Enjoy the Show

Do You Notice a Pattern?

Jun 21, 2025

This feature is a follow-up to ‘Information Warfare,’ and is best read with that context in mind.

The Steele dossier was the Achilles heel of the entire conspiracy to frame Trump for Russian collusion. It was the major weapon used to obtain FISA warrants in order to spy on Trump, and was also the basis for the Mueller investigation.

But the dossier wasn’t the enemy’s original plan.

It was a plan that was FORCED on the enemy because they never expected Hillary to lose the 2016 election. They were FORCED to quickly come up with a plan to get Trump impeached and removed from office as soon as possible.

On the night of the 2016 election, the enemy was in pure panic. That’s why Hillary never showed up to her election night rally, and instead sent her campaign manager, John Podesta out to talk to the crowd and inform them that she wouldn’t be speaking to them. Hillary supporters across the nation were crushed that she lost, and many were breaking out in tears. The entire media had assured them that Hillary had anywhere from a 91% to 75% chance of winning the election.

It was supposed to be over before it began.

Why were the media and democrats so confident Hillary would win?

They thought Hillary would actually win Florida. That meant that the only path Trump would have to win was to win the three rust belt states that a Republican had not won in many years.

The media narrative was that Trump was struggling and might lose Florida, which meant he was in trouble in a lot of other states as well.

Was that reality?

Or just media “projection?”

Florida was supposed to be Hillary’s “checkmate” state in the 2016 election. Hillary supporters across the country were ready to celebrate ‘early’ because they were expecting a landslide victory. But then the Florida results started pouring in, and the state was much closer than the media expected.

Chuck Todd had actually revealed the truth without knowing it.

There was a “stagnant turnout” of African Americans for Hillary in the early voting in Florida. She has always been a flawed and unpopular candidate. Trump wasn’t the one in trouble in these battleground states, Hillary was.

The media script completely flipped after Florida was called for Trump.

After Hillary lost Florida, she only had one path to victory, as her supporters instantly felt the dread set in. You could also feel the air going out of the balloon for the media, because they knew that Trump had the clear advantage.

When Trump was declared the winner in Pennsylvania, the race was over. Pay particular attention to the “somber” mood of the media that is supposed to be impartial. It’s as if they are attending a funeral.

They were “stunned.”

Nobody in the media ever thought Hillary would lose Pennsylvania. The democrat party machine has controlled the city of Philadelphia for many years, and that control had always assured a democrat victory in the state of Pennsylvania. Hillary lost, and it was also a repudiation of the Obama administration. He had campaigned a lot for Hillary in these crucial states, and it had little effect.

Does anybody remember this famous Obama clip?

Hillary was never supposed to lose. Obama’s worst nightmare was now reality.

Panic in DC.

There was no time to waste. An immediate plan had to be thrown together to remove Trump. It began to unfold on the very night of the election.

A portion of Q drop 153 — Nov 14, 2017 9:25:09 PM EST:

Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded MEETING? Why didn’t HRC give a concession speech? When was the last time a presidential candidate didn’t personally give a concession speech?

The military was monitoring everything.

Why did Hillary meet with Obama and his top officials suddenly in a “very private and highly secured/guarded MEETING?”

FEAR.

A portion of Q drop 350 — Dec 14, 2017 9:27:05 PM EST:

Shall we play a game? Find the spider(s) and build the web (the ‘map’). Remember, they consider you to be the fly (specifically, the ‘feeder’). Remember, they never thought she was going to lose. Therefore, they never thought investigations and/or public interest into their criminal acts would be exposed/investigated. Therefore, they never thought they had anything to FEAR.

This FEAR is real.

There was a story that came out near the end of the 2016 campaign that almost all of the media and fact checkers still deny happened. But the person who reported it is a credible journalist, and there is also circumstantial evidence to back him up.

Does anybody remember this story?

According to Investment Watch Blog:

I’ve read on the AltMedia that Hillary Clinton had an outburst, in which the pathological liar said probably the only truthful thing she’s ever said:
“If that fucking bastard [Donald Trump] wins, we all hang from nooses.”
So I did a search and found the source of that quote: Bill Still, of The Still Report videos on YouTube.

On his website, Still describes himself as:
A former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News. He has written 22 books and two documentary videos.

