26 Comments

Sometimes you have to choose between less than perfect options. Iranian backed terrorist groups that want to obliterate Israel seem to instigate far more violence against civilians and launch indiscriminate missiles continually into civilian areas in Israel. Not to mention taking civilian hostages and raping the women and children and torturing or killing the men. That Israel responds with killing specific leadership targets or attacking terrorists strongholds actually shows quite a bit of restraint. Supporting Israel does not mean supporting all their bad actions, as they are an imperfect state just like all others. I support America but I do not support the criminals or deep state globalists in our government. But given the choice between Iranian supported terrorists and Israel, I have to say it is best to support Israel. As far as Biden/Harris/liberal globalists, they seem to support both sides and appear to enjoy providing what ever funding is needed by whomever needs it to balance the playing field and keep the conflict going. Who profits from war? The people who sell the weapons and ammunition.

Trump actually prevented open warfare from breaking out, a strong indicator that he is not tied into the profit machine of war.

Expand full comment
Aug 6·edited Aug 6

Sorry, but your comment reflects very typical American brainwashing in regards to Israel.

Israel has never shown restraint when dealing with the people who have lived there since biblical times.

Our host touched on only a couple examples of Israel's murderous duplicitousness.

Mossad specializes in masquerading as Arabs and committing atrocities in order to elicit American involvement and money.

Besides the U.S.S. Liberty, there is overwhelming evidence of Israel's direct involvement in the Barracks bombing in Beirut in 1983 that killed scores of Americans.

There is also very strong evidence of Israel's involvement in both the JFK assassination, as well as 9/11.

I will leave it up to the interested reader to delve further into those rabbit holes, but make no mistake, Israel has been engaged in large scale, covert war against the U.S. for many decades, in order to use our military might to achieve their own tribal objectives in the mid East, to say nothing of the outright bribery and extortion AIPAC uses against most of Congress.

I will also leave alone the very real possibility, backed by centuries of circumstantial evidence, that the Ashkenazi have no genetic connection to the ancient Israelites, as well as the fact that modern Judaism has only a superficial connection to the biblical covenants, thus obviating any land claim that modern Jews have in Palestine.

I applaud Ryan's attempt to broach the subject of Israel's skullduggery, as I find it alarming how blinded most American patriots are to the question of modern Israel's undeclared war against the U.S. Most Americans, particularly evangelicals, unthinkingly parrot whatever propaganda has been fed to them over the past two generations in regards to the true nature of politics in the Mid East.

We will never achieve true freedom or awakening without addressing modern Israel, and how that tiny state has so effectively hijacked America's ship of state, as well as our very minds and perceptions.

Expand full comment

"...circumstantial evidence, that the Ashkenazi have no genetic connection to the ancient Israelites, as well as the fact that modern Judaism has only a superficial connection to the biblical covenants, thus obviating any land claim that modern Jews have in Palestine."

That is a good point. The common misunderstanding is that the Jewish people, the genuine ones, are Israel. The real Jews are descendants of two Tribes of Israel, Judah and Levi. Israelites are the descendants of the OTHER twelve Tribes of Jacob/Israel, and are not Jews.

But as to the "land claim", Jerusalem was always the home of the actual Jews, and rightfully so, and the muslims have no right to it. I make a distinction between Jerusalem and the proxy state territory called Israel. That is another subject.

Expand full comment
founding

Throw Benjamin in there to support your position...

A deep study of the covenants and the implications of their fulfillment by Jesus will also clarify the validity of claims. Think: property surrendered (because of unwillingness to "pay the mortgage") back to He who owns it all. He, the Owner and Creator, still has plans for the land, but those who forfeited their claim will need to get in line with the rest of the nations (be grafted back in, in other words).

Expand full comment
Aug 6Liked by Ryan DeLarme

Your gifts are truly appreciated as we try to wind our way through the mine field at the same time the narratives are directed at sides with different goals. I do have faith that God’s gifted many to ensure His will for this time is completed I His timeframe….not ours. Thank you, Ryan for sharing your gifts with us. God bless.🙏

Expand full comment
author

My pleasure! Thanks for always reading

Expand full comment

Pity you did not mention Operation Cyanide and the U.S.S. Liberty. The USS Liberty was attacked by unmarked planes and torpedo boats in international waters during the Six Day War between Israel and the Arab States. The attack on the surveillance ship lasted 75 minutes -- 34 men died and 172 were injured. Initially it was thought that either Egypt or the U.S.S.R. was responsible, but astonishingly Israel, the U.S.'s closest ally, said that the planes and boats belonged to them, and that they mistook the ship for an Egyptian vessel -- despite the prominently displayed Stars and Stripes.

