I can see how you might think that but you're wrong. Surely it's possible to write about a topic without promoting it at the same time? If a writer reveals the research about child trafficking does that mean he is also promoting child trafficking? I think your logic needs to re-evaluated.
I can see how you might think that but you're wrong. Surely it's possible to write about a topic without promoting it at the same time? If a writer reveals the research about child trafficking does that mean he is also promoting child trafficking? I think your logic needs to re-evaluated.
Justin, combined with the content of the video included here your neutrality is strained. I posted an evaluation of your lack of wise discernment a previous comment here.
Revealing also are your assertions in various Badlands discussions which I have followed. I’m a nobody. Pay no attention.
The problem here, David, is not the presenting of facts, but that along with that solutions and analysis are presented...or hinted at. The analysis and solutions here are of the same vile substance as the evil they purport to battle, because your philosophical world consists of this substance. Such a very small world you live in! It limits the “thought” because the “food” is clearly set on the table in such a way that the reader will be led into that prison world...as you — some others here — have been. I find this post disingenuous and coy. Or else, you deceive yourself.
I can see how you might think that but you're wrong. Surely it's possible to write about a topic without promoting it at the same time? If a writer reveals the research about child trafficking does that mean he is also promoting child trafficking? I think your logic needs to re-evaluated.
Justin, combined with the content of the video included here your neutrality is strained. I posted an evaluation of your lack of wise discernment a previous comment here.
Revealing also are your assertions in various Badlands discussions which I have followed. I’m a nobody. Pay no attention.
Stop policing others connection to Christ. If you think you have some infallible understanding of the lord, you are the one with hubris, dick.
Yes, I imagine it is possible. But I wrote what it seems like to me. Maybe I'm wrong but maybe I'm right.
Demonstrably right.
"If a writer reveals the research about child trafficking does that mean he is also promoting child trafficking?"
That depends entirely on how it's presented .
Is it presented as evil? As something to be resisted and overcome with thoughts, actions and words? Or is it presented as "food for thought"?
The problem here, David, is not the presenting of facts, but that along with that solutions and analysis are presented...or hinted at. The analysis and solutions here are of the same vile substance as the evil they purport to battle, because your philosophical world consists of this substance. Such a very small world you live in! It limits the “thought” because the “food” is clearly set on the table in such a way that the reader will be led into that prison world...as you — some others here — have been. I find this post disingenuous and coy. Or else, you deceive yourself.