Given Hillary’s history and the fact that she may be one of the most despised people in politics today; does anybody think this story is far fetched?

What was the context of this “statement” by Hillary? What caused her to have this outburst?

BOOMERANG!

Did you know that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were part of the Mueller investigation?

They were both forced to leave early on, when their declassified text messages revealed their bias against Trump.

Coincidence?

Now they had flipped and took deals to become “cooperating witnesses.”

Remember, Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel in May of 2017 to take the baton from Comey’s FBI investigation into Trump/Russian collusion. And before Mueller’s investigation was even finished, these “cooperating witnesses” were now giving testimony and exposing the entire FBI conspiracy to frame Trump. They were completely cutting the legs out from under the “ongoing” Mueller investigation.

It was an Information War, and the tide was turning. The enemy was losing control of the narrative.

But let’s go back to when the Mueller investigation first began.

Rosenstein and Comey had conspired to appoint Mueller as Special Counsel.

Mueller had three important tasks:

Gather and hide all the evidence of the Obama spy operation and other crimes.
Prosecute the “plants” installed within Trump’s campaign (Carter Page, Paul Manafort and George Papadopoulos) for Russian collusion.
Charge Trump with “obstruction of justice” for firing James Comey.

Everyone associated with this conspiracy knew that the plan to remove Trump from office and shield them from prosecution was centered around Robert Mueller being appointed as Special Counsel. Only one president had been removed from office in history, and their plan was to make Trump an example to prevent another outsider in the future.

This was going to be another Watergate, but this time on steroids.

Mueller was now in place, and the enemy thought his appointment had sealed Trump’s fate. Mueller would now have free rein to go after everyone surrounding Trump, and the media couldn’t hide their glee.

Can you sense Rachel Maddow’s jubilation?

She was acting like Mueller had chosen an “all-star” team to take down Trump. These prosecutors were supposedly experts in these categories: “Watergate, the mob, money laundering, criminal law, and at least one had fluency in Russian.”

Here’s a “fun fact” for Rachel Maddow:

Treason doesn’t have a statute of limitations.

The enemy thought they had pulled it off. The stars were all lining up. This seemed like the perfect team to take down Trump for Russian collusion.

Guess who was in charge of picking this “all-star” team for the Mueller investigation?

Do you think it was Robert Mueller?

Do you think Mueller was running the investigation?

Or was he just a “figure-head?”

In my recent article titled “The Biggest Boomerang In History,” I mentioned that there was a “major player” in the conspiracy who had been trapped, and was awaiting the unsealing of his own indictment. This person had played a major role for several decades in creating the two tier justice system within the DOJ. This person was also one of the more important pawns in Hillary’s “protection racket.”

He was also at the very heart of the conspiracy to bring down Trump.

Who was really running the Mueller investigation?

Who was directing the play?

According to Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch announced today the U.S. Department of Justice released 73 pages of records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) containing text messages and calendar entries of Mueller special counsel prosecutor Andrew Weissmann showing he led the hiring effort for the investigation that targeted President Trump.
“These documents show Andrew Weissmann, an anti-Trump activist, had a hand in hiring key members of Mueller’s team – who also happened to be political opponents of President Trump,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“These documents show that Mueller outsourced his hiring decisions to Andrew Weissmann. No wonder it took well over a year to get this basic information and, yet, the Deep State DOJ is still stonewalling on other Weissmann documents!”

The person who was really leading the Mueller investigation was Andrew Weissmann.

Remember, Mueller had flipped and took a deal to save himself from prosecution in the Uranium One cover-up.

Why would Trump want Weissmann to be in control of the Mueller investigation?

How do you trap a very dangerous animal?

By Trump allowing Weissmann to take on a larger role in the conspiracy, he was adding to his charges of treason, and was also using him to draw in and trap other conspirators.

Trump’s DOJ was “stonewalling” on the other Weissmann documents.

Why?

As I explained in a previous article, Q had told us that the reason for the “slow walking” of documents was because those documents were being used as EVIDENCE in ongoing investigations.

Weissmann was a BIG TARGET of the RICO investigations happening in the background.

I also believe that Weissmann was one of the seven people who attended the “private & highly secured/guarded MEETING” only hours after Hillary had lost the election. He was highly involved with the planning to take down Trump.

