Q often used movie references in the drops.
Why?
The purpose of Q was to light a fire in the people and create a “Great Awakening.”
What better way to do that, than to use the same weapons that have been used for ages to brainwash the public with propaganda?
From Q drop #632 - Jan 27, 2018:
(HW) is Hollywood.
“Who controls Hollywood?”
“Who really controls Hollywood?”
When Q asks, “who really controls” something? It is almost always the CIA.
Q asked the question: Why are movies made to glorify past ‘true events’? And why did Q emphasize the word ‘true’?
Q emphasized “true” because our history has been a complete lie. Everything we’ve been told, has been twisted in a way to hide the real truth and protect the hidden enemy. Movies were just one more way to control the population in an ongoing narrative war.
But how did the CIA gain control of Hollywood?
Answer: The same way they gained control over a lot of powerful people.
According to the New York Daily News:
This little black book could bring down a few more than “Two and a Half Men.”
The address book of former “Hollywood Madam” Heidi Fleiss, who counted actor Charlie Sheen among her celebrity clients, is up for sale on eBay, TMZ reports.
Among the names are celebrities, politicians, sports figures and musicians, the listing says.
This little black book was talked about way before Epstein’s little address book was ever mentioned in the media.
The CIA uses the same playbook over and over because it has always worked.
From Q drop #392 - Dec 19, 2017:
Then there’s this drop from Q:
At that time, Charlie Sheen was one of the biggest Hollywood stars. Heidi Fleiss helped the CIA control Hollywood. It’s no wonder that someone like Harvey Weinstein would become one of the biggest movie producers in Hollywood and be above the law for decades. It wasn’t a coincidence that Weinstein was convicted and went to prison while Trump was president.
A message was sent to Hollywood.
Things have changed.
Movies in the past preached hidden messages to the masses, and the CIA needed to control Hollywood so they could control the narrative.
From Q drop #2682 - Feb 10, 2019:
Mind control.
The famous CIA program called “Mockingbird” never stopped, even though the CIA claimed they ended the program decades ago. It was a program to control the media narrative, and it has only gotten larger and more dangerous.
We are bombarded daily with lies and hidden messages by every controlled media source. They are all pushing the same narrative and conclusions. They make it harder for individuals to go against the stream because it makes them look like a kook to their family and friends. They were counting on the FACT that most people are too busy to do research for themselves and instead will rely on supposedly ‘trusted’ news sources.
The Q operation changed all of that.
The bread crumbs given to a small band of anons to encourage them to dig and share quickly lit a fire around the world that has been the spark for the worldwide Great Awakening. It became so effective that the CIA was using their super computers to combat the anons and demonize them. I wrote about that in my last article. Their entire controlled media complex began a coordinated campaign to paint anons (short for anonymous) as “conspiracy theorists.”
Our numbers kept growing because there was a yearning for truth. We wore that “conspiracy theorist” label as a badge of honor, and mocked the enemy all over social media. We were so effective that they had to resort to outright censorship across all social media because they couldn’t compete with the truth.
Their greatest fear is a population united against them. This is why they expend so much ammunition to keep the people divided.
More from Q drop #2682 - Feb 10, 2019:
A free-thinking logical person who draws conclusions based on facts is the biggest threat to the enemy.
All the enemy cares about is POWER and PERSONAL GAIN (money).
Everything is about money. That’s why everything is connected.
Q talked about movies for a very important reason. Q was trying to reveal the real enemy to the people, and expose their plans of controlling the world.
In my last article, I wrote about Snow White.
Q often mentioned the movie Snow White as a reference to the CIA and their seven super computers named after the seven dwarves in the movie. But as Q said, there can be multiple meanings. The Snow White reference was also referring to one specific individual. Trump pointed this person out in a Twitter post. His tweet was another bread crumb for anons to dig and research because this person was very important in this war. Trump put a spotlight on him for a reason.
Who was it?
According to the BBC:
A Saudi prince has described US businessman Donald Trump, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, as a "disgrace to America".
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal said on Twitter that Mr Trump should give up his presidential ambitions because he would never win.
It follows Mr Trump's call for Muslims to be barred from entering the US for security reasons.
