The fact that Trump pulled this off in front of the world actually lends a lot of credibility that the British Royals are/were a part of the Cabal network.
There is no way that a Cabal puppet president would ever be allowed to get away with such a breach of protocol. The British Monarchy do not usually tolerate such things unless they have no choice.
What if the Q statement: “Patriots are in control” is not just a hollow statement with no proof to back it up?
The fact that Trump went to the UK to see the Royals tells me a lot of what is said in this article has a lot of weight. He basically had them by the short and curlies and it also explains the erratic behaviour of Harry of all things.
I think the minute Trump’s plane landed in England, that marked the end of the overall power of the Royals, however the Cabal network is vast and has a lot of levels and has a lot of compartmentalization.
Cutting off one head of the hydra doesn’t stop the rest of the heads and the body from still being very dangerous.
Ever since then this has been a massive clean up operation, slowly unwinding the Cabal at every level of society.
It's certainly the case that the British Royals are part of the Cabal. But they are junior partners to the Jewish money power. This started when Cromwell took money from the Jews (see his correspondence with Ebenezer Pratt) to fund his rebellion, in return for which the Jews were readmitted to England. Control was entirely flipped when William of Orange was introduced as a puppet king, and the master-puppet relationship has remained the same since.
But I rather thought that WW1 was engineered by the cabal with the key role being played by Rothschild, and that British Israel was the price Rothschild extracted for delivering American support when it became necessary. The delivery of support was possible because of the influence the bankers had over Woodrow Wilson whose administration saw the creation of the federal reserve, the imposition of the income tax, as well as the US entering WW1, and it is interesting to note that WW1 was started shortly after his election was secured.
This explanation covers both the timing of the Balfour declaration (coincident with US entry to the war), the fact that the declaration was addressed to Rothschild, and the degree of subsequent Rothschild involvement with, and influence over, Israel. The alternative explanation does not fit the facts nearly as well.
It is also the case that Edward Mandel House, who did indeed play a key role in most of these events, according to his own notes met regularly with Warburg throughout the period, and appears to have acted as his agent. The Warburgs were of course originally Venetian, and then German "Jews" - and had no real link to Britain at all.
I tend to believe that every war this world has seen since Waterloo was "engineered" by corrupt "bankers". As for that POS woodrow wilson, the only thing he did good was to admit creating the Federal Reserve was a huge mistake, just before he died. He most certainly was a puppet for Morgan and Rockefeller.
That was one among quite a few details that were not mentioned in the MSM reporting.
Trump's whole trip was full of symbolism but this came at a time before Q was even on the scene.
When he was stepping in front of the Queen to review the troops he was symbolizing that they were HIS troops to review.
Also recall he was late and kept the Queen waiting, another slight to the monarchy, you NEVER keep the Queen waiting, it's you who waits at the Queen's pleasure, Head of state or not.
The only thing more symbolic would have been Trump marching into the City of London and declaring he was going to takeover the Fed, which he did do in 2020.
This wasn't the first incident either, Trump also did the same thing to Charles a bit later on.
I haven't been keeping up lately with what Putin has been saying or it's context.
However if I were to make an educated guess he's sending a signal not to NATO or the Deep State, he's signalling to Trump and the white hats that he's willing to negotiate but only with them.
The Deep State is still trying to oust him in any way possible.
and he knows that it's futile to talk to the Biden administration or the globalists in the EU who would see such a gesture as weakness and double down on trying to remove him and destabilize Russia.
The fact that Putin is mentioning peace now and not during the past 6-8 months tells me some sort of condition was fulfilled which allows him to proceed to the next stage.
I suspect the collapse of Macron's power and the unrest in France, the economic slide of Germany in recession and the increasing collapse of the Ukraine "offensive" is pushing the Cabal into desperation. This combined with the obvious deterioration of Biden and his family coming under increasing political pressure in the US and on the Democrats is having a major impact on the Deep State's operations.
Also the fact that Biden let slip that NATO no longer has reserve military supplies to be able to fight a sustained conventional conflict with Russia tells me Putin knows he has a very strong bargaining position against NATO.
We also need to keep in mind that the BRICS alliance is about to get a whole lot larger with more than 20 other countries lined up asking for membership, and their parallel banking, finance and trade system backed by gold is about to hammer the US Petro Dollar into the ground.
The Deep State is rushing to finalize their push into totalitarian dictatorship with the digital ID and CBDC system combined with climate lockdowns which will be imposed just in time for the 2024 US election.
These are my guesses at this point in time, as with everything happening these days it's hard to know what's real and what's not so I won't be surprised if I'm way off in my analysis.
Thank you for your analyses here. And thank you also for the link. The two Alexes, whom I had followed often earlier, had fallen off my radar and it’s good to hear them again.
Makes me think the missing end of the Bayeux Tapestry is now being completed.
I agree: we're on the same page on this whole bunch of points !
I just tried to search the source site where I had read Putin's quote pertaining "peace talks" and "the ball is in NATO yard" and I couldn't find it again ...
I hope someone may have better search tools and skills than me to help find it back ... if any !
I'm deeply convinced it was on ZeroHedge / Trendind Politics or Western Journal / America First Report / Just the New or NewsMax, but a search on these sites didn't find the facts (and it can have been deleted !)
Thank you so much for your positive search which confirm what I had read (and seems to have disappear from the sites I follow daily) !
I'm deeply convinced there's a message for a specific group or person when Putin uses this soccer expression: as President Trump he never speaks without meaning !
Trumpist — This was a handy way to send you this completely unrelated story, but it’s a link to an analysis, in French, on the devastating Kakhovka Dam failure. This link was in a very important and well-researched piece by Arn Grim. They come to the same conclusion about it. That is — it was a series of war-related injuries to the dam and questionable water management by both sides, combined with an already aged dam (built in ‘50s) and the sheer forces of nature — water is powerful! But it was not a deliberate sabotage by either side to completely destroy the dam, causing catastrophic flooding and the loss of the hydro plant, among other serious problems. The worst of which may be the risky blame game.
ArnGrimR’s first two pieces, written in June, are worth looking at, too — although this third piece repeats some of the thought processes & evidence in the first two (can skip those already seen), the first relates how this makes clear that we must guard against rushing to judgement. And the second piece adds some butter and chives to the meat and at the end addresses some of the news & comments (Many quite toxic) surrounding the event.
(His first two pieces can be found on his substack page)
There may be too much information here and it’s lengthy. It’s all very, very, thorough & clearly logical & scientific — fascinating because of or despite (depending on one’s bent) the presence of numerous charts, graphs & data, and valuable as a reminder of what integrity in journalism can be and a caution to guard our tendency these days to jump or be led to dangerous conclusions. This is award material. I wish everyone would read it.
Thanks for your indulgence — I hope you find it worth your time — if you do, please share, as it’s most deserving, I think.
I thoroughly agree! There is a twinkle in their eye sometimes that quickens the heart. Calms and gladdens at once ! Sometimes it’s a mock sternness. Trump does the double meanings & allusions all the time in his brief writings & speeches.
I’m glad to have been able to help. It seems worth noting those outlets where the article has disappeared (unless it’s just that it can’t be located); if it’s just gone, I’d be wary of those sources — i no longer trust Newsmax (OAN still seems ok), & even Zero Hedge is on my side-eye list.
God Bless!
🙏🏽👆🏼✝️🕊😎
(I have appropriated your dove/HS — I’d not thought to use it before. Thanks!)
Yes Eric, this was masterful. I have a friend in British Special Forces, does he tell me anything? Not as such, but they slip out (brag or something). Anyway. to hear it from him (he is pretty high like me and a few others in Intelligence clearance) you'd think the UK has done everything. MI6 killed Diana whom I've recently seen a picture of. They were responsible for Jeffrey Epstein-maybe. Lots of things I can't disclose. You are very close though, closer than ANYONE I've seen yet. For 911 look to Israel, that one is simple. They had a friendly relationship with Iran? NO. Of course there were insiders too, the Bush's were one. George simply ignored the CIA's warnings his daddy owned the CIA.