Why do I believe that?

According to FOX News:

On Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Mueller investigator Andrew Weissmann attended Hillary Clinton’s election-night party at the Javits Center in New York City.
Fox News reported earlier this week that Weissmann in January also praised departing acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she was fired for refusing to defend President Trump’s travel ban.

Weissmann was with Hillary at her election-night party. It was supposed to be a grand celebration, and instead, it ended in tears. There was supposedly a “private & highly secured/guarded MEETING” a few hours after her loss. When Mueller was appointed, he quickly chose Weissmann for his investigation and let him oversee the hiring of the other prosecutors.

Just a coincidence?

What kind of prosecutors were being hired by Weissmann?

Why?

Because they were smart enough to know, that the higher players in the conspiracy would love to pin all the blame on them. They both took a deal.

BOOMERANG!

But do you remember the first person in that Q post who was listed as a “cooperating witness?”

His name was Bruce Ohr.

Why was Bruce Ohr’s testimony as a “cooperating witness” so important?

Bruce Ohr wasn’t just trying to save himself, he was also trying to save his wife, Nellie Ohr.

They were both participating in the conspiracy to frame Trump and were connected to the Steele Dossier. They were also connected to several key players in the DOJ and FBI. They were conduits between the DOJ, FBI, Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.

Declassified information just kept dripping out and exposing all the traitors. It was impossible for the enemy to plug up all the leaks in the dam.

Fusion GPS was hired by Hillary to find dirt on Trump, and they had hired Nellie Ohr. But she also worked for someone else.

Guess who?

Why was Nellie Ohr being fluent in Russian so significant?

The CIA(FARM) “requires select skill-sets.”

Many CIA assets were fluent in Russian. She was on loan from John Brennan to help dig up dirt on Trump and Russia.

Bruce Ohr had flipped, and there was one particular person who was really panicked.

Can you guess who?

According to the American Thinker:

A week ago, August 27th, Bruce Ohr, the demoted former Associate Deputy Attorney General, testified before the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees. Among the newsworthy items that emerged, a few stand out. One of course is that his wife Nellie began working for Glenn Simpson's opposition research outfit, Fusion GPS, back in 2015 -- adding fuel to the speculation that she was involved as an FBI contractor in illegally mining NSA databases for information on GOP presidential candidates. Another item, highlighted by Chuck Ross at The Daily Caller, was that Ohr kept a number of FBI and DOJ colleagues "in the loop" regarding his highly irregular contacts with Christopher Steele, the "former" MI6 spook.

Did you know that Nellie Ohr was working for Fusion GPS back in 2015?

Do you realize how important Nellie Ohr is to this entire conspiracy?

She was a CIA operative who was contracted with the FBI to dig up dirt using the NSA database. She was part of the illegal Obama/Brennan spy operation that was happening way before the election.

When Admiral Mike Rogers discovered that the NSA database was being accessed by people who weren’t supposed to have access, he reported it to the FISA court and cut off access.

That is what FORCED Comey’s FBI to apply for a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

Bruce and Nellie Ohr were in contact with Christopher Steele. Nellie was helping Steele with research for the dossier, and Bruce was the liaison between Steele and the DOJ/FBI.

Guess who, specifically Bruce Ohr was keeping “in the loop” at the DOJ?

More from the American Thinker:

Sources familiar with Ohr’s testimony before the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees told The Daily Caller News Foundation that Ohr informed Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page about his interactions with Steele and Simpson. He also informed Justice Department prosecutor Andrew Weissmann about his dossier-related work.
Weissmann is now serving as right-hand man to Robert Mueller at the special counsel’s office.

Bruce Ohr was in contact with Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele through his wife, Nellie. He was then keeping everyone who was involved in the conspiracy, informed on the progress.

Why would Bruce Ohr be informing Weissmann?

Weissmann wasn’t a part of the counterintelligence operation. As I said earlier, Weissmann was at that secret/secure meeting on election night, and was in on the plan to frame Trump from the beginning. He was a key player.

