Who Says Free Energy Isn't Real?

A Cosmological Basis for Securing a Practical Human Need

Greetings one and all.

Today we’re going to discuss something that, on the surface, may appear a divergence from our usual topics regarding Trump, Devolution, Q, 5G warfare, and so on… but appearances can be deceiving.

Today, we’re going to talk about energy, cosmology, and physics—but don’t worry, this won’t be too deep or technical (at least, no more than is strictly necessary). The point of this article is to poke holes in mainstream narratives regarding the so-called ‘impossibility’ of the existence of free energy. At the end of this article, I’m going to point you in the direction of an extremely useful resource on this topic, should you choose to pursue this information further.

One of the key skills we must build as Digital Soldiers (herein meant as a poetic euphemism for truth teller), is the ability to see beyond what’s obvious—to make connections between seemingly-unconnected things. Without this skill, almost nothing of value can be accomplished in terms of freeing ourselves from cabal control.

We owe a debt of gratitude to anons for their skills and efforts in putting breadcrumbs together and helping us all solve many of the world’s puzzles. At the same time, we could certainly use more participation—this will always be the case as long as the battle continues.

(And, just to cover my bases fully, the “battle” of which I speak is the battle of truth vs falsehood. Make no mistake that truth and falsehood are inherently opposed to each other, hence the necessity to frame things as a battle.)

At the end of the day, anything that increases the freedom and knowledge of the people should be comprehensively identified and utilized in the battle. It’s a mistake to see the battle as primarily ‘political’ in nature—nor is it sufficient to see it as a ‘spiritual’ battle—the truth is, it’s a full-spectrum battle that includes the spiritual, the cultural, the political, the economic, and the physical.

Control of energy and resources is a key component that needs to be addressed.

Let’s ask ourselves a profound question: can we provide for our energy needs without the current energy-grid in place? Are we as dependent on the system as we are told?

It is my personal belief, based on many years’ worth of research and experience, that a great many solutions to vital problems—such as healing methods for cancer, in addition to many energy technologies that would render the grid obsolete—have been deliberately hidden, misrepresented, slandered, and so on.

I can’t make definitive claims here, because, alas, that’s not allowed. But I nonetheless stand by this opinion. What follows from here cannot be construed as any kind of licensed professional advice, however, it is indeed my first amendment right to speak plainly and truthfully about things I’ve seen or read, and any logical conclusions derived therefrom.

Is Free Energy Real?

Some may wonder, isn’t free energy a myth? Isn’t it impossible?

Of course, if mainstream science were infallible, then it would be a fool’s errand to investigate free energy; but, as Badlands readers undoubtedly know, mainstream media (and science and education) could be rightly described as nothing more than an enormous con job. Indeed, some of the most fundamental assumptions of mainstream science are themselves utterly ridiculous on their face—and many have been disproven entirely.

Everything from the Big Bang Theory to the Theory of Evolution is now being widely questioned by large numbers of the public—and we will see more and more assumptions of mainstream science receive the same treatment as the public wakes up to the extent of the lies we’ve all been told/sold.

‘Polite society’ sees it as offensive to question fundamental assumptions about reality, but isn’t it more offensive that we aren’t allowed to ask basic, common-sense questions?

Speaking of common-sense questions, how was it possible for all the laws of physics to ‘spring into existence’ at once via the Big Bang? According to what conditions and laws did this explosion take place in the first instant? How can the very material and logic of existence emerge from genuine randomness in which nothing legitimately existed, as we are told by Big Bang theorists?

Many questions could be asked in regards to many mainstream ‘scientific’ beliefs, but I have a specific point I’m making with regards to the Big Bang.

You see, it’s impossible to explain existence if you can’t explain how non-extended, non-matter somehow ‘becomes’ both the matterium (aka physical existence) as well as the set of laws that govern the matterium. I have a hunch that the reason why this question is so rarely addressed is because to answer it would reveal how free energy works.

The fact of the matter is that mainstream science cannot be entirely correct about the Big Bang—we must seek a more fundamental origin to existence than the ‘singularity’ that gave rise to the Big Bang.

Indeed, where did this singularity come from, assuming it exists at all?

If indeed the universe ‘came from nothing,’ then that would logically mean that the Universe, taken sum totally, could be described as its own free energy source.

I believe this is why dogmatic, academic ‘science’ will never get around to making a genuine model that explains how the universe emerged from the Big Bang singularity. They quite literally cannot afford to investigate this question so long as their benefactors don’t want humanity to be empowered with accurate information about the true nature of existence.

Inescapable, Logical Conclusions

Believe it or not, you can ‘checkmate’ academia entirely regarding the question of whether or not free energy exists using self-evident logic. I will demonstrate this to you right now.

Consider that the entire point of ‘reality theory’ is to answer the question, ‘what is reality?’

Many propose that there are multiple realities—but if this were the case, then that would necessarily mean that an ultimate reality comprising all possible sub-realities must exist. The question therefore remains, how do we describe ultimate reality?

We don’t need a complete answer to that question in order to recognize at least this much: reality cannot reach outside of itself in order to fetch the raw materials it requires to create itself. Therefore, the universe MUST be 100% self-created.

If the universe were, in theory, to reach outside of itself to create itself, then the ‘place’ from which it gathers its base materials would still be a part of the universe. Separate realities are, by definition, completely inaccessible and un-detectable within our reality; and anything that can effect reality as we know it necessarily belongs to inside of our reality.

Because all of the above is self-evidently true, we can say beyond any shadow of a doubt that the universe in which we live contains the potential for self-generation, which is the same exact thing as free energy.