I'm not saying they did kill Diana, but there are a number of suspicious circumstances around her death, and her boyfriend's wealthy, powerful, connected dad publicly stated that that this was what had happened.
If you want a motive, do you think it is possible that Luciferian cabal member Prince (now King) Charles shared an unusual hobby with his great pal (and the man he described as his mentor) Jimmy Saville, and that Diana knew about it...?
Anyone who closely observed Diana's behavior during her marriage saw her going from a shy girl into a more and more confident woman.
That is until after the birth of her children, then you heard more and more reports of marital instability, infidelity (on both sides) and signs of depression.
The fact that she had no supporters among the family at all but she did have supporters among the servants.
When Camilla finally re-entered the picture is when Diana finally lost it and had enough.
I think her time with that family finally woke her up and I think she was also clued in by the household staff about the real situation inside the palace.
When she tried to build another life outside that circle was when she became too much of a risk.
I think she outlived her usefulness the second William was born and I do suspect Charles wanted her out of he picture so he could officially bring Camilla back into his life.
Unlike his mother, Charles is not a sympathetic figure nor one to inspire any kind of loyalty, watching his body language you get a sense of a cold, distant man who cannot and will not empathize with anyone in the world.
As King he's a failure, notice that there isn't much enthusiasm for his reign so far and nobody seems to much like the guy.
When you say, "Unlike his mother, Charles is not a sympathetic figure" do you believe Queen Elizabeth may not have been evil like the rest of them? I always had such admiration for her, it's hard for me to believe she was one of the evil puppet-masters. But I could certainly be wrong and deceived.
She maybe as evil as the rest of them, however she was very much better at hiding it than Charles. The fact that her funeral generated so much sympathy and was such a big production to exceed any Hollywood blockbuster shows you the extent to which her image was managed.
However, it didn't extend to the rest of that dysfunctional family, look especially at Andrew's life and antics, at least Charles had enough brains to remain discreet.
The Queen's children have frankly been failures in life, they haven't inspired much confidence in the British public and the calls for the abolition of support for the "freeloaders" have been rising during the past 20 years.
The only person to actually boost the positive image of the Royals was Diana, she did more for the PR of that family in 10 years than the Queen did in 50 years.
Look today at what's happening in the UK and you hardly see any positive mention of Charles at all.
And word has been spreading about his support and promotion of the ideals of the World Economic Forum and that's not good news, on top of all the drama Prince Harry was causing.
Unfortunately she was one of the evils. The pedophile ring was her baby as well as Charles'. If you think our deep state is bad, they are nothing in comparison to the UK's.
I personally never saw Diana as this "saintly" figure, an image she herself cultivated.
Unfortunately, her social justice causes (AIDS, land mines, etc.) appear to have paved the way for William to become a WEF shill (not unlike his father).
The truth, she was never killed. The threat that she could be involved is Queen Elizabeth. A further truth has to remain classified, both because you would never believe it (I had trouble swallowing it at first) and it touches others (innocents and Trump).
💯 over the last several months every rabbit hole i jumped in led to “London”. - follow the money 😉
I listened to a couple great interviews with Richard Poe on Mel K’s podcast and he and you are on the same page.
I wonder if JFK’s father connected all these dots while ambassador to England? Or was he controlled? Considering how long this war has been going on my hope is that they were on our team and thats why JFK was eliminating the Fed fiat and destroying the CIA and The cabal was a hard nope on both fronts. Truth is so much more interesting than fiction; well at least now when we can be confident in Victory instead of continuing mental and financial slavery.
JFK was a tragic figure, he had the right idea but at the wrong time.
I think his father tried to warn JFK about the kind of people they were dealing with but I think JFK was an idealist, and overestimated the kind of support he would have inside his administration. Joseph Kennedy knew crooks when he saw them as he had to frequently deal with them in his business career.
Another figure who tried warn JFK and the world at large was Eisenhower, unlike JFK, Eisenhower was a seasoned soldier and political strategist. I think he knew exactly what he was dealing with and that the military-industrial complex, the Deep State-Cabal wasn't going to be easily removed.
Eisenhower gave his speech and then stepped out of the limelight, it's a wonder he wasn't killed shortly thereafter but he may not have been enough of a threat.
The assassination of JFK I think was the catalyst for the formation of the modern white hats, before then I think the white hat coalition was much more diffuse and disorganized, after the event I think some very tough and savvy military leaders joined the effort and began the laborious planning to stop and eventually eliminate the Cabal.
60 years later and the war with the Deep State has finally come out in the open, so far at the cost of millions of civilian deaths and millions more to come due the jab and other attacks forthcoming. As we can now see the Deep State will soon begin it's open attack in the civilian population to break their spirit and control them, unfortunately for them too many people have now woken up and aren't going back to sleep.
It's why and I very much pray I'm wrong, the final defeat of the Cabal will be a bloody affair, they will never surrender, only die and their defeat will come at a high cost.
I think we need to wait and see what Eisenhower's real role was. Was he really the good guy? He did warn of the threat of the military complex (controlled opposition?) What was his role in Gen Patton's death? He seemed to have a hand in that but we'll have to wait for the facts.
Likely the Vatican. But then the question is who is behind the Vatican? I believe the real top level made themselves invisible. Rumor is that they were also in Italy though. I am of course speaking only in human terms.
Bravo!! Thank you for the article - spreading this far and wide! As well, just watched Fall of the Cabal: Birth of the Cabal from FallCabal on bitchute very informative on the beginning of the Cabal infiltrating England and supports every bit of history you have listed.
Great article, thanks! I was somewhat shocked last week when MI6 Head Richard Moore came out in person.......what would cause him to do that????😊
I am going to share your article widely to all the Trump-haters I know.
Secondly, if you could ever share your thoughts on the Meghan Markle/Prince Harry affair, that would be interesting. I have been following that all along, and I am wondering if either of them are smart enough to know what is going on with the Royal Family/ world domination? Are they as clueless as they seem? The last item I wanted to mention was before she was killed, Diana told one of her friends she had discovered something "horrible" and I wonder if she had uncovered the trafficking ?
From what I've heard, Meghan Markle was planted within the British Royal Family in order to destroy them from the inside. Another young black woman came out, saying she was "recruited" for this, but was ultimately not chosen.
Jul 28, 2023·edited Jul 30, 2023Liked by Erik Carlson
Interesting. I agree partially and I think, Erik, that you are closer than not to the truth. BUT. I think you your investigation needs to go deeper into WHO became the power in the City of London, HOW, and FROM WHERE (Prussia for example?). What does "British" mean? ... that they live in Britain? Who are they really?
Yes, saying "Jews" or even "Zionists" are in control is not accurate. But that's because the label "Jew" (especially) and "Zionist" have been clothed with such variable meanings and connotations by TPTB (esp. those using the ADL and the MSM) as to be nearly meaningless labels anymore. (There are many that call themselves "Jews" that protest that anyone that claims to be a "Jew" is one ... nothing else is needed or important to be "Jewish" according to them ... and that therefore speaking against them is anti-"Semitic.")
Consider the fact that many who took over the City of London and the banking industry that controls the City of London (think Bank of England and the BIS, especially), were "Jews" but in name only, having absolutely NO care or concern for "Judaism" (another vague -ism term), the Law of Moses, "real" Jews (whoever they are) or "Israel" (once again, define that, as it has different meanings to different people with different beliefs) or any persecution of those "Jews," or of anyone else for that matter. They used (and still use) their claimed "Jewishness" as simply a cover for their crimes. (Soros comes to mind ... he has never given a scheisse about the "Jewish" people or "Judaism" (as a belief system), yet he is protected by the MSM & ADL by claims of "anti-semitism" if accused of anything criminal, which basically describes his entire life history.)
So, again, you can call the enemy "British," but that doesn't tell us who they really were or are or claimed to be and where their power and money came from or for that matter how they became "royalty," blood- or money-wise. Claiming that "Jews" are just the strings "being pulled" neither defines those you are calling "Jews," nor tells us anything about those you say were/are pulling those strings, many of whom called themselves "Jews" when it was to their benefit (think ADL), but weren't really, or were backed by "Jewish" money.
