Trump Knows
What Is the Secret Weapon?
Badlands Media will always put out our content for free, but you can support us by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Help our collective of citizen journalists take back the narrative from the MSM. We are the news now.
On January 20th, 2017, then President-Elect Donald J. Trump uttered words that would send shockwaves through the criminal networks that covertly exert undue power and influence over the free people of the world.
This secret group of blackmailers and debt peddlers—who weaponize vice, engage in international banking schemes, and manufacture crises to accumulate power—never intended for a man like Donald Trump to take power.
Unlike what some might have thought, Trump did not continue the long tradition of parasitically draining freedoms from hardworking Americans. Instead, 45 would do the unthinkable—he’d begin the process of giving power back to the people.
“What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.”
“Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning, because today we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C., and giving it back to you, the people.” — President Donald J. Trump’s in his 2017 inaugural address.
What power was Trump referring to?
Later in the speech, he hints at the answer:
“What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. January 20th, 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again.”
To the average citizen, the idea that power needs to be returned to the people might seem crazy. But after the draconian pandemic response and the disenfranchisement of millions of Americans in the 2020 election, the truth that the people aren’t truly the rulers of the nation rings more true than ever.
Power, in this sense, refers to discretion over one’s life—how much power does a citizen have to defend their rights and foster the fair use of their lawfully-based freedoms?
When we have power, our will is represented—our choices and values are taken into account within whatever decision is being made that affects our lives.
What do we call people who have no power over their own lives? Slaves. Prisoners. Civilly, we’d refer to a subjected nation as conquered.
Whose choices have the most impact on our lives? Yes, we do enjoy relative freedom, we can choose between multiple brands of soda, for instance. We can decide on different types of cell phones. We can even decide what toxic experimental vaccines to choose from to satisfy unlawful vaccine mandates.
No. I’m sorry, but we aren’t in control of our lives. Not in any meaningful sense.
Certainly not in the way the founding fathers enjoyed. We have more power of choice than an abject slave depicted in movies like The Color Purple, but the choices we can make are themselves pre-prescribed options produced by others—the globalists, the international bankers, and the communists that work with them across the world. We have a bit more choice than a prisoner in prison, but not much more than that.
I know it sounds like a stretch, but from a rule of law perspective, this is precisely the case.
We are considered spiritually dead, lunatics, which are unable to manage our own affairs as God prescribes (competently in harmony with God’s Will), and therefore, we are treated like contemptible wards of the state. This is literally true within the secret law system upon which the one we interact with operates. (The Cestui Que Vie Act 1707, 1707 CHAPTER 72 6 Ann)
The elite engage in lobbying, manipulation of the media, and manipulation of public officials to make sure, whatever influence you have in government—in your life—is marginal at best.
Therefore, in effect, WE THE PEOPLE, have no representation, and therefore, we have no real and meaningful way to govern ourselves and reign in the hijacked government. And therefore, according to the foundational basis of law upon which our nation was built, “… whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”
Was Trump speaking to this elephant in the living room? This nightmare reality where freedom is slavery, and weakness is strength? It seems so. The American people are a conquered people, and Trump knows.
Who Does the Country Serve?
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." — Thomas Jefferson.
Whose interests does the country serve?
The people barely scrape by while the representatives of the people and their corporate partners take home handsome rewards. Trump and the allies of freedom know that the people are not served by their government. Instead, WE THE PEOPLE are made to serve our government. And our government is made to serve the interests of people who do not have our best interests at heart.
According to a September 2014 study performed by Princeton University Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University Professor Benjamin Page, “Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.”
Influence, here means power—the ability to contribute to outcomes that affect your life in some way.
Ask the average citizen how much power they have to influence their lives, and most will answer, ‘little to none.’ Modern civilization can’t exist without the widespread participation of the citizenry. Hospitals would cease to function without nurses, janitors, support staff, and, of course, doctors. The same is true for the ever-complex world of technology we are increasingly dependent upon.