More from the American Thinker:

It seems to me that the question that needs to be asked is: Why Andrew Weissmann? Why was Ohr keeping Weissmann, who was at the time head of DoJ's Criminal Fraud Section, in the loop on what to all appearances was a Counterintelligence investigation?
If Ohr kept Weissmann in the loop out of friendship, that still breaks the first rule of conspiratorial operations: need to know. Unless ... Weissmann was contributing or could potentially contribute something of value to the conspiracy.
What Weissmann's contribution to the Russia hoax might have been is suggested by his previous career.

Was Weissmann a part of the conspiracy from the beginning?

What was his “previous career?”

More from the American Thinker:

Weissmann is best known as a hard charging prosecutor, but one with a reputation for being willing to take ethical shortcuts to make the big case. This led, in 2005, to the US Supreme Court unanimously overturning the conviction in his biggest case: Arthur Anderson, part of the Enron Scandal.
The criticism of Weissmann's "intimidating" "scorched earth" tactics that arose from the case made him a hot potato in the legal world, but fortunately for him, he landed on his feet -- as General Counsel to a friend and former colleague, FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Weissmann had a well deserved reputation of being an “unethical” prosecutor.

Do you realize how bad you have to trample the constitutional rights of people in order to get a “unanimous” Supreme Court decision to overturn your conviction?

Weissmann had a long history of not just “unethical” behavior as a federal prosecutor, but illegality. He was committing crimes by violating the constitutional rights of the people he targeted.

According to the Hill:

Yet Mueller tapped a different sort of prosecutor to lead his investigation — his long-time friend and former counsel, Andrew Weissmann. He is not just a “tough” prosecutor. Time after time, courts have reversed Weissmann’s most touted “victories” for his tactics. This is hardly the stuff of a hero in the law.
Weissmann, as deputy and later director of the Enron Task Force, destroyed the venerable accounting firm of Arthur Andersen LLP and its 85,000 jobs worldwide — only to be reversed several years later by a unanimous Supreme Court.
Next, Weissmann creatively criminalized a business transaction between Merrill Lynch and Enron. Four Merrill executives went to prison for as long as a year. Weissmann’s team made sure they did not even get bail pending their appeals, even though the charges Weissmann concocted, like those against Andersen, were literally unprecedented.
Weissmann’s prosecution devastated the lives and families of the Merrill executives, causing enormous defense costs, unimaginable stress and torturous prison time. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the mass of the case.
Weissmann quietly resigned from the Enron Task Force just as the judge in the Enron Broadband prosecution began excoriating Weissmann’s team and the press began catching on to Weissmann’s modus operandi.
Mueller knows this history.
Is this why he tapped Weissmann to target Paul Manafort?

He should have been disbarred and brought up on charges himself, but he was a major player in building the two tier justice system. Weissmann was an “untouchable.”

Let’s go back to the American Thinker article:

By the end of 2005, Weissmann went into private practice, becoming a partner at Jenner & Block in New York. But in 2011, Weissmann returned to the FBI and his mentor Mueller, serving as General Counsel under Mueller until the end of Mueller's term in September 2013.

This is huge.

Two important things here.

Weissmann was a “partner” at the private law firm Jenner & Block.
Just a coincidence that Trump signed an Executive Order that targeted Jenner & Block, like he had targeted Perkins-Coie?
When Trump targeted Perkins-Coie in an executive order, he was also targeting Hillary and the DNC.
When Trump targeted Jenner & Block, he was also targeting Andrew Weissmann.
“On March 25, 2025, Trump issued Executive Order 14246, titled "Addressing Risks From Jenner & Block," which suspended security clearances for the firm’s lawyers and restricted their access to government buildings, officials, and federal contracting work.” (Brave search engine summary)
Andrew Weissmann went back to work at the FBI from 2011 to 2013 under Robert Mueller.
Why was that timeframe important? That was when Mueller was trying to hide the undercover FBI investigation into Uranium One and coverup the corruption, so that the deal would go through.

But did you catch what position Weissmann had at the FBI under Mueller?

He was “General Counsel.” Weissmann was in that position before James Baker.

How important is the “General Counsel” position?

More from the American Thinker:

"The General Counsel of the FBI is ultimately responsible for all of the legal affairs of the FBI. ... The General Counsel interacts regularly with all of the elements of the FBI, the Justice Department, the U.S. Intelligence Community, a range of other government agencies, foreign partners...."
You get the drift.
During his four years as General Counsel at the FBI, Weissmann would have been interacting on a daily basis with FBI management at the very highest levels, certainly including the Director (Mueller, then Comey) and Deputy Director -- with additional contact with the highest levels in all important Divisions.
Beyond that, however, he would have been developing contacts throughout the Intelligence Community and with "foreign partners" -- prominently including the British intelligence agencies.