JFK said in his famous Secret Society speech that the battle is ancient in its roots. My research has led to Kharzaria ( what is now called Ukraine. They disguised themselves as jews but are actually a Satanic cult and worship BAAL etc. Britain is just where they established a control centre for “a time” 😉
Clif High had a recent piece where he explained that the Khazarians are not really Jews --
"The [KM] hides in the body of the Jewish people, as a sacrificial cloak, so that then they can claim ‘antisemitism’ if you question any of their practices, but they are not jews. They consider themselves better than jews. They are true, pure, satanists..."
Maybe the best name for these Parasites is Sabbatean / Frankists. An entire culture based off of "Inverted scripture," designed to fool some and confuse others. Yet this culture has nothing to do with Jews, it is it's own psychopathic identity.
It's older than that - but that is certainly part of the history. And there are direct links between Jacob Frank, Rothschild and Weishaupt.
I don't think it's correct to say "this culture has nothing to do with Jews" - that would be akin to saying "typhoid has nothing to do with Mary", because the Kabbalah is like a parasite for which biblical Judaism has become the host. It is true that the parasite can live inside other institutions and religions (e.g. Ismaili sect, freemasonry, catholicism etc.) but it has been hiding in Judaism for a very long time.
When I said that the Jewish culture has nothing to do with the cabal, I was trying to make a distinction between the regular mainstream Jewish population as specifically being fully conscious or accepting of these Parasites. I do realize that some are in on it, but I like to give emphasis to individuals; for example, Henry Kissinger is very likely one of these monsters. If I can identify a person like that, it makes for a very straightforward argument and I'm certain that he has connections to this subversive Sabbatean cult. My current sense is that most people involved in this Criminal Cabal in a conscious way, are very old bloodlines like the Dragon Bloodline. They are likely the private owners of the BIS and Cede & Co. They own all Land Patents and hold them in Allodium. All this crap is all tied together, interconnected but hidden.
I'm interested in this "very old bloodline" theory. I have come across it many times. One version is "Venetian black nobility", and frequently linked back to Roman senatorial families. The "dragon" bloodline version appears to be based on a couple of authors (Nicholas de Vere and another whose name I cannot remember). However in both cases, very little in the way of evidence is offered.
On the other hand the evidence against the Rothschilds and a handful of other Jewish banking families and their connections to almost everything and everyone in the last three centuries is much clearer and more concrete.
There are ways to prove these things out but no direct proof, unless you can go back to a period before the first waves of social political infiltrations took place, such as in Ancient Egypt; I have been studying the language so there is nothing these Black Nobility can hide from me.
Nicholas de Vere is quite prominant in my study of Dragon Court, along with a researcher who goes by "Firestarter." His threads are on Lawful Path Forums and Ron Paul Forums. Awesome levels of detail.
Sabbatean / Frankists are the cult that inhabits inside the Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities; they privately do not follow those religions. Sabbateans are mostly inside the highest ruling class of the Jewish community, they are the Rothschilds, Montegue Barons, Warbergs and Habsburgs; in the North America, they would include the Bronfmans, Lanskeys and many others. By definition these are "posers," they get the majority of the community they inhabit to take the blame for the crimes they (Over Class) commit. The Sabbateans essentially work for the Black Nobility. Rothschilds are just the banking staff, Black Nobility are their clients. All Wealth world wide is actually controlled using the system of private equities through Trusts.
I have written and compiled quite a bit on the Sabbateans and their control structure both post below are reasonably accurate, though I am still finding more information:
Intergranular summarizes the history of Dragon Court and aspects on how their hidden system functions; please see the first diagram as you scroll down.
Corporate Chains goes into the various systems and "Tools" they use to hold control, such as the Trust System.
People's eye glaze over when they feel overwhelmed by too much to soak in; I have always thought that if we can work together to map out the complexities, develop a good knowledge base, that would go a long way to "main stream" this information.
I'm well aware of the Sabbataean Frankists. That is the group for which a great deal of hard evidence exists, and of whose guilt (and that of their successors) I am reasonably sure.
It is this idea that they work for some other hidden group for which the evidence is much more limited.
I have read Frances Leader's substack. The problem is that, as with everyone who makes these assertions, she is very long on assertions and very short on evidence.
For example, there is clear documentation covering the Rothschild connections to Frank, Moses Hess, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler, Balfour, the Rockefellers, Rhodes, Milner etc.
But for all this other stuff - just claims.
That doesn't mean it's definitely not true of course. And some claim that this black nobility has framed "the Jews" and made them scapegoats for their own crimes. But - given the available evidence - it seems more likely to me that the converse is true.
Cynthia Chung and Matt Ehret espouse this (black nobility) view as well - and they do a lot of deep and interesting research uncovering all sorts of interesting tidbits. But even they don't seem to provide actual evidence for their claims on this particular topic (although to be fair they write so much I can't keep up with all of it).
It's a difficult conundrum. For example some claim that the Jesuits manipulate events and then scapegoat the Jews. But then there is the counterclaim that Loyola was a crypto-Jew and the boot is on the other foot.
When you consider that a great many of such "conversos" continued to practise judaism in secret, it is not a stretch to believe that it is entirely possible that the Jesuits are controlled by the Sabbataeans rather than vice versa.
Then one has to consider practical politics. The bankers have the power ro print money out of thin air. Even were they once the servants to hidden masters, the money power would be more than sufficient to turn the tables. So what would have prevented them from doing so?
First, I very much enjoyed and profited from this dialogue.
Second, I love so much of what the English are and the great writings and honorable deeds throughout their past. So, the abolition of slavery and the slave trade (one example) seems to belie the absolute dominance of this ancient cabal — in certain instances — or is there a part of this Godly and upright move that actually does secretly comport with the plans of the cabal?
There have been good and true men throughout and I think it’s valuable to Consider these, lest we forget that mad Satan is really very stupid. And that God, whose boundless love rests on mankind, is supreme, sovereign and infinitely powerful.
Yes there are evil psychopaths who knowingly do their bidding, but there are also many well-meaning people within their organizations who have been deceived into working towards their evil goals in the belief that they are not evil.
This was even truer in earlier times when it was harder to see where the evil was headed, which explains two things:
(1) Why the corruption is becoming so obvious now - only out and out crooks are willing to go along with their schemes any longer
(2) Why many of the people involved in earlier times also did many good and noble things. If you truly believe you are spreading peace on earth it's not surprising for example that you do some other good things along the way.
Remember Paradise Lost. It's easy for Satan to appear noble when he first raises his flag in rebellion against the tyranny of heaven. Later on his nature becomes clearer.
And finally of course - yes I think their gaining control of power has been a gradual process. For sure they had less control two hundred years ago than they do now.
I claim to be a Zionist Christian (Roman Catholic) and have always seen and respected the Jewish people as our elder from the beginning of the Bible (Old Testament).
In the darkness times of the Middle Age, the Catholic Church decided the Christians were not allowed to manage money, nor exercise any job linked to banking or lending operations.
As soon the Jews were allowed to exercise these economically fundamental roles, they were made the scapegoats for all the economical disasters and bad choices the European decadent monarchies made, and that continued when they settled the american continent and other places they slowly discovered ...
Dear T de La F ... there is SO much in your perhaps heart-felt, but unfortunately VERY mis-informed, post that I could comment on, starting immediately with your "I claim to be," but it would be too long a commentary for this venue, and I don't hear in what you wrote any particular request or even desire to be corrected or informed, or even any hint of an understanding that you might need to be. So, lacking any of those basic requirements (for me to exert the energy), I'm not going to wade into that ball of confusion. I'll just say that you need to be able to hold very lightly (and humbly) onto what you've been taught and/or decided to believe and do your own, or at least much deeper, research (including what the Bible really says about ... well, I'm going to resist going there). God bless you, too, in your search for truth.
Thank you for your own take I respect, even if I don't even know if I agree or disagree on certain points...
