One type of law that you didn't mention is contract law. The breach of law that took place in 1871 was a violation of contract law. The original constitution formed a contractual basis for our government and it contained instructions for how the contact could be lawfully changed. When the Bank of England insisted that our constitution be bastardized unlawfully in title and contents (when the USA became a corporation), it committed fraud. We should all seek damages against this fraudulent corporation from our civil courts. Though the USA company can never pay back what it owes, our county sheriffs, who enforce the laws of the land, and whose job it is to enforce the orders of our civil courts, should deputize as many able bodied people as necessary to confiscate all federal property and buildings in lieu of damages in every county in the states. The USA corporation is treating all of us as employees. It defines citizens as agents of a foreign power (England). We have been coerced into a relationship with this company through fraud. You don't have to work for them. You don't have to have any relationship with them. You don't have to pay your money to them. You don't owe them your sons and daughters to go and die in foreign wars. They owe you for 150 years of fraud and the murder of our soldiers in fraudulent foreign wars.
A little historical background that may help those new to this portion of history.
After the US Civil War aka The War Between the States, the USA was in dire straights monetarily. The recovery process, which included rebuilding damaged areas, pensions for the widows of Union soldiers and payments to disabled Union soldiers to mention only a few of the monetary problems, Pres. Grant had to look abroad for a loan to bail out the country.
The International Bankers of the City of London were happy to "help out." there were certain conditions to obtaining the loan.
But first you will understand better if you realize that one of the foreign countries and agencies that helped precipitate the Civil War was England and the International Bankers of the City of London.
As is the case today, when there is a planned "takeover" of a country without firing a shot, there were agents, foreign influenced agents, in Congress during the period of time when the 14th Amendment was being debated and ratified after the Civil War.
The public reason for the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans whom it was believed that the Emacipation Proclamation had freed. As is usual in times of deceit, what is said and what is done are two different things entirely.
By expanding pre-Civil War Citizenship to both citizenship (capitalization or lack thereof is intentional and has meaning) of the State where born and the United States was a carefully planned ruse to give the Representatives of the people elected to Congress control. (i.e. the ability to make the "citizens", black and white "slaves" to the "laws" passed by Congress.)
The International Bankers of the City of London knew that it was only a mater of time before the USA would have to come to them, hat in hand, begging for funds. So there was pre-planning successfully carried out to smooth the effect the International Bankers wanted to implement when the time came.
It took a little while, from 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified on July 28, 1868 and the Act of 1871, that if memory serves me correct was passed February 21, 1871, and created a Corporation titled the UNITED STATES and as one old US History book stated; the UNITED STATES territory was "the air above the land and water previously known as the united States of America." (little "u" united is intentional). The Corporate status change was necessary for the Grant Administration to obtain the loan from the International Bankers of the City of London.
This covers the main points necessary to smooth the path from a Constitutional Republic (USA) to the Corporate UNITED STATES which was a necessary step for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act some 42 years later in 1913.
Couple of things. The 14th was never ratified because it did not have to be. It's a corporate charter for a bankrupt corporation. Also their main agent was Lincoln. As a card carrying BAR attorney he was disqualified from holding any Public Office anywhere in the country. It did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America,inc.That's why the southern states left without quorum. Also, he never freed any slaves, The Emancipation Proclamation only freed the states that were still using slavery from their obligations to their slaves,in hopes that it would start a revolt by the slaves. His motives were simple. His grandfather lost his fortune supporting the Americans during the Revolution,and was never paid back. Hence the stories of the abject poverty Lincoln grew up in. I will say he may have had a change of heart after seeing the carnage of his traitorous acts, but he was murdered before he could do anything. To get back to the constitutions. There are three (3) "federal" constitutions. The one with the 14th does not apply to Americans or follow ratification clause
According to 3 old US History Books I read back in the 1990s, that were printed between 1880 and 1892, there was no United States of America, Inc. until the Corporation was formed on February 1, 1871 and it was called the UNITED STATES, all caps, signifying that it was a Corporation. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 prior to Corporation being formed.
There were no "card carrying BAR Attorney"(s) during Lincoln's lifetime or for some years afterward.
You are correct that the no titles of nobility clause was prior to Lincoln's election.
However, the Third Vice President was Aaron Burr, 1801-1805, under Thomas Jefferson. He was a Lawyer as was John C. Calhoun who was Vice President under both John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.
Prior to the Act of February 21, 1871, also called The Organic Act of 1871 there were over 100 Representatives in Congress, 28 Senators and 3 SCOTUS Justices who were graduates of just one Law School, the Litchfield Law School in Connecticut.
The first official Bar Association was formed in 1870 in New York City. It was called the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Prior to that time there were "bar associations" which were little more than "social clubs for lawyers" in various parts of the country. It was 1916 before each State had a State BAR Association that regulated the practice of Law in each State.
In the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the Capitol Building in Washington D.C. that was used from 1810-1860, there was a railing going across the chamber that separated the gallery from the lawyers tables and the Justice's Desk. This railing functioned as a "bar" to prevent just anyone from approaching the lawyer's tables and the Justice's area. In the center of this railing was a gate through which the lawyers and their assistants could pass and be seated before the start of the court proceedings. The original meaning of "passing the bar" was to be allowed to use that gate to reach the lawyers tables.
It was many years after Lincoln's passing before there were any uniform tests, now called Bar Exams, a Lawyer had to pass to be able to call himself a Lawyer and hang out a shingle and practice Law.
The American BAR Association was founded August 21, 1878. It was not until after the founding of the American BAR Association that the BAR came to mean British Accreditation Registry.
The "Title of Nobility" that violates the Constitution is not "Lawyer" or "Attorney" and has nothing to do with a License to Practice Law commonly referred to as a "Bar Card." It is the British Title "Esquire" which was not in common usage in America until the early 20th century.
In the British Empire a Banker was known as a "Squire" and his lawyer who sued those who fell behind on their bank payments was called an "Esquire" to separate him from other lawyers.
Thus the title of "Esquire" was a special title signifying that Lawyer was above other Lawyers, and was known as a "Title of Nobility" with special recognition by the British Crown.
Once every State had a State Bar Association and the American BAR Association accredited Law Schools, then it became relatively common for lawyers who passed a Bar Exam, which typically includes a portion that is nation wide plus a portion that is state specific, to refer to themselves as "Esquires."
