gotten for our money?

I see a huge problem here. Democrats love free money and they have no appreciation of value. Taxing us and returning nothing is fun for them because they are not wasting their money, they are wasting ours. That is how an empty vessel thrives.

Expand full comment
founding

By a ratio of 50:1.

Expand full comment
founding

The people are watching. “Let’s see what happens..” 🤓 Love to all of you in the trenches!

Expand full comment

Bill Nelson's Face... I've seen better heads than his fall off the side of a fish truck

Expand full comment

Looks like he got hit by a fish truck.

Expand full comment

LOL

Expand full comment

“the screeching communist harpies that have decreed themselves official narrative-setters for the entire country realize with mounting dread and panic that they've lost complete control of the story, which, as I have been saying for over two years, IS the war.” - BB

Our uncommon perseverance and devotion to integrity and truth has paid off! God Bless the Anons and alternative media. We are winning ❤️🇺🇸

Expand full comment

Elon/NASA: If you borrow $1k form the bank, the bank owns you. If you borrow $100m from the bank. You own the bank.

And yes... the US never set foot on the moon. One small fraud for a man... one giant fraud for mankind

Expand full comment

There's so much evidence we went to the moon. The "evidence" we did not is all complete nonsense like none of the photos on the moon show stars in the background. The shutter speed to show stars would have to be many minutes long and the astronauts didn't shoot film for minutes. The Van Allen Belts are another pile of abject idiocy. NASA planned for the time through the Van Allen Belts to be where the ionizing radiation was a minimum, and the time spent traversing the Belts wasn't long enough to get a damaging dose of radiation. NASA is a shady op in many ways but it did take us to the moon many times.

Expand full comment

Thank you! 👏👏👏

Expand full comment

It's so easy to make those who believe we never went to the moon look like morons. Mike Bara is a brilliant researcher, and writer with an extensive professional tech background. His book on JFK, and the secret space programs contains a chapter of all the evidence we did land men on the moon, and he destroys the arguments by the idiots who believe we did not, one, by one, by one using basic science, obvious logic, and photographic evidence. I mean he destoys them so badly nobody coudd ever again, in their right mind, take these dopes seriously. .

Expand full comment

Actually, from a logical position alone, the moon landings and further, the RETURN back to Earth with the equipment they used at the time is quite laughable. But, it will all come out in due time. The Earth isn't flat, but we also never had people walking on the moon in the 1960s either.

Expand full comment

Don’t think so !!! Fake tin can and they talked to Nixon on a phone ☎️ right!!

Go ahead believe what you want.

Space is non existent.

Rabbit holes remain infinitely curios.

Or stay stuck in your limited capacity to believe nasa

Who films their ISS in a swimming pool

Green screen

Produce a real picture of earth without CGI

Ok waiting…..

waiting

Tell me virus exist

Tell me net zero is a good idea

Tell me they went to the moon 🌚 and I’ll tell you

Don’t believe so!!

Good luck rocket man you can’t get out of low earth orbit

Expand full comment

No there are several new books out (see amazon) that show that we did not get to the Moon. Also James Webb (telescope named after him) resigned right before Apollo 11. He knew it was being faked. A good source is AULIS online.

Expand full comment

There was a movie about that (with OJ Simpson), but I can’t think of the name of the movie.

Expand full comment

Capricorn One! A real documentary !!!😊

Expand full comment

Never got to moon 🌝 never!! Van Allen Belts.

Moon is plasma.

Expand full comment

Do you brew the Duff beer that Homer Simpson drinks?

Expand full comment

Then what rang when struck by the missile? Plasma??

Expand full comment

Maybe??? 1965 professor said plasma??

I can tell you with certainty we never landed on da moon!!

Pravda idk you tell me? Moon 🌝 is a mystery.

Expand full comment

😠

Expand full comment
founding

AiA: "From a change management standpoint, this has great educational value. The election period, and particularly the two weeks that bookend Election Day, is the maximum exposure period, when the greatest number of Americans are tuned into the narrative." Brilliant take Ashe!

Change management is a very mis-used and misunderstood concept. When we talk about "game theory" and "narrative setting" we are inserting "change" into not only words but biases. The problem is that non-cognitive dissonance (the unconscious rejection of an idea that occurs in the part of the brain that actually responds to change as a risk) results in (triggers) not only resistance, but often outright rejection - but again not for "reason", for self-defense. By allowing the DOJ to bring the shock and then honestly responding to it, Virginia has forced the people's brains to unconsciously see the DOJ as the "change-agent" they do not like.

Also - based on Bezos op ed and the NBC bonus article I am conflicted. I think they (NBC) actually got it right (or should I say correct). There are extremists with conspiracies who threaten our elections: Harris, BO, HRC, former Speaker and professional inside trader, etc...and we have proof that they have and will incite violence if things don't go their way!