I'm only an hearted human and believer, with my own experimented life, and I try to give my best as far as I can. I try to act according to my beliefs and confess my failures.
I don't need (want ?) to know the very detailed truth about every thing; it's God's privilege ...
🙏 God bless you and those who have the courage and the faith for searching more and share their discoveries ! 🙏
Perhaps you don't want to know the detailed truth about everything. But I think the bible does suggest that we need to beware false teachers and false prophets. It seems to me that that involves at least some care in deciding what and who to believe.
And when it comes to Jews, remember that Jesus came to them as their Messiah. Those that listened to him became Christians and spread the word to all of us. Those that refused to listen to their own Messiah and hardened their hearts against their own God refused the new covenant and remained "Jews" according to today's definition.
EXACTLY!!! You refer to the Khazarian mafia, those who are claiming a blood line to Judeans of ancient time but are not Jews by blood. The name stealers. The Khazarians control nations and their first step, is the introduction of a central bank. Control the money, control the nation.
From what I have read and those I follow, Zuckerberg is the “face” of Facebook/social media. Facebook was Lifelog created by DARPA/USDefense Department and we were told Zuckerberg created it to mask who the real creators were to surveil all of us!
Jul 28, 2023·edited Jul 28, 2023Liked by Erik Carlson
I was very pleasantly surprised with this post. So many posts I've seen promise to expose the enemy, then just point at some idea, tool, or fiction like "the government" or "the deep state" or the classic "they." You hit it right on the head, including the type of warfare being employed. The British Empire's most prized resource is your mind.
Some fun things to check:
If you look up 'British Invasion' on Wikipedia, you'll find the section 'End of the first British Invasion and its aftermath' starts with, "The historical conclusion of the British Invasion is ambiguous" because the war has not ended.
If you look up 'New York Provincial Congress' on Wikipedia, you'll find it described as "a pro-American alternative to the more conservative New York General Assembly" a/k/a the CROWN's ANTI-AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!
Like you said, there are lots of examples if you accept what you see.
Very interesting idea who the true puppet masters are. If you are right, you should run for POTUS. We need intelligent people at the top, yes? Your idea fits the history I know, but I wonder that any idea so well organized or logical is too logical. My previous view of world affairs contains much more randomness and unpredictability because of Complexity Theory which indicates that a country the size of England actually responds to stimulus the same way as a living organism. And it is unpredictable just like a living organism. I would like to believe your idea, but could you tell us more about yourself or how well you researched this subject all these years? Can you at least add references because if your idea is true, we need to verify. Oh, and by the way take out a life insurance policy today - something for your survivors. Please "Stay Alive".
Thank you sir, it already appears you have inspired others to do their own research. I also follow the work of Clif High and he has been on the KM for a while.
Early on in the covid crime and lockdown I was doing a ton of research and came across a documentary about The City of London square mile about which I knew nothing previously. I learned much about the British Empire after its demise in the 1950s and how they turned this around and became a secret financial empire, exercising the same global control as before. I think many people here in UK have no idea that the City of London is a separate country much like Vatican City and Washington DC, has its own separate police force, it’s own mayor, is exempt from UK law and has the weirdest and most ancient customs and operates in secret.
Absolutely love your writing Eric. I learn so much from you and it does not shock me in the least to learn the extent of British skulduggery. I think I come in your third category.
Yes, Washington, DC should never have been created, just like the other two points of that triangle. I have heard it described as the "Rulers, the Bank, and the Army" My reason for President Trump to be the true "19th" POTUS.
I would have to say that your "demise" of the British Empire never occurred. It was more likely the handing over of the title "World Superpower" to the U.S. so the Royals could focus on their banking.
What I meant to describe was the demise of the outwardly visible pomp and glory of the British Empire which could no longer be sustained, and when all their ex pats had to return home in ignominy from foreign lands that became newly independent. It was a blow to a prideful nation that once coloured the world map mostly red to denote all their ‘ownership’. Of course they continued on as ever only undercover.
Well done! I absolutely am in awe of the depth of detail and as other commenters noted it has been the British cabal all along right in front of our noses if one bothers to look and dig deep.
Thank you sir ! Others have already said what I was going to say so I will save the ink. Gotta get back to reading through the comments!
I have research that backs this up. I would recommend for everyone to watch the very first speaker on Day 2 in the Grand Jury mock trial, a guidepost for prosecuting the criminals for their crimes against humanity when we ever regain control from the criminals. The entire series is excellent, but the very first speaker gives an in-depth analysis of England's corrupt reign and desire to enslave America back into its clutches:
Geez, Erik, your articles just get better and better!!
It is my studied opinion that central banking around the world is the very root of all evil in this world. The Rothchilds showed the Royals how to do it after they stole massive wealth from Englanders with the lies that they told about Waterloo, and thus, the Bank of England, the MAIN root of this world's evil. To see this evil, one only needs to know the answer to the question, "what kind of person/group would loan money to both sides of the same war and make the (planned) victor the loan collector?" The answer: The Bank of England and its world of central banks.
It is well past time for America(ns) to ABOLISH THE FED, and I believe that is exactly what President Trump intends to do.
Richard Poe, a Best-Selling author and journalist, (see Richard Poe substack) has written extensively on the impact of British control of world affairs.
There is one event which put this article in context and had a lot more symbolic value than was indicated at the time.
A lot happened during Trump’s 2017 world tour.
Also, a lot of symbolism was pushed out there which 99% of people missed at the time.
A sword dance in Saudi Arabia: https://youtu.be/tD8tbuWMHt4
The visits to Israel and the Vatican.
A visit to China and exclusive dinner at the Forbidden City with Xi.
The handing of the soccer ball from Putin to Trump saying “the ball is in your court”.
Finally a visit to England with a massive breach of etiquette… https://youtu.be/tyBKS-rV4eE
The fact that Trump pulled this off in front of the world actually lends a lot of credibility that the British Royals are/were a part of the Cabal network.
There is no way that a Cabal puppet president would ever be allowed to get away with such a breach of protocol. The British Monarchy do not usually tolerate such things unless they have no choice.
What if the Q statement: “Patriots are in control” is not just a hollow statement with no proof to back it up?
The fact that Trump went to the UK to see the Royals tells me a lot of what is said in this article has a lot of weight. He basically had them by the short and curlies and it also explains the erratic behaviour of Harry of all things.
I think the minute Trump’s plane landed in England, that marked the end of the overall power of the Royals, however the Cabal network is vast and has a lot of levels and has a lot of compartmentalization.
Cutting off one head of the hydra doesn’t stop the rest of the heads and the body from still being very dangerous.
Ever since then this has been a massive clean up operation, slowly unwinding the Cabal at every level of society.
Just my $0.02 or rather $0.25 with inflation…
Inflation == British Taxation without representation
Another tea party activist:)
A couple pieces which expound a bit on what you and Erik said:
https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/why-the-globalists-are-terrified
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-russia-saved-the-united-states
Whatever happened to bioclandestine?, he wrote a lot of great stuff in 2022 but stopped in January of this year.
Yeah, I don't know. Maybe some of the Badlands crew might have an idea.
Thanks for the links, listened to both! 👌
It's certainly the case that the British Royals are part of the Cabal. But they are junior partners to the Jewish money power. This started when Cromwell took money from the Jews (see his correspondence with Ebenezer Pratt) to fund his rebellion, in return for which the Jews were readmitted to England. Control was entirely flipped when William of Orange was introduced as a puppet king, and the master-puppet relationship has remained the same since.
They may have gained some leverage...."British Isreal" was created by the Brits
Obviously "the British" were complicit.
But I rather thought that WW1 was engineered by the cabal with the key role being played by Rothschild, and that British Israel was the price Rothschild extracted for delivering American support when it became necessary. The delivery of support was possible because of the influence the bankers had over Woodrow Wilson whose administration saw the creation of the federal reserve, the imposition of the income tax, as well as the US entering WW1, and it is interesting to note that WW1 was started shortly after his election was secured.
This explanation covers both the timing of the Balfour declaration (coincident with US entry to the war), the fact that the declaration was addressed to Rothschild, and the degree of subsequent Rothschild involvement with, and influence over, Israel. The alternative explanation does not fit the facts nearly as well.