Yes,you are correct about Jefferson,but there is a difference between an attorney at law,and counsel in law. Lincoln most certainly was a member of the BAR, I'll dig it up and send it to you. The Act of 1871 was repealed in 1871,although parts of it came thru in the nxt couple of years, under different legislation. As for companies and corps, The State of States that were hijacked by the Brits,were actually formed by the founders,same as the first incorporation of the United States dba for the several states of the union as a way to spread out the workload over different jurisdictions of the fledgling new country,same as today. If you'd like,and if you haven't already,check out TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net it has some great resources. I hope I didn't come off like a know-it-all ,because I thought it was great to see so many well informed comments including the ones you left, especially after such a great article. I've been hoping there were those like you out there for awhile now. It has been wonderful talking with all of you. Let's do more of it.
I admire your enthusiasm. Reminds me of myself some 50 years ago when I first visited Willimasburg, Virginia and looked for old history books. My quest took me to D.C. multiple times, to Philadelphia multiple times as well as to obscure little colleges in more than one State because they usually had in their "stacks" old history books that had been swept from the libraries of larger Colleges and Universities.
Abe Lincoln was from Springfield, Illinois. That is where he practiced Law before becoming the President. The Illinois Bar Association was not formed until 1877 some 12 years after Lincoln died. So it would be impossible for him to have been a member of an organization that did not exist until after he died.
The term "attorney" comes from early 14th century England where an "attorney" was more of what we would today call a "paralegal". The attorney's job was to prepare a case for the "Barrister" who argued it in count.
In America the term"Barrister" was never adopted. Early on the term used was "Lawyer" and was the preferred and most used term until the late 19th and early 20th century. Origionally the English spelling was "atorney", only 1 "t". In America the spelling became "attorney", with 2 "t's".
Over time the general designation for a lawyer who represented someone in court in America became "attorney and counselor at law." The original definition of atorney/attorney was "one designated by another to act in his place." This was from the French, atorne', "one appointed."
As can be seen, there is a great similarity between "attorney at law" i.e. someone appointed to act in the place of another in court," and "counselor at law" which is the designation of someone representing another in court."
Over the years I learned that some souces were more careful in their research and conclusions than other sources. Those sources who were less careful appeared to either be somewhat sloppy in their research and "jump" to conclusions or lacking in complete understanding.
I have known of Anna von Reitz's work for some time now. (The American States Assemblies).
Much of her work agrees with years of study that I and the ones I used to study with had discovered and verified.
I would be careful with sources who claim that the Act of 1871 was repealed in 1871. That would have had one of two effects: 1. The loans from the International Bankers from the City of London would have been canceled before any money had changed hands or 2. a country that was essentially bankrupted by a Civil War would have been invaded by the British and very likely would have lost that war. Besides, none of the old history books I read mentioned any type of repealing of any portion of the Act of 1871 during 1871.
As an interesting historical fact, during the Civil War Lincoln was able to get the Russian Czar to have his Navy patrol the North's sea ports, (Atlantic seaports), to protect against an English blockade of the Noth. England was still chaffing from not being able to bring the "colonies" back under English rule in the War of 1812. As happens many times, what could not be accomplished by war, England won by manipulation of a post war problem, near bankruptcy of America.
I don't consider you a "know it all". At one point I was, myself, subject to be considered a know it all.
Keep digging, but don't forget to verify what you find. The best verification is old history books written and printed close to the era being researched.
Thanks for your posts. Very smart to get old history books. I read this one from years ago (written in the late 1800s)- I read it years ago, but was impressed with her understanding of the monetary system and the tricks of the bankers (I think she called them shylocks)- my recollection is that she had no clue about all of these other legal tricks and deceptions. Interestingly, she dedicated her book to the enslaved people of a dying republic:
Seven Financial Conspiracies which Have Enslaved the American People
"The American BAR Association was founded August 21, 1878. It was not until after the founding of the American BAR Association that the BAR came to mean British Accreditation Registry." ------ I just about dropped my hot coffee on my lap.
It is so amazing how all the little dots seem to connect themselves. ---- Cheers
The BAR (British Accreditation Registry) or BAR Temple in the City of London - Roman Law System. They have been carrying the shield for their masters, one way or another, since the 15th century. These attorneys absolutely existed within "The United States of America" being British Titles called ESQUIRE, having NOTHING to do with the "State of State" Franchises of Washington D.C. - the Corporation. We are not talking about "State" Bar, which derives from the original. Obfuscate some more. Lead the people from the truth. Looks like a bunch of that going on here. Not just bitterroot, but others. There are AI misinformation going on here. This is war, people. It has been since long before you were born. War against mankind. Welcome to the machine.
Years of research in Williamsburg, Virginia (Home of the College of William and Mary, the location of the first "Law School" in north America) along with multiple trips to D.C. and Philadelphia plus trips to small colleges in more than one State which had the old history books that had been swept from the Libraries of larger Colleges and Universities is the basis of my claims.
In the reading of literally hundreds of old Court Cases in the U.S.,. both Federal and State Court Cases, the title "Esquire" was markedly absent and did not appear until decades after the Corporation. It is always possible, given the huge amount of Court Cases in both the Federal and State systems to have missed some where the Lawyers were referred to as "Esquires"
No offense meant, however, the tone of your post, above, matches the tone of everyone I have met in the past 50 years who was trying to make others believe a falsehood. I hope it was just a combination of youth and desire to defeat the enemy we are all fighting.
I mean that last 2 sentences as constructive criticism, not a slap down. As you age, you will likely learn that you "catch more flies with honey than vinegar." Also with experience comes the ability of discernment that grows deeper with age. I choose to believe you are willing to go into battle and fight for what you believe. I believe you would fight valiantly and I hope your preparation would allow you to live to reap the rewards of those who win the battle. As an "old warrior" in this battle, I have seen many "young warriors" rush into battle before they were fully prepared. Take a deep breath, look for the vulnerabilities of the enemy and learn how to exploit them. Being able to completely and logically explain the situation always wins more converts to your side than any other technique.
I would love to hear your take on the theory that the Republican Party and the Democrat Party completely switched places at some point during history. Thus, if this were true, it would mean the current Democrat Party was never responsible for promoting and protecting the right to own slaves because the Democrats were actually the Republicans at that time. I have heard this story from so-called educated people and I don't believe it, but I'm not educated enough to know how to refute their claims.