This hard-hitting investigation shows that on that day in 1967, the world came closer to all-out nuclear war than ever before -- this incident made the Cuban Missile Crisis seem tame by comparison. Peter Hounam reveals that the attack was part of a clandestine plan between the US and Israel known as "Operation Cyanide," designed to ensure victory for Israel in the Middle East. By blaming the attack on the Arab world, retaliation on a grand scale would be justified.Makes Lavon affair patty cake. As far as the Donald. He is Deep State. He is ardently pro-Zionist. Israel owns him. On the other hand a plausible smokescreen slightly different than Biden covering up atrocity -you know MAGA-could work to make a deal. Better anti-missile system say and better bigger beefier weapon systems.

Expand full comment
author

Interesting, I'll definitely be looking into Operation Cyanide!

btw I did mention the Liberty:

"The USS Liberty incident, a false flag that killed 34 and injured 171 American soldiers, serves as another example of the West's cover-up of fatal Israeli skullduggery."

Expand full comment

LBJ had a Mossad mistress.

Expand full comment

He did indeed. One of many major U.S. politicians who have been compromised by Israeli Intel, thus severely distorting what our role in the Mid East should be.

Expand full comment

By the Donald, do you mean President Trump? His is NOT a "pro-Zionist", he supports Jerusalem, not necessarily the proxy state of Israel. He is most certainly not "deep state", that's absurd. The deep state wants him dead.

Expand full comment

No. Theater. His faux shooting. Look up his ownership of a CIA property. Resorts International.

Expand full comment
Aug 6Liked by Ryan DeLarme

Of course they are silent. This is a no win situation. They stand to lose New York Jews or college students and protesters.

Expand full comment
author

Great point

Expand full comment
Aug 6Liked by Ryan DeLarme

Keep your friend close. Keep your enemy closer.

Expand full comment

Let us stop with all of this end of the world stuff. If you think of it peace and stability have never been the human experience. To quote my Christian Zionists (also an oxymoron) "we will not know the day nor the hour when our Lord will return"...so live your lives and love the Lord. Furthermore, though Iran is a bad actor - they do not have a major death wish (nor does Israel). Yes, there can be an exchanges of missiles and drones - which I believe will be mostly for show. Israel (US) would be really stupid to press the matter further. If there should be a major exchange of nukes...this would be a major fail (stating the obvious). Instead of war, both sides (the rest of the world) should be looking for an off-ramp and a way to de-escalate tensions. There is no way another ME conflict will come to a good end. OK.... off of my soapbox. Pax

Expand full comment

I am not a "zionist", and I do not take sides in this middle east conflict. But what is the point? That the proxy state of Israel is run by the Mossad? Yes, same as the US deep state is run by the CIA. And Mossad formed Hamas, same as Obama and Hillary formed ISIS. And they want America dragged into a nuclear war because they know Trump has the support of the vast majority of voters, and when he returns he will "abolish the deep state".

Should I have remorse for a terrorist threat killed by Israel? I have more concern for the American and Jewish hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. Trump would have them released in two days.

Why didn't Harris (Obama) choose PA Gov Shapiro as her running mate? Because he's Jewish, and the regime supports the muslim invasion of the US, with the goal of total destruction of our society. Look at what they have done in England.

I am a Bible believer, and I "pray for the peace of Jerusalem". But there will be no peace there until the Millenium. By the way, the nation/state in the middle east calling itself Israel is not the people of Israel referred to in Bible prophecy.

Expand full comment
author

No, I did not ask that people feel remorse for the assassinated. He knew what he signed up for. I'm only drawing attention to the fact that no one is Western leadership seems capable or willing to reign in the situation. It is my hope that Trump has a plan and is just keeping his cards close to his chest until he's in.

I 1000% agree with you about Israel. " By the way, the nation/state in the middle east calling itself Israel is not the people of Israel referred to in Bible prophecy."

There are bad actors who know that most Christians will not consider the differentiation you highlighted, and I think that they use this blind loyalty to their advantage. Biblical prophecy does not name a time, but many assume that time is now. The current form that Israel has taken on might not be the same Israel mentioned in the Bible.