During the COVID pandemic response, citizens were asked to shelter in place, lock down their lives, and ruin their businesses in the name of public safety. The politicians, experts, and industry leaders who demanded we do these things refused to participate themselves.
Mothers were unable to see their sick children in the hospital.
Husbands were unable to support their families.
Children were forced to stay home from school.
Mask and vaccine mandates were forced upon the people, who, by and large, were willing to shoulder their share of the burden in the name of public health.
While the average citizens dutifully drank the full measure of the plandemic bitter cup, elites all over the world ignored the lockdowns, took advantage of the low business competition to expand and pad their profit margins, and enacted laws and policies that sought to permanently strip freedoms given up on a temporary basis for the good of the pandemic response—and Trump knows.
While many raged at Trump for his response to the pandemic, his remarks from the 2017 inaugural speech oddly spoke to what happened afterward.
As if Trump knew what was coming, he said,
“For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government, while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth. Politicians prospered, but the jobs left and the factories closed. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. Their victories have not been your victories. Their triumphs have not been your triumphs, and while they celebrated in our nation’s capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.”
Trump is speaking to what we’ve all felt at one time or another; it’s the fact that there are rules for average citizens and rules for those in power—the so-called establishment. We have a two-tiered justice system.
Before and after the declaration of a pandemic in January 2020, insider trading schemes enabled members of congress and their allies in the business world to gain unfair advantages as a result of the lockdowns. It was a shady partnership between corrupt elected officials in Washington DC, globalist business moguls, and their co-conspirators in the medical industrial complex and media. Within less than a year, those in the know would amass incredible wealth and power, at the expense of the people.
The ”establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. Their victories have not been your victories.” Trump knows.
Yahoo News reported in March 2021, that 15 companies gained over a trillion dollars in market capitalization as a result of the pandemic. Netflix ($97.51 billion increase), Zoom ($77.67 billion increase), and Facebook ($192.86 billion increase), to name a few, were poised to take advantage of the globally coordinated response to the pandemic.
Did these profiteers lower their prices in an act of social service to help the economically depressed? Not at all.
The people received a mere $2,000 in stimulus, which doesn’t sound that bad until you consider that real inflation was 32% at the end of 2022. The payoff to citizens was nothing—a small token for the horrible price WE THE PEOPLE had to pay for little safety and no protection.
The Signs
How could Trump have known?
Trump might have seen the writing on the wall. That is, Trump seems to know the profile of these corrupt actors. He might have seen warning signs of a criminal conspiracy to use a pandemic to further consolidate power in the hands of globalists. Trump likely knew because the same modus operandi had been used many times in the past. He knew in the same way a parent knows that their kid has been in the cookie jar—there are crumbs all over the bed.
The corrupt elite is arrogant. They say that their grip on the minds of the people is so complete that even if they themselves were to tell the world, using evidence to prove that they are indeed behind the pandemic and other insidious NWO globalism, the people wouldn’t accept the truth. For this reason, and others not mentioned, the elite boldly displays their exploits and agenda, and for the most part, the normies are too busy with Tik Tok, social media, celebrities, and other distractions to pay much attention—let alone understand what they’re looking at even if they did pay attention.
The M.O. of corrupt forces betrays the truth ignored by those who unwittingly drank the kool aide. This truth is that a syndicate of criminals has infested every corner of human civilization. And while the names, groups, and objectives might change from generation to generation, the same fundamental techniques are used to gain incredible power over human societies and communities.
5th Generational Warfare is a phrase that speaks to the weapons used by globalists to wage a psychological war against the pillars of freedom.