According to my study of Political History the Republican Party was formed in 1854 to oppose the extension of Slavery into the Western Territories. The Republican Party also fought to protect the rights of Black Americans after the Civil War.
The first Republican President was Abraham Lincoln who won the Presidential Election in 1860. The Lincoln Douglas Debates over slavery, Lincoln against slavery Douglas for slavery, took place between August and October 1858.
If you understand the paragraph above then you will understand that there was no opportunity for, as you put it in your post above; "the current Democrat Party was never responsible for promoting and protecting the right to own slaves because the Democrats were actually Republicans at that time." There was no time in the history of slavery in America when the Republican Party supported slavery because of two things; 1. What the Republican Party was founded for only 6 years before Lincoln was elected President and 2. the Democratic Party was founded in 1828, some 26 years prior to the founding of the Republican Party and it was the Democrat Douglas who debated with the Republican Lincoln in 1858. The timelines of the founding of the two political parties prove that those "educated people" mentioned by you are not really educated at all.
Awesome detail there thank you. There are other branches to this story as well, but that's the true nature of history; everything is very interwoven. I am beginning to see that the current condition we are witnessing today was planned centuries ago. The same people behind what happened here in the US, were setting up a planning out the 1st World War.
Yep. That is why one should know what they're signing. Also how to sign things. It's nice to see so many who are catching on. Was wonderin when y'all were gonna show up. Nice to see you.
We were being what we thought were good citizen living our lives and raising kids day after day and now that we are older we have more time to peruse substacks LOL that give the TRUTH cause you know NOW we "can handle the truth" even if it makes us mad!!
Well, maybe some of us "were being what we thought were good citizens..." Some of us were trouble from the very start...but if you're one of them, you've been in good company. 😉
To clear some things up, Americans are not born under any political obligations. As such we are not born as American State Citizens,we are born as American State Nationals, who later can choose to become American State Citizens. The difference between the two is American State Nationals are not beholden to any set of laws, even American Common Law,so long as they do not disturb the peace,do not damage or steal another's property, and do not commit fraud on a contract. They are free in every sense of the word,but they have no say in how their government is run. American State Citizens choose to take on the duties and obligations of State Citizenship, (meaning there are consequences for failure to perform)and are the ONLY one's who can lawfully populate any level of our American government.Not U.S. citizen,not citizens of the United States,and not America. State Nationals. Only American State Citizens are one of "We The People"as well. American State Nationals,U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States are simply "the people." No one else is. Each state is a separate and foreign nation to every other state. International and interstate have always been interchangeable in America. The state one is born on gives one their nationality. As an example, I was born on the land and soil of Iowa,however I've lived the majority of my life in Arizona, so if I were to choose State Citizenship it would be as an Arizona State Citizen, while my nationality will always be as an Iowan. No American was born as a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States. It was done to each of us without disclosure and with deceit. However,as an adult,by your own hand, multiple times, under penalty of perjury, most have claimed to be something (much) less than an American everytime you "checked" "yes" to the question "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States?" The exact day it happened can be found in one's Birth Certificate. Look for the File Date, that is the day the American "legally died",and the U.S. citizen/citizen of the United States was "born." A U.S. citizen is considered property of the British U.S. Territorial government. The citizen of the United States is considered property of the Municipal United States government,which would make one property of the Vatican. The U.S. Territorial government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States of America." The Municipal United States government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States." The original or "organic" constitution is known as "The Constitution for the united States of America," which has only 13 Amendments, the last one being The Titles Of Nobility Act of 1819 (T.O.N.A) which forbids anyone accepting any foreign titles from holding any public office anywhere in the country. All BAR attorneys hold the foreign title of Esquire. Lincoln was a card carrying BAR attorney,which disqualified him from holding the Public Office of President of The United States of America,but did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America, inc. which is why the southern states left without quorum before the "civil war." They knew what we have forgotten. As proof of my statements, I'll leave you with this..."Therefore the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox,298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. and this..."The right to trial by jury in civil cases guaranteed by the 7th Amendment...and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment...have been distinctly held not to be privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment...and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosocution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment...and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment...it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment,and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment were not privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twinning vs New Jersey,211 US 78,98-99
Thank you so much for this detailed information. About 20 years ago, someone told me to "read Creature from Jekyll Island: a Second Look at the Federal Reserve." He said it would change my life.
Being thoroughly documented, mostly by government documents even, it is indisputable.
I've only had time to browse the article at this point so excuse me if this is mentioned; but I could have sworn their original bill, ca 1913, contained an end date of 99 years; ie, control of our money should have returned to the Treasury. Of course, by then the banksters were so all-powerful, I'm sure they could have ignored that. But I've always been curious. Do you know?
I apologize for all the typos in my response. It is 3am here, and it had been another long day. I will come back and answer the other questions after a little rest.
I got your response via email and it's fascinating! Corporations going bankrupt and then other people (oligarchs) incorporating under the same name. Man, the deceit never ends, does it! And please don't worry about a late response. I was brand new to substack and, due to the tsunami of authors & info, didn't even remember I'd posed the question! Many thanks for the time you spent answering!
That's why those two (Becerra and Miller) now I am saying the FED is a hoax. The dollar bills are hoaxes, but people don't read the fine print. Monopoly money.
A few wanted me to work with different cryptos, but I really didn't understand them. Soon as I get some farming set, seeds in the ground so all I'll have to do is water them. I'll research Brownbucks another guys' idea. I can't see him being angry if it works.
They are not worthless, however. Each Federal Reserve Note, is proof of the crimes committed against the American People, and the rest of the world. Also, the bankers, and corparations, and "government" were actually making obscene profit, even if what they were pushing was "monopoly money." That profit came from the principal, the credit, the assets, the fucking Value of all of it, came from the living people...us. It's all owed to us. Each and every one of us. They just like to pretend we're "missing" or we "abandoned" the assets and everything on and off the books.
They incorporate in Delaware in good part because of the state's Chancery Court, which is pretty much directly 'imported' from Britain. According to their own website:
"The Delaware Court of Chancery is widely recognized as the nation's preeminent forum for the determination of disputes involving the internal affairs of the thousands upon thousands of Delaware corporations and other business entities through which a vast amount of the world's commercial affairs is conducted. Its unique competence in and exposure to issues of business law are unmatched."