Trump had called for a ban on any immigration from countries designated as terror threats, which should be common sense. Prince Alwaleed took great offense to that and bashed Trump, saying “he would never win” the election.
Hillary wasn’t supposed to lose.
It surprised Alwaleed as much as it surprised Hillary and Obama.
After Alwaleed’s bashing, Trump fired back and revealed two huge bread crumbs.
The battle between these two men began back in 2015 when Trump was running for president. Trump already knew how big a threat that Alwaleed was to not just him, but his entire family. Alwaleed was the most dangerous man in the world for Trump. I will continue to prove that in coming articles.
Trump gave Prince Alwaleed a ‘nickname’ in that tweet, and then described what Alwaleed was doing with all of his money.
Why did Trump call Alwaleed “Dopey?”
He did it for several reasons. Alwaleed didn’t just control our U.S. politicians with his wealth, he also controlled the CIA, and I will continue to make that case in this series. It was a reference to the CIA super computers named after the seven dwarves, but there was another reason Trump called him “Dopey” that most people don’t know anything about.
According to Vanity Fair:
The Stockholder in the Sand
Worth an estimated $27 billion, the enigmatic Prince Alwaleed bin Talal has very public holdings: he is the second-largest voting shareholder in News Corp., he owns Paris’s George V hotel and part of New York City’s Plaza hotel, he is a stockholder in Apple, and he will soon own the world’s tallest building.
But the private origins—and exact size—of his massive fortune are the subject of continued debate between bin Talal and prominent media outlets. So what’s the truth? And does one of the richest men on Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index—a calorie-counting cell-phone addict who loves texting James Murdoch—really spend his free time throwing dwarves?
Don’t miss these important facts.
Alwaleed was a major shareholder of some very important American corporations. He was not only the second biggest shareholder of News Corp, but was also in constant contact with the Murdoch family. What you will find when you look, is that Alwaleed didn’t just have ‘influence’ over the corporations that he invested in, he had control over them. Owning shares isn’t the only way to control a corporation; controlling the CIA gives you way more power than most people realize.
But did you catch that last line from the article?
Does Prince Alwaleed really spend his free time “throwing dwarves?”
More from Vanity Fair:
So it didn’t quite fit the image he was trying to convey when Business Insider broke the dwarf-throwing story in January 2012. The source was a former American employee of Alwaleed’s (who was also a friend of Alwaleed’s 35-year-old son, Khaled).
The prince’s defenders hastened to put it all into context: dwarves are outcasts in Saudi Arabia; when they come begging, Alwaleed, in his great beneficence, hires them to be a roving band of court jesters, thus instilling in them “a work ethic, and you really can’t fault that.”
In Saudi Arabia, the wealthy think it is lucky to have dwarves around, and the dwarves enjoy it, “kind of like a circus situation.” When they are pressed into service as human projectiles, there are pillows to catch them. Pillows are obviously moot, however, when Alwaleed has the dwarves dive for $100 bills in bonfires, as the Business Insider story also alleged. Talk about occupational hazards!
“It’s all lies,” Alwaleed told me emphatically during our first meeting at the Plaza hotel, in February 2012.
Alwaleed claims “it’s all lies,” but if that was true, then why would his defenders try to put the story into “context” and paint Alwaleed as someone who cares for the dwarves and is teaching them a “work ethic?” They are used as “court jesters” to entertain Alwaleed, similar to a circus.
Why would a good friend of Alwaleed’s only son, who worked for and lived with them for several years, just make up this story? Clearly Alwaleed is worried about his “image” to the world, and Trump knew exactly how to troll and mock him, which is why he called him “Dopey.”
More from Vanity Fair:
Maybe because stories about dwarf-tossing at his desert encampments became public, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the 58-year-old Saudi Arabian financial, media, and real-estate mogul, no longer invites journalists to visit his $130 million, 460,000-square-foot Riyadh complex with 371 rooms, an 80-foot-high entrance hall, 500 televisions, and a staff of 100.
The prince has traditionally been proud to show off his immense wealth, but he has also worked hard to become the Western face of Saudi finance, and slinging dwarves around like so much hash would not go down too well with a First World audience.
One of the largest shareholders in Citigroup, the second-largest voting shareholder in News Corporation after the Murdoch family, and with major stakes in dozens of other Western companies, he travels the globe often wearing bespoke suits instead of the traditional Saudi thawb.