It is also the case that Edward Mandel House, who did indeed play a key role in most of these events, according to his own notes met regularly with Warburg throughout the period, and appears to have acted as his agent. The Warburgs were of course originally Venetian, and then German "Jews" - and had no real link to Britain at all.
I tend to believe that every war this world has seen since Waterloo was "engineered" by corrupt "bankers". As for that POS woodrow wilson, the only thing he did good was to admit creating the Federal Reserve was a huge mistake, just before he died. He most certainly was a puppet for Morgan and Rockefeller.
I would go back at least as far as the French revolution. And before that I simply haven't examined any evidence :-).
This makes more sense to me, historically, than the "British Monarchy Cabal," who's power is titular at best.
I thought it was interesting that the British band was playing the anthems of the U.S. military branches of service!
That was one among quite a few details that were not mentioned in the MSM reporting.
Trump's whole trip was full of symbolism but this came at a time before Q was even on the scene.
When he was stepping in front of the Queen to review the troops he was symbolizing that they were HIS troops to review.
Also recall he was late and kept the Queen waiting, another slight to the monarchy, you NEVER keep the Queen waiting, it's you who waits at the Queen's pleasure, Head of state or not.
The only thing more symbolic would have been Trump marching into the City of London and declaring he was going to takeover the Fed, which he did do in 2020.
This wasn't the first incident either, Trump also did the same thing to Charles a bit later on.
I have trouble seeing the crown on Camilla's head. I wonder what Diana thinks?
🤔🤔🤔😎
Hello GRY! 🙋🏼♂️🇫🇷
Re: "The handing of the soccer ball from Putin to Trump saying “the ball is in your court”."
Putin just used the same words these very last days while evoking the fact of possible peace talks with NATO and Ukraine. WHY ??
I haven't been keeping up lately with what Putin has been saying or it's context.
However if I were to make an educated guess he's sending a signal not to NATO or the Deep State, he's signalling to Trump and the white hats that he's willing to negotiate but only with them.
The Deep State is still trying to oust him in any way possible.
https://youtu.be/GYvqzybt5Tw
and he knows that it's futile to talk to the Biden administration or the globalists in the EU who would see such a gesture as weakness and double down on trying to remove him and destabilize Russia.
The fact that Putin is mentioning peace now and not during the past 6-8 months tells me some sort of condition was fulfilled which allows him to proceed to the next stage.
I suspect the collapse of Macron's power and the unrest in France, the economic slide of Germany in recession and the increasing collapse of the Ukraine "offensive" is pushing the Cabal into desperation. This combined with the obvious deterioration of Biden and his family coming under increasing political pressure in the US and on the Democrats is having a major impact on the Deep State's operations.
Also the fact that Biden let slip that NATO no longer has reserve military supplies to be able to fight a sustained conventional conflict with Russia tells me Putin knows he has a very strong bargaining position against NATO.
We also need to keep in mind that the BRICS alliance is about to get a whole lot larger with more than 20 other countries lined up asking for membership, and their parallel banking, finance and trade system backed by gold is about to hammer the US Petro Dollar into the ground.
The Deep State is rushing to finalize their push into totalitarian dictatorship with the digital ID and CBDC system combined with climate lockdowns which will be imposed just in time for the 2024 US election.
These are my guesses at this point in time, as with everything happening these days it's hard to know what's real and what's not so I won't be surprised if I'm way off in my analysis.
Thank you for your analyses here. And thank you also for the link. The two Alexes, whom I had followed often earlier, had fallen off my radar and it’s good to hear them again.
Makes me think the missing end of the Bayeux Tapestry is now being completed.
I agree: we're on the same page on this whole bunch of points !
I just tried to search the source site where I had read Putin's quote pertaining "peace talks" and "the ball is in NATO yard" and I couldn't find it again ...
I hope someone may have better search tools and skills than me to help find it back ... if any !
Hello, Trumpist!
I will try to hunt it up too.
Hi Dick !
Thank you for your help !
I'm deeply convinced it was on ZeroHedge / Trendind Politics or Western Journal / America First Report / Just the New or NewsMax, but a search on these sites didn't find the facts (and it can have been deleted !)
Hello Trumpist!
Sorry to be so late in this. Here is what I found — relating to peace, Putin, in talking bout nato and Ukraine:
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/ball-now-on-ukraine-s-side-with-regard-to-talks--putin
He also used a similar expression back in December of 2021:
https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/the-ball-is-in-their-court-russia-warns-west-over-nato-expansion-101640280660032.html
And, of course the famous transfer of the soccer ball to Trump.
God’s good Blessings on you and yours!
PS—Let me know if it helped!
Hello Dick !
Thank you so much for your positive search which confirm what I had read (and seems to have disappear from the sites I follow daily) !
I'm deeply convinced there's a message for a specific group or person when Putin uses this soccer expression: as President Trump he never speaks without meaning !
🙏🏻✝️ God bless you !
Trumpist — This was a handy way to send you this completely unrelated story, but it’s a link to an analysis, in French, on the devastating Kakhovka Dam failure. This link was in a very important and well-researched piece by Arn Grim. They come to the same conclusion about it. That is — it was a series of war-related injuries to the dam and questionable water management by both sides, combined with an already aged dam (built in ‘50s) and the sheer forces of nature — water is powerful! But it was not a deliberate sabotage by either side to completely destroy the dam, causing catastrophic flooding and the loss of the hydro plant, among other serious problems. The worst of which may be the risky blame game.
ArnGrimR’s first two pieces, written in June, are worth looking at, too — although this third piece repeats some of the thought processes & evidence in the first two (can skip those already seen), the first relates how this makes clear that we must guard against rushing to judgement. And the second piece adds some butter and chives to the meat and at the end addresses some of the news & comments (Many quite toxic) surrounding the event.
1) https://www.lettrevigie.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/230610-note-destruction-Nova-Khakovka-v3.pdf
2) https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/kakhovka-dam-new-information
(His first two pieces can be found on his substack page)
There may be too much information here and it’s lengthy. It’s all very, very, thorough & clearly logical & scientific — fascinating because of or despite (depending on one’s bent) the presence of numerous charts, graphs & data, and valuable as a reminder of what integrity in journalism can be and a caution to guard our tendency these days to jump or be led to dangerous conclusions. This is award material. I wish everyone would read it.
Thanks for your indulgence — I hope you find it worth your time — if you do, please share, as it’s most deserving, I think.
As always, mon ami, God Bless you and keep you.
✝️👆🏼🕊
I thoroughly agree! There is a twinkle in their eye sometimes that quickens the heart. Calms and gladdens at once ! Sometimes it’s a mock sternness. Trump does the double meanings & allusions all the time in his brief writings & speeches.
I’m glad to have been able to help. It seems worth noting those outlets where the article has disappeared (unless it’s just that it can’t be located); if it’s just gone, I’d be wary of those sources — i no longer trust Newsmax (OAN still seems ok), & even Zero Hedge is on my side-eye list.
God Bless!
🙏🏽👆🏼✝️🕊😎
(I have appropriated your dove/HS — I’d not thought to use it before. Thanks!)
Thank you for this information and the author of this piece is definitely on the right track.
Excellent perspective! I agree!
Correct ! You beat me to it. Thanks!
Eric!! Holy Sheeeet! So thankful for researchers like you.. you wrapped it up and put a beautiful bow on it. Thank you!
Yes Eric, this was masterful. I have a friend in British Special Forces, does he tell me anything? Not as such, but they slip out (brag or something). Anyway. to hear it from him (he is pretty high like me and a few others in Intelligence clearance) you'd think the UK has done everything. MI6 killed Diana whom I've recently seen a picture of. They were responsible for Jeffrey Epstein-maybe. Lots of things I can't disclose. You are very close though, closer than ANYONE I've seen yet. For 911 look to Israel, that one is simple. They had a friendly relationship with Iran? NO. Of course there were insiders too, the Bush's were one. George simply ignored the CIA's warnings his daddy owned the CIA.