The Chancery Court specializes in this sort of business disputes, which means that it is generally less expensive and faster to litigate a matter there than in the common courts of other states; and the outcomes are generally more predictable.
There are also certain tax advantages to incorporating in Delaware (also true in other states), but the main reason (as I understand it) to incorporate in Delaware is that business uncertainty is reduced because of the court system.
I can tell you how, but very few will even try it. The good news is they ARE all fired, gone, whichever adverb you like. The rest of the government is too.
Pretty much don't do anything. This is don't pay income tax. All the lawyers I've spoken to haven't paid since 2015, another was saying. "You're a sovereign person, income tax is for slaves." My personal thought is I won't fund an illegal, immoral, illegitimate regime.
I have to disagree with Rob,at least in the part about not doing anything(I have not filed taxes since 2010,so I do agree with that part) It's not so much that the politicians need to be fired (they do) as much as Americans need to relearn who and what they are. Our employees have "presumed" we are "missing" and are doing are jobs "for" us. If you ask any American "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States 99% would answer"Yes". U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States have zero constitutional guarantees and are considered property. What is another name for a man or woman who is considered the property of someone else? Slave. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox, 298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143,56 S.Ct. 773.
To fix what has been done,go here
TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net When you get there go to the "Chart Your Course" section,then find the "928" documents. You can thank me later. 😉
P.S. by "not doing anything" you remain silent, and therefore it's considered a tacit agreement to all the criminality and treason.
It baffles me how you don't pay taxes since 2010! I would love to do that...but they've come after me (and I am not rich) for minor "infractions. Do you just stop doing it? They take taxes out of my check! Just don't file at the end of the year? What? How?
You go back to what you were born as,meaning you correct your status and return to being an American State National. Then you send the IRS your revocation. As for your paychecks,once you've sent your revocation to the IRS and Internal Revenue Service,(yes two different offices) you use a W4v,at your employers. Yes if you follow the link, you will find the info you need,including examples of the revocation letters,examples on how to fill out the W4v,as well as contact info for people that are in your local area that have experience and that can help you.
To answer your other questions,yes I stopped filing in 2010,,after I told them I was done with their games,and no there are no deductions taken from my checks.
When you claim to be a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States,you are also claiming to be a "taxpayer." That is how and why they can garnish wages,arrest you etc. When you correct your status,you are removing yourself from their jurisdiction and reclaiming your constitutional guarantees,freedoms,rights,etc. Also until we all do,"they" will keep claiming Americans are "missing" and they are doing are jobs "for us. I'm sure you're aware of all the shit that has been done in our names,all around the world. That has to stop,and the only way it can/will is when we as Americans step up,do our jobs,and hold those responsable accountable. These crimes have been done to the past 6 generations of Americans. Again,it has to stop. We as American's have a lot of work to do. So I hope you check out what I have said,and if you decide it's right for you,I hope you will share the info. If you do,let me be the first to say Good Luck,and Welcome Home.
That is an excellent article, I've been trying to do research on various aspects of the Sabbatean Billionaire Elites for awhile now. Their methods of both "soft" and "hard infiltration." Their hard infiltration is the establishment of pseudo legal structures that are later used to facilitate the harm they do; the soft version of their infiltration is using tools like "Philanthropy," to establish normalization of concepts regular human beings would never have accepted. The very central thing they created was a concept of institutional "hierarchy." Natural hierarchy would center around localized interactions between individuals, where there is healthy competition for status or reward.
I am trying to find factual resources to help nullify the entire Alloidal Trust System so that at some point in the future, people will finally be able to 100% OWN what they own. This could illegalize property taxes for example. Parents would be both the OWNER and the holder of their child's Birth Certificate until they are an adult, no government involvement, no corporate involvement.
I published an article on Individualized Sovereignty.
"When we use language that addresses "I am" to (a subject) in this case, "citizenship" we are addressing ourselves within a linguistic constraint; tethering the infinite condition of a sovereign being directly to a conditional, legally defined fictional entity. Which is then controlled by the issuing entity; Depository Trust Corporation under the legal umbrella of the United States Incorporated. Through issuance and control of birth certificates, the citizen becomes legal collateral to the Bank of International Settlements, this creates ipso facto guarantorship for every living human being who holds a “citizenship.” [For collateral against the Debt]
Hence forward; I do not use the "I am" declaration of citizenship on any forms, I will write: I am currently "holding a citizenship," also I will never sign my name "under penalty of perjury" ever again. Above any signature, I put: "Without prejudice UCC 1 308."
[UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.]
One type of law that you didn't mention is contract law. The breach of law that took place in 1871 was a violation of contract law. The original constitution formed a contractual basis for our government and it contained instructions for how the contact could be lawfully changed. When the Bank of England insisted that our constitution be bastardized unlawfully in title and contents (when the USA became a corporation), it committed fraud. We should all seek damages against this fraudulent corporation from our civil courts. Though the USA company can never pay back what it owes, our county sheriffs, who enforce the laws of the land, and whose job it is to enforce the orders of our civil courts, should deputize as many able bodied people as necessary to confiscate all federal property and buildings in lieu of damages in every county in the states. The USA corporation is treating all of us as employees. It defines citizens as agents of a foreign power (England). We have been coerced into a relationship with this company through fraud. You don't have to work for them. You don't have to have any relationship with them. You don't have to pay your money to them. You don't owe them your sons and daughters to go and die in foreign wars. They owe you for 150 years of fraud and the murder of our soldiers in fraudulent foreign wars.
Good article!
A little historical background that may help those new to this portion of history.
After the US Civil War aka The War Between the States, the USA was in dire straights monetarily. The recovery process, which included rebuilding damaged areas, pensions for the widows of Union soldiers and payments to disabled Union soldiers to mention only a few of the monetary problems, Pres. Grant had to look abroad for a loan to bail out the country.
The International Bankers of the City of London were happy to "help out." there were certain conditions to obtaining the loan.
But first you will understand better if you realize that one of the foreign countries and agencies that helped precipitate the Civil War was England and the International Bankers of the City of London.