Is it starting to make sense now why Bruce Ohr was keeping Weissmann “in the loop” on the Steele dossier and Crossfire Hurricane investigation?

As “General Counsel” under Mueller, Weissmann had ALREADY made a lot of close contacts with major players in the conspiracy.

Can you see why “General Counsel” James Baker flipping and becoming a “cooperating witness” was so important?

He was connected to every facet of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and the conspiracy to frame Trump.

PANIC IN DC.

More from the American Thinker:

He continued at the FBI under James Comey until January 2015, when he returned to DoJ as head of the Criminal Fraud Section. His final career move, to date, was his reunion with Mueller, joining Mueller's Special Counsel team in June 2017.

Don’t miss this important fact.

Andrew Weissmann was conveniently working at the FBI during Hillary’s Uranium One scandal, and then left the General Counsel position at the FBI in order to take over the Criminal Fraud Section of the DOJ.

Why was that so important?

The Clinton Foundation was a massive money laundering operation and as Secretary of State, Hillary was using her foundation as the center of a worldwide “pay to play” operation. Andrew Weissmann was put in charge of the Criminal Fraud Section in order to protect Hillary and the Clinton Foundation as she made her presidential run for the White House. That’s exactly what he did.

According to the Washington Examiner:

The New York Times report Thursday said that Clinton Cash “caught the attention of FBI agents, who viewed some of its contents as additional justification to obtain a subpoena for foundation records,” but former officials said that “top Justice Department officials denied a request in 2016 from senior FBI managers in Washington to secure a subpoena.” The outlet said that “the decision frustrated some agents who believed they had enough evidence beyond the book, including a discussion that touched on the foundation and was captured on a wiretap in an unrelated investigation.”

There were FBI investigators in the New York field office who thought that the Clinton Foundation needed to be investigated for corruption. But “top Justice Department officials” denied their request for a subpoena.

Without a subpoena, there is no investigation.

What are the odds that Weissmann played a role in protecting the Clintons?

Trump changed all of that.

[Weissmann] is a major target for Trump and the military.

He has a sealed indictment with his name on it.

As soon as he joined the Mueller investigation, he began using his power as a federal prosecutor to try and force false testimony to convict Trump.

Guess who broke this story?

None other than, John Solomon.

According to The Hill:

The ink was still drying on special counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment papers when his chief deputy, the famously aggressive and occasionally controversial prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, made a bold but secret overture in early June 2017.
Weissmann quietly reached out to the American lawyers for Ukrainian oligarch Dmitry Firtash with a tempting offer: Give us some dirt on Donald Trump in the Russia case, and Team Mueller might make his 2014 U.S. criminal charges go away.
The specifics of the never-before-reported offer were confirmed to me by multiple sources with direct knowledge, as well as in contemporaneous defense memos I read.

Did Dmitry Firtash actually have dirt on Trump? Or was Weissmann suborning perjury?

Weissmann was looking for “dirt” on Trump son-in-law “Jared Kushner.”

This was ALWAYS an important part of the enemy’s plan. They knew that Kushner was an important player to take down, but it was much more than that.

Weissmann was TARGETING Trump’s children in order to prevent Trump from declassifying evidence of the conspiracy.

This was part of the enemy’s “insurance policy.”

Their plan was to keep the evidence of the conspiracy hidden so that they could continually lie about the investigations in order to control the narrative. They were planning to hold “sealed indictments” over the head of Trump’s children in order to prevent declassification.

It wasn’t just Jared Kushner.

