Thank you, Ashe, for the detailed comparison between our elections and the Enron/Andersen scandal. I remember it clearly because Arthur Andersen was advising a project on my military base where I was a liaison. I was totally shocked at the time….not now. The cozy relationships between all levels of government with private companies is truly a fascist system and it only worsened with Obama where coincidentally (not) several companies you mentioned went private. The absolutely perfect example of corruption from top to bottom and no recourse available until the rule of law is regained.
The entire government at all levels is complicit…just like Andersen. Even the courts have not granted standing to the election fraud, although, that may likely be a timing factor.
Our apathy and laziness has brought our constitutional republic to the brink of total collapse. Thank you Ashe for sharing your gifted and knowledgeable insight into this. God bless you.🙏🇺🇸
The criminal-minded overloads have their roots so deep in our overly complex bureaucracy of the Federal Government, that the layers of complexity require an education beyond the average intelligence of us citizens. The more complex, the more we have to “trust” the powers that be….until it dawns on us that such complexity is built into the criminal mind. Ashe just gave an amazing education. 🙏❤️📚🦅
Complexity is a feature, not a bug, of these systems.
Counting votes is actually a pretty simple problem. Adding numbers is something that computers actually happen to be pretty good at -- fast and 100% accurate. Better than people, in fact. And simple. I could write a computer program that could add up votes for different candidates in less than an hour, and while I do have some experience in the field (mostly digital signal processing), I'm not a computer guy by training nor experience.
Frauding votes is much more complex. A computer by its nature does not lie. It simply does what it is told (programmed) to do. It has no will of its own; its actions express the will of its programmers. Fraud requires adding a controlled amount of error into the programming -- e.g., every 5th ballot for Trump, count a vote for Biden instead. You can make it as complicated as you wish, in an attempt to obscure what is being done. However, as with public accounting, complexity itself is a red flag warning that something is rotten.
There is no reason that voting machines cannot work (I remember the electromechanical machines used back in the 1960s in Michigan; I was in elementary school then and the school was a polling place. Some of the older students were invited to a demonstration of how the machines worked. Part of our education in civics, I presume. Nobody accused those machines of impropriety.)
It is not only the criminal mind which is based on unnecessary complexity -- whenever you see a complex solution to what should be a simple problem, you should suspect that there is 'fu*kery afoot.'
There are, of course, problems that are complex inherently -- computing course corrections for an interplanetary space mission is one example. Many, many inputs and sources of potential error must be considered. Counting votes is not like that.
I tried watching this, U-tube screwed up but I did see the first part of it.
There are still a lot of things we don't know and understand (some that some people know but aren't telling the rest of us). And things we know something about and are learning. It will be interesting to see what comes out, once the Cabal and its hidden secrets are revealed. 😎💖
Paper ballots, even though not totally immune to fraud, is the only way as far as I can see. The complexity, and proprietary nature of voting software and machines leaves absolutely no way to do a proper audit that works satisfy me that it can be trusted at all.
Believing that they won't interfere isn't naivety, it's just stupidity.
The criminal gang has been stealing elections after elections and continues to be well regarded by the media.
Why wouldn't they steal more?
Nothing happens to them, everything that is said is hidden or is a conspiracy theory.
As long as they are not removed from public office, they will continue to steal elections and all the people together.
it is the way of being and being in the society of these gangs, They are not politicians, they are criminals, corrupt, ignorant, thieves and they occupied the positions of politicians.
Don't expect anything other than being robbed again in these elections.
Its just so easy to show ID and vote but the problem is that then none of the swamp would win, none of the tax increases would pass, thus, FRAUD is necessary. Until the good guys get control, this is the corrupt system stealing our lives from us.
While crimes of this nature are second to human trafficking - and therefore don’t deserve the death penalty (unless treason that has cost American lives is involved!) - the Bible certainly has something to say about crooked financial dealings. For example, speaking of the scales and weights that were used in business transactions, Proverbs 16:1 says, ‘A false balance is an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is his delight.’ There are at least eight other references in the Old Testament alone to this issue. If God considers this kind of thing an ‘abomination’, then it is serious, indeed, because ultimately it’s self-destructive to a society.
