And they will appeal time and time again. SCOTUS needs to be the branch that it was intended to be under the Constitution. This country is falling apart while they stand by twiddling their thumbs and come up with "reasons" they cannot rule on a particular filing. Shameful.
Shameful. When you read this you'll realize why they've been invalidating the Constitution from the moment it was written. The author is a lefty, to be sure. But one often finds uncomfortable truths in the words of their opponents:
Regarding the "potential" President Trump's indictement that seems coming close:
Employing Bicameral Thinking and Game Theory to the whole context (I think about Putin's arrest warrant issued by ICC yesterday):
- Such moves will put these facts front and centre stage, and It will cast a much darker and deeper shadow behind the scenes, where powerful players will be able to make decisive strategic moves discreetly
- It will provide President Trump and all the Defenders and Fighters of Truth a worldwide media momentum to deploy new narratives
- It will make emerge new evidences and help keep them in the records for everyone to s├йe them. This will probably destroy some DS / CB/ Dems and Biden mafia narratives
- Regarding some potential coming SCOTUS cases (think Kari Lake or Raland Brunson ones ...), they could offer a timely golden opportunity to file a brief amicus curiae, and maybe even a powerful and overwhelming writ of quo warranto targeting the whole corruption and treason acts in the main branches, structures and agencies of government
This is just my own take and I'd like to have those of anyone who could help to enlight these possibilities...
Turning down the Brunson brothers twice was wrong. They are appealing to be heard yet again!
And they will appeal time and time again. SCOTUS needs to be the branch that it was intended to be under the Constitution. This country is falling apart while they stand by twiddling their thumbs and come up with "reasons" they cannot rule on a particular filing. Shameful.
Shameful. When you read this you'll realize why they've been invalidating the Constitution from the moment it was written. The author is a lefty, to be sure. But one often finds uncomfortable truths in the words of their opponents:
The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It: The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987 https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=lawineq (23 pages, a lot of it footnotes)
I think Kari Lake and Raland Brunson cases could have been throttled in order to be taken by SCOTUS at the more efficient timing opportunity
Precisely:)
Hope youтАЩre correct!
Regarding the "potential" President Trump's indictement that seems coming close:
Employing Bicameral Thinking and Game Theory to the whole context (I think about Putin's arrest warrant issued by ICC yesterday):
- Such moves will put these facts front and centre stage, and It will cast a much darker and deeper shadow behind the scenes, where powerful players will be able to make decisive strategic moves discreetly
- It will provide President Trump and all the Defenders and Fighters of Truth a worldwide media momentum to deploy new narratives
- It will make emerge new evidences and help keep them in the records for everyone to s├йe them. This will probably destroy some DS / CB/ Dems and Biden mafia narratives
- Regarding some potential coming SCOTUS cases (think Kari Lake or Raland Brunson ones ...), they could offer a timely golden opportunity to file a brief amicus curiae, and maybe even a powerful and overwhelming writ of quo warranto targeting the whole corruption and treason acts in the main branches, structures and agencies of government
This is just my own take and I'd like to have those of anyone who could help to enlight these possibilities...