One type of law that you didn't mention is contract law. The breach of law that took place in 1871 was a violation of contract law. The original constitution formed a contractual basis for our government and it contained instructions for how the contact could be lawfully changed. When the Bank of England insisted that our constitution be bastardized unlawfully in title and contents (when the USA became a corporation), it committed fraud. We should all seek damages against this fraudulent corporation from our civil courts. Though the USA company can never pay back what it owes, our county sheriffs, who enforce the laws of the land, and whose job it is to enforce the orders of our civil courts, should deputize as many able bodied people as necessary to confiscate all federal property and buildings in lieu of damages in every county in the states. The USA corporation is treating all of us as employees. It defines citizens as agents of a foreign power (England). We have been coerced into a relationship with this company through fraud. You don't have to work for them. You don't have to have any relationship with them. You don't have to pay your money to them. You don't owe them your sons and daughters to go and die in foreign wars. They owe you for 150 years of fraud and the murder of our soldiers in fraudulent foreign wars.
A little historical background that may help those new to this portion of history.
After the US Civil War aka The War Between the States, the USA was in dire straights monetarily. The recovery process, which included rebuilding damaged areas, pensions for the widows of Union soldiers and payments to disabled Union soldiers to mention only a few of the monetary problems, Pres. Grant had to look abroad for a loan to bail out the country.
The International Bankers of the City of London were happy to "help out." there were certain conditions to obtaining the loan.
But first you will understand better if you realize that one of the foreign countries and agencies that helped precipitate the Civil War was England and the International Bankers of the City of London.
As is the case today, when there is a planned "takeover" of a country without firing a shot, there were agents, foreign influenced agents, in Congress during the period of time when the 14th Amendment was being debated and ratified after the Civil War.
The public reason for the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans whom it was believed that the Emacipation Proclamation had freed. As is usual in times of deceit, what is said and what is done are two different things entirely.
By expanding pre-Civil War Citizenship to both citizenship (capitalization or lack thereof is intentional and has meaning) of the State where born and the United States was a carefully planned ruse to give the Representatives of the people elected to Congress control. (i.e. the ability to make the "citizens", black and white "slaves" to the "laws" passed by Congress.)
The International Bankers of the City of London knew that it was only a mater of time before the USA would have to come to them, hat in hand, begging for funds. So there was pre-planning successfully carried out to smooth the effect the International Bankers wanted to implement when the time came.
It took a little while, from 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified on July 28, 1868 and the Act of 1871, that if memory serves me correct was passed February 21, 1871, and created a Corporation titled the UNITED STATES and as one old US History book stated; the UNITED STATES territory was "the air above the land and water previously known as the united States of America." (little "u" united is intentional). The Corporate status change was necessary for the Grant Administration to obtain the loan from the International Bankers of the City of London.
This covers the main points necessary to smooth the path from a Constitutional Republic (USA) to the Corporate UNITED STATES which was a necessary step for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act some 42 years later in 1913.