With this style of conquest, the battlefield is not soil and grass on earth, but ideals and values in the hearts of men and women. The very ideas of freedom, prosperity, equality, the rule of law, and justice are attacked at every level. At the end of the campaign, after thorough demoralization has taken place, the people are incapable of governing themselves; the people are so thoroughly confused about what makes a society truly free and prosperous, citizens unthinkingly demand safety, confusing tyranny with freedom. [You are here]
Yuri Bezmenov, Soviet journalist and former KGB agent, who defected to Canada speaks to this style of cultural warfare in his famous interview with G. Edward Griffin:
Trump, it seems, knows all about this insidious agenda of propaganda control.
Trump’s solution to this age-long problem is spot on.
From Trump’s inaugural speech in 2017:
”Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning, because today we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C., and giving it back to you, the people.”
Transferring power back to the people sounds good. It’s clearly the only real solution. And yet, it’s not risk-free.
History shows that many times when the people regain power, albeit through color revolution-style campaigns orchestrated by intelligence agencies, the elites regained control in short order. The history of the United States is one of the best examples.
The First Banker Bailout Resembles the Silicon Valley Bank Debacle
After the Revolutionary War, the international bankers who were using Britain and other nations as proxies for their commercial conquest schemes managed to install an offshore central bank in the US by December 1791.
The idea of a populist revolution appears to have been developed by power brokers in Europe at the time, who wanted to use it to overthrow established power structures. The Bavarian Illuminati planned to overthrow the established order at the time, using the new technique of color revolutions to do it. The French Revolution was a successful beta test. We know this because of the diligent research of Rab Marvin S. Antelman, author of To Eliminate the Opiate, who unearthed various letters and correspondences between key figures within the infamous movement.
Six months after the formation of the first central bank of the newly formed United States, the Panic of 1792 occurred. It was apparently fueled by a previous scheme in 1791 involving the selling of shares of the First Central Bank of the United States, which required then Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton to enter into a contract with the Bank of New York to purchase a sizable portion of the shares for which a price collapse had triggered market upset.
Through similar forms of securities manipulation that hedge funds engage in today, the price of securities rose again sharply in December 1791, followed by yet another price crash that triggered yet another bank run. The newly-created central bank contributed to the crisis by further restricting credit (money printing). In effect, the 1791 and 1792 financial events are a carbon copy of what happened in early 2023 with the Silicon Valley Bank debacle.
Then, like now, the same core problems plague freedom-seeking Americans.
This problem is the same problem that has been weaponized against freedom-seeking people throughout human history. That problem is, as Trump has mentioned many times, the ultimate solution: once WE THE PEOPLE have risen from their slumber to finally embrace the required duties necessary to maintain a truly free and prosperous nation.
Trump Talks About it All the Time
There are few presidents, or elected officials, in general, who really get what’s holding America back.
President Donald Trump has hinted about it. He’s also boldly stated it many times in his public remarks and social media postings.
What is the Rule of Law?
The Rule of Law is a phrase that has taken on many meanings over the years.
That’s not an accident.
The meaning of the phrase has been intentionally distorted so that the power of the ideas behind the phrase can be obscured.
Why bother?
Because the law, in its best form, is literally a blueprint for a perfecting civilization. It is not a blueprint for a perfect civilization, however, because that’s the communist utopia. If you’re not following me on the nuance here, don’t be ashamed. It’s the relationship between the infinite (God) and the finite (children of God). Since all law comes from God, and man is finite, man is forever claiming hold of the blueprint (the law)—hence a perfecting civilization.
The cabal, globalists, deep state, or whatever name you prefer, have had to attack the concept of law for a very long time because it’s the single biggest threat to their shallow and false claims to power. The mass mind control used by the controllers of this world is powerful; we’ve already been living in it for a very long time. It’s so effective, in fact, if we had the ultimate solution dropped into our laps, nearly everyone on earth would likely reject it due to the fact they wouldn’t be able to comprehend its worth.
So, what is it?
The Rule of Law simply means the law is clear, publicized, stable, and applied evenly.
This is a good start to wrapping your head around the subject. We’ll spend more time on understanding what the Rule of Law is in a future post.
The rule of law is most definitely not what we have in the world today.