I disagree that the current regime favors Muslims over Israelites, all they care about is optics and they would lose at least 10% of the vote if they went with Shapiro. If Kamala wins she is not going to stop giving Israel everything it wants. They might feign support for a bill or policy that they know has no chance, they might even pay lip service to whatever the Pro Palestine useful idiots want to hear, but at the end of the day the real powers behind the throne do not care which side you support, only that you DO support a side.

Expand full comment
founding

I put part of this in a response and then decided to submit it as a stand-alone comment, in part because Ryan suggested that the topic would be covered both strategically and theologically...

A deep study of the covenants, and the implications of their fulfillment by Jesus, will clarify the validity of claims to the land. The promise to Abraham of an everlasting possession and to the sons of Israel after the exodus, had conditions; as was proven by their exile (see Leviticus 26 and Deut. 28&30). (BTW - Abraham's descendant were not allowed to possess the land at the time of the promise because the current inhabitants (the Amorites) had not completed their iniquities which would result in their eviction some 440 years later...so "everlasting" clearly had time bound conditions.) Their eventual return to the land (after 70 years of Sabbaths for the land) and commission to rebuild, retained the covenantal conditions - but the mercy seat was gone and the Glory of the Lord was not seen until Jesus entered the temple after His birth. (One of the reasons for their return was to retain the line that would bring forth the "seed of the woman" - Jesus!)

Forty years after the covenants were fulfilled at Jesus' death, justification and ascension, the opportunity to recognize, as a nation (meaning the ruling classes) their messiah were completed. Their failure to do so led to the city and the temple being destroyed, as Jesus had prophesied. As for the land that God owns: think - property surrendered (because of unwillingness to "pay the mortgage") back to He who owns it all. He, the Owner and Creator, still has plans for the land, but those who forfeited their claim will need to get in line with the rest of the nations (be grafted back in, in other words) to experience that fulfillment.

One critical point of hermeneutics when it comes to understanding the various theological perspectives: generally speaking, evangelical Zionists believe that Old Testament prophecies should be used to clarify, define, and interpret New Testament prophecies (what is known as futurist pre-millennialism - which oddly enough was first propagated by the Roman Catholic church in the 1500's in defense of their increasing involvement in secular governance). So, regarding Gog and Magog for example: Rev. 16:17-21; 17:8-14; 19:17-18,21; 20:7-10 should be understood by Ezekiel 38 and 39.

The pre-millennial doctrines that were accepted by the early disciples (what is known as historic pre-millennialism) held that the Old Covenants were fulfilled by Jesus (as He stated) and that New Testament prophecies of the last things were to be used to clarify, define, and interpret any Old Testament prophecies that had not been fulfilled (or annulled due to disobedience to conditions). So, Ezekiel 38 and 39 (Gog and Magog, etc.) should be understood by Rev. 16:17-21; 17:8-14; 19:17-18,21; 20:7-10.

Thanks for listening...

Expand full comment

I believe the truth about Israel is a deeply hidden evil agenda (Zionism) that is slowly being brought to light. I also don't believe we really know what Trump thinks but when Netanyahu was at Maralago recently we caught a glimpse. It feels like Trump and those aligned with him are trying to keep peace until he gets back in, but the DS isn't making it easy. Excellent article laying out truths.

Expand full comment

The 4 D Chess option is the only thing that makes sense to me, given the farce of an assasination attemp which was followed by a 'Punch & Judy' show in which Trump's team used a 'programmable life' force/clone to point out that Vincent Fusca was again in the crowd. Though we were not shown anything but his Fedora & back view & he did not respond to Trumps invitation to come on stage with him, the mention of sharing a 'foxhole' did not go amiss, given that Trump also touts himself as the 'finisher', ManyPHall's secret destiny of America & the great 'Quest' seems to be behind it all, with Christ as the 'cornerstone' & Trump as the 'capstone'. https://youtu.be/OlvFDwoaCLQ?si=KJsEvCAJQpCA09G_

Expand full comment
author

The assassination attempt is honestly hard for me to wrap my head around. If there is this all powerful secret military alliance backing Trump, then how could this goober kid almost shoot him? "POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting he’s even a target is false." -Drop 6

The only thing that makes sense to me is if it was staged, that the White Hats are using the deep state playbook against them, but then how do we explain the man who died? It boggles my mind honestly.