To clear some things up, Americans are not born under any political obligations. As such we are not born as American State Citizens,we are born as American State Nationals, who later can choose to become American State Citizens. The difference between the two is American State Nationals are not beholden to any set of laws, even American Common Law,so long as they do not disturb the peace,do not damage or steal another's property, and do not commit fraud on a contract. They are free in every sense of the word,but they have no say in how their government is run. American State Citizens choose to take on the duties and obligations of State Citizenship, (meaning there are consequences for failure to perform)and are the ONLY one's who can lawfully populate any level of our American government.Not U.S. citizen,not citizens of the United States,and not America. State Nationals. Only American State Citizens are one of "We The People"as well. American State Nationals,U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States are simply "the people." No one else is. Each state is a separate and foreign nation to every other state. International and interstate have always been interchangeable in America. The state one is born on gives one their nationality. As an example, I was born on the land and soil of Iowa,however I've lived the majority of my life in Arizona, so if I were to choose State Citizenship it would be as an Arizona State Citizen, while my nationality will always be as an Iowan. No American was born as a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States. It was done to each of us without disclosure and with deceit. However,as an adult,by your own hand, multiple times, under penalty of perjury, most have claimed to be something (much) less than an American everytime you "checked" "yes" to the question "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States?" The exact day it happened can be found in one's Birth Certificate. Look for the File Date, that is the day the American "legally died",and the U.S. citizen/citizen of the United States was "born." A U.S. citizen is considered property of the British U.S. Territorial government. The citizen of the United States is considered property of the Municipal United States government,which would make one property of the Vatican. The U.S. Territorial government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States of America." The Municipal United States government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States." The original or "organic" constitution is known as "The Constitution for the united States of America," which has only 13 Amendments, the last one being The Titles Of Nobility Act of 1819 (T.O.N.A) which forbids anyone accepting any foreign titles from holding any public office anywhere in the country. All BAR attorneys hold the foreign title of Esquire. Lincoln was a card carrying BAR attorney,which disqualified him from holding the Public Office of President of The United States of America,but did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America, inc. which is why the southern states left without quorum before the "civil war." They knew what we have forgotten. As proof of my statements, I'll leave you with this..."Therefore the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox,298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. and this..."The right to trial by jury in civil cases guaranteed by the 7th Amendment...and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment...have been distinctly held not to be privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment...and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosocution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment...and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment...it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment,and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment were not privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twinning vs New Jersey,211 US 78,98-99
Thank you so much for this detailed information. About 20 years ago, someone told me to "read Creature from Jekyll Island: a Second Look at the Federal Reserve." He said it would change my life.
Being thoroughly documented, mostly by government documents even, it is indisputable.
I've only had time to browse the article at this point so excuse me if this is mentioned; but I could have sworn their original bill, ca 1913, contained an end date of 99 years; ie, control of our money should have returned to the Treasury. Of course, by then the banksters were so all-powerful, I'm sure they could have ignored that. But I've always been curious. Do you know?
That is an excellent article, I've been trying to do research on various aspects of the Sabbatean Billionaire Elites for awhile now. Their methods of both "soft" and "hard infiltration." Their hard infiltration is the establishment of pseudo legal structures that are later used to facilitate the harm they do; the soft version of their infiltration is using tools like "Philanthropy," to establish normalization of concepts regular human beings would never have accepted. The very central thing they created was a concept of institutional "hierarchy." Natural hierarchy would center around localized interactions between individuals, where there is healthy competition for status or reward.
I am trying to find factual resources to help nullify the entire Alloidal Trust System so that at some point in the future, people will finally be able to 100% OWN what they own. This could illegalize property taxes for example. Parents would be both the OWNER and the holder of their child's Birth Certificate until they are an adult, no government involvement, no corporate involvement.
I published an article on Individualized Sovereignty.
"When we use language that addresses "I am" to (a subject) in this case, "citizenship" we are addressing ourselves within a linguistic constraint; tethering the infinite condition of a sovereign being directly to a conditional, legally defined fictional entity. Which is then controlled by the issuing entity; Depository Trust Corporation under the legal umbrella of the United States Incorporated. Through issuance and control of birth certificates, the citizen becomes legal collateral to the Bank of International Settlements, this creates ipso facto guarantorship for every living human being who holds a “citizenship.” [For collateral against the Debt]
Hence forward; I do not use the "I am" declaration of citizenship on any forms, I will write: I am currently "holding a citizenship," also I will never sign my name "under penalty of perjury" ever again. Above any signature, I put: "Without prejudice UCC 1 308."
[UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.]
One type of law that you didn't mention is contract law. The breach of law that took place in 1871 was a violation of contract law. The original constitution formed a contractual basis for our government and it contained instructions for how the contact could be lawfully changed. When the Bank of England insisted that our constitution be bastardized unlawfully in title and contents (when the USA became a corporation), it committed fraud. We should all seek damages against this fraudulent corporation from our civil courts. Though the USA company can never pay back what it owes, our county sheriffs, who enforce the laws of the land, and whose job it is to enforce the orders of our civil courts, should deputize as many able bodied people as necessary to confiscate all federal property and buildings in lieu of damages in every county in the states. The USA corporation is treating all of us as employees. It defines citizens as agents of a foreign power (England). We have been coerced into a relationship with this company through fraud. You don't have to work for them. You don't have to have any relationship with them. You don't have to pay your money to them. You don't owe them your sons and daughters to go and die in foreign wars. They owe you for 150 years of fraud and the murder of our soldiers in fraudulent foreign wars.