Why would they kill Diana?
What that possible threat could she be?
I'm not saying they did kill Diana, but there are a number of suspicious circumstances around her death, and her boyfriend's wealthy, powerful, connected dad publicly stated that that this was what had happened.
If you want a motive, do you think it is possible that Luciferian cabal member Prince (now King) Charles shared an unusual hobby with his great pal (and the man he described as his mentor) Jimmy Saville, and that Diana knew about it...?
Anyone who closely observed Diana's behavior during her marriage saw her going from a shy girl into a more and more confident woman.
That is until after the birth of her children, then you heard more and more reports of marital instability, infidelity (on both sides) and signs of depression.
The fact that she had no supporters among the family at all but she did have supporters among the servants.
When Camilla finally re-entered the picture is when Diana finally lost it and had enough.
I think her time with that family finally woke her up and I think she was also clued in by the household staff about the real situation inside the palace.
When she tried to build another life outside that circle was when she became too much of a risk.
I think she outlived her usefulness the second William was born and I do suspect Charles wanted her out of he picture so he could officially bring Camilla back into his life.
Unlike his mother, Charles is not a sympathetic figure nor one to inspire any kind of loyalty, watching his body language you get a sense of a cold, distant man who cannot and will not empathize with anyone in the world.
As King he's a failure, notice that there isn't much enthusiasm for his reign so far and nobody seems to much like the guy.
We, here in Blighty, do not like, trust or admire this snivelling little bastard. I'm quoting Spike Milligan, of course.
I agree with everyone there.
When you say, "Unlike his mother, Charles is not a sympathetic figure" do you believe Queen Elizabeth may not have been evil like the rest of them? I always had such admiration for her, it's hard for me to believe she was one of the evil puppet-masters. But I could certainly be wrong and deceived.
She maybe as evil as the rest of them, however she was very much better at hiding it than Charles. The fact that her funeral generated so much sympathy and was such a big production to exceed any Hollywood blockbuster shows you the extent to which her image was managed.
However, it didn't extend to the rest of that dysfunctional family, look especially at Andrew's life and antics, at least Charles had enough brains to remain discreet.
The Queen's children have frankly been failures in life, they haven't inspired much confidence in the British public and the calls for the abolition of support for the "freeloaders" have been rising during the past 20 years.
The only person to actually boost the positive image of the Royals was Diana, she did more for the PR of that family in 10 years than the Queen did in 50 years.
Look today at what's happening in the UK and you hardly see any positive mention of Charles at all.
And word has been spreading about his support and promotion of the ideals of the World Economic Forum and that's not good news, on top of all the drama Prince Harry was causing.
Unfortunately she was one of the evils. The pedophile ring was her baby as well as Charles'. If you think our deep state is bad, they are nothing in comparison to the UK's.
I personally never saw Diana as this "saintly" figure, an image she herself cultivated.
Unfortunately, her social justice causes (AIDS, land mines, etc.) appear to have paved the way for William to become a WEF shill (not unlike his father).
I read in number of places that she was pregnant and the royals could not allow a step brother or sister. Of course I don’t know.
The truth, she was never killed. The threat that she could be involved is Queen Elizabeth. A further truth has to remain classified, both because you would never believe it (I had trouble swallowing it at first) and it touches others (innocents and Trump).
I only was told that MI6 killed her. Two days ago I saw her picture, she was radiantly smiling. You could only see her age in her neck.
No idea or even that they did since I've just seen her picture and she had rosy cheeks.
💯 over the last several months every rabbit hole i jumped in led to “London”. - follow the money 😉
I listened to a couple great interviews with Richard Poe on Mel K’s podcast and he and you are on the same page.
I wonder if JFK’s father connected all these dots while ambassador to England? Or was he controlled? Considering how long this war has been going on my hope is that they were on our team and thats why JFK was eliminating the Fed fiat and destroying the CIA and The cabal was a hard nope on both fronts. Truth is so much more interesting than fiction; well at least now when we can be confident in Victory instead of continuing mental and financial slavery.
God bless 🙏❤️
JFK was a tragic figure, he had the right idea but at the wrong time.
I think his father tried to warn JFK about the kind of people they were dealing with but I think JFK was an idealist, and overestimated the kind of support he would have inside his administration. Joseph Kennedy knew crooks when he saw them as he had to frequently deal with them in his business career.
Another figure who tried warn JFK and the world at large was Eisenhower, unlike JFK, Eisenhower was a seasoned soldier and political strategist. I think he knew exactly what he was dealing with and that the military-industrial complex, the Deep State-Cabal wasn't going to be easily removed.
Eisenhower gave his speech and then stepped out of the limelight, it's a wonder he wasn't killed shortly thereafter but he may not have been enough of a threat.
The assassination of JFK I think was the catalyst for the formation of the modern white hats, before then I think the white hat coalition was much more diffuse and disorganized, after the event I think some very tough and savvy military leaders joined the effort and began the laborious planning to stop and eventually eliminate the Cabal.
60 years later and the war with the Deep State has finally come out in the open, so far at the cost of millions of civilian deaths and millions more to come due the jab and other attacks forthcoming. As we can now see the Deep State will soon begin it's open attack in the civilian population to break their spirit and control them, unfortunately for them too many people have now woken up and aren't going back to sleep.
It's why and I very much pray I'm wrong, the final defeat of the Cabal will be a bloody affair, they will never surrender, only die and their defeat will come at a high cost.
I think we need to wait and see what Eisenhower's real role was. Was he really the good guy? He did warn of the threat of the military complex (controlled opposition?) What was his role in Gen Patton's death? He seemed to have a hand in that but we'll have to wait for the facts.
My question is, who's BEHIND this UK Cabal?
Who is the greatest deceiver of all?
Besides Satan?
Bingo
“Lead us not to temptation but deliver us from the evil one”
🙏❤️
Likely the Vatican. But then the question is who is behind the Vatican? I believe the real top level made themselves invisible. Rumor is that they were also in Italy though. I am of course speaking only in human terms.
Anyone connected to the Bank of England.
WHAT A FINE ARTICLE! THANK YOU ERIK CARLSON!!!
Bravo!! Thank you for the article - spreading this far and wide! As well, just watched Fall of the Cabal: Birth of the Cabal from FallCabal on bitchute very informative on the beginning of the Cabal infiltrating England and supports every bit of history you have listed.
Great article, thanks! I was somewhat shocked last week when MI6 Head Richard Moore came out in person.......what would cause him to do that????😊
I am going to share your article widely to all the Trump-haters I know.
Secondly, if you could ever share your thoughts on the Meghan Markle/Prince Harry affair, that would be interesting. I have been following that all along, and I am wondering if either of them are smart enough to know what is going on with the Royal Family/ world domination? Are they as clueless as they seem? The last item I wanted to mention was before she was killed, Diana told one of her friends she had discovered something "horrible" and I wonder if she had uncovered the trafficking ?
From what I've heard, Meghan Markle was planted within the British Royal Family in order to destroy them from the inside. Another young black woman came out, saying she was "recruited" for this, but was ultimately not chosen.
Interesting. I agree partially and I think, Erik, that you are closer than not to the truth. BUT. I think you your investigation needs to go deeper into WHO became the power in the City of London, HOW, and FROM WHERE (Prussia for example?). What does "British" mean? ... that they live in Britain? Who are they really?
Yes, saying "Jews" or even "Zionists" are in control is not accurate. But that's because the label "Jew" (especially) and "Zionist" have been clothed with such variable meanings and connotations by TPTB (esp. those using the ADL and the MSM) as to be nearly meaningless labels anymore. (There are many that call themselves "Jews" that protest that anyone that claims to be a "Jew" is one ... nothing else is needed or important to be "Jewish" according to them ... and that therefore speaking against them is anti-"Semitic.")