But while the cry for more accountability understandably rises again, I believe that that accountability needs to begin at a much more fundamental level than putting into place more agencies.
As an example, I turn again to the Bible. In Exodus 18, we find that after Moses has led his people across the sea and out of bondage, his daily routine had devolved into listening to grievances from sunrise to sunset. This was because he was personally overseeing 600,000 households - a bit of a steep ratio, I’d say. After observing this unworkable setup for awhile, his father-in-law Jethro gives him the following advice, which Moses wisely follows: ‘Look for able bodied men from all the people, men who fear God [in other words, they have a functioning conscience], who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. Every great matter they will bring to you, but any small matter they shall decide themselves. So it will be easier for you, and they will bear the burden with you.’
Now, to carry this over to our present day republic, let’s borrow the phrase ‘chain of custody’ from our voting process and apply it not only to one’s vote in an election, but to any grievances or even just basic physical or emotional needs in any one household. If every 10 households were required to appoint a representative/overseer/elder for themselves, and then every five overseers were to select a leader for themselves (a ‘chief of fifty’) and every two of those leaders do the same for themselves (a ‘chief of a hundred’) and every 10 of those leaders has a representative for themselves, etc. Because the population of our country is much greater than what Moses was managing, our tiers would continue (5,000, 10,000, etc.).
In this way, there would be a continuous, face-to-face, tangible chain of custody from individual household to national representative. Leaders of 10s and 50s would, I imagine, be volunteer positions like HMO seats, but crucial, nonetheless. I’ll let someone else work out the details. In the meantime, I’m going to map out the Master Development where I live and have a plan ready.
Cheers if you read all of this - I just had to finally write it out for myself!
We have this. It’s called our central committee and our precincts, but generally speaking, the parties don’t encourage participation. People are easier to control if they are not aware.
Great job! You offer an apt comparison that should be easily understood when it comes to our investments and should certainly prompt us to guard election integrity.
To me, the "scariest" part about all of this is how consistently easy it is to trick the masses using perceived authority and Bernaysian marketing tactics.
In this war, the first to market with emotionally resonating "information" wins, no matter how full of crap they may be.
Thank you Ashe, I am with you on this Substack - but, how does Sydney Powell’s findings in her book on the Enron/ AA scandal fit in to your essay? Thanks. GM
Our federal, state, and local governments are largely criminal enterprises with some small fraction of all of them maintaining some modicum of legitimacy. Our currency is under the control of a criminal, private banking cartel. The Central Intelligence Agency is an unconstitutional behemoth of criminality that cannot even be prosecuted for the crimes it routinely committs. The FBI is similarly a criminal organization that was run for decades by a closeted homosexual cross-dressing freak who sexualy abused boys. Our Armed Services are also largely criminal and support regime change abroad to install totalitarians in the name of "spreading democracy." Marine General Smedley Butler knew this, and wrote about in "War is a Racket." He also helped stop a Fascist coup. The Nazis did win WWII in reality while losing it on paper. A small handful of them were hanged at Nuremberg in a show trial while thousands of them were imported to the U.S. and other countries. The result has been the Fourt Reich International. Marxist, and Fascism are merely two sides of the divide-and-conquer-coin of our realm.
Thank you, Ashe, for the detailed comparison between our elections and the Enron/Andersen scandal. I remember it clearly because Arthur Andersen was advising a project on my military base where I was a liaison. I was totally shocked at the time….not now. The cozy relationships between all levels of government with private companies is truly a fascist system and it only worsened with Obama where coincidentally (not) several companies you mentioned went private. The absolutely perfect example of corruption from top to bottom and no recourse available until the rule of law is regained.
The entire government at all levels is complicit…just like Andersen. Even the courts have not granted standing to the election fraud, although, that may likely be a timing factor.
Our apathy and laziness has brought our constitutional republic to the brink of total collapse. Thank you Ashe for sharing your gifted and knowledgeable insight into this. God bless you.🙏🇺🇸
What a great comment, ALtab!!!