As part of Trump’s spat with Alwaleed on Twitter, Trump also reposted a meme that pointed out the connection to Alwaleed’s control of FOX News. Trump was purposely provoking him to draw attention to this online fight.
Alwaleed was a major shareholder in two of the most politically connected companies in America: News Corp, which controls FOX News and Citigroup, which is the most corrupt bank in America.
I wrote two articles on the history of Citigroup titled “The Battle For Control” and “Friends In High Places.” It is the most corrupt and politically connected bank in America and always has been.
But Alwaleed’s control of News Corp was a huge deal in this narrative war, especially in America.
More from Vanity Fair:
The ties between Alwaleed and Murdoch run deep. Alwaleed owns 56.2 million shares of Murdoch’s News Corporation; News Corporation, in turn, owns a 19.9 percent stake, worth around $150 million, in Rotana, Alwaleed’s privately held pan-Arab media conglomerate, based in Bahrain.
Alwaleed also owned media conglomerates in the Middle East. He controlled a lot of companies that gave him control of the narrative worldwide, not just in America.
Alwaleed quickly responded to Trump’s tweet about him and Megyn Kelly from FOX News, who just happened to be hosting one of the debates at the time, and had been particularly nasty towards Trump.
Alwaleed had purchased Trump’s yacht and a controlling stake in his Plaza Hotel in the early nineties, and he reminded Trump of that in his tweet.
Trump then made an interesting statement that sure sounded like a prediction to me.
According to The Daily Mail:
Aboard his Boeing 757, parked on the tarmac in Des Moines, DailyMail.com asked The Donald about Alwaleed's claim that he had rescued him financially.
'No, no,' Trump insisted. 'He didn't bail me out. Let me tell you – he needs bailing out right now, if you look at where he's going. He needs bailing out. He needs big bailouts.'
'Nope. Never been a fan of his. Never been a fan. Never liked him.'
Asked if he had ever met Alwaleed personally, the man on whom he had just heaped a helping of billionaire scorn, Trump paused for a moment.
'No. Never liked him. Never met him,' he said.
Trump said that he never liked Alwaleed or met him, but he also said “he needs bailing out right now, if you look at where he’s going.”
Where was he going?
Did Trump already know how big a player Alwaleed, was and that he would be arrested in Saudi Arabia in the near future?
Was the plan always to take down Alwaleed early in this war in order to weaken all of his puppets worldwide?
I believe so, and I wrote about that important event in my first article in this series, “Trump Takes Out The King.”
The Snow White movie was centered around Prince Alwaleed and the CIA.
That was an important movie reference by Q.
But there were several movie references in the drops that centered around the CIA.
One of those movies was “The Sum Of All Fears.”
Here’s an overview of the movie from Brave search engine:
Overview: The Sum of All Fears is a 2002 American action-thriller film directed by Phil Alden Robinson and based on the 1991 novel of the same name by Tom Clancy. The film is a reboot of the Jack Ryan film series, with Ben Affleck playing the role of Jack Ryan, a young CIA analyst.
Plot: The movie takes place in 2002, where a group of rogue Russian nationalists, led by a former KGB agent, plan to start a war between the United States and Russia by detonating a nuclear bomb at a football game in Baltimore. Jack Ryan, a CIA analyst, discovers the plot and must work to prevent the attack and uncover the truth behind the conspiracy.
I used to love Tom Clancy movies. That was before I realized that his only purpose was to glorify the CIA as heroes. He clearly has inside sources and writes his books based on that insider information, but he never writes about the truth. He never writes about the CIA being the biggest drug trafficker in the world. He also doesn’t write about the CIA being behind the nuclear proliferation by rogue nations and terrorists. He writes about the CIA defending America against the enemies that the CIA actually controls and created.
Tom Clancy is a propagandist and a clown, in my opinion.
The Sum Of All Fears movie depicted a plan by “rogue” Russian “nationalists” wanting to detonate a nuclear bomb In Baltimore, Maryland. They are trying to demonize nationalism because they are always trying to glorify globalism. That’s a purposeful narrative.
It was also a purposeful narrative to demonize Russia.