As is the case today, when there is a planned "takeover" of a country without firing a shot, there were agents, foreign influenced agents, in Congress during the period of time when the 14th Amendment was being debated and ratified after the Civil War.
The public reason for the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans whom it was believed that the Emacipation Proclamation had freed. As is usual in times of deceit, what is said and what is done are two different things entirely.
By expanding pre-Civil War Citizenship to both citizenship (capitalization or lack thereof is intentional and has meaning) of the State where born and the United States was a carefully planned ruse to give the Representatives of the people elected to Congress control. (i.e. the ability to make the "citizens", black and white "slaves" to the "laws" passed by Congress.)
The International Bankers of the City of London knew that it was only a mater of time before the USA would have to come to them, hat in hand, begging for funds. So there was pre-planning successfully carried out to smooth the effect the International Bankers wanted to implement when the time came.
It took a little while, from 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified on July 28, 1868 and the Act of 1871, that if memory serves me correct was passed February 21, 1871, and created a Corporation titled the UNITED STATES and as one old US History book stated; the UNITED STATES territory was "the air above the land and water previously known as the united States of America." (little "u" united is intentional). The Corporate status change was necessary for the Grant Administration to obtain the loan from the International Bankers of the City of London.
This covers the main points necessary to smooth the path from a Constitutional Republic (USA) to the Corporate UNITED STATES which was a necessary step for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act some 42 years later in 1913.
Couple of things. The 14th was never ratified because it did not have to be. It's a corporate charter for a bankrupt corporation. Also their main agent was Lincoln. As a card carrying BAR attorney he was disqualified from holding any Public Office anywhere in the country. It did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America,inc.That's why the southern states left without quorum. Also, he never freed any slaves, The Emancipation Proclamation only freed the states that were still using slavery from their obligations to their slaves,in hopes that it would start a revolt by the slaves. His motives were simple. His grandfather lost his fortune supporting the Americans during the Revolution,and was never paid back. Hence the stories of the abject poverty Lincoln grew up in. I will say he may have had a change of heart after seeing the carnage of his traitorous acts, but he was murdered before he could do anything. To get back to the constitutions. There are three (3) "federal" constitutions. The one with the 14th does not apply to Americans or follow ratification clause
According to 3 old US History Books I read back in the 1990s, that were printed between 1880 and 1892, there was no United States of America, Inc. until the Corporation was formed on February 1, 1871 and it was called the UNITED STATES, all caps, signifying that it was a Corporation. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 prior to Corporation being formed.
There were no "card carrying BAR Attorney"(s) during Lincoln's lifetime or for some years afterward.
You are correct that the no titles of nobility clause was prior to Lincoln's election.
However, the Third Vice President was Aaron Burr, 1801-1805, under Thomas Jefferson. He was a Lawyer as was John C. Calhoun who was Vice President under both John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.
Prior to the Act of February 21, 1871, also called The Organic Act of 1871 there were over 100 Representatives in Congress, 28 Senators and 3 SCOTUS Justices who were graduates of just one Law School, the Litchfield Law School in Connecticut.
The first official Bar Association was formed in 1870 in New York City. It was called the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Prior to that time there were "bar associations" which were little more than "social clubs for lawyers" in various parts of the country. It was 1916 before each State had a State BAR Association that regulated the practice of Law in each State.
In the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the Capitol Building in Washington D.C. that was used from 1810-1860, there was a railing going across the chamber that separated the gallery from the lawyers tables and the Justice's Desk. This railing functioned as a "bar" to prevent just anyone from approaching the lawyer's tables and the Justice's area. In the center of this railing was a gate through which the lawyers and their assistants could pass and be seated before the start of the court proceedings. The original meaning of "passing the bar" was to be allowed to use that gate to reach the lawyers tables.
It was many years after Lincoln's passing before there were any uniform tests, now called Bar Exams, a Lawyer had to pass to be able to call himself a Lawyer and hang out a shingle and practice Law.
The American BAR Association was founded August 21, 1878. It was not until after the founding of the American BAR Association that the BAR came to mean British Accreditation Registry.
The "Title of Nobility" that violates the Constitution is not "Lawyer" or "Attorney" and has nothing to do with a License to Practice Law commonly referred to as a "Bar Card." It is the British Title "Esquire" which was not in common usage in America until the early 20th century.
In the British Empire a Banker was known as a "Squire" and his lawyer who sued those who fell behind on their bank payments was called an "Esquire" to separate him from other lawyers.
Thus the title of "Esquire" was a special title signifying that Lawyer was above other Lawyers, and was known as a "Title of Nobility" with special recognition by the British Crown.
Once every State had a State Bar Association and the American BAR Association accredited Law Schools, then it became relatively common for lawyers who passed a Bar Exam, which typically includes a portion that is nation wide plus a portion that is state specific, to refer to themselves as "Esquires."
Yes,you are correct about Jefferson,but there is a difference between an attorney at law,and counsel in law. Lincoln most certainly was a member of the BAR, I'll dig it up and send it to you. The Act of 1871 was repealed in 1871,although parts of it came thru in the nxt couple of years, under different legislation. As for companies and corps, The State of States that were hijacked by the Brits,were actually formed by the founders,same as the first incorporation of the United States dba for the several states of the union as a way to spread out the workload over different jurisdictions of the fledgling new country,same as today. If you'd like,and if you haven't already,check out TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net it has some great resources. I hope I didn't come off like a know-it-all ,because I thought it was great to see so many well informed comments including the ones you left, especially after such a great article. I've been hoping there were those like you out there for awhile now. It has been wonderful talking with all of you. Let's do more of it.
Chad,
I admire your enthusiasm. Reminds me of myself some 50 years ago when I first visited Willimasburg, Virginia and looked for old history books. My quest took me to D.C. multiple times, to Philadelphia multiple times as well as to obscure little colleges in more than one State because they usually had in their "stacks" old history books that had been swept from the libraries of larger Colleges and Universities.
Abe Lincoln was from Springfield, Illinois. That is where he practiced Law before becoming the President. The Illinois Bar Association was not formed until 1877 some 12 years after Lincoln died. So it would be impossible for him to have been a member of an organization that did not exist until after he died.
The term "attorney" comes from early 14th century England where an "attorney" was more of what we would today call a "paralegal". The attorney's job was to prepare a case for the "Barrister" who argued it in count.