PS - great reads on the subject of change management: "Neuroscience for Organizational Change" by Hilary Scarlett and "Thinking: Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman

Expand full comment

Thanks for your insight on this! Wonderful discernment.🙏

Expand full comment

Wonderful comment, HGV!

I’m not familiar with change management (nor the books you cited) but I suspect the more one invests emotion into their position, the greater likelihood the defensive triggers.

Great comment though. Thank You!

Expand full comment
founding

Thank you Feather!

Neurologically it actually goes deeper than cognitive "investment" and in fact often seems to contradict the very "rational" or expected response to change. In studies the panic or flight reaction is as likely for "good" change as it is for "bad".

Expand full comment

Internet interruptions today-lost my post & no time to rewrite, however, suffice it to say the escalations and accelerations are increasing exponentially! Plus, the 2024 elections totally demonstrate the ‘serfs’ are rising in total rebellion against their ‘would-be’ masters! We have the best citizen journalists in the world! NASA a clown show…glad my science nerd dad is not with us as we watched everything moon related in 1969!

Convergence indeed! Putin, Elon, Trump, and ALL those building behind the scenes…

God bless each participant here!!🙏🙏

Expand full comment
founding

And it appears we may need to add Jeff Bezos to the roster. 343 words (including title and by-line, a little over 1/3 of BB's '1000 words' reference) that will change the game of journalism going forward. The CIA must be really miffed with him!

"Anyone who doesn’t see this is paying scant attention to reality, and those who fight reality lose. Reality is an undefeated champion."

-- Jeff Bezos, "The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media," WaPo Oct 28

Expand full comment
Oct 30·edited Oct 30

Yes the Clementine mission to the Moon--most of the photos are classified. They can see license plates from space. We could easily have a detailed photo of a landing site, but no, just photoshopped ones. Notice how scared they are to launch Artemis. The cannot get those astronauts there and back with primitive technology.

Expand full comment

Badlands, have you considered having a link to a separate page for each of your blurbs? This way we could share the individual blurbs to others based on preference. We can always share the full edition, but many of my friends sadly won’t read the entire edition. But they would like to read 1-3 of the selected blurbs if spoon fed to them.

I have sent to friends the links to the article (to original mass media piece), but It doesn’t include the “Our Take” commentary.

Am I missing something?

🙏🏻

Expand full comment

I've often wished I could hit like directly to a commentary, or have a link to a specific article with corresponding take. Great idea!

Expand full comment
founding

It would be simple to add a link at the beginning of each article, that would take you to the complete News Brief, but down to the particular article referenced. Then folks could read that particular piece, and who knows, they might keep reading!

Expand full comment

That's interesting, I was wishing for that as I was reading today.

Expand full comment

CiA Mike on Morning Joe whined endlessly about Huge NYC Trump HATE Party + Cooper openly mocking Kamal[a[ = Proof Positive White Hat Directors are writing MSM scripts. Can U feel the Endless Waves of Love? Nov 6 ... Let Make Earth Great Again! Let's Evolve Together as Christed Men and Women. Pls innerstand Jesus is one of many Christed Ones (Ascended Masters). 2nd Coming = masses learning to surf REALLY HUGE LOVE WAVES!

Expand full comment

Amen, Yogi!

Expand full comment
founding

"It's not that Kamala is evil, or corrupt, or hateful, though she is all of those things.

It's that Kamala is empty, vapid and disconcertingly inert.

She lacks anything to build a story around.

And in a war made of them ... that's not a great plan."

— Burning Bright

Just about sums it up, BB. You're on fire today! 🔥🔥🐯🐯

Expand full comment

“have Trump and Putin been colluding this whole time? You're damn right they have—and we thank God for it” Thanks Ghost!! 👍👏❤️🇺🇸🕊

Expand full comment

Sorry that I got a late start today but thanks y'all for another round of great Takes.

When you take a step back you cannot help but laugh at thr DS Rat Bastards. Their inverse reality really is like the Sienfeld BazzaroWorld 😀

And the normies that still come out to defend the defenseless are really pitiful.

It is a good thing we can laugh because there is not help for them or any point in ttrying to debate them. Bless their little hearts 💕

Wild week continues...

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

Expand full comment

Bill Nelson looks like either he is on vid raping children, likely little boys, like longest-serving House Speaker in history, Denny Hastert, a closeted homosexual did when he was a wrestling coach in Yorkville, IL l, which is why Hastert was selected to be the longest-serving speaker, or he's being bribed with boatloads of cash, but either way he has that twisted look of a creepy fuck so prevalent among politicians.

Expand full comment
founding

Lots will be coming out. The creepy fucks are scared shitless.

Expand full comment

And what's been going on with turtle Mitch McConnell? He should've stepped down years ago.

Expand full comment

Two ways the mainstream papers could work to restore credibility would be to never hire anyone with a journalism degree, and to only hire people who have worked for some time in an unrelated field. Staying away from people from the blue hives wouldn't be bad either.

Expand full comment