Vladimir Putin has known for a very long time who the real enemy is. The cabal hates Putin because he isn’t afraid to stand up against them, and they have been trying their best to bring Russia under control. Hollywood purposely paints Russia as our enemy in lots of movies.
The SUM OF ALL FEARS was one of those movies.
So what did Q have to say about this movie?
This drop is a huge deal. It exposes a lot of things that are very important to reveal in this war. Some topics I will have to leave for a future article. It helps us see how everything is connected.
First, it mentions Uranium 1.
The Uranium 1 scandal is a huge deal, and often seems forgotten. Most people don’t even realize what the true purpose of the Uranium 1 deal was about.
Uranium 1 - Canada - Europe - Asia - Iran/North Korea.
This Q drop tracks the route that American uranium for nuclear weapons traveled to reach its final destination. But was the final destination really Iran/North Korea? Those two countries were controlled by the CIA, which was helping them develop nuclear missiles. Uranium was definitely heading to those two countries, but that wasn’t the final destination.
Read through that drop again.
There is a common thread. It is centered around the proliferation of nuclear weapons by our own politicians. We were arming our enemies. It is also centered around one person who was controlling them.
Why were we selling uranium to Iran/North Korea?
It wasn’t just so our politicians could enrich themselves, or so the CIA could protect their drug trafficking and terrorist groups. There was another very specific purpose, and Q hinted at it near the end of this drop.
The world cannot handle the truth. This pill cannot be swallowed by most. Risk in painting this picture.
THE SUM OF ALL FEARS.
Q
The enemy had a plan in place, and it involved everything in this drop.
The Uranium 1 deal, set up by Obama and Hillary, was providing uranium to Iran and North Korea. The Obama nuclear deal with Iran was providing the cash for this operation, along with the typical graft and funding for hidden CIA operations. Obama had classified the deal at the highest level to prevent Congress from seeing the details. Nobody was supposed to ever know that billions in foreign cash was being flown to Iran by the CIA in the middle of the night.
One plane didn’t land in Iran. It had a different purpose.
Where did it land, and why?
As I’ve said in the past, Iran is the linchpin to exposing treason. It’s way worse than most people can even imagine.
Why were we arming our enemies? Why were we providing them with weapons-grade nuclear material?
The whole Iran deal was just a “cover” for this operation, and was used to distract the American people. The controlled media pushed the fight over whether or not the Iran nuclear deal was good or bad, already knowing that the deal would happen. It was all a distraction.
What was the real purpose for the Iran nuclear deal?
SUM OF ALL FEARS.
Q drop #1306 - Apr 30, 2018:
Did you even know that Iran had a ‘satellite’ nuclear facility in Syria? I didn’t. Has the media ever mentioned that fact? Has our intelligence community or government ever mentioned that? Do you really think Obama and Hillary didn’t already know that before they approved the Uranium 1 and Iran nuclear deals?
What other bad actors are possibly involved? Did the U.S. know? Where did the cash payments go? How many planes delivered? Did all planes land in same location?
When Obama and the CIA tried to secretly send Iran billions in cash on planes in the middle of the night, one plane didn’t fly to Iran. It flew to Syria. That cash was being used to fund the building of a bomb in Syria.
Why Syria?
Bashar al-Assad and Syria are allied with Russia.
If the uranium can be traced to Syria, then Russia would get the blame.
That bomb was going to be used in the United States, and blamed on Russia in order to start a nuclear WAR.
Can you understand why Q said this in the previous drop?
The world cannot handle the truth. This pill cannot be swallowed by most. Risk in painting this picture.
THE SUM OF ALL FEARS.
What would happen if Russia supplied uranium to Iran/Syria, and they detonated a nuclear bomb on U.S. soil?
WAR.
That was the REAL purpose of the Uranium 1 deal.
The Uranium 1 deal, which was approved by President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was providing weapons grade uranium to Iran for a very specific purpose.
Obama and Hillary were trying to frame Russia for a planned “dirty bomb” going off in the United States.
They were trying to start a nuclear war with Russia.
Where did the U1 material end up? Is this material traceable? Yes. Define cover. What if U1 material ended up in Syria? What would be the primary purpose?
SUM OF ALL FEARS.
