61 Comments

Re "the Revolution won't be televised." Remind me what Q has been wrong about, so far? Ok so here is "My Take": We Must have a Revolution. Not a physical one, and not just a return to our Republic roots. Oh no, dear friends, we need a huge change from our damned complacency and "I don't care what they do in DC as long as they leave me alone" attitude! We must take the helm of this great ship, get fully engaged, VOTE, get involved in local politics (yes, Politics), and steer her back to our Maker's course. There is no 'returning' to anything but God, at this point, imho. Trump said in his Inaugural Address that he was handing the country back to the People. Next step: We must reach out and take it. This will be the Revolution, and it will be in our hearts and minds. And yes, I believe it has begun.

Expand full comment

Here,here!!

Expand full comment

Judging by what I've seen, yes the revolution has begun. Violent? The right people are handling that aspect. A woman I would never expect it from gave a blistering rant, one that I loved seeing. The American spirit still lives!

Expand full comment

Obvious acceleration is occurring on a myriad of fronts and one wonders at which point it will ‘hit the fan’? Hint: I’d bet it’s not going to be the so-called Republican debates tonight.🤣

Ashe nailed it, “You can’t impeach an illegitimate president. But you should be able to prosecute one, right?”

It’s past time to return God to our nation. Praying for His mercy on this nation as there must be a few good God-fearing people here. I believe there are many on this list of truth journalists.🙏

Expand full comment

Hi ALtab !🙋🏼‍♂️🇫🇷

I do agree 💯/💯 but I'd rather say loudly it’s past time to return our nation / our whole world to God !!

🙏🏻✝️ May the Glory and the Grace go to God, and only to Him ! ✝️🙏🏻

Expand full comment

You are so correct as God created the entire world and All nations need to return to His word!🙏🙏

Expand full comment

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

Expand full comment

I don't think it will be at the debate, but afterward. The why is Trump won't be there. You can definitely remove him for not signing his oath. Even with 3320 in May he was covered but now? Times up.

Expand full comment

Hi Rob ! 🙋🏼‍♂️🇫🇷

Please can you explain me what does your expression 'Even with 3320 in May he was covered but now? Times up" mean ??

I can't figure a clear understanding ... 🥴

Expand full comment

In the whole broo ha ha about they must have a signed document of their Oath of Office (MANDATORY it is in the Constitution) in by April something, not just the verbal photo op bit. A guy who likes all his i's dotted and t's crossed pointed out article 3320 gave the Dems. an extra 30 days. Okay, they were definitely illegitimate after May 29th. if he wants to be a stickler. 3320 is that loophole. but the time is as you can see well past. I hope that clears it up for you, if not tell me what's still murky.

I'm working on something with another veteran that nobody else knows about yet. After we pass it by a lawyer or two it will be in my substack.

Expand full comment

Hi Rob !

Thank you so much for your comprehensive administrative explanation I had to read several times before I can understand the whole situation 😃🙏🏻

This highlights the absolute need to reduce your/our excessive administrative state in many countries!

They're all drowning us slowly but surely! 😡🤬

Expand full comment

They are trying to drown us in red tape, yes indeed.

Expand full comment

More interesting Briefs & Takes today.

As I have stated many times if we could figure out the plan it would be a pretty shitty plan. So with that in mind I can't help but wonder how/when we get past the point that anybody does what the TV tells them to do. The DS Rat Bastards on the MSM will never tell the truth because if the do then they admit that they have been committing treason for years. So people will have to stop watching and reading MSM completely because the MSM will not stop lying. But I remain compfyAF because as Chris Paul often says you don't have to have all the answers to call out that the DS Rat Bastards are lying.

Keep it coming.

God Wins!

God Bless!!!

Expand full comment

I've stopped reading and watching MSM.

Expand full comment

Newsmax and Gateway Pundit for me.

Expand full comment

AND Badlands, Epoch, StopWorldControl.com, ETC!!!

Expand full comment

You can add Breitbart, ZeroHedge, AmericaFirstReport, Geller Report and JustTheNews..

😉🙂

Expand full comment

Haven’t watched MSM since 1990 and stopped watching MSM (FOX) when it called AZ during the 2020 election. 🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Yes, that was the moment they showed their hand. Fox calling it? At 11% of the vote counted, or in, can't remember. It's an election fraud Proof.

Expand full comment

Let's hope President Trump smiles brightly at his new televised series. He is the king of all media, after all. Countdown sidewise & Tangential .

Expand full comment

I prefer that, on the snapping of the arrest pic, he give his meanest scowl . . . just think of the million "Thug-Life and Wanted Poster T-shirts" he would sell!

Expand full comment

"All because Adam Grant doesn’t like mean tweets."~~~ OMG THAT'S HILARIOUS ! v

Expand full comment

As far as this particular article is concerned, I thought from the start that it was written by HUGH Grant (with his pants down to his ankles!) and I probably laughed even harder, so much so did I find the ideas expressed in line with this outrageous behaviour by Hugh Grant ...