In America the term"Barrister" was never adopted. Early on the term used was "Lawyer" and was the preferred and most used term until the late 19th and early 20th century. Origionally the English spelling was "atorney", only 1 "t". In America the spelling became "attorney", with 2 "t's".
Over time the general designation for a lawyer who represented someone in court in America became "attorney and counselor at law." The original definition of atorney/attorney was "one designated by another to act in his place." This was from the French, atorne', "one appointed."
As can be seen, there is a great similarity between "attorney at law" i.e. someone appointed to act in the place of another in court," and "counselor at law" which is the designation of someone representing another in court."
Over the years I learned that some souces were more careful in their research and conclusions than other sources. Those sources who were less careful appeared to either be somewhat sloppy in their research and "jump" to conclusions or lacking in complete understanding.
I have known of Anna von Reitz's work for some time now. (The American States Assemblies).
Much of her work agrees with years of study that I and the ones I used to study with had discovered and verified.
I would be careful with sources who claim that the Act of 1871 was repealed in 1871. That would have had one of two effects: 1. The loans from the International Bankers from the City of London would have been canceled before any money had changed hands or 2. a country that was essentially bankrupted by a Civil War would have been invaded by the British and very likely would have lost that war. Besides, none of the old history books I read mentioned any type of repealing of any portion of the Act of 1871 during 1871.
As an interesting historical fact, during the Civil War Lincoln was able to get the Russian Czar to have his Navy patrol the North's sea ports, (Atlantic seaports), to protect against an English blockade of the Noth. England was still chaffing from not being able to bring the "colonies" back under English rule in the War of 1812. As happens many times, what could not be accomplished by war, England won by manipulation of a post war problem, near bankruptcy of America.
I don't consider you a "know it all". At one point I was, myself, subject to be considered a know it all.
Keep digging, but don't forget to verify what you find. The best verification is old history books written and printed close to the era being researched.
Happy digging,
Bitterroot
Thanks for your posts. Very smart to get old history books. I read this one from years ago (written in the late 1800s)- I read it years ago, but was impressed with her understanding of the monetary system and the tricks of the bankers (I think she called them shylocks)- my recollection is that she had no clue about all of these other legal tricks and deceptions. Interestingly, she dedicated her book to the enslaved people of a dying republic:
Seven Financial Conspiracies which Have Enslaved the American People
https://archive.org/details/sevenfinancialc00emergoog/page/n4/mode/2up
When my eyes came across:
"The American BAR Association was founded August 21, 1878. It was not until after the founding of the American BAR Association that the BAR came to mean British Accreditation Registry." ------ I just about dropped my hot coffee on my lap.
It is so amazing how all the little dots seem to connect themselves. ---- Cheers
Glad to see that you are connecting the dots! cheers to you also.
The BAR (British Accreditation Registry) or BAR Temple in the City of London - Roman Law System. They have been carrying the shield for their masters, one way or another, since the 15th century. These attorneys absolutely existed within "The United States of America" being British Titles called ESQUIRE, having NOTHING to do with the "State of State" Franchises of Washington D.C. - the Corporation. We are not talking about "State" Bar, which derives from the original. Obfuscate some more. Lead the people from the truth. Looks like a bunch of that going on here. Not just bitterroot, but others. There are AI misinformation going on here. This is war, people. It has been since long before you were born. War against mankind. Welcome to the machine.
Hello Swift Justice,
Years of research in Williamsburg, Virginia (Home of the College of William and Mary, the location of the first "Law School" in north America) along with multiple trips to D.C. and Philadelphia plus trips to small colleges in more than one State which had the old history books that had been swept from the Libraries of larger Colleges and Universities is the basis of my claims.
In the reading of literally hundreds of old Court Cases in the U.S.,. both Federal and State Court Cases, the title "Esquire" was markedly absent and did not appear until decades after the Corporation. It is always possible, given the huge amount of Court Cases in both the Federal and State systems to have missed some where the Lawyers were referred to as "Esquires"
No offense meant, however, the tone of your post, above, matches the tone of everyone I have met in the past 50 years who was trying to make others believe a falsehood. I hope it was just a combination of youth and desire to defeat the enemy we are all fighting.
I mean that last 2 sentences as constructive criticism, not a slap down. As you age, you will likely learn that you "catch more flies with honey than vinegar." Also with experience comes the ability of discernment that grows deeper with age. I choose to believe you are willing to go into battle and fight for what you believe. I believe you would fight valiantly and I hope your preparation would allow you to live to reap the rewards of those who win the battle. As an "old warrior" in this battle, I have seen many "young warriors" rush into battle before they were fully prepared. Take a deep breath, look for the vulnerabilities of the enemy and learn how to exploit them. Being able to completely and logically explain the situation always wins more converts to your side than any other technique.
Regards,
Bitterroot
I would love to hear your take on the theory that the Republican Party and the Democrat Party completely switched places at some point during history. Thus, if this were true, it would mean the current Democrat Party was never responsible for promoting and protecting the right to own slaves because the Democrats were actually the Republicans at that time. I have heard this story from so-called educated people and I don't believe it, but I'm not educated enough to know how to refute their claims.
According to my study of Political History the Republican Party was formed in 1854 to oppose the extension of Slavery into the Western Territories. The Republican Party also fought to protect the rights of Black Americans after the Civil War.
The first Republican President was Abraham Lincoln who won the Presidential Election in 1860. The Lincoln Douglas Debates over slavery, Lincoln against slavery Douglas for slavery, took place between August and October 1858.
If you understand the paragraph above then you will understand that there was no opportunity for, as you put it in your post above; "the current Democrat Party was never responsible for promoting and protecting the right to own slaves because the Democrats were actually Republicans at that time." There was no time in the history of slavery in America when the Republican Party supported slavery because of two things; 1. What the Republican Party was founded for only 6 years before Lincoln was elected President and 2. the Democratic Party was founded in 1828, some 26 years prior to the founding of the Republican Party and it was the Democrat Douglas who debated with the Republican Lincoln in 1858. The timelines of the founding of the two political parties prove that those "educated people" mentioned by you are not really educated at all.
Awesome detail there thank you. There are other branches to this story as well, but that's the true nature of history; everything is very interwoven. I am beginning to see that the current condition we are witnessing today was planned centuries ago. The same people behind what happened here in the US, were setting up a planning out the 1st World War.
