Another possibility on the crypto article: The Deep State is not actually winning, though they claim to be. This is just another case of disinformation. Fiat currencies are on their last legs, ECB would probably already be toast if they re-valued their balance sheet properly; and if it were not for continuing infusions of cash laundered via Ukraine, they would likely be insolvent today. Why else would Janet Yellen promise Zelenskyyy another $1.25 Bn? The Cabal hungers, we must feed them...
The two Justs, Just Human and Justin. Well, I JUST can’t wait to read the next News Brief! Great info that I didn’t know and found really interesting. Thanks!
Ok I know it's not in French so it may be hard to understand for you.
Argument (which isn't a real argument its just plain fact these substackers are "leaving out"
Crypto currency is a deep state/ government/CIA creation.
I'm assuming thats fairly easy to understand.
It was created so they could move large sums of money from slush fund to slush fund and other entities in the world without detection.
I'm assuming this is easy enough to understand.
Crypto currency IS NOT a creation of the people for the people.
I assume this is easy to understand.
What you should be asking is the author of that article why they haven't done their research, well I'm assuming you haven't either since my original comment seemed to baffle you.
What I've put forth is fact and it's undisputed.
That knowledge comes from internet research. It's not top secret information its ready available.
Ok. I just put in an order to babble to learn French.
You obviously don't understand English.
What I presented IS THE FACTS.
It's that simple.
I'm not sure how French schools are but in America we do things a certain way.
When our teachers give us an assignment to find answers to the questions we would have to do research to find the answers to the questions.
We don't tell our teachers we don't accept someone who gives us the lesson but won't give us the answers.
Now, I have been to France many times and I understand the French are some of the laziest people on the planet. So it doesn't surprise me you'd ask for all the answers because you're too lazy to look for yourself.
If you think you're going to push my buttons ask the other 1st line defenders if they were able to?
I gave you the facts (lesson)
Now it's up to you to verify the lesson I've given you by what? RESEARCHING!
Go look for yourself. I never asked you to believe me. Look for yourself.
Don't be lazy and expect someone else to give you the answers. I know getting all the answers is the easy way but it's not my way.
The facts are yours to find. I've even told you were to look.
How many times have you asked these substack authors to prove what they say?
I'll bet never.
1. Because you're a 1st line defender.
2. You just take their word for it. No matter what they say even though they don't provide sources or facts.
That's very odd to me. You will try to push my buttons because what I say isn't "believable" yet these Substack authors can say whatever they want and it's gospel.
How about the other Clinton causality. A friend of theirs also Hamptons Long Island and NYC just either suicided or was murdered a few days ago shotgun to head in his NY office.
Swamp creature connected to Epstein and homosexual world. EVIL FOR SURE. His name was Mr Lee. (Not Asian)
I look forward to the Badlands News Briefs every weekday morning. Question though? Wasn’t the FED ushered in in 1913?
Please take some time for reading the 5 first links about the Fed and its history:
https://badlands.substack.com/archive?sort=search&search=Reserve
Another possibility on the crypto article: The Deep State is not actually winning, though they claim to be. This is just another case of disinformation. Fiat currencies are on their last legs, ECB would probably already be toast if they re-valued their balance sheet properly; and if it were not for continuing infusions of cash laundered via Ukraine, they would likely be insolvent today. Why else would Janet Yellen promise Zelenskyyy another $1.25 Bn? The Cabal hungers, we must feed them...
The two Justs, Just Human and Justin. Well, I JUST can’t wait to read the next News Brief! Great info that I didn’t know and found really interesting. Thanks!
The article said the FED was ushered in in 2013 (misprint?). Shouldn’t it have said 1913? Am I missing something?
I think you're right regarding the misprint ;-)
Please take some time for reading the 5 first links about the Fed and its history:
https://badlands.substack.com/archive?sort=search&search=Reserve
Excellent material - love the "our take".
Only improvement I would welcome would be using the "Drudge Report " format. I still mourn the loss of Drudge Report to the woke-ians.
Totally false take on crypto currency.
It's wasn't developed by the people for the people it's another CIA/ Govt/ deep state operation to move massive amounts of money without "detection"
Nice try though liars.
Please feel free to develop your arguments and explain us YOUR own take about crypto !
It could lead to an interesting and passionnante discussion here...
And WE all have some to learn about crypto !
Ok I know it's not in French so it may be hard to understand for you.
Argument (which isn't a real argument its just plain fact these substackers are "leaving out"
Crypto currency is a deep state/ government/CIA creation.
I'm assuming thats fairly easy to understand.
It was created so they could move large sums of money from slush fund to slush fund and other entities in the world without detection.
I'm assuming this is easy enough to understand.
Crypto currency IS NOT a creation of the people for the people.
I assume this is easy to understand.
What you should be asking is the author of that article why they haven't done their research, well I'm assuming you haven't either since my original comment seemed to baffle you.
What I've put forth is fact and it's undisputed.
That knowledge comes from internet research. It's not top secret information its ready available.
I'm sorry if my comment confused you.
I thought what I said was easy to understand.
Thanks you for your long and detailed answer.
I read and understand well English writings 😉
I can't accept somebody says anyone else act as a liar without explaining WHY and sharing facts in support.
I don't agree all your arguments but respect your own analysis.
Have a nice day !
Ok. I just put in an order to babble to learn French.
You obviously don't understand English.
What I presented IS THE FACTS.
It's that simple.
I'm not sure how French schools are but in America we do things a certain way.
When our teachers give us an assignment to find answers to the questions we would have to do research to find the answers to the questions.
We don't tell our teachers we don't accept someone who gives us the lesson but won't give us the answers.
Now, I have been to France many times and I understand the French are some of the laziest people on the planet. So it doesn't surprise me you'd ask for all the answers because you're too lazy to look for yourself.
If you think you're going to push my buttons ask the other 1st line defenders if they were able to?
I gave you the facts (lesson)
Now it's up to you to verify the lesson I've given you by what? RESEARCHING!
Go look for yourself. I never asked you to believe me. Look for yourself.
Don't be lazy and expect someone else to give you the answers. I know getting all the answers is the easy way but it's not my way.
The facts are yours to find. I've even told you were to look.
Have a nice day froggy.
You can freely disagree as much as you want, but aggression and contempt do not encourage adherence to your point.
Go in peace! 🕊️🕊️
🇫🇷 🕊️ 🇺🇸
How many times have you asked these substack authors to prove what they say?
I'll bet never.
1. Because you're a 1st line defender.
2. You just take their word for it. No matter what they say even though they don't provide sources or facts.
That's very odd to me. You will try to push my buttons because what I say isn't "believable" yet these Substack authors can say whatever they want and it's gospel.
That's how I know you're a 1st line defender.
Nice try froggy.
I'm not disagreeing with you.
I'm telling you the facts.
It's really that simple 1st line defender.
What aggression and contempt?
If you are lazy and can't comprehend simple statements why are you here?
How about the other Clinton causality. A friend of theirs also Hamptons Long Island and NYC just either suicided or was murdered a few days ago shotgun to head in his NY office.
Swamp creature connected to Epstein and homosexual world. EVIL FOR SURE. His name was Mr Lee. (Not Asian)