🤣🤣

Expand full comment

In his book "A Conflict of Visions" Thomas Sowell suggests that those with a constrained vision recognize the flaws in mankind and depend on the larger masses to help mitigate man's sinfulness (my word not his). Those of the unconstrained vision believe that there are those at "the top" whose genius and altruism (my word not his) should be allowed to make the important decisions for us plebes.

Grant's article seems to suggest that we should give up our efforts to hold the scoundrels responsible for cheating (because they really have our best interest at heart - the lack of profiteering in politics is our proof - sarcasm intended) and return to the Grecian formula of selection.

Ultimately, which ever of the heads of the dragon are in control, the lack of peace, the bondage of tyranny and the death of war and sorcery (Rev. 6:3-8) will be their fruit. God has a plan - but in that plan it is on each of us to choose in whom we place our trust.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this outstanding point ! 🙏🏻

I had to use Deepl to understand the deep meaning of your comment, and I think President Donald TRUMP seems to be a outstanding sample of the sort of people is needed to bring this whole world back to God !

🙏🏻✝️ God bless President Trump and all of those who are fighting for the Truth alongside him ! ✝️🙏🏻

Expand full comment

I find Sowell's words from 'The Vision of the Anointed' to be most illuminating in our present situation:

"What a vision may offer, and the prevailing vision of our time emphatically does offer, is a special state of grace for those who believe in it. Those who accept this vision are deemed to be not merely factually correct but morally on a higher plane. Put differently, those who disagree with the prevailing vision area seen as being not merely in error, but in sin."

Redemption through belief is a powerful tool. Like all tools, it can be used for good or evil. Like all battles, our current struggle is between good and evil. A religion of God, or a religion of men and Satan. I pray that when that time comes, the vast majority of people will choose wisely. 🙏🕊✝

Expand full comment

In reference to getting rid of elections, see the Magna Carta. The power to judge the government's laws (at the time, the king's laws) rested with Juries. Trial by Jury was the cornerstone of the British constitution. Juries, chosen at random, had (and have) the constitutional power to judge a person charged with a crime as well as the law. I do advocate that principle. In the Commonwealth countries, it is still the law because the Magna Carta cannot be revoked by a government. It was, and remains, a covenant on the rules of governance between the people and the government. Those who usurped power don't want you to know that.

Expand full comment

'Jury nullification' is still a valid doctrine in the USA. TPTB don't want you to know that, however. The quickest way to get tossed from a jury pool is to mention the words 'jury nullification' during voir dire.

Expand full comment

Me too. November 3, 2020.

I have seen clearer and clearer every day since 😃

Expand full comment

Nothing to do with these stories, but India has landed on the moon! I supposed PG will say it's all fake...LOL

Expand full comment

A new term from Ashe: "To go mockingbird." 🤣🤣🤣

Perfect!

Expand full comment

According to Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse, The NYT is the mouthpiece of the DOJ and FBI.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/08/the-fourth-branch-of-united-states-government/

Expand full comment

Sundance is rarely wrong in such matters.

Expand full comment

they should not post the bond. I agree w dan bongino...let them have to jail trump meaning clearing the jail for trump and secret service...let the serpents SCRAMBLE. what a show THAT would be...🤞🤞🤞

Expand full comment

We still do not know exactly what Trump has planned when he shows up at that jailhouse. He may well have a plan to drop a turd into Fani's punch bowl... only time will tell 😎

Expand full comment

Just see what Rudy Giuliani said loudly during his presser... 😉

I can't imagine President Donald Trump could let him take the pole position from the Boss himself... 🙏🏻✝️🕊️

Expand full comment

I jokingly used to say, “ I demand a second chance to make a first impression.”

Expand full comment

Ashe writing, “…people who steal elections would never rig a lottery…” reminds me of hearing that Jeffrey Epstein ‘won’ more than one lottery.

Expand full comment

"...memos that conflict with the narrative Democrats..."

I call this "lazy" writing because there's a word missing. As it stands, it potentially stalls the reader. For a moment, it had me wondering "what's a narrative Democrat?" until my eyes moved to the next line to discover "...have sustained...".

Ideally, it should read: "...memos that conflict with the narrative, which Democrats have sustained".

I hope this helps.

Expand full comment

I agree as I found an useless word in an "Our take" !

But it's not the same ...😃😃

Expand full comment

GRRrrrr ... THAT'S EXCELLENT. Hope The President Is Reading This Sight ! Kudos !

Expand full comment

Hi Paul ! 🙋🏼‍♂️🇫🇷

You can bet it's been the case since the beginning of Badlands because of this FANTASTIC moment:

https://burningbright.substack.com/p/a-spontaneous-moment-of-awesomeness

It was GREAT !! 🙏🏻✝️🕊️

Expand full comment