The Law vs The Legal System
Let’s understand the difference between the law and the legal system.
Here are some analogies:
The law is the game of baseball, whereas the legal system is little league.
The law is the idea of a perfect hamburger, whereas the legal system is one man’s attempt at creating the perfect hamburger.
The law is Elvis Presley, whereas the legal system is an Elvis Presley impersonator.
The law is the perfect rule system, whereas the legal system is man’s attempt (sometimes a paltry attempt) to create a perfect rule system.
The law is the rules that govern all of reality.
The rules that govern gravity, electromagnetism, the shape of an apple, and so on, are natural laws.
The rules that govern social relationships, like fairness, ethics, and so on, are moral laws.
These laws existed before mankind and they will exist after mankind is gone. When man aligns himself with the law, he gains wisdom, knowledge of how to do things effectively and correctly.
For instance, if we want to build a flying machine, we need to understand gravity, aerodynamics, thermodynamics, and so on. This knowledge of the truth acts as a guide for how we build a machine to fly through the air.
For civilizations, the laws of social realities are at play. The laws of contracts, agreements, trust, duty, stewardship, and so on are the pillars upon which all social groups operate. Nothing can escape them. Yet those groups that fail to embrace them suffer endless strife, disorder, corruption, poverty, and malevolence. Sound familiar?
How do two or more people coordinate their intentions, desires, and behavior without trampling all over each other? Moral laws and ethics are the rules that govern what man ought to do in the world, usually framed within a religious context.
For most of human history, the lawful basis of the crime of murder, for instance, was that each man had a right to life provided to them by some god-like being, like Ra, Marduk, or YahWah. And since we aren’t this god-like being, we do not have the right to kill another person. But if the gods come to earth, via a prophet, we can receive permission to kill, even to commit genocide (e.g. the Old Testament).
Translation: Law comes from the gods (more truly, God).
In modern times, despite the best effort of secular humanists, rights and moral law is still in the hands of religious justifications. In short, for all the efforts to separate the law, morality, and ethics from God and the domain of spirit, every law system on earth rests its basis on top of the belief that law comes from God and the justice system is man’s attempt to carry out the will of God. When man does this successfully, justice, and the rule of law rule the kingdoms of men.
The founding fathers, in recognizing this, and embracing it, created one of the best nations on earth.
The law acts above mankind, who lives “beneath” the law. Like the truth, man is bound by the law, the law doesn’t come from man. The legal system, however, is different.
While man cannot invent rules or laws that do not exist, man can create rules that govern himself and other men. These rules are what we call the legal system, with all its varied names, forms, and types.
The legal system is created by man to bring order and stability to man’s world, which is human civilization.
Gravity brings order to every object affected by gravity.
Electromagnetism brings order to everything affected by electromagnetism.
Order means organization and synergy.
Look at this plate vibrating with sand on it:
Each particle of sand is a person that is around other people—other sand particles.
When there is no vibration, at the beginning of the video (0:30), the sand particles are in a state of disorder; they don’t work together to form any coherent or orderly shape. But when a vibration is applied, all the sand moves in harmony to form orderly shapes on the plate.
The analogy here is that law brings order to the things that are subjected to the laws. The vibration brings order to everything that is affected by it, just as law brings order to the natural world and brings order to man’s world, when man allows himself to be governed by law.
In effect, the legal system is a piece of non-material technology designed to bring order and coordination to social systems that we call civilizations.
A legal system, like the law in general, is made of rules.
Rules govern a game.
Games coordinate human behavior.
Place ten people on a basketball court without any rules and it just looks like a high school dance, with all its juvenile awkwardness. Take that same set of ten people, break them up into two teams, and ask them to play basketball, following the standard rules, and now you have a basketball game.
Rules make order.