Expand full comment

Check out my videos! There was ‘nothing’ real about the assasination! It was all a fake to re-show Fusca & predict the next move!

Expand full comment

Dead cat bounce.

Expand full comment

Thanks Dave, who is brainwashing me? America is a very divided nation with very different viewpoints, media, information. I would like to know which camp is brainwashing me as "American" is way to broad of a description. Thank you.

Expand full comment

It is our Goal: To return to a Constitutional republican form of government this year. 2024 !! It must be done in steps. A next step: can be for a Civilian common law Court of record to require their Sheriff and / or the occupant of the Office of Sheriff to acquire for our perusal; their proper oath to the proper Constitutions with the Laws of nature and of Nature's God included. This has a protocol involved; in matters of over $20.00 in value a verdict from a jury is required; in common law of Article III and Amendment VII. What you testify must be spoken in open court. With witnesses that do not rebut you and form a Jurat signed, sealed, stamped, witnessed with proof of service published. We use www.orsja.org. On Oregon Sheriffs have 61 days to get all of their bona fides in order. With one exception. That clock is ticking.

Right now! We think. There is no other way another state, commonwealth or territory can join in a Congress Assembled in original jurisdiction. You must be with your states ARTICLE I Section 1 provisional government without rebuttal.

The basic tenets of a Church(s) were / are / have been / will be modified to meet the conditions of the secular state. Now, how can that be??? When a Church takes on a 501 C3 they put the jurisdiction of the state or states ahead of God and the congregation. Let me see; men and women with our progeny make up the congregation. Sovereigns in a social compact with their God. Then people become persons and go ‘pro se” into giving jurisdiction where none should be relinquished by “jura summi imperii.” Unalienable rights are impossible to lose. Please rescind any “contempt for common law.” Amendment VII and stop repeating the lie it is civil only. It is suits in common law that includes criminal also (Bouvier law 1856) “ in suits “ as defined with the proper dictionary of the proper year for The United States of America’s Constitution circa 1859. Original Jurisdiction of the one supreme Court claiming Article III, that is not SCOTUS. A jury must have 12!! Article III is found in the county nearest the event / action /crime. Article III is found in Amendment VII and as the value exceeds $20.00 there is no Judge involved and the jury verdict has no appeal in fact. That is a one supreme Court. This Article III Amendment VII Civilian common law Court of record is operated by ARTICLE I Section 1 on Oregon. It is our social compact having implemented ex parte Milligan and nullifying martial law / Lieber code / FEMA on Oregon aka the de jure provisional government on Oregon. Our Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly has an Article III Amendment VII Civilian common law Court of record. All of you are with us and have with full faith and credit a share in our court. Those of us on Oregon may not have something others are deprived of. By the provenance of the only know history of a sovereign man or woman with our progeny from before 1775, forward through 1776 and the 1777 Confederation and perpetual Union’s last article, known as our Constitution 1789. Then states and amendments were added. See, 1819 for the last lawful amendment. Virginia ratified XIII TONA. Then Oregon 1859 is the last lawful state among the several states of our Confederated perpetual Union. Federal is code for after March 1861 with governing law being martial law. Our lawful The United States of America’s in Congress Assembled has not happened since 24 December 1860. When South Carolina seceded and broke the Confederation and perpetual Union, we acquired color of law until March 1861. Then we got martial law. Lincoln’s EO #100 the Lieber Code and it is still in effect in the US Army plan for Martial Law 2018. Except on Oregon as of June 2018.

They, USMC, make the claim it is not them. It is Navy( bullshit the Navy is not on the land and soil) it is DOD bullshit 1775 USMC more ancient responsibility. A de jure, original jurisdiction, responsibility. They take orders from the several states and Oregon is one of those several states and we are the ARTICLE I Section I provisional government on Oregon the land and soil de jure to de jure USMC. That billet must exist!!! With the proper oath to the Proper Constitutions. QUESTION?: who in the USMC is responsible for keeping the part of the oath that covers "Enemies from within?" It cannot be the Federal US Army they are the de facto perpetrators. When the USMC claim, “not me,” is made "to shift responsibility." We deny that claim and demand the USMC support that claim. A preponderance of evidence is in the public domain and published at www.orsja.org.

Expand full comment