Consider the fact that many who took over the City of London and the banking industry that controls the City of London (think Bank of England and the BIS, especially), were "Jews" but in name only, having absolutely NO care or concern for "Judaism" (another vague -ism term), the Law of Moses, "real" Jews (whoever they are) or "Israel" (once again, define that, as it has different meanings to different people with different beliefs) or any persecution of those "Jews," or of anyone else for that matter. They used (and still use) their claimed "Jewishness" as simply a cover for their crimes. (Soros comes to mind ... he has never given a scheisse about the "Jewish" people or "Judaism" (as a belief system), yet he is protected by the MSM & ADL by claims of "anti-semitism" if accused of anything criminal, which basically describes his entire life history.)
So, again, you can call the enemy "British," but that doesn't tell us who they really were or are or claimed to be and where their power and money came from or for that matter how they became "royalty," blood- or money-wise. Claiming that "Jews" are just the strings "being pulled" neither defines those you are calling "Jews," nor tells us anything about those you say were/are pulling those strings, many of whom called themselves "Jews" when it was to their benefit (think ADL), but weren't really, or were backed by "Jewish" money.
JFK said in his famous Secret Society speech that the battle is ancient in its roots. My research has led to Kharzaria ( what is now called Ukraine. They disguised themselves as jews but are actually a Satanic cult and worship BAAL etc. Britain is just where they established a control centre for “a time” 😉
Clif High had a recent piece where he explained that the Khazarians are not really Jews --
"The [KM] hides in the body of the Jewish people, as a sacrificial cloak, so that then they can claim ‘antisemitism’ if you question any of their practices, but they are not jews. They consider themselves better than jews. They are true, pure, satanists..."
https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/the-flip-is-near
(n.b. [KM] = Khazarian Mafia as Clif mentions earlier in the piece)
Yes, I agree and I think it is completely relevant to what is going on now.
Maybe the best name for these Parasites is Sabbatean / Frankists. An entire culture based off of "Inverted scripture," designed to fool some and confuse others. Yet this culture has nothing to do with Jews, it is it's own psychopathic identity.
It's older than that - but that is certainly part of the history. And there are direct links between Jacob Frank, Rothschild and Weishaupt.
I don't think it's correct to say "this culture has nothing to do with Jews" - that would be akin to saying "typhoid has nothing to do with Mary", because the Kabbalah is like a parasite for which biblical Judaism has become the host. It is true that the parasite can live inside other institutions and religions (e.g. Ismaili sect, freemasonry, catholicism etc.) but it has been hiding in Judaism for a very long time.
When I said that the Jewish culture has nothing to do with the cabal, I was trying to make a distinction between the regular mainstream Jewish population as specifically being fully conscious or accepting of these Parasites. I do realize that some are in on it, but I like to give emphasis to individuals; for example, Henry Kissinger is very likely one of these monsters. If I can identify a person like that, it makes for a very straightforward argument and I'm certain that he has connections to this subversive Sabbatean cult. My current sense is that most people involved in this Criminal Cabal in a conscious way, are very old bloodlines like the Dragon Bloodline. They are likely the private owners of the BIS and Cede & Co. They own all Land Patents and hold them in Allodium. All this crap is all tied together, interconnected but hidden.
I'm interested in this "very old bloodline" theory. I have come across it many times. One version is "Venetian black nobility", and frequently linked back to Roman senatorial families. The "dragon" bloodline version appears to be based on a couple of authors (Nicholas de Vere and another whose name I cannot remember). However in both cases, very little in the way of evidence is offered.
On the other hand the evidence against the Rothschilds and a handful of other Jewish banking families and their connections to almost everything and everyone in the last three centuries is much clearer and more concrete.
Also, you should read Frances Leader's stack on the Black Nobility, here's the latest one she just posted today:
https://boodicca.substack.com/p/exposing-roman-empire-20
She's excellent.
There are ways to prove these things out but no direct proof, unless you can go back to a period before the first waves of social political infiltrations took place, such as in Ancient Egypt; I have been studying the language so there is nothing these Black Nobility can hide from me.
Nicholas de Vere is quite prominant in my study of Dragon Court, along with a researcher who goes by "Firestarter." His threads are on Lawful Path Forums and Ron Paul Forums. Awesome levels of detail.
Sabbatean / Frankists are the cult that inhabits inside the Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities; they privately do not follow those religions. Sabbateans are mostly inside the highest ruling class of the Jewish community, they are the Rothschilds, Montegue Barons, Warbergs and Habsburgs; in the North America, they would include the Bronfmans, Lanskeys and many others. By definition these are "posers," they get the majority of the community they inhabit to take the blame for the crimes they (Over Class) commit. The Sabbateans essentially work for the Black Nobility. Rothschilds are just the banking staff, Black Nobility are their clients. All Wealth world wide is actually controlled using the system of private equities through Trusts.
I have written and compiled quite a bit on the Sabbateans and their control structure both post below are reasonably accurate, though I am still finding more information:
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/intergranular-corruption-and-how
Intergranular summarizes the history of Dragon Court and aspects on how their hidden system functions; please see the first diagram as you scroll down.
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/corporate-chains-of-custody-illustrate
Corporate Chains goes into the various systems and "Tools" they use to hold control, such as the Trust System.
People's eye glaze over when they feel overwhelmed by too much to soak in; I have always thought that if we can work together to map out the complexities, develop a good knowledge base, that would go a long way to "main stream" this information.
PS I added more text to my comment after you "liked" it. I should have added a separate comment - didn't realize you would be so quick on the draw :-)
I'm well aware of the Sabbataean Frankists. That is the group for which a great deal of hard evidence exists, and of whose guilt (and that of their successors) I am reasonably sure.
It is this idea that they work for some other hidden group for which the evidence is much more limited.
I have read Frances Leader's substack. The problem is that, as with everyone who makes these assertions, she is very long on assertions and very short on evidence.
For example, there is clear documentation covering the Rothschild connections to Frank, Moses Hess, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler, Balfour, the Rockefellers, Rhodes, Milner etc.
But for all this other stuff - just claims.
That doesn't mean it's definitely not true of course. And some claim that this black nobility has framed "the Jews" and made them scapegoats for their own crimes. But - given the available evidence - it seems more likely to me that the converse is true.
Cynthia Chung and Matt Ehret espouse this (black nobility) view as well - and they do a lot of deep and interesting research uncovering all sorts of interesting tidbits. But even they don't seem to provide actual evidence for their claims on this particular topic (although to be fair they write so much I can't keep up with all of it).
It's a difficult conundrum. For example some claim that the Jesuits manipulate events and then scapegoat the Jews. But then there is the counterclaim that Loyola was a crypto-Jew and the boot is on the other foot.
It does indeed seem to be the case that Ignatius came from a Jewish family of conversos. cf https://academic.oup.com/fordham-scholarship-online/book/18461/chapter-abstract/176560786?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
When you consider that a great many of such "conversos" continued to practise judaism in secret, it is not a stretch to believe that it is entirely possible that the Jesuits are controlled by the Sabbataeans rather than vice versa.
Then one has to consider practical politics. The bankers have the power ro print money out of thin air. Even were they once the servants to hidden masters, the money power would be more than sufficient to turn the tables. So what would have prevented them from doing so?
Well said, Horace! You are a menace to the enemy!
Spot on, and see my comment below arguing that "the Jewish money power" and "the British Empire" are essentially the same thing:
https://badlands.substack.com/p/who-are-the-true-puppet-masters/comment/21522514
Your point about what on earth "a Jew" actually is, is also very valid.
Horace, et al —
First, I very much enjoyed and profited from this dialogue.
Second, I love so much of what the English are and the great writings and honorable deeds throughout their past. So, the abolition of slavery and the slave trade (one example) seems to belie the absolute dominance of this ancient cabal — in certain instances — or is there a part of this Godly and upright move that actually does secretly comport with the plans of the cabal?
There have been good and true men throughout and I think it’s valuable to Consider these, lest we forget that mad Satan is really very stupid. And that God, whose boundless love rests on mankind, is supreme, sovereign and infinitely powerful.
Thank you!
The cabal works through deception.
Yes there are evil psychopaths who knowingly do their bidding, but there are also many well-meaning people within their organizations who have been deceived into working towards their evil goals in the belief that they are not evil.