According to Law and Crime:

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who spent more than a year as one of Robert Mueller's top deputies in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, unleashed harsh criticism on the Special Counsel's Office in an interview with The Atlantic published on Monday.
According to the report, Weissmann's book recounts several specific examples in which Mueller's team refused to aggressively pursue members of the president's family because they feared how Trump might react.
"For example, the special counsel shied away from subpoenaing Don Trump Jr. to testify about his notorious June 2016 meeting in Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer offering dirt on Hillary Clinton," the story said. "Ivanka Trump, who didn't attend the meeting but talked with participants afterward in the lobby, and later discussed with her father how to conceal details from the press, was never even asked to speak with Mueller's investigators."
In Where Law Ends, Weissman said that the intimidation tactic effectively worked, writing that they "feared that hauling her in for an interview would play badly to the already antagonistic right-wing press—Look how they're roughing up the president's daughter—and risk enraging Trump, provoking him to shut down the Special Counsel's Office once and for all."
Additionally, Weissmann told Packer that the special counsel's stated reasoning for not pursuing interviews with President Trump or his daughter was not simply to avoid a protracted legal battle, as the office claimed in the Mueller report. According to Packer, in the book, Weissmann asserts that "the real reason for not compelling the president to be interviewed was Mueller's aversion to having an explosive confrontation with the White House."

Can you see the full picture?

Have I pulled back enough of the curtain?

After the Mueller investigation had ended and Trump was exonerated, Weissmann was hitting the media circuit with his book tour. He was describing how there was a lot more “evidence” out there that Mueller had not allowed him to pursue.

Weissmann thought that the reason that Mueller didn’t pursue subpoenas and questioning of Trump or his children was because Mueller didn’t want a “confrontation” with the president.

Who was directing the play?

The truth is, Mueller was leveraged and had already cut a deal. Weissmann was made to believe that he was in charge of the investigation, and he was targeting Trump’s children.

But that was never going to happen.

“A FATHER'S LOVE FOR HIS CHILDREN KNOWS NO BOUNDS.”

The article in the link talks about speculation of coming indictments for Trump’s children. But it was all from “unnamed sources,” and I believe it was a purposeful narrative deployment by Trump, not the enemy.

Why?

Trump was trying to build up the media and democrats’ expectations as high as he could. Right before he once again pulled the rug out from under them when he would be officially exonerated. It worked perfectly.

The implication in the story, was that AG Barr had agreed with Mueller to indict Trump’s children.

That conversation never happened.

Did POTUS just install a rogue AG who allows for the indictment of HIS CHILDREN based on false pretenses? BARR Senate vote? 54-45 Do UNICORNS exist? Q

“Do UNICORNS exist?”

The answer is NO. Barr wasn’t a rogue AG, he was actually unleashing RICO investigations against these traitors.

Trump’s children weren’t the ones who were trapped.

Andrew Weissmann had walked through the front door, and now, he was trapped. He knows justice is coming for him.

According to Just The News:

Mueller investigators 'accidentally' wiped over a dozen phones before turning over to I.G.'s office
Newly released records from the Department of Justice show that multiple high-ranking members of Robert Mueller's special investigation into the Russia conspiracy theory wiped their phones before handing them over to the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General.

NOTHING is ever truly deleted.

According to The Daily Wire:

One of the biggest problems in Washington, D.C., is that when people in government do bad things, they are not often held accountable. There is also a glaring double standard for who is charged and who isn’t.
It appears that may be changing for the people who actively investigated Trump and his 2016 campaign for the sole purpose of spinning a narrative to damage his administration.
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News’ Gregg Jarrett that criminal referrals would be made “in the coming weeks” against members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, many of which hid exculpatory evidence on FISA warrant applications that allowed the investigation to continue.
“We’ve also expanded our investigation into the Mueller team and everything that happened with Mueller and the people at DOJ and FBI that were above Mueller. And so, we will be making criminal referrals in the coming weeks against the Mueller team. We’re just now putting that together and, of course, as always, waiting on more documents that we really need to come out,” Nunes told Jarrett on the program.

It wasn’t just criminal referrals from Congress against the Mueller team. Barr had also launched criminal investigations against them through Durham.

Barr will play a big role in my next article.

Weissmann’s days are numbered, and I believe he will likely be the second big unsealed indictment after James Comey.

I teased at the end of my last article that Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein and James Comey all had something in common.

I will reveal it in my next article, and prove that this was the BIGGEST STING OPERATION in history.

Badlands Media articles and features represent the opinions of the contributing authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Badlands Media itself.

If you enjoyed this contribution to Badlands Media, please consider checking out more of Joe’s work for free at Joe Lange’s Substack.

Badlands Media

Discussion about this post

Ready for more?