The criminal-minded overloads have their roots so deep in our overly complex bureaucracy of the Federal Government, that the layers of complexity require an education beyond the average intelligence of us citizens. The more complex, the more we have to “trust” the powers that be….until it dawns on us that such complexity is built into the criminal mind. Ashe just gave an amazing education. 🙏❤️📚🦅
Complexity is a feature, not a bug, of these systems.
Counting votes is actually a pretty simple problem. Adding numbers is something that computers actually happen to be pretty good at -- fast and 100% accurate. Better than people, in fact. And simple. I could write a computer program that could add up votes for different candidates in less than an hour, and while I do have some experience in the field (mostly digital signal processing), I'm not a computer guy by training nor experience.
Frauding votes is much more complex. A computer by its nature does not lie. It simply does what it is told (programmed) to do. It has no will of its own; its actions express the will of its programmers. Fraud requires adding a controlled amount of error into the programming -- e.g., every 5th ballot for Trump, count a vote for Biden instead. You can make it as complicated as you wish, in an attempt to obscure what is being done. However, as with public accounting, complexity itself is a red flag warning that something is rotten.
There is no reason that voting machines cannot work (I remember the electromechanical machines used back in the 1960s in Michigan; I was in elementary school then and the school was a polling place. Some of the older students were invited to a demonstration of how the machines worked. Part of our education in civics, I presume. Nobody accused those machines of impropriety.)
It is not only the criminal mind which is based on unnecessary complexity -- whenever you see a complex solution to what should be a simple problem, you should suspect that there is 'fu*kery afoot.'
There are, of course, problems that are complex inherently -- computing course corrections for an interplanetary space mission is one example. Many, many inputs and sources of potential error must be considered. Counting votes is not like that.
Nice comment, WildBill ❤️🇺🇸👍
Hey WildBill…
Coming back here as this is the last comment I found from you and I wanted to send you this link…
It appeals to me on an intuitive level but someone like you, with your background, might find it intriguing on a more practical level as well 😉❤️
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Re7FqKh7i_c
Yeah, I've been traveling for a couple weeks...
I tried watching this, U-tube screwed up but I did see the first part of it.
There are still a lot of things we don't know and understand (some that some people know but aren't telling the rest of us). And things we know something about and are learning. It will be interesting to see what comes out, once the Cabal and its hidden secrets are revealed. 😎💖
Yes she did!
Paper ballots, even though not totally immune to fraud, is the only way as far as I can see. The complexity, and proprietary nature of voting software and machines leaves absolutely no way to do a proper audit that works satisfy me that it can be trusted at all.
Yep, Australia has paper ballots
Our senator paper is a three feet long and two feet wide.
They provide hb pencils that are light on the white paper
They HAVE to scan these papers to do the complex calculations to arrive at the results
Designed complexity to disguise cheating …
Excellent article Ashe. I am also very impressed with your back story.
If we are to have elections then like Chris Paul constantly says they must be free, fair, transparent and auditable by anyone who want to.
Not sure how we get from where we are now to where we need to be but our current system is FUBAR!
Thanks for all your hard work.
God wins!
God Bless!!!
Is there an easy way to share this article? It should be plastered everywhere!!
Here is the direct link. Thank you!
https://open.substack.com/pub/badlands/p/us-elections-must-be-independent?r=1g6n2x&utm_medium=ios
Believing that they won't interfere isn't naivety, it's just stupidity.
The criminal gang has been stealing elections after elections and continues to be well regarded by the media.
Why wouldn't they steal more?
Nothing happens to them, everything that is said is hidden or is a conspiracy theory.
As long as they are not removed from public office, they will continue to steal elections and all the people together.
it is the way of being and being in the society of these gangs, They are not politicians, they are criminals, corrupt, ignorant, thieves and they occupied the positions of politicians.
Don't expect anything other than being robbed again in these elections.
This has been true. But since 2020 we are actually starting to see some fraudsters jailed for this. It's been a very long time coming though...
Its just so easy to show ID and vote but the problem is that then none of the swamp would win, none of the tax increases would pass, thus, FRAUD is necessary. Until the good guys get control, this is the corrupt system stealing our lives from us.