Good article!
A little historical background that may help those new to this portion of history.
After the US Civil War aka The War Between the States, the USA was in dire straights monetarily. The recovery process, which included rebuilding damaged areas, pensions for the widows of Union soldiers and payments to disabled Union soldiers to mention only a few of the monetary problems, Pres. Grant had to look abroad for a loan to bail out the country.
The International Bankers of the City of London were happy to "help out." there were certain conditions to obtaining the loan.
But first you will understand better if you realize that one of the foreign countries and agencies that helped precipitate the Civil War was England and the International Bankers of the City of London.
As is the case today, when there is a planned "takeover" of a country without firing a shot, there were agents, foreign influenced agents, in Congress during the period of time when the 14th Amendment was being debated and ratified after the Civil War.
The public reason for the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans whom it was believed that the Emacipation Proclamation had freed. As is usual in times of deceit, what is said and what is done are two different things entirely.
By expanding pre-Civil War Citizenship to both citizenship (capitalization or lack thereof is intentional and has meaning) of the State where born and the United States was a carefully planned ruse to give the Representatives of the people elected to Congress control. (i.e. the ability to make the "citizens", black and white "slaves" to the "laws" passed by Congress.)
The International Bankers of the City of London knew that it was only a mater of time before the USA would have to come to them, hat in hand, begging for funds. So there was pre-planning successfully carried out to smooth the effect the International Bankers wanted to implement when the time came.
It took a little while, from 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified on July 28, 1868 and the Act of 1871, that if memory serves me correct was passed February 21, 1871, and created a Corporation titled the UNITED STATES and as one old US History book stated; the UNITED STATES territory was "the air above the land and water previously known as the united States of America." (little "u" united is intentional). The Corporate status change was necessary for the Grant Administration to obtain the loan from the International Bankers of the City of London.
This covers the main points necessary to smooth the path from a Constitutional Republic (USA) to the Corporate UNITED STATES which was a necessary step for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act some 42 years later in 1913.
I hope these articles also lead to the fact that paying taxes is voluntary.
Interesting stuff, You continue to wet my appetite for more knowledge on this subject.
Keep up the good work.
God Bless!!!
To clear some things up, Americans are not born under any political obligations. As such we are not born as American State Citizens,we are born as American State Nationals, who later can choose to become American State Citizens. The difference between the two is American State Nationals are not beholden to any set of laws, even American Common Law,so long as they do not disturb the peace,do not damage or steal another's property, and do not commit fraud on a contract. They are free in every sense of the word,but they have no say in how their government is run. American State Citizens choose to take on the duties and obligations of State Citizenship, (meaning there are consequences for failure to perform)and are the ONLY one's who can lawfully populate any level of our American government.Not U.S. citizen,not citizens of the United States,and not America. State Nationals. Only American State Citizens are one of "We The People"as well. American State Nationals,U.S. citizens and citizens of the United States are simply "the people." No one else is. Each state is a separate and foreign nation to every other state. International and interstate have always been interchangeable in America. The state one is born on gives one their nationality. As an example, I was born on the land and soil of Iowa,however I've lived the majority of my life in Arizona, so if I were to choose State Citizenship it would be as an Arizona State Citizen, while my nationality will always be as an Iowan. No American was born as a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States. It was done to each of us without disclosure and with deceit. However,as an adult,by your own hand, multiple times, under penalty of perjury, most have claimed to be something (much) less than an American everytime you "checked" "yes" to the question "Are you a U.S. citizen,and/or a citizen of the United States?" The exact day it happened can be found in one's Birth Certificate. Look for the File Date, that is the day the American "legally died",and the U.S. citizen/citizen of the United States was "born." A U.S. citizen is considered property of the British U.S. Territorial government. The citizen of the United States is considered property of the Municipal United States government,which would make one property of the Vatican. The U.S. Territorial government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States of America." The Municipal United States government's constitution is known as "The Constitution of the United States." The original or "organic" constitution is known as "The Constitution for the united States of America," which has only 13 Amendments, the last one being The Titles Of Nobility Act of 1819 (T.O.N.A) which forbids anyone accepting any foreign titles from holding any public office anywhere in the country. All BAR attorneys hold the foreign title of Esquire. Lincoln was a card carrying BAR attorney,which disqualified him from holding the Public Office of President of The United States of America,but did not disqualify him from holding the private office of President (CEO) of the United States of America, inc. which is why the southern states left without quorum before the "civil war." They knew what we have forgotten. As proof of my statements, I'll leave you with this..."Therefore the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp vs Fox,298 U.S. 193,80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. and this..."The right to trial by jury in civil cases guaranteed by the 7th Amendment...and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment...have been distinctly held not to be privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment...and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosocution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment...and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment...it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment,and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment were not privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twinning vs New Jersey,211 US 78,98-99
Well done.