Order coordinates human behavior, creating harmony. The rules, in this case, are a tool—a tool for the players to achieve their personal goals of playing basketball. Each player might want to play the game, but they need at least nine other players to do it. What does the lone player do? He asks nine other people if they want to play the game, and once they say yes, he asks them to agree on the rules. Once they agree, they can start the game and play. As long as everyone plays by the rules, the individual players have their needs met. Additionally, their collaboration produces something valuable: they can determine which team is the best through their competition in basketball.
Like the vibrating plate, the rules of basketball, just like the rules in a legal system, coordinate the sand particles, creating harmony between them.
The legal system creates harmony, even if it’s a bad harmony, for the people in the legal system. But who designed the system? Was it everyone in the legal system, or was it someone else?
Skipping to the end a bit here, the legal system was designed by cheaters, fraudsters, and manipulators, who rigged the system to unfairly benefit themselves at the cost of everyone else.
In other words, the legal system is a giant game—a set of rules that are found in the laws of the universe but designed to serve an occulted (hidden) elite.
The legal system changes quite a bit depending on which jurisdiction you’re in. In this way, the legal system is like a set of house rules that change when you go from your father’s house to your uncle’s house. Both your father and uncle want to protect their belongings from potential thieves, they want to make sure electricity and water aren’t wasted, and so on. They each devise a set of rules that looks a bit different, but are essentially for the same purpose.
The legal system, because it is created by people, has the same variance. As the saying goes, “there are many ways to skin a cat.” And in this way, God gave mankind plenty of freedom to decide how to govern itself.
So what happens when most of the people in a community don’t understand what the law is, how it works, or they didn’t participate in the process at all? What we have is the systems we use today, where the various legal systems benefit the elite and those who understand them and know how to use them.
Taxes are an example of this.
The IRS produces extremely complex and hard-to-navigate tax codes. Only those who understand the system can use it to pay very little in taxes. And that’s the point. It’s designed to be a rigged system (ab initio, from the beginning).
What does this have to do with Trump and the rule of law?
Everything.
Trump knows.
In the next installment in this series, I’ll break down precisely how the legal system is not a rule of law system, but a color of law system. I’ll show that the ultimate weapon against the cabal is for the people to reclaim their knowledge of the law, so we can create a true rule of law-based society. And I’ll argue that Trump and the patriots are preparing the world for this very solution, and that, possibly, we already have an early version we can use right now to get a head start.
“The best is yet to come.”
Badlands Media articles and features represent the opinions of the contributing authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Badlands Media itself.
If you enjoyed this contribution to Badlands Media, please consider checking out more of my work for free on Substack.
I'm a 76 Y-O Englishman, living in the East Midlands. I'm working class, never attended University. I'm noy a criminal, and have never been tempted to pursue criminality as a lifestyle, as some do. I particularly enjoyed reading what Justin Deschamps had to say about the Law, and legal Systems. From what I've read, legal systems the world over are largely the same, and the thing about them all is that they are built and composed in such a way that ordinary people cannot usually find their way about inside them. Therefore every Nation has an army of well-versed and well-heeled lawyers to help those trapped by that system to make sense of it. I describe these people as well-heeled, because, of course, the ordinary people have to pay for this help, sometimes a considerable amount of money changes hands for not very much work. Here in England, and I'm sure almost everywhere else, one cannot buy a house without the aid of a Solicitor, or make one's will, or whatever. There are very few instances involving conflict between an ordinary citizen and officialdom in which a lawyer does not become involved, for a fee, of course. I'm inclined to think that these people are parasites on society, and that the Law is written to make them indisepensible in almost every circumstance. Why? Why cannot the Law be written in such a way that ordinary people can understand it without having to spend several years learning the language? It's something for which I can only see one explanation, it's a fix.
Very well done!
“the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom”. I used to think this was a fear of punishment from God. One of Jordan Peterson’s lectures helped me to understand this better. Maybe rephrase it to this; “the respect of Universe is the beginning of wisdom”.
You live by the Law of Universe, you will have success. You live against the Law of Universe, disaster.