You got it! WWI was planned prior to the end of the 19th Century. It was planned even down to the route of attack in the opening movements.
wow! Nice, succinct, bravo! And from memory?!? wow! : )
I hope these articles also lead to the fact that paying taxes is voluntary.
We'll get there, I promise.
Yeah,but only for Americans,not U.S. citizens or citizens of the United States. As long as one claims to be either,then it is not voluntary.
Actually when you sign the forms (when you are employed) I think it does!!
Yep. That is why one should know what they're signing. Also how to sign things. It's nice to see so many who are catching on. Was wonderin when y'all were gonna show up. Nice to see you.
We were being what we thought were good citizen living our lives and raising kids day after day and now that we are older we have more time to peruse substacks LOL that give the TRUTH cause you know NOW we "can handle the truth" even if it makes us mad!!
Well, maybe some of us "were being what we thought were good citizens..." Some of us were trouble from the very start...but if you're one of them, you've been in good company. 😉
Interesting stuff, You continue to wet my appetite for more knowledge on this subject.
Keep up the good work.
God Bless!!!
To clear some things up, Americans are not born under any political obligations. As such we are not born as American State Citizens,we are born as American State Nationals, who later can choose to become American State Citizens. The difference between the two is American State Nationals are not beholden to any set of laws, even American Common Law,so long as they do not disturb the peace,do not damage or steal another's property, and do not commit fraud on a contract. They are free in every sense of the word,but they have no say in how their government is run. American State Citizens choose to take on the duties and obligations of State Citizenship, (meaning there are consequences for failure to perform)and are the ONLY one's who can lawfully populate any level of our American government.Not U.S. citizen,not citizens of the United States,and not America. State Nationals. Only American State Citizens are one of "We The People"as well. American State Nationals,U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States are simply "the people." No one else is. Each state is a separate and foreign nation to every other state. International and interstate have always been interchangeable in America. The state one is born on gives one their nationality. As an example, I was born on the land and soil of Iowa,however I've lived the majority of my life in Arizona, so if I were to choose State Citizenship it would be as an Arizona State Citizen, while my nationality will always be as an Iowan. No American was born as a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States. It was done to each of us without disclosure and with deceit. However,as an adult,by your own hand, multiple times, under penalty of perjury, most have claimed to be something (much) less than an American everytime you "checked" "yes" to the question "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States?" The exact day it happened can be found in one's Birth Certificate. Look for the File Date, that is the day the American "legally died",and the U.S. citizen/citizen of the United States was "born." A U.S. citizen is considered property of the British U.S. Territorial government. The citizen of the United States is considered property of the Municipal United States government,which would make one property of the Vatican. The U.S. Territorial government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States of America." The Municipal United States government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States." The original or "organic" constitution is known as "The Constitution for the united States of America," which has only 13 Amendments, the last one being The Titles Of Nobility Act of 1819 (T.O.N.A) which forbids anyone accepting any foreign titles from holding any public office anywhere in the country. All BAR attorneys hold the foreign title of Esquire. Lincoln was a card carrying BAR attorney,which disqualified him from holding the Public Office of President of The United States of America,but did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America, inc. which is why the southern states left without quorum before the "civil war." They knew what we have forgotten. As proof of my statements, I'll leave you with this..."Therefore the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox,298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. and this..."The right to trial by jury in civil cases guaranteed by the 7th Amendment...and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment...have been distinctly held not to be privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment...and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosocution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment...and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment...it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment,and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment were not privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twinning vs New Jersey,211 US 78,98-99
Well done.
Thank you so much for this detailed information. About 20 years ago, someone told me to "read Creature from Jekyll Island: a Second Look at the Federal Reserve." He said it would change my life.
Being thoroughly documented, mostly by government documents even, it is indisputable.
I've only had time to browse the article at this point so excuse me if this is mentioned; but I could have sworn their original bill, ca 1913, contained an end date of 99 years; ie, control of our money should have returned to the Treasury. Of course, by then the banksters were so all-powerful, I'm sure they could have ignored that. But I've always been curious. Do you know?
I apologize for all the typos in my response. It is 3am here, and it had been another long day. I will come back and answer the other questions after a little rest.
I got your response via email and it's fascinating! Corporations going bankrupt and then other people (oligarchs) incorporating under the same name. Man, the deceit never ends, does it! And please don't worry about a late response. I was brand new to substack and, due to the tsunami of authors & info, didn't even remember I'd posed the question! Many thanks for the time you spent answering!
Enthralling reading. Looking forward to more.
I hope we don't have a contract with the Fed, as Beccera and Stevens have said, "It's a hoax." The Fed prints money, but it's bankrupt.
I offer everybody around here to have look and read this complementary article on
"Hear Me Roar" Substack:
"Legal Tender vs Lawful Money [or NO thing vs SOME thing]"
https://courageouslion380.substack.com/p/legal-tender-vs-lawful-money
That's why those two (Becerra and Miller) now I am saying the FED is a hoax. The dollar bills are hoaxes, but people don't read the fine print. Monopoly money.
Don't despair, I'm working on a new currency. It's not exactly new a guy in either MO or Tennessee had the idea first. 'Brownbucks.'
Hi Rob ! 🙋🏼♂️🇫🇷
It seems there are many people working hard on a new currency throughout the World 🌎 these current days...
Do you work with/for any of the new emergent currencies (crypto or either ?), or rather seeking to create your own one ?
I support & admire a such courageous choice ! 👋🏻👋🏻
A few wanted me to work with different cryptos, but I really didn't understand them. Soon as I get some farming set, seeds in the ground so all I'll have to do is water them. I'll research Brownbucks another guys' idea. I can't see him being angry if it works.
They are not worthless, however. Each Federal Reserve Note, is proof of the crimes committed against the American People, and the rest of the world. Also, the bankers, and corparations, and "government" were actually making obscene profit, even if what they were pushing was "monopoly money." That profit came from the principal, the credit, the assets, the fucking Value of all of it, came from the living people...us. It's all owed to us. Each and every one of us. They just like to pretend we're "missing" or we "abandoned" the assets and everything on and off the books.
Hello !
I offer everybody around here to have look and read this complementary article on
"Hear Me Roar" Substack:
"Legal Tender vs Lawful Money [or NO thing vs SOME thing]"
https://courageouslion380.substack.com/p/legal-tender-vs-lawful-money
Enjoy !