Thank you so much for this detailed information. About 20 years ago, someone told me to "read Creature from Jekyll Island: a Second Look at the Federal Reserve." He said it would change my life.
Being thoroughly documented, mostly by government documents even, it is indisputable.
I've only had time to browse the article at this point so excuse me if this is mentioned; but I could have sworn their original bill, ca 1913, contained an end date of 99 years; ie, control of our money should have returned to the Treasury. Of course, by then the banksters were so all-powerful, I'm sure they could have ignored that. But I've always been curious. Do you know?
Enthralling reading. Looking forward to more.
I hope we don't have a contract with the Fed, as Beccera and Stevens have said, "It's a hoax." The Fed prints money, but it's bankrupt.
Hello !
I offer everybody around here to have look and read this complementary article on
"Hear Me Roar" Substack:
"Legal Tender vs Lawful Money [or NO thing vs SOME thing]"
https://courageouslion380.substack.com/p/legal-tender-vs-lawful-money
Enjoy !
Biden said the other day, “my state, Delaware has more corporations than all other states combined”. Equity huh, well that fits.
Nearly one month after this topic was published, I offer you to read this additional article:
David Stockman on "The Status of the everything bubble created by the Fed"
Source: https://internationalman.com/articles/david-stockman-on-the-status-of-the-everything-bubble-created-by-the-fed/
Found on ZeroHedge: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/david-stockman-status-everything-bubble-created-fed
Fantastic! Will be a supporter as soon as I can.
These people in our government do not work for me/us. Paying them to not represent us is beyond infuriating.
Now how do we get out from under this servitude to which we did not agree? I want to fire them all.
That is an excellent article, I've been trying to do research on various aspects of the Sabbatean Billionaire Elites for awhile now. Their methods of both "soft" and "hard infiltration." Their hard infiltration is the establishment of pseudo legal structures that are later used to facilitate the harm they do; the soft version of their infiltration is using tools like "Philanthropy," to establish normalization of concepts regular human beings would never have accepted. The very central thing they created was a concept of institutional "hierarchy." Natural hierarchy would center around localized interactions between individuals, where there is healthy competition for status or reward.
I am trying to find factual resources to help nullify the entire Alloidal Trust System so that at some point in the future, people will finally be able to 100% OWN what they own. This could illegalize property taxes for example. Parents would be both the OWNER and the holder of their child's Birth Certificate until they are an adult, no government involvement, no corporate involvement.
I published an article on Individualized Sovereignty.
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/individualized-sovereignty-and-political
Just a small highlight:
"When we use language that addresses "I am" to (a subject) in this case, "citizenship" we are addressing ourselves within a linguistic constraint; tethering the infinite condition of a sovereign being directly to a conditional, legally defined fictional entity. Which is then controlled by the issuing entity; Depository Trust Corporation under the legal umbrella of the United States Incorporated. Through issuance and control of birth certificates, the citizen becomes legal collateral to the Bank of International Settlements, this creates ipso facto guarantorship for every living human being who holds a “citizenship.” [For collateral against the Debt]
Hence forward; I do not use the "I am" declaration of citizenship on any forms, I will write: I am currently "holding a citizenship," also I will never sign my name "under penalty of perjury" ever again. Above any signature, I put: "Without prejudice UCC 1 308."
[UCC § 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.]
Thanks