This was even truer in earlier times when it was harder to see where the evil was headed, which explains two things:
(1) Why the corruption is becoming so obvious now - only out and out crooks are willing to go along with their schemes any longer
(2) Why many of the people involved in earlier times also did many good and noble things. If you truly believe you are spreading peace on earth it's not surprising for example that you do some other good things along the way.
Remember Paradise Lost. It's easy for Satan to appear noble when he first raises his flag in rebellion against the tyranny of heaven. Later on his nature becomes clearer.
And finally of course - yes I think their gaining control of power has been a gradual process. For sure they had less control two hundred years ago than they do now.
The Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/03/10/the-hidden-history-of-the-incredibly-evil-khazarian-mafia/
I claim to be a Zionist Christian (Roman Catholic) and have always seen and respected the Jewish people as our elder from the beginning of the Bible (Old Testament).
In the darkness times of the Middle Age, the Catholic Church decided the Christians were not allowed to manage money, nor exercise any job linked to banking or lending operations.
As soon the Jews were allowed to exercise these economically fundamental roles, they were made the scapegoats for all the economical disasters and bad choices the European decadent monarchies made, and that continued when they settled the american continent and other places they slowly discovered ...
An excellent sample with a reknown name:
https://www.jewishhistory.org/the-rothschilds/
🙏 God bless 🙏
Dear T de La F ... there is SO much in your perhaps heart-felt, but unfortunately VERY mis-informed, post that I could comment on, starting immediately with your "I claim to be," but it would be too long a commentary for this venue, and I don't hear in what you wrote any particular request or even desire to be corrected or informed, or even any hint of an understanding that you might need to be. So, lacking any of those basic requirements (for me to exert the energy), I'm not going to wade into that ball of confusion. I'll just say that you need to be able to hold very lightly (and humbly) onto what you've been taught and/or decided to believe and do your own, or at least much deeper, research (including what the Bible really says about ... well, I'm going to resist going there). God bless you, too, in your search for truth.
Thank you for your own take I respect, even if I don't even know if I agree or disagree on certain points...
I'm only an hearted human and believer, with my own experimented life, and I try to give my best as far as I can. I try to act according to my beliefs and confess my failures.
I don't need (want ?) to know the very detailed truth about every thing; it's God's privilege ...
🙏 God bless you and those who have the courage and the faith for searching more and share their discoveries ! 🙏
Perhaps you don't want to know the detailed truth about everything. But I think the bible does suggest that we need to beware false teachers and false prophets. It seems to me that that involves at least some care in deciding what and who to believe.
And when it comes to Jews, remember that Jesus came to them as their Messiah. Those that listened to him became Christians and spread the word to all of us. Those that refused to listen to their own Messiah and hardened their hearts against their own God refused the new covenant and remained "Jews" according to today's definition.
EXACTLY!!! You refer to the Khazarian mafia, those who are claiming a blood line to Judeans of ancient time but are not Jews by blood. The name stealers. The Khazarians control nations and their first step, is the introduction of a central bank. Control the money, control the nation.
From what I have read and those I follow, Zuckerberg is the “face” of Facebook/social media. Facebook was Lifelog created by DARPA/USDefense Department and we were told Zuckerberg created it to mask who the real creators were to surveil all of us!
I was very pleasantly surprised with this post. So many posts I've seen promise to expose the enemy, then just point at some idea, tool, or fiction like "the government" or "the deep state" or the classic "they." You hit it right on the head, including the type of warfare being employed. The British Empire's most prized resource is your mind.
Some fun things to check:
If you look up 'British Invasion' on Wikipedia, you'll find the section 'End of the first British Invasion and its aftermath' starts with, "The historical conclusion of the British Invasion is ambiguous" because the war has not ended.
If you look up 'New York Provincial Congress' on Wikipedia, you'll find it described as "a pro-American alternative to the more conservative New York General Assembly" a/k/a the CROWN's ANTI-AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!
Like you said, there are lots of examples if you accept what you see.
Another one: Tie Warfare: https://youtu.be/g_OsAlae94c
Erik,
Very interesting idea who the true puppet masters are. If you are right, you should run for POTUS. We need intelligent people at the top, yes? Your idea fits the history I know, but I wonder that any idea so well organized or logical is too logical. My previous view of world affairs contains much more randomness and unpredictability because of Complexity Theory which indicates that a country the size of England actually responds to stimulus the same way as a living organism. And it is unpredictable just like a living organism. I would like to believe your idea, but could you tell us more about yourself or how well you researched this subject all these years? Can you at least add references because if your idea is true, we need to verify. Oh, and by the way take out a life insurance policy today - something for your survivors. Please "Stay Alive".
Best, Doug Czor
My hope with this article is to get people to research further and not just trust what I said.
Thank you Erik! Good idea.
Best, Doug
Thank you sir, it already appears you have inspired others to do their own research. I also follow the work of Clif High and he has been on the KM for a while.
Watch out for limited hangouts & psyops.
I truly believe "The Creature From Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin would be a great start.
G. Edward Griffin was a tireless prophet against Communism.
Early on in the covid crime and lockdown I was doing a ton of research and came across a documentary about The City of London square mile about which I knew nothing previously. I learned much about the British Empire after its demise in the 1950s and how they turned this around and became a secret financial empire, exercising the same global control as before. I think many people here in UK have no idea that the City of London is a separate country much like Vatican City and Washington DC, has its own separate police force, it’s own mayor, is exempt from UK law and has the weirdest and most ancient customs and operates in secret.
Absolutely love your writing Eric. I learn so much from you and it does not shock me in the least to learn the extent of British skulduggery. I think I come in your third category.
Yes, Washington, DC should never have been created, just like the other two points of that triangle. I have heard it described as the "Rulers, the Bank, and the Army" My reason for President Trump to be the true "19th" POTUS.
I would have to say that your "demise" of the British Empire never occurred. It was more likely the handing over of the title "World Superpower" to the U.S. so the Royals could focus on their banking.
And stay hidden in the shadows.
What I meant to describe was the demise of the outwardly visible pomp and glory of the British Empire which could no longer be sustained, and when all their ex pats had to return home in ignominy from foreign lands that became newly independent. It was a blow to a prideful nation that once coloured the world map mostly red to denote all their ‘ownership’. Of course they continued on as ever only undercover.
Well done! I absolutely am in awe of the depth of detail and as other commenters noted it has been the British cabal all along right in front of our noses if one bothers to look and dig deep.
Thank you sir ! Others have already said what I was going to say so I will save the ink. Gotta get back to reading through the comments!
Tremendous article!
I have research that backs this up. I would recommend for everyone to watch the very first speaker on Day 2 in the Grand Jury mock trial, a guidepost for prosecuting the criminals for their crimes against humanity when we ever regain control from the criminals. The entire series is excellent, but the very first speaker gives an in-depth analysis of England's corrupt reign and desire to enslave America back into its clutches:
https://rumble.com/vv6qih-grand-jury-day-2-full-session-february-12th-2022-historical-background.html
Also, another great resource is this video about the Committee of 300:
https://rumble.com/v2jj0jk-rulers-of-our-world-the-committee-of-300.html
And I agree - I have never believed that Jewish people were behind it all. It doesn't make sense.
Thank you for an excellently researched and written article. Please keep up the incredible work!
Geez, Erik, your articles just get better and better!!
It is my studied opinion that central banking around the world is the very root of all evil in this world. The Rothchilds showed the Royals how to do it after they stole massive wealth from Englanders with the lies that they told about Waterloo, and thus, the Bank of England, the MAIN root of this world's evil. To see this evil, one only needs to know the answer to the question, "what kind of person/group would loan money to both sides of the same war and make the (planned) victor the loan collector?" The answer: The Bank of England and its world of central banks.
It is well past time for America(ns) to ABOLISH THE FED, and I believe that is exactly what President Trump intends to do.
Thank you for this incredible piece of work! I am passing it on. Please keep these pieces coming. We need them.
Richard Poe, a Best-Selling author and journalist, (see Richard Poe substack) has written extensively on the impact of British control of world affairs.