To put it bluntly, self-created energy IS free energy. Anything that can generate matter from ‘nothing’—which is exactly what the universe had to do in order to exist—qualifies as a free energy device.

If you had anything approximating an accurate model for describing how the ‘creation-from-nothing’ process works, you’d be well on your way to building yourself a free energy device. With this fundamental component in hand, everything else simply becomes details.

Real Science vs ‘Establishment Science’

Unfortunately, if I were to present the above argument to most ‘scientists’ or academics, they would undoubtedly disagree with me. Does that mean I’m wrong and they’re right?

Of course not.

Anyone with even a tiny modicum of skill in science, philosophy or logic can tell you that ‘appeal to authority’ is not a real argument. For that matter, appeal to consensus is also a red herring. The only things that matter are experimental and/or logical demonstration.

There are plenty of intelligent people in the world of science and technology, however the functionaries that run the show have no interest whatsoever in hearing new or innovative ideas—even if such ideas are 100% viable on their face. It’s not a matter of personal opinion that free energy is possible; as I’ve already shown above, the universe itself must be based on free energy, otherwise it couldn’t exist in the first place.

Real science has no room for subjective opinions—that’s what the arts are for.

One cannot ‘decide’ to make 2 + 2 equal anything other than 4, nor are the rules of logic available for editing by mortal minds; they can only be discerned and discovered. Artistic creativity has a place in society—a very important place—but that place is NOT the laboratory, for the entire purpose of science is to reveal to us the objective laws and workings of the universe.

Unfortunately, ‘scientists’ are beholden to their careers, and to their sources of funding; and whenever the truth contradicts their bottom line, you can be certain that the truth will not only be ignored, but frequently misrepresented and attacked.

Not only that, but the human ego is a factor as well—even if funding or professional prestige didn’t matter, people often cannot face the existential dread that comes with updating their worldview when forced to do so by new evidence and proof. Ironically, there is no danger in correcting one’s worldview when necessary—the real danger is in refusing to do so.

But fret not, friends, for there is a silver lining, and that is the simple fact that the truth is the truth. You can fight it only for so long before it wins.

At the end of the day, we’ve shown here that the premise of free energy is viable. But even if we had not provided any such demonstration, the onus is still on mainstream science to prove why such things aren’t possible.

Since when did science proceed by refusing to entertain possibilities?

Science should mean the pursuit of objective truth and the systematic testing of possibilities—if science is not about such things, then it’s nothing more than mere pageantry.

(As an aside, my condolences to honest scientists everywhere who, for one reason or another, are prevented from speaking honestly or pursuing genuine lines of inquiry into the mysteries of our world.)

In the Present 5G Conflict, Everything—as in, Literally Everything—Counts

To come full circle to where we began: the more of us know about the truth, the better poised we are in the present 5G battle.

Q told us to “expand our thinking”, did he not?

We must take EVERYTHING into account, including the very nature of existence, when figuring things out as Digital Soldiers.

We didn’t cover anything strictly ‘political’ in this post, and yet, what could be more politically damaging to the establishment than the proliferation of information that proves them to be liars? And what if that same information were to greatly undermine humanity’s artificial dependence on the current system?

Either the Storm we were promised will happen, leading to a massive cleanup of our country (I indeed believes this will happen), or the insanity of the current system will cause total infrastructure failure.

Thanks to politically correct hiring practices that devalue merit in favor of ‘equity’—not to mention that near total disappearance of any useful education being taught in our schools—we are collectively losing the competence necessary to maintain society. If this trend continues unabated, then it’s theoretically possible we could hit a point of no return, and the America we knew will cease to exist.

Again, I believe we have a glorious future ahead of us—I believe we’ll get our country back. But either way, wouldn’t it be nice to be able to provide for our energy and food needs regardless of what happens?

Perhaps we can secure our needs through creative means while the world crumbles around us—THAT is the true value of this type of information. Whether we’re talking free energy or cures for cancer, the fact of the matter is that we can never pursue anything before we at least believe in its existence.

Indeed, I was inspired to write the above post by an obscure book entitled A Practical Guide to Free Energy Devices. I am reading it myself and am looking forward to experimenting with the ideas it presents.

As I was reading this book, I couldn’t help but think to myself that the main reason why people don’t look into this stuff is because they don’t believe it’s possible. Either that, or people have come (mistakenly) to believe that they don’t have what it takes to make sense or good use out of such information.

Perhaps you’ve already decided to pursue alternative energy sources yourself—after all, this book is but one of many sources on such information.

In any event, to spread the truth undoubtedly hastens the Great Awakening; but let it not be forgotten that it helps us out in all other potential scenarios as well. There is simply no situation in which it’s somehow more desirable to be powerless (literally and metaphorically).

Knowledge IS power (which is especially true when it comes to knowledge of free energy) and it’s time we gained as much of it as we are physically able.

I wish you all the utmost happiness—and prosperity and security—in the coming days. May all your needs be met, and may we continue to study and inform each other. Sooner or later, we may very well be able to outmaneuver those who want us to remain powerless.

Godspeed Patriots.

American Hypnotist, signing off …

---

Badlands Media articles and features represent the opinions of the contributing authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Badlands Media itself.

---

If you enjoyed this contribution to Badlands Media, please consider checking out more of this author’s work for free at American Hypnotist.

---

Badlands Media will always put out our content for free, but you can support us by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Help our collective of citizen journalists take back the narrative from the MSM. We are the news now.