It was all about a bomb that would be used to trigger a war, just like in the movie.
Have you heard of the enemies sixteen-year plan to destroy the United States and the constitution?
Eight years of Obama as president that was meant to degrade the country and the constitution in order to prepare for eight years of Hillary and World War III.
This is a portion of Q drop #570 - Jan 21, 2018:
Q said that this was part of the cabal’s sixteen-year plan. It wasn’t just a plan to destroy America; it was also going to destroy Russia.
Eight years of Obama was bad enough, but we would not have survived eight years of Hillary, which is why the military was prepared to do the unthinkable in order to prevent her from becoming president.
The enemy plan was going to be a controlled nuclear war that eliminated millions of people in order to make the worldwide population more controllable by the puppet masters. The United States was no longer going to be a super power, and neither was Russia.
The real purpose of the Uranium 1 deal was to trigger World War III.
Trump gets no credit for preventing this planned nuclear war that would have killed millions of people.
But how did Trump prevent it?
Do you remember when president Obama made his “red line” in the sand declaration against Syria?
According to Politico:
Although she was a private citizen at the time, Clinton did play a supporting role in the red-line saga. As it unfolded in late August and early September 2013, she had several conversations with Obama and his top aides and with Secretary of State John Kerry. She issued several public statements supporting Obama, including unplanned remarks on the day of her White House visit.
In doing so, Clinton put her stamp on one of the most consequential episodes of Obama’s presidency, one she has sometimes defended — and at other times tried to distance herself from, as she did on Sunday night.
Why was Hillary trying to distance herself from this debacle as she was running for president?
Obama threatened to bomb Syria if they used chemical weapons again in their war. He was then humiliated when they did it again and he did nothing about it.
We should always be against the use of chemical weapons in the world, but what was the big problem with Obama’s “red line?”
Syria wasn’t the only one using chemical weapons.
There’s always more to the story.
Assad was battling ISIS, who were constantly using chemical weapons in the war. Those were the other “bad actors” that Q mentioned. Did Obama ever come out and declare a “red line” against chemical weapons by ISIS?
Of course not.
Instead he was the one calling ISIS the “junior varsity” team compared to Al-Qaeda. Remember that? While ISIS was conquering the Middle East and publicly chopping people’s heads off, Obama was doing his best to distract the American people from the threat?
I wonder why?
(A lot more on that subject in a coming article.)
There is a lot more happening in the so called Syrian civil war than we know. Q told us that Iran had a satellite nuclear facility in Syria, and that the uranium was transported there thanks to Obama and Hillary.
ISIS, the “newly formed” terrorist group was fighting in Syria, and both sides were using chemical weapons.
But let me ask the question again:
How did Trump prevent the enemies planned nuclear war?
Did you catch the end of the previous Q drop #1306 - from April 30, 2018?
Why did we strike Syria? Why did we really strike Syria? Define cover. Patriots in control. Q
Did Trump strike Syria?
According to NBC News:
President Donald Trump on Friday ordered the United States military — in conjunction with France and the United Kingdom — to launch strikes on Syria in retaliation for a suspected chemical weapons attack by the regime of President Bashar al-Assad on a Damascus suburb last week.
The president said the U.S. would aim to hit sites "associated with the chemical weapons capabilities" of Assad's regime.
Trump launched missile strikes in Syria for “suspected” chemical weapons attacks.
Was that the “cover story,” as Q suggested? Did we actually take out the satellite Iranian nuclear facility? I would bet on it.
More from NBC News:
On Saturday Putin reaffirmed Russia's view that the purported chemical attack was a fake, criticizing the U.S. and its allies for launching the strike without waiting for inspectors from the international chemical weapons watchdog to visit the area.
Trump praised the missile strike.
Perfect “cover story” to take out that secret nuclear facility that was controlled by the CIA, and Trump deserves credit for it.
There’s far more happening in Syria than we know.
But so much of what we’ve been told by the controlled media on the civil war in Syria has been a lie.
Here’s an article that reveals some big information that cuts into the media narrative that constantly paints Russia as our enemy.
According to The Times Of Israel:
US and Russian troops exchanged friendly greetings and posed for pictures together over the weekend on a northeast Syria highway in a rare display of congeniality between the rival forces.