That's why I'm wearing this "When I die don't let me vote democrat" t-shirt 👇 🤣
we-the-people-are-pissed-off-2.creator-spring.com/listing/wdie5
While crimes of this nature are second to human trafficking - and therefore don’t deserve the death penalty (unless treason that has cost American lives is involved!) - the Bible certainly has something to say about crooked financial dealings. For example, speaking of the scales and weights that were used in business transactions, Proverbs 16:1 says, ‘A false balance is an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is his delight.’ There are at least eight other references in the Old Testament alone to this issue. If God considers this kind of thing an ‘abomination’, then it is serious, indeed, because ultimately it’s self-destructive to a society.
But while the cry for more accountability understandably rises again, I believe that that accountability needs to begin at a much more fundamental level than putting into place more agencies.
As an example, I turn again to the Bible. In Exodus 18, we find that after Moses has led his people across the sea and out of bondage, his daily routine had devolved into listening to grievances from sunrise to sunset. This was because he was personally overseeing 600,000 households - a bit of a steep ratio, I’d say. After observing this unworkable setup for awhile, his father-in-law Jethro gives him the following advice, which Moses wisely follows: ‘Look for able bodied men from all the people, men who fear God [in other words, they have a functioning conscience], who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. Every great matter they will bring to you, but any small matter they shall decide themselves. So it will be easier for you, and they will bear the burden with you.’
Now, to carry this over to our present day republic, let’s borrow the phrase ‘chain of custody’ from our voting process and apply it not only to one’s vote in an election, but to any grievances or even just basic physical or emotional needs in any one household. If every 10 households were required to appoint a representative/overseer/elder for themselves, and then every five overseers were to select a leader for themselves (a ‘chief of fifty’) and every two of those leaders do the same for themselves (a ‘chief of a hundred’) and every 10 of those leaders has a representative for themselves, etc. Because the population of our country is much greater than what Moses was managing, our tiers would continue (5,000, 10,000, etc.).
In this way, there would be a continuous, face-to-face, tangible chain of custody from individual household to national representative. Leaders of 10s and 50s would, I imagine, be volunteer positions like HMO seats, but crucial, nonetheless. I’ll let someone else work out the details. In the meantime, I’m going to map out the Master Development where I live and have a plan ready.
Cheers if you read all of this - I just had to finally write it out for myself!
We have this. It’s called our central committee and our precincts, but generally speaking, the parties don’t encourage participation. People are easier to control if they are not aware.
They are easiest to control if they don't even care.
Great job! You offer an apt comparison that should be easily understood when it comes to our investments and should certainly prompt us to guard election integrity.
Free Tina Peterson
She was set up by the Flynn network which also helped corral the J6'rs.
To me, the "scariest" part about all of this is how consistently easy it is to trick the masses using perceived authority and Bernaysian marketing tactics.
In this war, the first to market with emotionally resonating "information" wins, no matter how full of crap they may be.
🎯
If you look at the UN connections to electoral offices and electoral officials, it’s a big club to game the people
Thank you Ashe, I am with you on this Substack - but, how does Sydney Powell’s findings in her book on the Enron/ AA scandal fit in to your essay? Thanks. GM
I haven’t read it. I will check it out when I get a sec.
Our federal, state, and local governments are largely criminal enterprises with some small fraction of all of them maintaining some modicum of legitimacy. Our currency is under the control of a criminal, private banking cartel. The Central Intelligence Agency is an unconstitutional behemoth of criminality that cannot even be prosecuted for the crimes it routinely committs. The FBI is similarly a criminal organization that was run for decades by a closeted homosexual cross-dressing freak who sexualy abused boys. Our Armed Services are also largely criminal and support regime change abroad to install totalitarians in the name of "spreading democracy." Marine General Smedley Butler knew this, and wrote about in "War is a Racket." He also helped stop a Fascist coup. The Nazis did win WWII in reality while losing it on paper. A small handful of them were hanged at Nuremberg in a show trial while thousands of them were imported to the U.S. and other countries. The result has been the Fourt Reich International. Marxist, and Fascism are merely two sides of the divide-and-conquer-coin of our realm.
I believe Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit was an actual auditor.
He was! We geeked out on this topic once. It was on why we vote I think. A year or so ago.
Bravo, Ashe! Succinct and well written.