Biden said the other day, “my state, Delaware has more corporations than all other states combined”. Equity huh, well that fits.
They incorporate in Delaware in good part because of the state's Chancery Court, which is pretty much directly 'imported' from Britain. According to their own website:
"The Delaware Court of Chancery is widely recognized as the nation's preeminent forum for the determination of disputes involving the internal affairs of the thousands upon thousands of Delaware corporations and other business entities through which a vast amount of the world's commercial affairs is conducted. Its unique competence in and exposure to issues of business law are unmatched."
The Chancery Court specializes in this sort of business disputes, which means that it is generally less expensive and faster to litigate a matter there than in the common courts of other states; and the outcomes are generally more predictable.
There are also certain tax advantages to incorporating in Delaware (also true in other states), but the main reason (as I understand it) to incorporate in Delaware is that business uncertainty is reduced because of the court system.
Limited liability
On the hunt
https://www.offshorecompanycorp.com/bs/en/insight/jurisdiction-update/why-incorporate-in-delaware-us
Another take:
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/incorporating-in-delaware/
Outsourcing again, liabilities. I long for “Companies” again.
Company = in house
Corporation = outhouse
Thank you
Nearly one month after this topic was published, I offer you to read this additional article:
David Stockman on "The Status of the everything bubble created by the Fed"
Source: https://internationalman.com/articles/david-stockman-on-the-status-of-the-everything-bubble-created-by-the-fed/
Found on ZeroHedge: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/david-stockman-status-everything-bubble-created-fed
Fantastic! Will be a supporter as soon as I can.
These people in our government do not work for me/us. Paying them to not represent us is beyond infuriating.
Now how do we get out from under this servitude to which we did not agree? I want to fire them all.
I can tell you how, but very few will even try it. The good news is they ARE all fired, gone, whichever adverb you like. The rest of the government is too.
Do tell Rob! I am all ears and attitude!
Although what you say as follow up indicated I don't need to do anything after all??
Pretty much don't do anything. This is don't pay income tax. All the lawyers I've spoken to haven't paid since 2015, another was saying. "You're a sovereign person, income tax is for slaves." My personal thought is I won't fund an illegal, immoral, illegitimate regime.
Oh, somebody asked what it cost. In money nothing it only cost me a smile that I couldn't lose for days.
I have to disagree with Rob,at least in the part about not doing anything(I have not filed taxes since 2010,so I do agree with that part) It's not so much that the politicians need to be fired (they do) as much as Americans need to relearn who and what they are. Our employees have "presumed" we are "missing" and are doing are jobs "for" us. If you ask any American "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States 99% would answer"Yes". U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States have zero constitutional guarantees and are considered property. What is another name for a man or woman who is considered the property of someone else? Slave. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox, 298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143,56 S.Ct. 773.
To fix what has been done,go here
TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net When you get there go to the "Chart Your Course" section,then find the "928" documents. You can thank me later. 😉
P.S. by "not doing anything" you remain silent, and therefore it's considered a tacit agreement to all the criminality and treason.
It baffles me how you don't pay taxes since 2010! I would love to do that...but they've come after me (and I am not rich) for minor "infractions. Do you just stop doing it? They take taxes out of my check! Just don't file at the end of the year? What? How?
I am going to that link.....
You go back to what you were born as,meaning you correct your status and return to being an American State National. Then you send the IRS your revocation. As for your paychecks,once you've sent your revocation to the IRS and Internal Revenue Service,(yes two different offices) you use a W4v,at your employers. Yes if you follow the link, you will find the info you need,including examples of the revocation letters,examples on how to fill out the W4v,as well as contact info for people that are in your local area that have experience and that can help you.
To answer your other questions,yes I stopped filing in 2010,,after I told them I was done with their games,and no there are no deductions taken from my checks.
When you claim to be a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States,you are also claiming to be a "taxpayer." That is how and why they can garnish wages,arrest you etc. When you correct your status,you are removing yourself from their jurisdiction and reclaiming your constitutional guarantees,freedoms,rights,etc. Also until we all do,"they" will keep claiming Americans are "missing" and they are doing are jobs "for us. I'm sure you're aware of all the shit that has been done in our names,all around the world. That has to stop,and the only way it can/will is when we as Americans step up,do our jobs,and hold those responsable accountable. These crimes have been done to the past 6 generations of Americans. Again,it has to stop. We as American's have a lot of work to do. So I hope you check out what I have said,and if you decide it's right for you,I hope you will share the info. If you do,let me be the first to say Good Luck,and Welcome Home.
That is an excellent article, I've been trying to do research on various aspects of the Sabbatean Billionaire Elites for awhile now. Their methods of both "soft" and "hard infiltration." Their hard infiltration is the establishment of pseudo legal structures that are later used to facilitate the harm they do; the soft version of their infiltration is using tools like "Philanthropy," to establish normalization of concepts regular human beings would never have accepted. The very central thing they created was a concept of institutional "hierarchy." Natural hierarchy would center around localized interactions between individuals, where there is healthy competition for status or reward.
I am trying to find factual resources to help nullify the entire Alloidal Trust System so that at some point in the future, people will finally be able to 100% OWN what they own. This could illegalize property taxes for example. Parents would be both the OWNER and the holder of their child's Birth Certificate until they are an adult, no government involvement, no corporate involvement.
I published an article on Individualized Sovereignty.
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/individualized-sovereignty-and-political
Just a small highlight:
"When we use language that addresses "I am" to (a subject) in this case, "citizenship" we are addressing ourselves within a linguistic constraint; tethering the infinite condition of a sovereign being directly to a conditional, legally defined fictional entity. Which is then controlled by the issuing entity; Depository Trust Corporation under the legal umbrella of the United States Incorporated. Through issuance and control of birth certificates, the citizen becomes legal collateral to the Bank of International Settlements, this creates ipso facto guarantorship for every living human being who holds a “citizenship.” [For collateral against the Debt]
Hence forward; I do not use the "I am" declaration of citizenship on any forms, I will write: I am currently "holding a citizenship," also I will never sign my name "under penalty of perjury" ever again. Above any signature, I put: "Without prejudice UCC 1 308."
[UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.]
Thanks