Both Washington and Moscow have troops on the ground in Syria backing opposing sides of the war that has ravaged the Middle Eastern country since 2011.
Russia’s war in Ukraine since February has exacerbated geopolitical tensions with the United States.
But on Saturday morning, US and Russian patrol routes intersected at an oil field near the town of Qahtaniyah in the northeastern province of Hassakeh, according to AFP correspondents.
It was not the first time they crossed paths in the Kurdish-held region but, instead of just zipping past each other, the convoys stopped and soldiers stood side by side as they spoke and posed for pictures.
Several troops even exchanged small patches worn on their uniforms as mementos of the interaction, the correspondents said.
While Biden, the media and every corrupt political hack tells us that we need to spare no expense to fight against Russia in Ukraine, our troops are more than friendly with Russian soldiers in Syria.
How does that make any sense?
The Ukraine war is the biggest money laundering operation in the world right now, and this article proves that it’s just another scam.
Putin and Russia are not our enemies. The cabal of puppet masters and the CIA are the real enemy.
They have started all the wars, and were planning on starting a nuclear war between the United States and Russia. That was the real purpose of the Uranium 1 and Iran nuclear deals. Obama and Hillary are both traitors.
Q spoke about Obama specifically as a traitor.
From Q drop #2180 - Sep 16, 2018
Define 'TRAITOR'.
1. a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust.
2. a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.
Synonym = Renegade
What was the USSS codename for HUSSEIN? [RENEGADE]
Q
The Uranium 1/Iran nuclear deal is the biggest coverup in American history.
From Q drop #237 - Nov 30, 2017:
What if NK had miniature nuke payload delivery in 2004?
What if NK had ICBM capability since 2009?
What if the previous tests that failed were staged?
Why would this be relevant?
Who is involved and why?
Biggest cover up in our history.
U1 - CA - EU - ASIA\NK.
Iran deal.
Russian reset.
Q
Do you remember the phony “Russian Reset?”
Do you want to know one of the biggest reasons that the Obama/Hillary “Russian Reset” didn’t work?
According to Russia Matters:
Moscow complained about what was seen as a bait and switch on Libya: Russia’s willingness to abstain on a U.N. resolution calling for a no-fly zone over the country after the anti-Gaddafi rebellion began in 2011 was based on its understanding that the U.S. and Western powers would create safe areas for civilian refugees, not become co-belligerents alongside the rebels to overthrow Gaddafi.
Subsequently, Moscow used its veto power at the United Nations to prevent any repetition of the Libya scenario in Syria, where Russia had concrete interests tied with the survival of the Bashar al-Assad regime—interpreted by Washington as intransigence to support a brutal dictator.
Putin was angry because Obama and Hillary had pulled a “bait and switch” on promises made about Libya. Russia voted for the “no fly zone” resolution at the United Nations, thinking that it would prevent civilian casualties. If Putin knew that Obama and Hillary’s plan was to kill and remove Gaddafi, he would have vetoed the “no fly zone” resolution.
That “no fly zone” resolution basically took away Gaddafi’s defenses and strengthened the rebels, who the CIA had trained and funded to overthrow him. Our CIA/shadow government overthrew Gaddafi, and it had nothing to do with terrorism.
Libya is a huge story that I will dive into in my next article.
Did you know that Q used a movie reference to describe Libya and Gaddafi, too?
I will also answer these questions from the Q drop:
Who paid for BO to attend Harvard? Why would this occur pre-political days?
Who was the biggest contributor to the CF?
Badlands Media articles and features represent the opinions of the contributing authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Badlands Media itself.
If you enjoyed this contribution to Badlands Media, please consider checking out more of Joe’s work for free at Joe Lange’s Substack.
Badlands Media will always put out our content for free, but you can support us by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Help our collective of citizen journalists take back the narrative from the MSM. We are the news now.
THANK YOU soooooo much for this series of articles! My mother was an avid reader of “history” (particularly Russia) and was always looking for another writer’s opinion, not just blindly believing. She taught me a LOT and I am so sad that she passed and I am unable to share Badlands and Joe Lange with her! THANKS
Excellent article ‼️ moves and countermoves. Thank you for this Joe ❤️🇺🇸🙏🙏🙏‼️